Effectiveness and Safety of Argon Plasma Coagulation in Patients with Haemoptysis Caused by an Endobronchial Malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with central neoplasms and haemoptysis show low survival rates. Symptom control without recurrence 48 h after bronchoscopic interventions may improve the prognosis of these patients. Bronchoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) is a useful technique for endobronchial management of haemoptysis in patients with central malignancies. Nevertheless, limited data are available in the literature on its efficacy and safety and the main predictors of success are still unclear. METHODS: An observational, prospective, single-centre cohort study was carried out to assess the efficacy (i.e., immediate bleeding cessation without recurrence during the following 48 h) of bronchoscopic APC in the treatment of patients with haemoptysis caused by endobronchial malignancies and the main predictors of success. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients with median age 75 years (interquartile range: 65-79) were enrolled. 67 (88.2%) patients had bleeding cessation without recurrence 48 h after bronchoscopic APC. A low rate of non-serious adverse events (5.3%) was recorded and a low (7.6%) recurrence rate of haemoptysis at 3.5 months after the procedure was also shown. No clinical, demographic and endoscopic variables related to a successful procedure at 48 h were found. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that bronchoscopic APC is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with haemoptysis caused by endobronchial malignancies, regardless of the clinical characteristics of the patients, the endoscopic and histological features of the neoplasm and the severity of the symptom. Furthermore, it shows a low rate of complications and long-term efficacy in bleeding control.

Differences in microenvironment of lung cancer and pleural effusions by single-cell RNA sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Direct comparison of tumor microenvironment of matched lung cancer biopsies and pleural effusions (PE) from the same patients is critical in understanding tumor biology but has not been performed. This is the first study to compare the lung cancer and PE microenvironment by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). METHODS: Matched lung cancer biopsies and PE were obtained prospectively from ten patients. We isolated CD45+ cells and performed scRNA-seq to compare the biopsies and PE. RESULTS: PE had a higher proportion of CD4+ T cells but lower proportion of CD8+ T cells (False detection rate, FDR = 0.0003) compared to biopsies. There was a higher proportion of naïve CD4+ T cells (FDR = 0.04) and naïve CD8+ T cells (FDR = 0.0008) in PE vs. biopsies. On the other hand, there was a higher proportion of Tregs (FDR = 0.04), effector CD8+ (FDR = 0.006), and exhausted CD8+ T cells (FDR = 0.01) in biopsies. The expression of inflammatory genes in T cells was increased in biopsies vs. PE, including TNF, IFN-É£, IL-1R1, IL-1R2, IL-2, IL-12RB2, IL-18R1, and IL-18RAP (FDR = 0.009, 0.013, 0.029, 0.043, 0.009, 0.013, 0.004, and 0.003, respectively). The gene expression of exhaustion markers in T cells was also increased in tumor biopsies including PDCD1, CTLA4, LAG 3, HAVCR2, TIGIT, and CD160 (FDR = 0.008, 0.003, 0.002, 0.011, 0.006, and 0.049, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher proportion of naïve T cells and lower proportion of exhausted T cells and Tregs in PE compared to lung cancer biopsies, which can be leveraged for prognostic and therapeutic applications.

The 2023 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Expert Consensus Document: Management of subsolid lung nodules.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancers that present as radiographic subsolid nodules represent a subtype with distinct biological behavior and outcomes. The objective of this document is to review the existing literature and report consensus among a group of multidisciplinary experts, providing specific recommendations for the clinical management of subsolid nodules. METHODS: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Clinical Practice Standards Committee assembled an international, multidisciplinary expert panel composed of radiologists, pulmonologists, and thoracic surgeons with established expertise in the management of subsolid nodules. A focused literature review was performed with the assistance of a medical librarian. Expert consensus statements were developed with class of recommendation and level of evidence for each of 4 main topics: (1) definitions of subsolid nodules (radiology and pathology), (2) surveillance and diagnosis, (3) surgical interventions, and (4) management of multiple subsolid nodules. Using a modified Delphi method, the statements were evaluated and refined by the entire panel. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 17 recommendations. These consensus statements reflect updated insights on subsolid nodule management based on the latest literature and current clinical experience, focusing on the correlation between radiologic findings and pathological classifications, individualized subsolid nodule surveillance and surgical strategies, and multimodality therapies for multiple subsolid lung nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the complex nature of the decision-making process in the management of subsolid nodules, consensus on several key recommendations was achieved by this American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert panel. These recommendations, based on evidence and a modified Delphi method, provide guidance for thoracic surgeons and other medical professionals who care for patients with subsolid nodules.