Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ethn Dis ; DECIPHeR(Spec Issue): 68-80, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846736

RESUMEN

Objective: To synthesize community and healthcare informants' perspectives on contextual considerations and tailoring recommendations for high-quality, sustainable implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for managing hypertension (HTN) in a multiethnic safety-net population. Design: Structured focus-group discussions and semistructured qualitative interviews. Background: High-quality, sustainable implementation of HTN-related EBPs can promote equitable care. Implementation challenges extend beyond individual patients to span multiple levels of context. Few studies have systematically engaged community and healthcare perspectives to inform the design of HTN intervention trials. Setting: A large safety-net healthcare system. Participants/Methods: We conducted four structured discussions with each of five race- or ethnicity-specific community action boards (CABs) to understand community members' HTN-related norms, assets, needs, and experiences across local healthcare systems. We interviewed 41 personnel with diverse roles in our partnered healthcare system to understand the system's HTN-related strengths and needs. We solicited EBP tailoring recommendations from both groups. We summarized the findings using rapid content analysis. Results: Participants identified contextual considerations spanning seven themes: social determinants, healthcare engagement, clinical interaction, system operations, standardization, patient education, and partnerships and funding. They offered tailoring recommendations spanning nine themes: addressing complex contexts, addressing social needs, system operations, healthcare system training and resources, linguistic and cultural tailoring, behavioral engagement, relational engagement, illness-course engagement, and community partnerships. Conclusions: Engaging community and healthcare informants can ground implementation in the policy, community, healthcare system, clinical, and interpersonal contexts surrounding diverse patients at risk for disparities. Such grounding can reframe inequitable implementation as a multilevel social problem facing communities and healthcare systems, rather than individuals.


Asunto(s)
Grupos Focales , Hipertensión , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Humanos , Hipertensión/terapia , Hipertensión/etnología , Femenino , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Entrevistas como Asunto , Etnicidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA