RESUMEN
The commitment of stem cells to differentiate into osteoblasts is a highly regulated and complex process that involves the coordination of extrinsic signals and intrinsic transcriptional machinery. While rodent osteoblastic differentiation has been extensively studied, research on human osteogenesis has been limited by cell sources and existing models. Here, we systematically dissect human pluripotent stem cell-derived osteoblasts to identify functional membrane proteins and their downstream transcriptional networks involved in human osteogenesis. Our results reveal an enrichment of type II transmembrane serine protease CORIN in humans but not rodent osteoblasts. Functional analyses demonstrated that CORIN depletion significantly impairs osteogenesis. Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation enrichment and mechanistic studies show that p38 MAPK-mediated CCAAT enhancer binding protein delta (CEBPD) upregulation is required for CORIN-modulated osteogenesis. Contrastingly, the type I transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan SDC1 enriched in mesenchymal stem cells exerts a negative regulatory effect on osteogenesis through a similar mechanism. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-seq, bulk and single-cell transcriptomes, and functional validations indicated that CEBPD plays a critical role in controlling osteogenesis. In summary, our findings uncover previously unrecognized CORIN-mediated CEBPD transcriptomic networks in driving human osteoblast lineage commitment.
RESUMEN
Mucinous ovarian carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy characterized by resistance to chemotherapy and poor survival in the metastatic setting. HER2 amplification is a frequent late event in carcinogenesis, yet the incidence of HER2-low in mucinous ovarian carcinoma is unknown. Further, the optimal method for determining overexpression in these tumors is not established. We sought to assess the ASCO/CAP and ToGA trial scoring methods for HER2 IHC with correlation to FISH, p53, and mismatch repair protein status and to determine the incidence of HER2-low in mucinous ovarian carcinoma. A total of 29 tumors from 23 patients were included. Immunohistochemistry for HER2, p53, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 was performed. Scoring was performed according to the ASCO/CAP and ToGA trial criteria. HER2 FISH was performed and scored according to the ASCO/CAP criteria. The proportion of HER2-low, defined as 1+ or 2+ staining with negative FISH, was determined. Using ASCO/CAP, 26% demonstrated 3+ while 35% demonstrated 2+ staining. Using ToGA, 30% demonstrated 3+ while 57% demonstrated 2+ staining. By FISH, 26% were positive for HER2 amplification. Both systems captured all FISH-positive cases; the use of ASCO/CAP resulted in fewer equivocal and false-positive cases. Among HER2-negative cases, 88% were HER2-low. Aberrant p53 expression was detected in 55% of cases; mismatch repair deficiency was not identified in any cases. ASCO/CAP guidelines are accurate and resource-effective in determining HER2 overexpression in mucinous ovarian carcinoma. HER2-low is common in these tumors; further studies to determine the role of HER2-targeted therapy including antibody-drug conjugates are indicated.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ/métodos , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisisRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Implementation of an interprofessional program at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, including nurse-led proactive calls to support patients with gynecologic cancers with malignant bowel obstruction, demonstrated improved outcomes compared with historical controls. The aim of the study was to convert the proactive calls into an electronic monitoring program to assess it's feasibility and scalability in patients with gynecologic cancers with or at risk of malignant bowel obstruction. METHODS: 'My Bowels on Track' smartphone application included weekly/biweekly electronic patient-reported outcomes (PROs), educational materials, and a secure messaging system. Based on PRO answers, an alerting system flagged patients with symptoms or uncompleted PROs. Nurses tracked and called patients on receiving clinical or compliance alerts. The primary objective was to assess adherence (≥70% PRO completion per patient considered an adherent patient) in the first 2 months on the program. A secondary objective was to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of the alerts to trigger recommendations. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between August 2021 and September 2022. Median age was 64.5 years (range 29-79 years). Primary diagnosis was ovarian (75%), endometrial (17.5%), or cervical (7.5%) cancer, and 92.5% of patients were receiving systemic therapy. Median duration on the program was 55 days (range 8-121 days). The 2-month adherence was 65% (95% CI 50% to 80%) and the overall adherence was 60% (95% CI 43% to 75%). Sixty-five symptom-related alerts (75% severe, 25% moderate) were reported in 60% (24/40) of patients. There were 59 recommendations triggered by the alerts. The PPV of the alerts to trigger actions was 72% (95% CI 58% to 82%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot electronic malignant bowel obstruction monitoring program with real-time PRO assessment was feasible, and 65% of participants were adherent during the first 2 months on the program. The PRO response-based alerting system flagged concerning symptoms in 60% of participants, with a PPV of 72% to trigger nurse-led actions and/or management recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03260647.
RESUMEN
Patients with cancer may be given treatments that are not officially approved (off-label) or recommended by guidelines (off-guideline). Here we present a data science framework to systematically characterize off-label and off-guideline usages using real-world data from de-identified electronic health records (EHR). We analyze treatment patterns in 165,912 US patients with 14 common cancer types. We find that 18.6% and 4.4% of patients have received at least one line of off-label and off-guideline cancer drugs, respectively. Patients with worse performance status, in later lines, or treated at academic hospitals are significantly more likely to receive off-label and off-guideline drugs. To quantify how predictable off-guideline usage is, we developed machine learning models to predict which drug a patient is likely to receive based on their clinical characteristics and previous treatments. Finally, we demonstrate that our systematic analyses generate hypotheses about patients' response to treatments.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The approved dose of Selinexor, 60 mg twice-weekly, is associated with several clinically relevant toxicities. Preclinical studies show that a sustained-release formulation of selinexor results in a lower toxicity profile. OBJECTIVE: The phase 1b METSSAR trial assessed the safety and tolerability of an alternative dosing schedule of selinexor (to mimic the sustained-release formulation) in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Selinexor was administered in a split-dose schedule (40 mg, 20 mg, 20 mg in the morning, afternoon, and evening, respectively) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle, until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Secondary objectives were EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life (QoL) assessment, and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: Twenty patients with 12 STS subtypes were enrolled and received a median of four cycles of treatment. There were no grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. Dysgeusia, nausea, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia were the most common grade ≤ 2 TRAEs. No treatments were discontinued due to TRAE, but four patients (20%) required dose reduction. Median change in global health status (GHS) score from baseline to cycle 2 (by QLQ-C30 v3.0) was - 8.33, and only 39% of patients reported a clinically meaningful decline in GHS score (≥ 10 points). Median symptom scale scores on treatment were increased for fatigue (+12.35), nausea/vomiting (+18.52), and anorexia (+16.67), but reduced for pain (- 3.70). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval 1.9-7.5). CONCLUSIONS: Split-dose once-weekly selinexor was reasonably well tolerated in this heterogeneous group of advanced STS patients with a better, or at least similar, clinician- and patient-reported toxicity profile compared to the standard dosing regimen. Further clinical evaluation is warranted, as better dose delivery can lead to improved antitumor efficacy.
RESUMEN
El cáncer mamario es una enfermedad con gran variabilidad geográfica y cuya etiología es heterogénea. La evaluación conjunta de los factores de riesgo que se conocen por estudios epidemiológicos y de las alteraciones específicas a nivel molecular, podría ser útil para identificar subgrupos de mujeres con alto riesgo de padecer dicho tumor maligno. En este artículo presentamos una revisión de la literatura acerca del papel que el Her-2/neu y el P53 tienen en la etiología y el pronóstico del cáncer mamario en mujeres. Además, discutimos las ventajas y limitaciones de utilizar biomarcadores en los estudios epidemiológicos. Concluimos que se requieren nuevas investigaciones orientadas a dilucidar las complejas relaciones que existen entre las alteraciones genéticas y los factores de riesgo para el cáncer mamario