Revision Dual Mobility Constructs With Unmatched Acetabular and Femoral Components Do Not Increase Failure Rate.

BACKGROUND: Dual mobility (DM) constructs for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have continued to grow in popularity to mitigate instability. This benefit comes at the cost of potential unique modes of failure, and there are theoretical concerns that combining femoral and acetabular components from different manufacturers could lead to increased failure rates. We aimed to investigate rates of reoperation between matched and unmatched DM implants used in revision THA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 217 revision THAs performed with DM constructs between July 2012 and September 2021 at a single institution. Dual mobility (DM) constructs were classified as "matched" if the acetabular and femoral components were manufactured by the same company. They were classified as "unmatched" if the acetabular and femoral components were manufactured by different companies. The primary outcome was reoperation for any reason. RESULTS: There were 136 matched DM constructs and 81 unmatched constructs. Average follow-up was 4.6 years (range, 2.0 to 9.6 years). There was no difference in reoperation rate between matched and unmatched groups (11.0 versus 13.6%, P = .576). The most common reasons for reoperation in both groups were instability and periprosthetic joint infection. There was 1 revision for intraprosthetic dislocation in the matched group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of unmatched DM components in revision THA was common and did not increase the risk of reoperation at an average of 4.6-year follow-up. This information can be helpful in operative planning, but further research on long-term survival will be necessary.

Defining recovery trajectories after shoulder arthroplasty: a latent class analysis of patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can have varying levels of improvement after surgery. As patients typically demonstrate a nonlinear recovery trajectory, advanced analysis investigating the degrees of variation in outcomes is needed. Latent class analysis (LCA) is a mixed and multilevel model that estimates random slope variance to evaluate heterogeneity in outcome patterns among patient subgroups and can be used to outline differing recovery trajectories. The purpose of this study was to determine recovery trajectory patterns after TSA and to identify factors that predict a given trajectory. METHODS: Data from a prospectively collected single institutional database of patients undergoing anatomic and reverse TSA were utilized. Patients were included if they had American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores preoperatively, as well as postoperative scores at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were excluded if they underwent a revision procedure or hemiarthroplasty or had prior infection. LCA was used to subdivide the patient cohort into subclasses based on postoperative recovery trajectory. This was performed for all patients as well as anatomic TSA and reverse TSA as separate groups. Unpaired Student t tests, analysis of variance, and Fisher exact test were used to compare classes based on factors including age, body mass index, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and type of arthroplasty. RESULTS: A total of 244 TSAs were included in the final analysis, comprising 89 anatomic TSA and 155 reverse TSA. In the combined group, LCA modeling revealed 3 patterns for recovery: Resistant Responders had low baseline scores (ASES < 30) and poor final results (ASES < 50), Steady Progressors had moderate baseline scores (ASES 30-50) with moderate final results (ASES 50-75), and High Performers had moderate baseline scores (ASES > 50) with excellent final results (ASES > 75). For anatomic TSA, we identified Delayed Responders with moderate baseline scores and a delayed response before ultimately achieving moderate final results, Steady Progressors with moderate baseline scores and a steady progression to achieve moderate final results, and High Performers who had moderate baseline scores and excellent final results. For reverse TSA, we identified Late Regressors with low baseline scores and poor final results, Steady Progressors with moderate baseline scores and moderate final results, and High Performers with moderate baseline scores and excellent final results. CONCLUSIONS: Patients recover in a heterogenous manner following TSA. Through LCA, we identified different recovery trajectories for patients undergoing anatomic TSA and reverse TSA.

Small Social Incentives Did Not Improve the Survey Response Rate of Patients Who Underwent Orthopaedic Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The generalizability of data derived from patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) depends largely on the proportion of the relevant population that completes PROM surveys. However, PROM survey responses remain low, despite efforts to increase participation. Social incentives, such as the offer to make a charitable donation on behalf of the survey respondent, have generally not been effective where online surveys are concerned, but this has not been extensively tested in medicine. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do personalized social incentives increase response rates or response completeness for postoperative PROM surveys in an orthopaedic population? (2) Are there demographic factors associated with response and nonresponse to postoperative PROM surveys? (3) Are some demographic factors associated with increased response to social incentive offers? METHODS: Participants were selected from an institutional orthopaedics database. Patients were older than 18 years, had an email address on file, and had undergone one of the following procedures 1 to 2 years ago: Achilles tendon repair, ACL reconstruction, meniscectomy, hip arthroscopy, TKA, or THA. Of 4685 eligible patients, 3000 (64%) were randomly selected for inclusion in the study. Participants were randomized to one of four groups: (1) control: no incentive (n = 750); (2) patient donation: offer of a USD 5 donation to provide medical supplies to a pediatric orthopaedic patient (n = 751); (3) research donation: offer of a USD 5 donation to a procedure-specific research program (n = 749); or (4) explanation: explanation that response supports quality improvement (n = 750). The four groups did not differ regarding patient age, gender, race, procedure type, or time since procedure. All patients were sent an email invitation with the same PROM survey link. The proportion of patients who responded (defined here as the response rate) was measured at 4 weeks and compared between intervention groups. We used a logistic regression analysis to identify demographic factors associated with response while controlling for confounding variables and performed subgroup analyses to determine any demographic factors associated with increased response to social incentives. RESULTS: There was no difference in the overall response rate (research donation: 49% [353 of 725], patient donation: 45% [333 of 734], control: 45% [322 of 723], explanation: 44% [314 of 719]; p = 0.239) or response completeness (research donation: 89% [315 of 353], patient donation: 90% [301 of 333], control: 89% [287 of 322], explanation: 87% [274 of 314]; p = 0.647) between the four groups. Women (odds ratio [OR], 1.175; p = 0.042), older patients (< 58 years: OR, 1.016 per 1-year increase; p = 0.001; 58-64 years: OR, 1.023 per 1-year increase; p < 0.001; > 64 years: OR, 1.021 per 1-year increase; p < 0.001), and white patients (OR 2.034 compared with black patients, p < 0.001) were slightly more likely to respond, after controlling for potential confounding variables such as gender, age, race, and procedure type. In subgroup analyses, men (research donation: 49% [155 of 316], patient donation: 45% [146 of 328], control: 40% [130 of 325], explanation: 39% [127 of 325]; p = 0.041) and patients younger than 58 years (research donation: 40% [140 of 351], control: 35% [130 of 371], patient donation: 32% [113 of 357], explanation: 27% [93 of 340]; p = 0.004) were slightly more likely to respond to the research donation than those with other interventions were. CONCLUSIONS: Despite small effects in specific subgroups, personalized social incentives did not increase the overall response to postoperative orthopaedic surveys. Novel and targeted strategies will be necessary to reach response thresholds that enable healthcare stakeholders to use PROMs effectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Effect of Antibiotic Spacer Dosing on Treatment Success in Two-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

INTRODUCTION: In two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), adding antibiotics to cement spacers is the standard of care; however, little is known about optimal dosage. There is emphasis on using >3.6 g of total antibiotic, including ≥2.0 g of vancomycin, per 40 g of cement, but these recommendations lack clinical evidence. We examined whether recommended antibiotic spacer doses affect treatment success. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 202 patients who underwent two-stage exchange for PJI from 2004 to 2020 with at least 1-year follow-up. Patients were separated into high (>3.6 g of total antibiotic per 40 g of cement) and low-dose spacer groups. Primary outcomes were overall and infectious failure. RESULTS: High-dose spacers were used in 80% (162/202) of patients. High-dose spacers had a reduced risk of overall (OR, 0.37; P = 0.024) and infectious (OR, 0.35; P = 0.020) failure for infected primary arthroplasties, but not revisions. In multivariate analysis, vancomycin dose ≥2.0 g decreased the risk of infectious failure (OR, 0.31; P = 0.016), although not overall failure (OR, 0.51; P = 0.147). CONCLUSION: During two-stage exchange for PJI, spacers with greater than 3.6 g of total antibiotic may reduce overall and infectious failure for infected primary arthroplasties. Furthermore, using at least 2.0 g of vancomycin could independently decrease the risk of infectious failure.

Comparison of Static and Articulating Spacers After Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on whether articulating or static spacers are superior during two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. We aimed to compare surgical time, need for extensile exposure, surgical costs, and treatment success for articulating and static spacers. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 229 periprosthetic joint infections treated with two-stage exchange with a minimum of one-year follow-up. For articulating and static spacers, we compared the need for extensile exposure during reimplantation and treatment failure based on an updated definition. Surgical time and costs at both stages were also compared. Subgroup analysis was performed for total knee and hip arthroplasties. RESULTS: There was no difference in the surgical time for spacer insertion; however, articulating spacers demonstrated reduced surgical time during reimplantation (181 vs. 234 minutes, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in extensile exposures (odds ratio 2.20, P = 0.081), but treatment failure was more likely for static spacers (odds ratio 2.17, P = 0.009). Overall surgical costs for two-stage exchange were similar between groups (23,782 vs. 23,766, P = 0.495). CONCLUSION: Articulating spacers demonstrated shorter surgical times and a trend toward decreased extensile exposures during reimplantation. They also had higher treatment success rates and similar surgical costs for overall two-stage exchange.

Comparison of computed tomography angiography and physical exam in the evaluation of arterial injury in extremity trauma.

BACKGROUND: CT angiography (CTA) is increasingly used in the evaluation of arterial injury in extremity trauma. While it may provide additional objective data, it comes with inherent risks and expense. The purpose of this study was to compare CTA to physical exam in the evaluation of arterial injury in extremity trauma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent CTA for evaluation of upper or lower extremity trauma at a Level 1 trauma center over a 10 month period. Patients were classified based on initial vascular exam (normal, soft signs, hard signs), and arterial injury on CTA was classified as major (named arteries) or minor (un-named arteries). We evaluated rates of vascular intervention in each group and compared the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) for physical exam and CTA in identifying arterial injury requiring intervention. RESULTS: A total of 135 CTA studies were included. On initial vascular exam, 71% of patients had a normal exam, 22% had soft signs, and 6% had hard signs. The NPVs for arterial injury requiring intervention of a normal physical exam and negative CTA were both 100%. The PPVs for arterial injury requiring intervention of major injury on CTA and hard signs on physical exam were 35% and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A normal physical exam can likely rule out the need for vascular intervention and eliminate the need for CTA. Additionally, the presence of hard signs on physical exam is potentially superior to CTA in predicting the need for vascular intervention.

Correlation of hip capsule morphology with patient symptoms from femoroacetabular impingement.

The relationship between morphological characteristics of the hip capsule and patient symptoms in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is undefined. In this study, patients with symptomatic FAI prospectively underwent 3T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the affected hip and completed the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) to determine the correlation between hip capsule anatomy and patient symptoms. Anterior hip capsule volume, posterior capsule volume, anterior-posterior capsule volume ratio, and proximal-distal volume ratio in the anterior capsule were quantified and measured using axial-oblique intermediate-weighted 3D fast spin echo MR images. A total of 35 patients (35 hips) were included for analysis (mean age: 30.6 years; mean body mass index [BMI]: 24.9 kg/m2 ; 57% male). The mean alpha angle was 62.2° ± 4.7°, the mean anterior hip capsule volume was 1705.1 ± 450.3 mm3 , the mean posterior hip capsule volume was 1284.8 ± 268.5 mm3 , the mean anterior to posterior capsule volume ratio was 1.1 ± 0.39, and the mean proximal to distal volume ratio of the anterior capsule was 0.65 ± 0.28. There was no correlation between age, gender, or BMI, and any hip capsule characteristics. Worse scores on the HOOS pain scale were correlated with increased anterior to posterior volume ratio (r = -.38; 95% confidence interval: -0.06 to -0.63). In conclusion, hip capsule morphology correlates with patient symptoms in the setting of FAI as increased anterior capsular volume, relative to posterior capsular volume, is associated with greater patient pain.

Disparity of health services in patients with knee osteoarthritis before total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence describes which interventions are driving insurance payments in the management of osteoarthritis (OA) before total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, relatively little is known about how these costs are distributed among patients. METHODS: We reviewed the Humana claims database for patients who underwent primary TKA from 2009 to 2016. Insurance payments for treatment, imaging, and evaluation and management were calculated from OA diagnosis to TKA, the distribution of payments was determined, and a high-payment group was identified by determining the point at which patients began to account for a disproportionate percentage of payments. This group of high-payment patients was compared with remaining patients (low-payment patients) based on demographic factors and nonarthroplasty payments and utilization. RESULTS: The top 30% of patients accounted for more than 70% of nonarthroplasty payments. High-payment patients were more likely to be younger, female, and more comorbid. Median time from diagnosis to TKA for high-payment patients was 3 times longer than that for low-payment patients (654 days [320-1191] vs 204 days [68-582], P < .001), and median payment per patient was more than 5 times higher ($1891 [1405-2782] vs $362 [198-613], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of high-payment patients in the management of knee OA may allow for targeted care pathways and cost-reduction strategies in the nonarthroplasty period, although additional studies are necessary to further characterize this population and efficiently recognize appropriate TKA candidates and timing.

Immediate Physical Therapy following Total Joint Arthroplasty: Barriers and Impact on Short-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests benefit to receiving physical therapy (PT) the same day as total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but relatively little is known about barriers to providing PT in this constrained time period. We address the following questions: (1) Are there demographic or perioperative variables associated with receiving delayed PT following TJA? (2) Does receiving immediate PT following TJA affect short-term outcomes such as length of stay, discharge disposition, or 30-day readmission? Methods. Primary TJA procedures at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Immediate PT was defined as within eight hours of surgery. Demographic and perioperative variables were compared between patients who received immediate PT and those who did not. We identified an appropriately matched control group of patients who received immediate PT. Postoperative length of stay, discharge disposition, and 30-day readmissions were compared between matched groups. RESULTS: In total, 2051 primary TJA procedures were reviewed. Of these, 226 (11.0%) received delayed PT. These patients had a higher rate of general anesthesia (25.2% versus 17.8%, p=0.006), later operative start time (13:26 [11:31-14:38] versus 9:36 [8:24-11:16], p<0.001), longer operative time (1.8 [1.5-2.2] versus 1.6 [1.4-1.8] hours, p=0.002), and higher overall caseload on the day of surgery (6 [4-9] versus 5 [4-8], p=0.002). A matched group of patients who received immediate PT was identified. There were no differences in postoperative length of stay or discharge disposition between matched immediate and delayed PT groups, but delayed PT (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.61-12.84; p=0.004) was associated with a higher 30-day readmission rate. CONCLUSION: Barriers to receiving immediate PT following TJA included general anesthesia, later operative start time, longer operative time, and higher daily caseload. These factors present potential targets for improving the delivery of immediate postoperative PT. Early PT may help reduce 30-day readmissions, but additional research is necessary to further characterize this relationship.

Risk Factors and Independent Predictors of 30-Day Readmission for Altered Mental Status After Elective Spine Surgery for Spine Deformity: A Single-Institutional Study of 1090 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Altered mental status (AMS) has been associated with inferior surgical outcomes. The factors leading to AMS after spine surgery are unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors and independent predictors of 30-day readmission for AMS in patients with spine deformity after undergoing elective spine surgery. METHODS: The medical records of 1090 adult (≥18 years old) patients with spine deformity undergoing elective spine surgery at a major academic institution from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed. We identified 18 patients (1.65%) who had AMS as the primary driver for 30-day readmission after surgery. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were collected for each patient. The primary outcome investigated in this study was risk factors associated with 30-day readmission for AMS. RESULTS: Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between both groups, with the AMS cohort being significantly older than the no-AMS cohort (70.11 vs. 61.93; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in intraoperative variables and complication rates within the cohorts. The AMS cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit (AMS, 61.11% vs. no-AMS, 19.76%; P = 0.0002) and rate of pulmonary embolism (AMS, 11.11 vs. no-AMS, 0.93; P = 0.02) after surgery. Other postoperative complication rates were similar between the cohorts. In a multivariate stepwise regression analysis, age (P = 0.013) and ICU transfer (P = 0.0002) were independent predictors of 30-day readmission for AMS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that increasing age and intensice care unit transfer are independent predictors of 30-day readmission for AMS after spine surgery in patients with spine deformity.

Increased 30-Day Complication Rates Associated with Laminectomy in 874 Adult Patients with Spinal Deformity Undergoing Elective Spinal Fusion: A Single Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have reported that decompression with fusion leads to superior outcomes in correction of spinal deformity. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complication rates in patients undergoing spinal fusion with and without decompression. METHODS: Medical records of 874 adult (≥18 years old) patients with spinal deformity undergoing elective spinal fusion at a major academic institution from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed; 374 (42.8%) patients underwent laminectomy in addition to spinal fusion. The primary outcome investigated was the rate of intraoperative and 30-day complications. RESULTS: Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. The laminectomy cohort had significantly higher estimated blood loss (P < 0.0001), incidence of allogeneic blood transfusions (P = 0.0001), and rate of intraoperative durotomies (laminectomy cohort 10.4% vs. no-laminectomy cohort 3.1%; P < 0.0001). The laminectomy cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients in the intensive care unit (28.6% vs. 17.7%; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission rate between cohorts (laminectomy cohort 13.0% vs. no-laminectomy cohort 9.8%; P = 0.13). Within 30 days after initial discharge, the laminectomy cohort had significantly higher rates of altered mental status (3.2% vs. 1.2%; P = 0.05), urinary tract infection (4.3% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.009), wound drainage (7.2% vs. 3.1%; P = 0.007), and instrumentation failure (1.1% vs. 0.0%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing spinal fusion with laminectomy may have higher complication rates than patients undergoing spinal fusion alone.

Impact of Intraoperative Steroids on Postoperative Infection Rates and Length of Hospital Stay: A Study of 1200 Spine Surgery Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The use of intraoperative steroids and their effects are relatively unknown and remain controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of intraoperative steroid use on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay after spine surgery. METHODS: Medical records of 1200 adult patients undergoing spine surgery at Duke University Medical Center during the period 2008-2010 were retrospectively reviewed; 495 (41.25%) patients were administered intraoperative steroids, and 705 (58.75%) patients were not administered intraoperative steroids. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complication rates were collected. The primary outcomes investigated were postoperative complications, specifically length of hospital stay and infection rates. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar between both cohorts. Comorbidities were also similar, with the intraoperative steroid use cohort having a higher number of patients with long-term steroid use than the no intraoperative steroid use cohort (6.95% [no steroids] vs. 13.74% [steroid use], P < 0.001). Operative variables, including length of operation and median number of fusion levels operated, were also similar between the 2 groups. Lumbar spine was the most common surgical location. Patients who were administered intraoperative steroids had a shorter length of hospital stay by an average of 1 day (6.06 days ± 6.76 [no steroids] vs. 5.04 days ± 4.86 [steroid use], P = 0.0025), lower rates of urinary tract infections (10.37% [no steroids] vs. 6.88% [steroid use], P = 0.040), and lower rates of other infections that were not deep or superficial surgical site infections (9.22% [no steroids] vs. 6.06% [steroid use], P = 0.0460). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive intraoperative steroids have shorter hospital stays and lower infection rates after spine surgery.