Bioequivalence of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol (FS) given by the FS Spiromax® and Seretide Accuhaler® systems
.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (SAL) in healthy volunteers following administration as two inhalations from the FS Spiromax 500/50 µg and Seretide Accuhaler 50/500 µg inhalers, without (study 1, n = 79) and with charcoal block (study 2, n = 77). Safety was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two single-center, open-label, randomized two-period crossover studies, PK parameters were calculated from plasma drug concentrations obtained pre-dose through 36 hours post-dose. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for the comparison of both FP and SAL were within 0.80 - 1.25. RESULTS: In study 1, in subjects administered FS Spiromax, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) FP AUC0-t and Cmax were 1,622.64 (419.44) pg×h/mL and 151.36 (40.37) pg/mL, respectively, vs. 1,487.52 (341.25) pg×h/mL and 137.57 (33.64) pg/mL with Seretide Accuhaler. Mean (SD) SAL AUC0-t and Cmax with FS Spiromax were 408.42 (155.40) pg×h/mL and 269.48 (105.74) pg/mL, respectively, vs. 401.79 (125.32) pg×h/mL and 265.66 (87.28) pg/mL with Seretide Accuhaler. Comparable data were seen in study 2 with charcoal block. Bioequivalence of FS Spiromax with Seretide Accuhaler was observed both without and with charcoal block for FP and SAL for both AUC0-t and Cmax. Both study treatments were well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events reported with the single use of FS Spiromax (23% study 1, 16% study 2) and Seretide Accuhaler (22%, 15%). CONCLUSION: FS Spiromax 500/50 µg (± charcoal block) was bioequivalent to Seretide Accuhaler 50/500µg.
.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety of Albuterol (Salbuterol) Multi-dose Dry-Powder Inhaler and ProAir(®) Hydrofluoroalkane for the Treatment of Persistent Asthma: Results of Two Randomized Double-Blind Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metered-dose inhalers require patients to coordinate inhalation with actuation. The present albuterol multi-dose dry-powder inhaler (mDPI) does not require patients to coordinate inspiration with actuation, thereby simplifying delivery of albuterol to the lungs. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, extrapulmonary pharmacodynamics, and safety of albuterol (salbuterol) delivered via a ProAir® hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler and an mDPI. METHODS: Two double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, crossover, multicenter, placebo-controlled studies in persistent asthma patients were conducted. Study 1: 47 adult patients were treated with cumulative doses of albuterol mDPI or ProAir HFA (90 µg/inhalation; 1 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 inhalations) or placebo. Study 2: 71 patients aged ≥12 years were randomly assigned to receive 90 or 180 µg of albuterol mDPI or ProAir HFA, or placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were baseline-adjusted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at 30 min (30-min FEV1) after each cumulative dose (Study 1) and FEV1 area under the effect curve over 6 h (FEV1 AUEC0-6) after dosing (Study 2). RESULTS: Study 1: differences, with corresponding 90% confidence intervals, between albuterol mDPI and ProAir HFA in FEV1 after each cumulative dose and in FEV1 AUEC0-6 after the final dose were within pre-established equivalence limits. The difference in FEV1 at high vs. low doses was significant for both active treatments (p < 0.0001). Active treatments were similar in systemic exposure, extrapulmonary pharmacodynamics, and safety. Study 2: mean FEV1 AUEC0-6 was significantly greater than for placebo for both doses of albuterol mDPI and ProAir HFA (p < 0.0001). Albuterol mDPI was comparable to ProAir HFA at 90 and 180 µg. Both study treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The bronchodilatory efficacy and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of albuterol mDPI and ProAir HFA are comparable, with a safety profile consistent with that of inhaled albuterol.