Subgroup analysis of phase 2 study of ceftolozane/tazobactam in neonates and young infants with pyelonephritis.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for the treatment of patients from birth to <18 y old with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem in neonates and young infants. NCT03230838 was a phase 2, randomized, active comparator-controlled, double-blind study of patients from birth to <18 y of age with cUTI, including pyelonephritis, given ceftolozane/tazobactam or meropenem in a 3:1 ratio. This subset analysis included only neonates and young infants < 3 mo of age. The microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population (mMITT) included 20 patients (ceftolozane/tazobactam, n = 14; meropenem, n = 6). All patients had pyelonephritis at baseline; two patients in each treatment group had bacteremia (overall 4/20, 20%). Escherichia coli was the most common baseline pathogen (overall 16/20, 80%). Safety and efficacy results were similar between treatment groups and consistent with the overall pediatric population. There were no serious drug-related adverse events (AEs), no discontinuations due to AEs, and no AEs leading to death in either treatment group. For the ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem treatment groups, clinical cure rates in the mMITT population were 92.9% and 100%, respectively. The population PK analysis of neonates and young infants demonstrated similar ceftolozane and tazobactam exposures to those of adults, achieving pharmacodynamic targets associated with clinical and microbiologic cure. Ceftolozane/tazobactam has a favorable safety profile and achieves high clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates in neonates and young infants < 3 mo of age with cUTI and pyelonephritis. IMPORTANCE Extrapolation of antibacterial agent pharmacokinetics from adults to newborns and young infants may not be appropriate; similarly, the clinical manifestations of infectious diseases and outcomes following antibacterial treatment may not be similar. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antibacterial drug combination active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. A clinical study led to the approval for ceftolozane/tazobactam in patients from birth to 18 y of age who have complicated urinary tract infections, including those with serious kidney infections. Based on data collected during that clinical study, we compared newborns and young infants who were treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam (14 patients) and those who were treated with meropenem (6 patients). We found that ceftolozane/tazobactam treatment of newborns and young infants up to 3 mo of age who have complicated urinary tract infections demonstrated a favorable safety profile and high clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates, similar to meropenem.

Assessment of pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability following twice-daily administration of molnupiravir for 10 days in healthy participants.

Molnupiravir is an orally administered, small-molecule ribonucleoside prodrug of ß-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) that has demonstrated potent, broad-spectrum preclinical activity against RNA viruses and has a high barrier to the development of resistance. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and tolerability of 10.5-day administration of multiple doses of molnupiravir and its metabolites in healthy, adult participants. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive molnupiravir (400 mg [n = 6], 600 mg [n = 6], and 800 mg [n = 12]) or matching placebo (n = 8) every 12 h (q12h) for 10.5 days. Blood was collected to evaluate the PKs of NHC in plasma and of its active metabolite, NHC-triphosphate (NHC-TP), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Molnupiravir was generally well-tolerated. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and none led to treatment discontinuation. No clinically meaningful dose-related safety findings were observed. Mean time to maximal concentration was ~1.50 to 1.98 h for plasma NHC and ~4.00 to 8.06 h for PBMC NHC-TP. Accumulation was minimal (<1.2) for NHC and ~2- to 2.5-fold for NHC-TP. Plasma NHC PKs was generally dose proportional, and PBMC NHC-TP PKs was less than dose proportional over the dose range studied. NHC and NHC-TP PK support twice-daily administration. Overall, molnupiravir administered at up to 800 mg q12h for 10.5 days was generally well-tolerated in healthy participants with dose-linear PKs, supporting the evaluation of longer molnupiravir dosing up to 10 days in future clinical trials.

A phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled study of molnupiravir in healthy Japanese to support special approval in Japan to treat COVID-19.

Molnupiravir (MK-4482) is an oral prodrug of the antiviral ribonucleoside analog, N-hydroxycytidine (NHC), which has activity against RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We conducted a phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of molnupiravir in healthy Japanese adult participants. A sample size larger than typically used in pharmacokinetic studies was implemented to collect additional safety data in the Japanese population to support special approval for emergency use in Japan. Single doses of molnupiravir up to 1600 mg and multiple doses of 400 and 800 mg administered every 12 h (q12h) for 5.5 days were generally well-tolerated. NHC appeared rapidly in plasma and reached maximum concentration (Cmax ), with a median time to Cmax (Tmax ) between 1.00 and 2.00 h. Area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf ), area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to 12 h (AUC0-12 ), and Cmax of plasma NHC increased approximately dose proportionally. With q12h dosing, the geometric mean (GM) accumulation ratios for NHC AUC0-12 and Cmax were ~1 for 400 and 800 mg. Pharmacokinetics of NHC triphosphate (NHC-TP), the active metabolite of NHC was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and also demonstrated roughly dose proportional pharmacokinetics. The GM accumulation ratios for NHC-TP AUC0-12 and Cmax were ~2.5 for 400 and 800 mg. Following administration with food, only a modest reduction (24%) in plasma NHC Cmax with comparable AUC0-inf was seen, supporting administration without regard to food.

The impact of a three-factor prothrombin complex concentrate on the anticoagulatory effects of the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban.

BACKGROUND: Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is a once-daily, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant. There is no established method to reverse the activity of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in cases of hemorrhage or urgent surgery. This study evaluated the ability of a 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (3F-PCC) to reverse the anticoagulatory effects of edoxaban. METHODS: In this phase 1 study, 24 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of 60 or 180mg edoxaban, followed by placebo, 25IU/kg 3F-PCC, or 50IU/kg 3F-PCC. Edoxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, including the primary endpoint of prothrombin time (PT) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), were assessed. D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 and 2 (F1+2) were also measured. RESULTS: Overall, there were no apparent consistent effects of 3F-PCC on edoxaban pharmacokinetics. Administration of 3F-PCC 25 or 50IU/kg with edoxaban 60 or 180mg did not substantially accelerate the return of PT to baseline levels. However, infusion of 3F-PCC 25 and 50IU/kg did substantially accelerate return to baseline of ETP compared with placebo. D-dimer and F1+2 data did not indicate any lasting procoagulant effects of 3F-PCC infusion, although a transient increase in F1+2 was noted during and after 3F-PCC infusion. Edoxaban and 3F-PCC co-administration was well tolerated in normal healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: There was no apparent reversal of PT prolongation with 3F-PCC following edoxaban infusion, but ETP was completely reversed. Co-administration of 3F-PCC was well tolerated, but a dose-dependent increase in F1+2 may reflect a procoagulant risk.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of edoxaban in end-stage renal disease subjects undergoing haemodialysis.

Edoxaban is an oral, direct, once-daily, factor Xa inhibitor developed for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment and secondary prevention of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Among elderly patients who require anticoagulation therapies, some may have end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This open-label, phase 1, randomised, two-way crossover study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of edoxaban in 10 subjects on haemodialysis. Eligible subjects with ESRD on chronic haemodialysis received a single, oral dose of edoxaban 15 mg 2 hours (h) prior to (on-dialysis) or in between (off-dialysis) haemodialysis sessions. Haemodialysis resulted in a minor decrease in mean total exposure (AUC0-∞; 676.2 ng·h/ml) as compared with that observed in subjects off-dialysis (691.7 ng·h/ml). Mean maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) values were comparable between on-dialysis and off-dialysis treatments (53.3 vs 56.3 ng/ml, respectively). Mean apparent total body clearance (CL/F) values were 24.1 and 22.5 l/h during the on-dialysis and off-dialysis treatment periods, respectively. Dialyser clearance was 5.7 l/h and haemodialysis clearance was 6.1 l/h. Haemodialysis clearance was only 6.1 l/h, suggesting that it only accounts for one-fourth of the total clearance in these subjects. A single, oral dose of 15 mg of edoxaban was well tolerated by subjects with ESRD. In conclusion, based on these single-dose PK data, a supplementary dose of edoxaban may not be required following a haemodialysis session. Importantly, haemodialysis is not an effective mechanism for removal of edoxaban from the blood.

Lack of effect of colesevelam HCl on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of aspirin, atenolol, enalapril, phenytoin, rosiglitazone, and sitagliptin.

AIMS: Drug interactions with bile acid sequestrants are primarily due to the potential of these agents to bind to concomitant drugs. Six clinical studies were performed to determine the effects of colesevelam on the pharmacokinetics of aspirin, atenolol, enalapril, phenytoin, rosiglitazone, and sitagliptin. METHODS: All six studies enrolled healthy subjects aged 18-45 years. The phenytoin study used a single-dose, three-period crossover design (phenytoin alone, phenytoin simultaneously with colesevelam, and phenytoin 4h before colesevelam). The other studies used a two-period crossover design (test drug alone and test drug simultaneously with colesevelam). Colesevelam (3750mg once daily) was dosed throughout the pharmacokinetic sampling period. After each single dose of the test drug, serial blood samples were collected for determination of plasma drug concentrations and calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: For all six test drugs, 90% CIs for geometric least-squares mean ratios of AUC and Cmax for the measured analytes were within specified limits, indicating no interaction between the test drug and colesevelam. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin, atenolol, enalapril, rosiglitazone, and sitagliptin may be taken with colesevelam. Although the phenytoin study indicated no pharmacokinetic interaction, phenytoin should continue to be taken ≥4h before colesevelam in accordance with current prescribing information.

The effects of colesevelam HCl on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of glimepiride, extended-release glipizide, and olmesartan medoxomil.

Bile acid sequestrants can potentially bind to concomitant drugs. Single-dose studies evaluated the effects of colesevelam on the pharmacokinetics of glimepiride, glipizide extended-release (ER), and olmesartan medoxomil. Each study enrolled healthy subjects aged 18-45 years. The olmesartan medoxomil study used a randomized adaptive crossover design that initially compared olmesartan medoxomil alone versus simultaneously with colesevelam, then olmesartan medoxomil alone versus 4 hours before colesevelam. The other studies used a three-period crossover design (test drug alone, test drug simultaneously with colesevelam, and test drug 4 hours before colesevelam). For the colesevelam coadministration periods, 3,750 mg once daily was dosed throughout the pharmacokinetic sampling period. After each single dose of test drug, serial blood samples were collected for determination of plasma drug concentrations and calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. Administering colesevelam simultaneously with glimepiride or glipizide ER resulted in minor reductions (18% and 13%, respectively) in total exposure that were negated by staggering colesevelam dosing by 4 hours. Administering colesevelam simultaneously with olmesartan medoxomil resulted in a major reduction (39%) in olmesartan exposure that was reduced by staggering colesevelam dosing by 4 hours. This reduction in olmesartan exposure is not predicted to have a clinically significant impact on blood pressure control.

Quantitative structure-property relationships modeling to predict in vitro and in vivo binding of drugs to the bile sequestrant, colesevelam (Welchol).

Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models were developed to correlate physicochemical properties of structurally unrelated drugs with extent of in vitro binding to colesevelam, and predicted values were compared with drug exposure changes in vivo following coadministration. The binding of 17 drugs to colesevelam was determined by an in vitro dissolution drug-binding assay. Data from several clinical studies in healthy volunteers to support administration of colesevelam in diabetic patients were also collected along with existing in vivo literature data and compared with in vitro results. Steric, electronic, and hydrophobic descriptors were calculated for test compounds, and univariate and partial least squares regression approaches were used to derive QSPR models to evaluate which of the molecular descriptors correlated best with in vitro binding. A quadrant analysis evaluated the correlation between predicted/actual in vitro binding results and the in vivo data. The in vitro binding assay exhibited high sensitivity, identifying those compounds with a low probability of producing relevant in vivo drug interactions. Drug lipophilicity was identified as the primary determinant of in vitro binding to colesevelam by the final univariate and partial least squares models (R(2) = 0.69 and 0.98; Q(2) = 0.48 and 0.59). The in vitro assay and in silico models represent predictive tools that may allow investigators to conduct only informative clinical drug interaction studies with colesevelam.

Lack of effect of DX-619, a novel des-fluoro(6)-quinolone, on glomerular filtration rate measured by serum clearance of cold iohexol.

DX-619 is a novel des-fluoro(6)-quinolone with activity against a broad range of bacterial strains, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The effects of DX-619 on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were evaluated because drug-related increases in serum creatinine levels were observed in studies with healthy volunteers. Forty-one healthy subjects were randomized to receive intravenous DX-619 at 800 mg or placebo once daily for 4 days, and the GFR was directly measured by determination of the clearance of a bolus iohexol injection in 33 subjects who completed the study per protocol. DX-619 was noninferior to placebo for the GFR on the basis of a criterion for a clinically significant difference of -12 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The mean GFRs on day 4 were 101.1 +/- 14.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and 100.2 +/- 15.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for the volunteers receiving placebo and DX-619, respectively. On day 4 the mean serum creatinine concentration for volunteers receiving DX-619 increased by 30 to 40%, with a corresponding decrease in mean creatinine clearance. Both parameters normalized within 7 days after the cessation of DX-619 treatment. Nonclinical studies suggest that DX-619 increases the serum creatinine concentration by inhibiting excretory tubular transporters. In conclusion, DX-619 administered intravenously at 800 mg once a day for 4 days did not affect the GFR in healthy volunteers. Glomerular toxicity is not expected to present a risk to patients receiving DX-619 in clinical trials, but monitoring of the renal function, with an emphasis on the serum creatinine concentration, is still warranted.