Patient perceptions of altering chemotherapy treatment due to peripheral neuropathy.

PURPOSE: Clinical practice guidelines recommend altering neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment in patients experiencing intolerable chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The primary objective of this survey was to understand patient's perspectives on altering neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment, including their perceptions of the benefits of preventing irreversible CIPN and the risks of reducing treatment efficacy. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed via social networks to patients who were currently receiving or had previously received neurotoxic chemotherapy for cancer. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Following data cleaning, 447 participants were included in the analysis. The median age was 57 years, 93% were white, and most were from the UK (53%) or USA (38%). Most participants who were currently or recently treated expected some CIPN symptom resolution (86%), but 45% of those who had completed treatment more than a year ago reported experiencing no symptom resolution. Participants reported that they would discontinue chemotherapy treatment for less severe CIPN if they knew their symptoms would be permanent than if symptoms would disappear after treatment. Most patients stated that the decision to alter chemotherapy or not was usually made collaboratively between the patient and their treating clinician (61%). The most common reason participants were reluctant to talk with their clinician about CIPN was fear that treatment would be altered. Participants noted a need for improved understanding of CIPN symptoms and their permanence, better patient education relating to CIPN prior to and after treatment, and greater clinician understanding and empathy around CIPN. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights the importance of shared decision-making, including a consideration of both the long-term benefits and risks of altering neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment due to CIPN. Additional work is needed to develop decision aids and other communication tools that can be used to improve shared decision making and help patients with cancer achieve their treatment goals.

Symptom clusters in breast cancer survivors with and without type 2 diabetes over the cancer trajectory.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate symptoms and symptom clusters in breast cancer survivors (BCS) with and without type 2 diabetes across three crucial periods during the cancer trajectory (0-6 months, 12-18 months, and 24-30 months) post-initial chemotherapy. Methods: Eight common symptoms in both BCS and individuals with diabetes were identified through natural language processing of electronic health records from January 2007 to December 2018. Exploratory factor analysis was employed to discern symptom clusters, evaluating their stability, consistency, and clinical relevance. Results: Among the 4601 BCS in the study, 20% (n = 905) had a diabetes diagnosis. Gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue were prevalent in both groups. While BCS in both groups exhibited an equal number of clusters, the composition of these clusters differed. Symptom clusters varied over time between BCS with and without diabetes. BCS with diabetes demonstrated less stability (repeated clusters) and consistency (same individual symptoms comprising clusters) than their counterparts without diabetes. This suggests that BCS with diabetes may experience distinct symptom clusters at pivotal points in the cancer treatment trajectory. Conclusions: Healthcare providers must be attentive to BCS with diabetes throughout the cancer trajectory, considering intensified and/or unique profiles of symptoms and symptom clusters. Interdisciplinary cancer survivorship models are essential for effective diabetes management in BCS. Implementing a comprehensive diabetes management program throughout the cancer trajectory could alleviate symptoms and symptom clusters, ultimately enhancing health outcomes and potentially reducing healthcare resource utilization.

Correlates of frailty in older female cancer survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer survivors are at risk of frailty because of cancer and its treatment. Understanding the factors that increase the risk of frailty is an important aspect of cancer care for the development of interventions to prevent or manage frailty, thus improving cancer survival and overall quality of life of cancer survivors. This study aimed to identify demographic, clinical, and psychosocial correlates of frailty in older, female cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a sub-study focusing on the exploratory aim of a larger cross-sectional study (NURS-IIR-IUSCC-0748). A total of 213 female cancer survivors aged 59-87 years old were included from the parent study in the current analysis. Frailty, the primary outcome, was measured using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator scale. The independent variables were age, relationship status, clinical stage of cancer, treatment type, comorbidity, depression, affect, optimism, stress, and social support. Stepwise linear regression modeling identified the independent variables that were significantly associated with frailty. RESULTS: The final regression model revealed that high patient-reported stress and depression, comorbidity, not being married or living with a partner, and low positive affect were significantly associated with worsening frailty in this population. DISCUSSION: Understanding the context of frailty is important for the design of interventions that target factors known to be associated with frailty in older cancer survivors. Further validation with a larger and a more diverse sample from a broad spectrum of sociodemographic and clinical population would fully account for the multiple independent variables influencing frailty in cancer survivors.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in HRQoL and Associated Risk Factors in Colorectal Cancer Survivors: With a Focus on Social Determinants of Health (SDOH).

PURPOSE: This study aimed to understand how health-related quality of life (HRQoL) differs by race/ethnicity in colorectal (CRC) survivors. We aimed to 1) examine racial/ethnic disparities in HRQoL, and 2) explore the roles of social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors for HRQoL differ by racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: In 2,492 adult CRC survivors using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey data (from 2014 to 2021, excluding 2015 due to the absence of CRC data), we used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HRQoL measure, categorized into "better" and "poor." Multivariate logistic regressions with prevalence risk (PR) were employed for our primary analyses. RESULTS: Compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) (PR = 0.61, p = .045) and Hispanics (PR = 0.32, p < .001) reported worse HRQoL in adjusted models. In adjusted models, unemployed/retired and low-income levels were common risk factors for worse HRQoL across all comparison groups (NHW, NHB, non-Hispanic other races, and Hispanics). Other SDOH associated with worse HRQoL include divorced/widowed/never married marital status (non-Hispanic other races and Hispanics), living in rural areas (NHW and NHB), and low education levels (NHB and Hispanics). Marital status, education, and employment status significantly interacted with race/ethnicity, with the strongest interaction between Hispanics and education (PR = 2.45, p = .045) in adjusted models. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need for culturally tailored interventions targeting modifiable factors (e.g., social and financial supports, health literacy), specifically for socially vulnerable CRC survivors, to address the disparities in HRQoL among different racial/ethnic groups.

Using Social Media to Understand Primary Discussions in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Machine Learning Approach.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rates of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are high in the United States as well as worldwide. The widespread use of social media provides unique opportunities to facilitate the dissemination of information, especially in the context of health. OBJECTIVE: We aim to characterize the public's primary discussions, including perceptions, concerns, and interests toward GI cancers, from prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to survivorship care through the social media platform Twitter, using tweets posted by Twitter users. METHODS: We analyzed 87 860 Twitter posts related to GI cancers. We used machine learning with natural language processing to identify salient topics and themes in the collected tweets. RESULTS: The most common themes across all GI cancer types included cancer risk prevention and awareness outreach programs, risk factors including lifestyles (primarily diet), and cancer survivorship-related discussions (primarily GI symptoms and quality of life). GI symptom-related tweets were prevalent in patients with colorectal and stomach cancers, whereas themes of newer clinical trials, end-of-life trials, palliative care trials, and disease prognosis were common in tweets related to liver/biliary and pancreatic cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Our research emphasizes the importance of individualized approaches in managing GI cancers, considering lifestyle and diet, the need for comprehensive survivorship care, raising awareness, delivering information, and improving targeted interventions related to GI cancers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our study suggests utilizing Twitter data to better understand the real-world interest and concerns about GI cancers among the public, which can guide future patient-centered research in this field.

Associations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor rs6265 polymorphism and cognitive function in breast cancer survivors from a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) often complain of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) during and even months after completing primary cancer treatments, particularly chemotherapy. The etiology of CRCI is unknown, but associations of CRCI with germline genetic polymorphisms have been reported, including Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) rs6265 polymorphism. The current study investigated the associations of specific BDNF rs6265 with CRCI. METHODS: Cancer-related cognitive impairment was assessed using subjective reports of cognitive symptoms (the version 1.0, 8-item short-forms of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®) and computerized objective cognitive function scores (CANTAB®). BDNF rs6265 genotypes were determined from buccal swabs. The associations of specific BDNF rs6265 with CRCI were examined by either one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post hoc tests and rank-based regression analysis. RESULTS: We examined 356 female BCS. The mean (SD) age was 55.6 (9.8) years old, the median (IQR) years since cancer diagnosis were 4.0 (6.0), and 331 (92.7%) were self-described as White. BCS carrying the Met/Met genotype showed poorer results on 'visual episodic memory and new learning' and 'spatial working memory and executive function.' This relationship was observed regardless of prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that carrying the BDNF rs6265 Met/Met genotype increases the risk for CRCI in BCS. These results are foundational in nature and provide important information to identify mechanisms underpinning CRCI.

Chemotoxicity and Associated Risk Factors in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients experience multiple types of chemotoxicity affecting treatment compliance, survival, and quality of life (QOL). Prior research shows clinician-reported chemotoxicity (i.e., grading scales or diagnostic codes) predicts rehospitalization and cancer survival. However, a comprehensive synthesis of clinician-reported chemotoxicity is still lacking. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine chemotoxicity's prevalence and risk factors in CRC. METHODS: A systematic search from 2009 to 2024 yielded 30 studies for review, with 25 included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Pooled prevalences of overall, non-hematological, and hematological moderate-to-severe toxicities were 45.7%, 39.2%, and 25.3%, respectively. The most common clinician-reported chemotoxicities were gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (22.9%) and neuropathy or neutropenia (17.9%). Significant risk factors at baseline were malnutritional status, frailty, impaired immune or hepato-renal functions, short telomere lengths, low gut lactobacillus levels, age, female sex, aggressive chemotherapy, and low QOL. Age was associated with neutropenia (ß: -1.44) and GI toxicity (ß:1.85) (p-values < 0.01). Older adults (>65 y.o.) had higher prevalences of overall (OR: 1.14) and GI (OR: 1.65) toxicities, but a lower prevalence of neutropenia (OR: 0.65) than younger adults (p-values < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of closely monitoring and managing chemotoxicity in CRC patients receiving chemotherapy.

Association between Cognitive Function and Physical Function, Frailty, and Quality of Life in Older Breast Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Older cancer survivors in general are at greater risk for cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), yet few studies have explored its association with health outcomes. This study examined the association between subjective and objective measures of cognitive function and physical function, frailty, and quality of life (QoL) among older breast cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Older breast cancer survivors who reported cognitive concerns completed surveys on patient-reported cognitive function, physical function, frailty, and QoL as well as objective tests of visuospatial working memory and sustained attention. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and separate linear regression models. RESULTS: A total of 219 female breast cancer survivors completed the study. Perceived cognitive abilities were associated with better physical function, frailty, and QoL (p ≤ 0.001) while cognitive concerns were negatively related with these metrics (p ≤ 0.001). Poorer visuospatial working memory and sustained attention were linked to increased frailty (p ≤ 0.001-0.01), whereas poorer sustained attention was associated with poorer physical function (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Older breast cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment and poorer cognitive performance reported poorer physical functioning, increased frailty, and poorer QoL. These findings underscore the importance of assessing cognitive concerns and their associated outcomes in older breast cancer survivors.

Risk factors for long COVID syndrome in postmenopausal women with previously reported diagnosis of COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Long COVID-19 syndrome occurs in 10-20 % of people after a confirmed/probable SARS-COV-2 infection; new symptoms begin within three months of COVID-19 diagnosis and last > 8 weeks. Little is known about risk factors for long COVID, particularly in older people who are at greater risk of COVID complications. METHODS: Data are from Women's Health Initiative (WHI) postmenopausal women who completed COVID surveys that included questions on whether they had ever been diagnosed with COVID and length and nature of symptoms. Long COVID was classified using standard consensus criteria. Using WHI demographic and health data collected at study enrollment (1993-98) through the present day, machine learning identified the top 20 risk factors for long COVID. These variables were tested in logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of n = 37,280 survey respondents, 1237 (mean age = 83 years) reported a positive COVID-19 test and 425 (30 %) reported long COVID. Symptoms included an array of neurological, cardio-pulmonary, musculoskeletal, and general fatigue, and malaise symptoms. Long COVID risk factors included weight loss, physical and mobility limitations, and specific heath conditions (e.g., history of heart valve procedure, rheumatoid arthritis). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of risk factors for long COVID may be the first step in understanding the etiology of this complex disease.

Impact of Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Adult Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021275421) synthesized evidence on the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive and functional outcomes in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: Articles were identified though PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from inception through June 30, 2023. Studies included participants ≥18 years old, diagnosed with cancer. Primary outcomes were validated measures of subjective and objective cognition. Articles were dual reviewed for eligibility and data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed with the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields. RESULTS: The search yielded 3,811 articles; 65 full-text articles were reviewed; 53 articles (15 cognitive training, 14 strategy-based, 21 combinations, three inpatient rehabilitation), representing 52 unique studies, were included. Positive effects were observed in at least one objective cognitive measure in 93% of strategy training, 81% of cognitive training, 79% of combination rehabilitation interventions. Positive effects were observed in subjective cognition in 100% of strategy training, 55% of cognitive training, and 92% of combination interventions. Among studies with comparator groups, processing speed improved in 60% of cognitive training studies, while strategy training did not improve processing speed; otherwise, cognitive domain effects were similar between intervention types. Impact on functional outcomes was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive rehabilitation appear beneficial for cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). Differential effects on specific cognitive domains (eg, processing speed) and subjective cognition may exist between intervention types. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses should increase patient and provider awareness of the benefits of cognitive rehabilitation for CRCI.