Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement.

The broad-spectrum herbicide glyphosate (common trade name "Roundup") was first sold to farmers in 1974. Since the late 1970s, the volume of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) applied has increased approximately 100-fold. Further increases in the volume applied are likely due to more and higher rates of application in response to the widespread emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds and new, pre-harvest, dessicant use patterns. GBHs were developed to replace or reduce reliance on herbicides causing well-documented problems associated with drift and crop damage, slipping efficacy, and human health risks. Initial industry toxicity testing suggested that GBHs posed relatively low risks to non-target species, including mammals, leading regulatory authorities worldwide to set high acceptable exposure limits. To accommodate changes in GBH use patterns associated with genetically engineered, herbicide-tolerant crops, regulators have dramatically increased tolerance levels in maize, oilseed (soybeans and canola), and alfalfa crops and related livestock feeds. Animal and epidemiology studies published in the last decade, however, point to the need for a fresh look at glyphosate toxicity. Furthermore, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer recently concluded that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans." In response to changing GBH use patterns and advances in scientific understanding of their potential hazards, we have produced a Statement of Concern drawing on emerging science relevant to the safety of GBHs. Our Statement of Concern considers current published literature describing GBH uses, mechanisms of action, toxicity in laboratory animals, and epidemiological studies. It also examines the derivation of current human safety standards. We conclude that: (1) GBHs are the most heavily applied herbicide in the world and usage continues to rise; (2) Worldwide, GBHs often contaminate drinking water sources, precipitation, and air, especially in agricultural regions; (3) The half-life of glyphosate in water and soil is longer than previously recognized; (4) Glyphosate and its metabolites are widely present in the global soybean supply; (5) Human exposures to GBHs are rising; (6) Glyphosate is now authoritatively classified as a probable human carcinogen; (7) Regulatory estimates of tolerable daily intakes for glyphosate in the United States and European Union are based on outdated science. We offer a series of recommendations related to the need for new investments in epidemiological studies, biomonitoring, and toxicology studies that draw on the principles of endocrinology to determine whether the effects of GBHs are due to endocrine disrupting activities. We suggest that common commercial formulations of GBHs should be prioritized for inclusion in government-led toxicology testing programs such as the U.S. National Toxicology Program, as well as for biomonitoring as conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Should oral gavage be abandoned in toxicity testing of endocrine disruptors?

For decades, hazard assessments for environmental chemicals have used intra-gastric gavage to assess the effects of 'oral' exposures. It is now widely used--and in some cases required--by US federal agencies to assess potential toxicity of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). In this review we enumerate several reasons why gavage is not appropriate for the assessment of EDCs using bisphenol A (BPA) as a main example. First, whereas human dietary exposures interact with the oral mucosa, gavage exposures avoid these interactions, leading to dramatic differences in absorption, bioavailability and metabolism with implications for toxicokinetic assumptions and models. Additionally, there are well acknowledged complications associated with gavage, such as perforation of the esophagus that diminish its value in toxicological experiments. Finally, the gavage protocol itself can induce stress responses by the endocrine system and confound the assessment of EDCs. These serious flaws have not been taken into account in interpreting results of EDC research. We propose the exploration of alternatives to mimic human exposures when there are multiple exposure routes/sources and when exposures are chronic. We conclude that gavage may be preferred over other routes for some environmental chemicals in some circumstances, but it does not appropriately model human dietary exposures for many chemicals. Because it avoids exposure pathways, is stressful, and thus interferes with endocrine responses, gavage should be abandoned as the default route of administration for hazard assessments of EDCs.

The Conflict between Regulatory Agencies over the 20,000-Fold Lowering of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for Bisphenol A (BPA) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

BACKGROUND: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommended lowering their estimated tolerable daily intake (TDI) for bisphenol A (BPA) 20,000-fold to 0.2 ng/kg body weight (BW)/day. BPA is an extensively studied high production volume endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) associated with a vast array of diseases. Prior risk assessments of BPA by EFSA as well as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have relied on industry-funded studies conducted under good laboratory practice protocols (GLP) requiring guideline end points and detailed record keeping, while also claiming to examine (but rejecting) thousands of published findings by academic scientists. Guideline protocols initially formalized in the mid-twentieth century are still used by many regulatory agencies. EFSA used a 21st century approach in its reassessment of BPA and conducted a transparent, but time-limited, systematic review that included both guideline and academic research. The German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) opposed EFSA's revision of the TDI for BPA. OBJECTIVES: We identify the flaws in the assumptions that the German BfR, as well as the FDA, have used to justify maintaining the TDI for BPA at levels above what a vast amount of academic research shows to cause harm. We argue that regulatory agencies need to incorporate 21st century science into chemical hazard identifications using the CLARITY-BPA (Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on BPA Toxicity) nonguideline academic studies in a collaborative government-academic program model. DISCUSSION: We strongly endorse EFSA's revised TDI for BPA and support the European Commission's (EC) apparent acceptance of this updated BPA risk assessment. We discuss challenges to current chemical risk assessment assumptions about EDCs that need to be addressed by regulatory agencies to, in our opinion, become truly protective of public health. Addressing these challenges will hopefully result in BPA, and eventually other structurally similar bisphenols (called regrettable substitutions) for which there are known adverse effects, being eliminated from all food-related and many other uses in the EU and elsewhere. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13812.

Soybeans as a phytochemical reservoir for the production and stabilization of biocompatible gold nanoparticles.

The present study demonstrates an unprecedented green process for the production of gold nanoparticles by simple treatment of gold salts with soybean extracts. Reduction capabilities of antioxidant phytochemicals present in soybean and their ability to reduce gold salts chemically to nanoparticles with subsequent coating of proteins and a host of other phytochemicals present in soybean on the freshly generated gold nanoparticles are discussed. The new genre of green nanoparticles exhibit remarkable in vitro stability in various buffers including saline, histidine, HSA, and cysteine solutions. MTT assays reveal that the green gold nanoparticles are nontoxic and thus provide excellent opportunities for their applications in nanomedicine for molecular imaging and therapy. The overall strategy described herein for the generation of gold nanoparticles meets all 12 principles of green chemistry, as no "man-made" chemicals, other than the gold salts, are used in the green nanotechnological process.

Low phytoestrogen levels in feed increase fetal serum estradiol resulting in the "fetal estrogenization syndrome" and obesity in CD-1 mice.

BACKGROUND: Although estrogenic chemicals can disrupt development of the reproductive system, there is debate about whether phytoestrogens in soy are beneficial, benign, or harmful. OBJECTIVES: We compared reproductive and metabolic characteristics in male and female mice reared and maintained on non-soy low-phytoestrogen feed or soy-based high-phytoestrogen feed. METHODS: The low-phytoestrogen diet was non-soy PMI 5K96 (verified casein diet), and the high-phytoestrogen diet consisted of soy-based PMI 5008 during pregnancy and lactation and soy-based PMI 5001 maintenance feed after weaning. RESULTS: In fetuses whose mothers consumed the low-phytoestrogen PMI 5K96 feed, we found a paradoxical significant elevation in endogenous serum estradiol, which was associated postnatally with adverse reproductive outcomes referred to as the "fetal estrogenization syndrome (FES)". In females, this syndrome included early puberty and increased uterine responsiveness to estrogen, and in males, it included reduced testis, epididymis, and seminal vesicle size, but an enlarged prostate. The low-phytoestrogen-fed males and females were lighter at birth, but, between weaning and adulthood, they became obese and developed abnormally high serum leptin levels; these males, but not females, showed impaired glucose regulation. CONCLUSIONS: Removing phytoestrogens from mouse feed produces an obese phenotype consistent with metabolic syndrome, and the associated reproductive system abnormalities are consistent with FES due to elevated endogenous fetal estradiol. Laboratory rodents may have become adapted to high-phytoestrogen intake over many generations of being fed soy-based commercial feed; removing all phytoestrogens from feed leads to alterations that could disrupt many types of biomedical research.

No effect of route of exposure (oral; subcutaneous injection) on plasma bisphenol A throughout 24h after administration in neonatal female mice.

Route of administration of chemicals in adults is an important factor in pharmacokinetics of chemicals such as bisphenol A (BPA), the monomer with estrogenic activity used to make polycarbonate plastic products and to line food and beverage cans. Based on findings in adults it has been proposed (CERHR, 2007) that non-oral routes of administration in newborn rodents would also lead to high exposure relative to oral administration. However, in fetuses and neonates, the enzyme that conjugates BPA (UDP-glucuronosyltransferase) is expressed at low levels, suggesting that there may be no differences in pharmacokinetics between oral and non-oral dosing. We thus conducted an analysis of plasma concentrations of unconjugated 3H-BPA after HPLC separation in postnatal day 3 female mice throughout the 24h after administering 3H-BPA orally or via subcutaneous injection at doses above and below the current EPA reference dose. We found no significant difference in plasma BPA based on route of administration in neonatal mice at either dose. However, compared to data from other studies conducted with adults, there was a markedly higher plasma BPA level after oral administration of BPA in newborn mice. This finding sets aside the belief that non-oral administration of BPA renders data as not suitable for consideration of the hazard posed by low-dose exposure to BPA during neonatal life. Therefore the large numbers of BPA studies that used non-oral administration at very low doses during the neonatal period should not be dismissed by scientists or the regulatory community based on route of administration.

Lack of skeletal effect of soy isoflavones in intact growing, female rats may be explained by constant serum estrogenic activity despite reduced serum estradiol.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Scarce data exist on the effects of soy isoflavones (IF) on bone during peripuberty, a known 'window of opportunity' for bone consolidation. Our aim was to determine the skeletal, reproductive, and serum estradiol (E(2))/estrogenic activity response of consuming naturally-occurring soy protein-associated IF during peripuberty. METHODS: Weanling (approximately 3 weeks old), female rats were placed on one of four nutritionally-complete dietary regimens in which protein (200 g/kg diet) was provided as casein or soy protein isolates containing either 0.11 (Low IF), 2.16 (Med IF), or 3.95 (High IF) mg total aglycone isoflavones/g protein for 8 weeks, during which body weights and estrus cycling were recorded. RESULTS: Bone growth and density were unaffected by soy intake while the reproductive tissues showed a slight response (greater uterine weights of the Med and High IF groups). Despite suppression of E(2) concentrations in the High IF group, total circulating estrogenic activity was unaltered. Moreover, in the High IF group, E(2) was significantly depressed compared with bioassayable estrogenic activity, suggesting negative feedback inhibition of E(2) by the elevated circulating levels of IF. CONCLUSIONS: This suppression in E(2) with maintenance of total serum estrogenicity in the High IF group may explain the lack of effect observed in the skeletal tissues.

Estradiol and Bisphenol A stimulate androgen receptor and estrogen receptor gene expression in fetal mouse prostate mesenchyme cells.

BACKGROUND: Hormonal alterations during development have lifelong effects on the prostate gland. Endogenous estrogens, including 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), and synthetic estrogenic endocrine disruptors, such as bisphenol A (BPA), have similar effects on prostate development. Increasing exposure to estrogens within the low-dose, physiologic range results in permanent increases in the size and androgen responsiveness of the prostate, whereas exposure within the high-dose, pharmacologic range has the opposite effects. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that the low-dose effects of estrogens on the developing prostate are associated with increased expression of androgen receptor (Ar) and estrogen receptor 1 (alpha) (Esr1) genes in mesenchyme cells. METHODS: Ar and Esr1 mRNA levels were quantified in primary cultures of fetal mouse prostate mesenchyme cells treated with E(2) and BPA. DISCUSSION: Ar and Esr1 mRNA expression increased in response to E(2), with thresholds of 0.001 and 0.037 nM, respectively; and in response to BPA, with a threshold of 1 nM for both mRNAs. We did not observe the expected inhibition of Ar mRNA expression by pharmacologic levels of E(2) relative to unexposed cells. CONCLUSIONS: The observed induction of gene expression occurred at concentrations within the range of free E(2) previously shown to permanently increase prostate size, thus supporting the involvement of direct effects of estrogens on gene expression in prostate mesenchyme. The effects of BPA occurred within the range of concentrations currently measured in human serum, demonstrating the vulnerability of developing tissues to xenoestrogens.

Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA).

The plastic monomer and plasticizer bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the highest volume chemicals produced worldwide. BPA is used in the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins used in many consumer products. Here, we have outlined studies that address the levels of BPA in human tissues and fluids. We have reviewed the few epidemiological studies available that explore biological markers of BPA exposure and human health outcomes. We have examined several studies of levels of BPA released from consumer products as well as the levels measured in wastewater, drinking water, air and dust. Lastly, we have reviewed acute metabolic studies and the information available about BPA metabolism in animal models. The reported levels of BPA in human fluids are higher than the BPA concentrations reported to stimulate molecular endpoints in vitro and appear to be within an order of magnitude of the levels needed to induce effects in animal models.

Is it time to reassess current safety standards for glyphosate-based herbicides?

Use of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) increased ∼100-fold from 1974 to 2014. Additional increases are expected due to widespread emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds, increased application of GBHs, and preharvest uses of GBHs as desiccants. Current safety assessments rely heavily on studies conducted over 30 years ago. We have considered information on GBH use, exposures, mechanisms of action, toxicity and epidemiology. Human exposures to glyphosate are rising, and a number of in vitro and in vivo studies challenge the basis for the current safety assessment of glyphosate and GBHs. We conclude that current safety standards for GBHs are outdated and may fail to protect public health or the environment. To improve safety standards, the following are urgently needed: (1) human biomonitoring for glyphosate and its metabolites; (2) prioritisation of glyphosate and GBHs for hazard assessments, including toxicological studies that use state-of-the-art approaches; (3) epidemiological studies, especially of occupationally exposed agricultural workers, pregnant women and their children and (4) evaluations of GBHs in commercially used formulations, recognising that herbicide mixtures likely have effects that are not predicted by studying glyphosate alone.

Large effects from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure.

Over 6 billion pounds per year of the estrogenic monomer bisphenol A (BPA) are used to manufacture polycarbonate plastic products, in resins lining metal cans, in dental sealants, and in blends with other types of plastic products. The ester bond linking BPA molecules in polycarbonate and resins undergoes hydrolysis, resulting in the release of free BPA into food, beverages, and the environment, and numerous monitoring studies now show almost ubiquitous human exposure to biologically active levels of this chemical. BPA exerts estrogenic effects through the classical nuclear estrogen receptors, and BPA acts as a selective estrogen receptor modulator. However, BPA also initiates rapid responses via estrogen receptors presumably associated with the plasma membrane. Similar to estradiol, BPA causes changes in some cell functions at concentrations between 1 pM and 1 nM, and the mean and median range of unconjugated BPA measured by multiple techniques in human pregnant maternal, fetal, and adult blood and other tissues exceeds these levels. In contrast to these published findings, BPA manufacturers persist in describing BPA as a weak estrogen and insist there is little concern with human exposure levels. Our concern with human exposure to BPA derives from 1) identification of molecular mechanisms mediating effects in human and animal tissues at very low doses, 2) in vivo effects in experimental animals caused by low doses within the range of human exposure, and 3) widespread human exposure to levels of BPA that cause adverse effects in animals.

Estrogen receptors in membrane lipid rafts and signal transduction in breast cancer.

Regulation of breast cancer growth by estrogen is mediated by estrogen receptors (ER) in nuclear and extranuclear compartments. We assessed the structure and functions of extranuclear ER that initiate downstream signaling to the nucleus. ER, including full-length 66-kDa ER and a 46-kDa ER splice variant, are enriched in lipid rafts from MCF-7 cells with (MCF-7/HER-2) or without (MCF-7/PAR) HER-2 gene overexpression and co-localize with HER-1 and HER-2 growth factor receptors, as well as with lipid raft marker flotillin-2. In contrast, ER-negative MCF-7 cells do not express nuclear or lipid raft ER. ER knockdown with siRNA also elicits a marked loss of ER in MCF-7 cell rafts. In MCF-7/PAR cells, estrogen enhances ER association with membrane rafts and induces rapid phosphorylation of nuclear receptor coactivator AIB1, actions not detected in ER-negative cells. Thus, nuclear and lipid raft ER derive from the same transcript, and extranuclear ER co-localizes with HER receptors in membrane signaling domains that modulate downstream nuclear events leading to cell growth.

Cell cycle proteins in normal and chemically induced abnormal secondary palate development: a review.

Cell cycle progression and thus proper cell number is essential for normal development of organs and organisms. Craniofacial tissues including the secondary palate are vulnerable to disruption of cell cycle progression and proliferation by many chemicals including mycotoxin, secalonic acid D (SAD), glucocorticoids, retinoic acid and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin. Induction of cleft palate (CP) by SAD in mice occurs from a reduction in the size of developing palatal shelves. This is associated with an inhibition of proliferation of murine and human embryonic palatal mesenchymal (MEPM and HEPM) cells as well as a G1/S block of cell cycle. In murine embryonic palates and HEPM cells, SAD inhibited G1/S-phase-specific cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)2 activity, reduced the level of cyclin E and increased the level of the CDK2 inhibitor, p21. These results, together with those from other laboratories, suggest that common cell cycle protein targets (biomarkers), relevant to the pathogenesis of CP by multiple chemical exposures, that can form the basis for the diagnosis and the development of preventive strategies, are likely to exist.

Phosphorylation of estrogen receptor alpha blocks its acetylation and regulates estrogen sensitivity.

Estrogen receptor (ER) alpha is mutated (lysine 303 to arginine, K303R) in approximately one third of premalignant breast hyperplasias, which renders breast cancer cells expressing the mutant receptor hypersensitive for proliferation in response to low doses of estrogen. It is known that ERalpha is posttranslationally modified by protein acetylation and phosphorylation by a number of secondary messenger signaling cascades. The K303R ERalpha mutation resides at a major protein acetylation site adjacent to a potential protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation site at residue 305 within the hinge domain of the receptor. Mutation of this phosphorylation site to aspartic acid to mimic constitutive phosphorylation blocks acetylation of the K303 ERalpha site and generates an enhanced transcriptional response similar to that seen with the naturally occurring K303R mutant receptor. Activation of PKA signaling by the cell-permeable cyclic AMP (cAMP) analog 8-bromo-cAMP further enhances estrogen sensitivity of the mutant receptor, whereas a specific PKA inhibitor antagonizes this increase. We propose that the hypersensitive ERalpha mutant breast cancer phenotype involves an integration of coupled acetylation and phosphorylation events by upstream signaling molecules.

Loss of estrogen receptor signaling triggers epigenetic silencing of downstream targets in breast cancer.

Alterations in histones, chromatin-related proteins, and DNA methylation contribute to transcriptional silencing in cancer, but the sequence of these molecular events is not well understood. Here we demonstrate that on disruption of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha signaling by small interfering RNA, polycomb repressors and histone deacetylases are recruited to initiate stable repression of the progesterone receptor (PR) gene, a known ERalpha target, in breast cancer cells. The event is accompanied by acquired DNA methylation of the PR promoter, leaving a stable mark that can be inherited by cancer cell progeny. Reestablishing ERalpha signaling alone was not sufficient to reactivate the PR gene; reactivation of the PR gene also requires DNA demethylation. Methylation microarray analysis further showed that progressive DNA methylation occurs in multiple ERalpha targets in breast cancer genomes. The results imply, for the first time, the significance of epigenetic regulation on ERalpha target genes, providing new direction for research in this classical signaling pathway.

The WT1 Wilms' tumor suppressor gene product interacts with estrogen receptor-alpha and regulates IGF-I receptor gene transcription in breast cancer cells.

The IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) has an important role in breast cancer development and progression. Previous studies have suggested that the IGF-IR gene is negatively regulated by a number of transcription factors with tumor suppressor activity, including the Wilms' tumor protein WT1. The present study was aimed at evaluating the hypothesis that IGF-IR gene transcription in breast cancer cells is under inhibitory control by WT1 and, furthermore, that the mechanism of action of WT1 involves functional and physical interactions with estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha). Results of transient coexpression experiments showed that all four predominant isoforms of WT1 (including or lacking alternatively spliced exons 5 and 9) repressed IGF-IR promoter activity by 39-49%. To examine the potential interplay between WT1 and ERalpha in control of IGF-IR gene transcription we employed ER-depleted C4 cells that were generated by clonal selection of ER-positive MCF-7 cells that were maintained in estrogen-free conditions. IGF-IR levels in C4 cells were approximately 43% of the values in MCF-7 cells whereas WT1 levels in C4 cells were 4.25-fold higher than in MCF-7. Triple cotransfection experiments using an ERalpha expression vector in the absence or presence of WT1 expression vectors, along with an IGF-IR promoter reporter plasmid, revealed that ERalpha stimulated IGF-IR promoter activity whereas coexpression of WT1 abrogated the effect of ERalpha. In addition, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated a specific association between WT1 and ERalpha. Combined, our results suggest that WT1 suppresses IGF-IR gene transcription in breast cancer cells via a mechanism that involves protein-protein association with ERalpha. As a result of this interaction, the ability of ERalpha to transactivate the IGF-IR promoter is abrogated. These findings are consistent with a potential tumor suppressor role for WT1 in breast cancer and suggest that WT1 inactivation in tumoral cells may result in deregulated IGF-IR gene expression and enhanced mitogenic activation by locally produced and/or circulating IGFs.

Basis of melengestrol acetate action as a progestin.

To provide insight into potential mechanisms contributing to the various biological responses of cattle to treatment with progesterone, norgestomet, and melengestrol acetate (MGA), MCF-7 cells were utilized to determine the relative binding affinity of the progesterone receptor for MGA, norgestomet, progesterone, and a progesterone agonist (R5020), and to determine if progesterone, MGA, or norgestomet have estrogenic and/or anti-estrogenic activities. The progesterone receptor had greater affinity (P<0.05) for MGA, R5020, and norgestomet than for progesterone; and the affinity for norgestomet exceeded (P<0.05) that of MGA and R5020. Estrogen stimulates proliferation of MCF-7 cells; therefore these cells have been utilized as a bioassay to detect estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity. Progesterone (10(-11) to 10(-5)M) did not promote cellular proliferation. However, MGA (10(-8), 10(-7), and 10(-6)M) increased (P<0.05) cell proliferation compared to the control group (10(-11) to 10(-9) and 10(-5)M MGA did not stimulate cell proliferation), and MGA-induced cell proliferation (10(-8)M) was reduced (P=0.095) by an estradiol antagonist (ICI 182,780; ICI). Cellular proliferation increased (P<0.05) with norgestomet (10(-5)M) compared to the control group (10(-11) to 10(-6)M norgestomet did not stimulate cell proliferation) and the increased proliferation was decreased (P<0.05) by ICI. Neither progesterone nor MGA demonstrated anti-estrogenic activity. Norgestomet (10(-10) to 10(-6)M) did reduce (P<0.05) maximal estrogen-stimulated cell proliferation, but not to basal levels. In summary, the affinities of the progesterone receptor for norgestomet, MGA, and progesterone are consistent with their effective dose to inhibit ovulation in vivo, but their progestin and their estrogenic/anti-estrogenic activities cannot fully explain why progesterone and norgestomet are more capable of reprogramming the reproductive axis in anestrous postpartum cows compared to MGA.

Transcription factor accessibility and histone acetylation of the progesterone receptor gene differs between parental MCF-7 cells and a subline that has lost progesterone receptor expression.

The human progesterone receptor (PgR) gene has a complex promoter that produces alternate mRNAs encoding the PgRA (94 kDa) and PgRB (120 kDa) protein isoforms. Expression of PgR is induced by estradiol (E(2)) in the breast, reproductive tract and many cell lines despite the lack of a classical estrogen responsive element (ERE) in the promoter regions. We employed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to analyze the sites of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and Sp1 occupancy of the PgR promoters in vivo. We also assessed the functional relevance of histone acetylation levels on the accessibility of transcription factors to the promoter and subsequent hormone-induced transcription. We utilized MCF-7 human breast cancer cells that express PgR in response to E(2) and the MCF-7 derived C4 cell strain that has lost PgR expression as a model system. We found that promoter-wide levels of histone acetylation were not decreased in C4 cells, but that access was partially blocked for Sp1 and completely blocked for ERalpha. The basal level of histone acetylation at six localized regions of the promoter did show some differences between cell lines, but it did not correlate with transcription factor binding. Furthermore, we found only a modest and highly localized change in histone acetylation levels in response to E(2) at only one of three sites of ERalpha binding in MCF-7 cells. This was at the B1 site at the distal 5' end of the promoter. This site also showed a significant decrease in basal histone acetylation in C4 compared to MCF-7 cells. We speculate that the histone acetylation level at this site may be a marker for chromatin structure that affects the access of transcription factors to the whole promoter.

Estrogen receptor expression and sensitivity to paclitaxel in breast cancer.

A retrospective analysis of CALGB trial 9344 suggested paclitaxel administration following cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin adjuvant chemotherapy is most beneficial for patients with ERalpha negative (ERalpha-) breast cancer. Since the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel are cell cycle dependent, we postulated that the relationship between ERalpha and the effectiveness of adjuvant paclitaxel reflects the observation that ERalpha positive (ERalpha+) breast cancers proliferate more slowly than ERalpha- breast cancers. Three in vitro models (MCF-7, T47D and ZR-75) were examined to compare growth rates and paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in ERalpha+ and ERalpha- clones of the same, originally ERalpha+ cell line. For the T47D and ZR-75 cell lines, loss of ERalpha was associated with a decrease in doubling time and an increase in paclitaxel sensitivity. However, when cell culture conditions were altered to achieve equivalent cell proliferation rates, no difference in paclitaxel sensitivity was observed. Similarly, an ERalpha- clone of MCF-7 cells that did not exhibit an enhanced growth rate compared to its ERalpha+ counterpart also did not show increased paclitaxel sensitivity. The combined apoptotic effects of tamoxifen and paclitaxel on MCF-7 cells were not synergistic or even clearly additive. In these in vitro models, the effectiveness of paclitaxel correlated more closely with growth rate than ERalpha expression. These data suggest that measurements of tumor proliferation may provide more accurate predictive markers for the benefits of adjuvant paclitaxel than ERalpha analysis.

Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity.

Information concerning the fundamental mechanisms of action of both natural and environmental hormones, combined with information concerning endogenous hormone concentrations, reveals how endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity (EEDCs) can be active at concentrations far below those currently being tested in toxicological studies. Using only very high doses in toxicological studies of EEDCs thus can dramatically underestimate bioactivity. Specifically: a) The hormonal action mechanisms and the physiology of delivery of EEDCs predict with accuracy the low-dose ranges of biological activity, which have been missed by traditional toxicological testing. b) Toxicology assumes that it is valid to extrapolate linearly from high doses over a very wide dose range to predict responses at doses within the physiological range of receptor occupancy for an EEDC; however, because receptor-mediated responses saturate, this assumption is invalid. c) Furthermore, receptor-mediated responses can first increase and then decrease as dose increases, contradicting the assumption that dose-response relationships are monotonic. d) Exogenous estrogens modulate a system that is physiologically active and thus is already above threshold, contradicting the traditional toxicological assumption of thresholds for endocrine responses to EEDCs. These four fundamental issues are problematic for risk assessment methods used by regulatory agencies, because they challenge the traditional use of extrapolation from high-dose testing to predict responses at the much lower environmentally relevant doses. These doses are within the range of current exposures to numerous chemicals in wildlife and humans. These problems are exacerbated by the fact that the type of positive and negative controls appropriate to the study of endocrine responses are not part of traditional toxicological testing and are frequently omitted, or when present, have been misinterpreted.