Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Teach Learn Med ; 30(2): 213-222, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29190158

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: Many U.S. medical schools have accreditation requirements for interprofessional education and training in cultural competency, yet few programs have developed programs to meet both of these requirements simultaneously. Furthermore, most training programs to address these requirements are broad in nature and do not focus on addressing health disparities. The lack of integration may reduce the students' ability to apply the knowledge learned. Innovative programs that combine these two learning objectives and focus on disenfranchised communities are needed to train the next generation of health professionals. INTERVENTION: A unique interprofessional education program was developed at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest. The program includes experiential learning, cultural exposure, and competence-building activities for interprofessional teams of medicine, nursing, and pharmacy students. The activities include (a) educational seminars, (b) clinical experiential learning in a student-led clinic, and (c) community-based service-learning through health assessments and survey research events. CONTEXT: The program focuses on interprofessional collaboration to address the health disparities experienced by the Marshallese community in northwest Arkansas. The Marshallese are Pacific Islanders who suffer from significant health disparities related to chronic and infectious diseases. OUTCOME: Comparison tests revealed statistically significant changes in participants' retrospectively reported pre/posttest scores for Subscales 1 and 2 of the Readiness for Interpersonal Learning Scale and for the Caffrey Cultural Competence in Healthcare Scale. However, no significant change was found for Subscale 3 of the Readiness for Interpersonal Learning Scale. Qualitative findings demonstrated a change in students' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward working with other professions and the underserved population. LESSONS LEARNED: The program had to be flexible enough to meet the educational requirements and class schedules of the different health professions' education programs. The target community spoke limited English, so providing interpretation services using bilingual Marshallese community health workers was integral to the program's success.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Cultural/educación , Personal de Salud/educación , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Adulto , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
2.
J Pharm Technol ; 34(5): 204-215, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34860999

RESUMEN

Background: Significant health disparities are present in Marshallese adults residing in the United States, most notably a high incidence of type 2 diabetes and other chronic conditions. There is limited research on medication adherence in the Marshallese population. Objective: This study explored perceptions of and experiences with medication adherence among Marshallese adults residing in Arkansas, with the aim of identifying and better understanding barriers and facilitators to medication adherence. Methods: Eligible participants were Marshallese adults taking at least one medication for a chronic health condition. Each participant completed a brief survey and semistructured interview conducted in Marshallese by a bilingual Marshallese staff member. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated from Marshallese to English. Qualitative data were coded for a priori and emergent themes. Results: A total of 40 participants were included in the study. The most common contributing factor for nonadherence was forgetting to take medication (82%). A majority of participants (70%) reported difficulty paying for medicine, 45% reported at least one form of cost-related nonadherence, and 40% engaged in more than one cost-related nonadherence practice. Family support and medication pill boxes were identified as facilitators for medication adherence. The majority of the participants (76.9%) stated that they understood the role of a pharmacist. Participants consistently desired more education on their medications from pharmacy providers. Conclusion: This is the first study to explore barriers and facilitators to medication adherence among Marshallese patients. The findings can be used to develop methods to improve medication adherence among Marshallese.

3.
Clin Trials ; 13(6): 582-591, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27562368

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Participants in health research studies typically express interest in receiving the results from the studies in which they participate. However, participants' preferences and experiences related to receiving the results are not well understood. In general, the existing studies have had relatively small sample sizes and typically address specific and often sensitive issues within targeted populations. METHODS: This study used an online survey to explore attitudes and experiences of registrants in ResearchMatch, a large database of past, present, and potential health research participants. Survey respondents provided information related to whether or not they received research results from studies in which they participated, the methods used to communicate the results, their satisfaction with the results, and when and how they would like to receive research results from future studies. In all, 70,699 ResearchMatch registrants were notified of the study's topic. Of the 5207 registrants who requested full information about the study, 3381 respondents completed the survey. RESULTS: Approximately 33% of respondents with previous health research participation reported receiving the results. Approximately half of respondents with previous research participation reported no opportunity to request the results. However, almost all respondents said researchers should always or sometimes offer the results to participants. Respondents expressed particular interest in the results related to their (or a loved one's) health, as well as information about studies' purposes and any medical advances based on the results. In general, respondents' most preferred dissemination methods for the results were email and website postings. The least desirable dissemination methods for the results included Twitter, conference calls, and text messages. Across all the results, we compare the responses of respondents with and without previous research participation experience and those who have worked in research organizations versus those who have not. Compared to respondents who have previous participation experience, a greater proportion of respondents with no participation experience indicated that the results should always be shared with participants. Likewise, respondents with no participation experience placed higher importance on the receipt of each type of results' information included in the survey. CONCLUSION: We present findings from a survey assessing attitudes and experiences of a broad sample of respondents that addresses gaps in knowledge related to participants' preferences for receiving the results. The study's findings highlight the potential for inconsistency between respondents' expressed preferences to receive specific types of results via specific methods and researchers' unwillingness or inability to provide them. We present specific recommendations to shift the approach of new studies to investigate participants' preferences for receiving research results.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Revelación , Difusión de la Información , Prioridad del Paciente , Sujetos de Investigación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Investigación Biomédica , Comunicación , Correo Electrónico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(3)2022 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35334993

RESUMEN

A cross-sectional survey design was used to assess Arkansas parents'/guardians' intentions to vaccinate their child against COVID-19. Parents/guardians whose oldest child was age 0-11 years (n = 171) or 12-17 years (n = 198) were recruited between 12 July and 30 July 2021 through random digit dialing. Among parents/guardians with an age-eligible child, age 12-17, 19% reported their child had been vaccinated, and 34% reported they would have their child vaccinated right away. Among parents/guardians with a child aged 0-11, 33% of parents/guardians reported they would have their child vaccinated right away. Twenty-eight percent (28%) of parents/guardians whose oldest child was 12-17 and 26% of parents/guardians whose oldest child was 0-11 reported they would only have their child vaccinated if their school required it; otherwise, they would definitely not vaccinate them. For both groups, parents'/guardians' education, COVID-19 vaccination status, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were significantly associated with intentions to vaccinate their child. More than a third of parents/guardians whose child was eligible for vaccination at the time of the survey reported they intended to have them vaccinated right away; however, they had not vaccinated their child more than two months after approval. This finding raises questions about the remaining barriers constraining some parents/guardians from vaccinating their child.

5.
Ann Pharmacother ; 43(12): 2031-43, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19934392

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of beta-adrenergic antagonist therapy on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in the treatment of hypertension. DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were conducted using MEDLINE (1966-August 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-August 2009), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (until third quarter 2009) to locate clinical trials and meta-analyses comparing beta-blocker therapy with placebo or other antihypertensive agents in patients with hypertension. Bibliographies from relevant research and review articles were reviewed for additional references. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language articles identified from the data sources were reviewed. Articles describing original research with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular outcomes and/or death as either primary or secondary endpoints were included. Articles describing the use of beta-blocker therapy for conditions other than hypertension were not included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five placebo-controlled studies and 10 active-controlled studies were reviewed. In addition, 11 meta-analyses were evaluated. Placebo-controlled trials of beta-blockers in hypertension provide evidence of reduced risk for stroke, cardiovascular events, and heart failure. Only 2 studies comparing beta-blockers with other antihypertensives found significant benefit with beta-blockers. However, the majority of meta-analyses comparing beta-blockers with other antihypertensive agents show increased risk for stroke with beta-blockers, and some data suggest increased risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. The majority of data results from studies of atenolol, and many studies employed combination antihypertensive therapies, which often included thiazide diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, data supporting beta-blockers as preferred therapy in hypertension are inadequate. Although most negative cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes of beta-blockers were associated with atenolol therapy, data supporting other beta-blockers in hypertension are lacking.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacología , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Atenolol/farmacología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones
6.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 6(4): 652-659, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737733

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Marshallese experience high rates of chronic diseases including hypertension and diabetes. Medication adherence is crucial to successful disease management, and healthcare providers play a crucial role in assisting their patients with medication adherence. METHODS: A qualitative study design was used with individual interviews and focus groups with pharmacists and community health workers (CHWs) serving the Marshallese community in Northwest Arkansas. Participants were asked about their experiences with and perceptions of barriers and facilitators to medication adherence among Marshallese adults in Northwest Arkansas. RESULTS: Eight pharmacists and nine CHWs were interviewed. Five themes emerged regarding barriers to medication adherence: (1) financial, (2) transportation, (3) language, (4) health literacy and understanding of Western medicine, and (5) mistrust. Four themes emerged regarding facilitators to medication adherence: (1) in-depth patient education strategies, (2) efforts to address the language barrier, (3) family engagement, and (4) public transportation and prescription home delivery. DISCUSSION: Pharmacists and CHWs identified the same barriers to medication adherence, which are consistent with those documented in previous studies. Pharmacists also reported distress over their inability to confirm Marshallese patient understanding in relation to the use of prescribed medications.


Asunto(s)
Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Adulto , Arkansas/epidemiología , Femenino , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Lenguaje , Masculino , Micronesia/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Honorarios por Prescripción de Medicamentos , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Transportes , Confianza
7.
AJOB Empir Bioeth ; 8(2): 69-74, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28949841

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study identifies the experiences, preferences, and perceptions of research participants regarding dissemination of research findings at the participant level and community level. METHODS: The qualitative study utilized focus-group methodology to explore research participants' experiences and preferences for the dissemination of research findings. Five focus groups were held with 53 participants who were recruited through existing community advisory boards in Arkansas. RESULTS: Participants stated that researchers should always offer to share research findings. Participants explained that disseminating findings is appropriate because of their sense of ownership of results, it encourages participation facilitating higher quality research, and it may foster greater trust between researchers and participants. Participants also provided insights on how research findings should be shared, including recommendations for appropriate mode, timing, and context, as well as ways to share sensitive findings and the role of community partners in dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: This study is consistent with other studies that document participants' desire to receive research findings and expands our knowledge by documenting participants' rationale for why they think it is important and their recommendations for how to share results. Further research is needed to understand why researchers are not disseminating study findings to participants and to test the best ways to share results.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Investigación Biomédica , Difusión de la Información , Investigadores , Sujetos de Investigación , Adolescente , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Anciano , Arkansas , Investigación Biomédica/ética , Participación de la Comunidad , Ética en Investigación , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Confianza , Adulto Joven
8.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 4(6): 1042-1050, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Pacific Islander population in the USA is growing rapidly. However, research on Pacific Islanders in the USA is limited, or sometimes misleading due to aggregation with Asian Americans. This project seeks to add to the dearth of health literature by conducting a health assessment of Marshallese in northwest Arkansas. METHODS: Using a community-based participatory research approach, nine health screening events were conducted at local Marshallese churches. Participants completed the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance Survey core questionnaire and diabetes module if applicable. Biometric data, including Hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and body mass index, were gathered by an interprofessional team. RESULTS: Four hundred one participants completed health screenings. High proportions of diabetes, obesity, and hypertension were found. A high percentage of participants were uninsured, and multiple barriers to health care were found within the sample. DISCUSSION: This project represents one of the first broad health assessments of Pacific Islanders in the USA. Proportions of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and uninsured found in the sample are much higher than national proportions.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/etnología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Hipertensión/etnología , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Arkansas/epidemiología , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Organizaciones Religiosas , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Pacientes no Asegurados/etnología , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/etnología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA