Evaluating the use of the AMBIANCE-Brief measure in clinical settings: Assessing acceptability, feasibility, and utility of the AMBIANCE-Brief.

Community agencies and practitioners around the globe seek opportunities to learn various assessment tools and interventions rooted in attachment theory. However, information regarding the feasibility of implementation and sustainability of these tools once participants have been trained to use them, is limited. This study investigated the perceived acceptability, feasibility, utility, relevance, fidelity, and sustainability of the Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification-Brief (AMBIANCE-Brief) among practitioners who had taken a training. Practitioners (N = 59) who attended a virtual AMBIANCE-Brief training originating from Canada between June 2020 and November 2021 completed an online follow-up survey. Practitioners reported that they primarily used the AMBIANCE-Brief for case conceptualization (68%). Additionally, 95% agreed that the AMBIANCE-Brief was relevant to their clinical practice, 98% agreed it was useful for their clinical work, 76% agreed that it was feasible to implement into their clinical work, and 59% found it easy to incorporate into their treatment planning with clients. Findings suggest that the AMBIANCE-Brief may be acceptable, feasible, and useful for practitioners. Avenues for continuing to evaluate the AMBIANCE-Brief include cross-cultural validity, coder drift, and booster sessions. Additional work clarifying how practitioners integrate the measure into practice would be valuable.

Agencias comunitarias y profesionales de la práctica alrededor del mundo buscan oportunidades para aprender sobre varias herramientas de evaluación e intervenciones basadas en la teoría de la afectividad. Sin embargo, la información acerca de la posibilidad de implementación y sostenibilidad de estas herramientas, una vez que los participantes han sido entrenados para usarlas, es limitada. Este estudio investigó la percepción sobre la aceptabilidad, posibilidad, utilidad, relevancia, fidelidad y sostenibilidad del Instrumento de Comportamiento Materno Atípico para la Evaluación y Clasificación, versión abreviada (AMBIANCE­Abreviado) entre los profesionales de la práctica que habían recibido un entrenamiento. Los profesionales de la práctica (N = 59) que asistieron a un entrenamiento virtual de AMBIANCE­Abreviado que se originó en Canadá entre junio de 2020 y noviembre 2021, completaron en línea una encuesta de seguimiento. Los profesionales de la práctica reportaron que ellos primariamente usaban el AMBIANCE­Abreviado para el caso de conceptualización (68%). Adicionalmente, el 95% estuvo de acuerdo en que el AMBIANCE­Abreviado era relevante para su práctica clínica, 98% estuvo de acuerdo con que era útil para su trabajo clínico, 76% estuvo de acuerdo que era posible implementarlo en su trabajo clínico, y 59% lo encontraba fácil de incorporar en su plan de tratamiento con clientes. Los resultados sugieren que el AMBIANCE­Abreviado pudiera ser aceptable, posible y útil para los profesionales de la práctica. Entre las maneras para continuar evaluando el AMBIANCE­Abreviado se incluyen la validez intercultural, la variación del codificador y las sesiones de refuerzo. El trabajo adicional que clarifique cómo los profesionales integran la medida dentro de su práctica sería valioso.

Post-secondary Student Mental Health During COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis.

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed notable challenges to post-secondary students, causing concern for their psychological well-being. In the face of school closures, academic disruptions, and constraints on social gatherings, it is crucial to understand the extent to which mental health among post-secondary students has been impacted in order to inform support implementation for this population. The present meta-analysis examines the global prevalence of clinically significant depression and anxiety among post-secondary students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Several moderator analyses were also performed to examine sources of variability in depression and anxiety prevalence rates. A systematic search was conducted across six databases on May 3, 2021, yielding a total of 176 studies (1,732,456 participants) which met inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses of 126 studies assessing depression symptoms and 144 studies assessing anxiety symptoms were conducted. The pooled prevalence estimates of clinically elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms for post-secondary students during the COVID-19 pandemic was 30.6% (95% CI: 0.274, 0.340) and 28.2% (CI: 0.246, 0.321), respectively. The month of data collection and geographical region were determined to be significant moderators. However, student age, sex, type (i.e., healthcare student vs. non-healthcare student), and level of training (i.e., undergraduate, university or college generally; graduate, medical, post-doctorate, fellow, trainee), were not sources of variability in pooled rates of depression and anxiety symptoms during the pandemic. The current study indicates a call for continued access to mental health services to ensure post-secondary students receive adequate support during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO website: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021253547.