Pelvic exenteration as ultimate ratio for gynecologic cancers: single-center analyses of 37 cases.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenterations are a last resort procedure for advanced gynecologic malignancies with elevated risks in terms of patients' morbidity. METHODS: This single-center analysis reports surgical details, outcome and survival of all patients treated with exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies at our university hospital during a 13-year time period. We collected data regarding patients and tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, peri- and postoperative management, transfusions, complications, and analyzed the impact on survival outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 37 patients between 2005 and 2013 with primary or relapsed cervical cancer (59.5%), vulvar cancer (24.3%) or endometrial cancer (16.2%). Median age was 60 years and most patients (73%) had squamous cell carcinomas. Median progression-free survival was 26.2 months and median overall survival was 49.9 months. The 5-year survival rates were 34.4% for progression-free survival and 46.4% for overall survival. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival with regard to disease entity. Patients with tumor at the resection margins (R1) had a nearly significantly worse progression-free survival (median: 28.5 vs. 7.3 months, HR 2.59, 95% CI 0.98-6.88, p = 0.056) and a significantly worse overall survival (median: not reached vs. 10.9 months, HR 4.04, 95% CI 1.40-11.64, p = 0.010) compared to patients with complete tumor resection (R0). In addition, patients without lymphovascular space invasion had a significantly better progression-free survival (p = 0.017) and overall survival (p = 0.034) then patients with lymphovascular space invasion. We observed complications in 14 patients (37.8%), 10 of those were classified as Clavien-Dindo 3 or 4. There was a trend to worse progression-free survival in patients that suffered complications (p = 0.052). Median total amount of transfused blood products was 4 (range 0-20). CONCLUSION: Pelvic exenteration is a procedure that provides substantial progression-free survival and overall survival improvement and-in selected patients-can even achieve cure in otherwise hopeless clinical situations. Patients need to be offered earnest counseling for sufficient informed consent with realistic expectations what to expect.

Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem in colorectal tissue.

BACKGROUND: There are only limited data on tissue kinetics of ertapenem in colorectal tissue more than 3 h after administration of the drug. The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ertapenem in colorectal tissue via population PK modeling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years requiring surgical intervention at the colon and/or rectum were eligible (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 00535652). Tissue and blood samples were taken during surgery after a single dose of 1 g ertapenem. Ertapenem concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Population PK modeling was performed in S-ADAPT. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled. The highest tissue concentration was 6.4 ± 2.3 mg/kg, the highest total plasma concentration 51.34 ± 9.4 mg/l, the highest unbound plasma concentration 7.05 ± 1.1 mg/l, and the unbound fraction in plasma was 14-15% for total ertapenem concentrations below approximately 22 mg/l, 19% at 100 mg/l, and 25% at 250 mg/l. The estimated geometric mean terminal half-life was 2.5 h for plasma and tissue. In the Monte Carlo simulation, a single dose of 1,000 mg ertapenem achieved robust (≥90%) probabilities of target attainment up to a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of approximately 2 mg/l for the bacteriostasis target (free time above MIC, fT(>)(MIC) = 20%) and up to 0.25-0.5 mg/l for the near-maximal killing target (40% fT(>)(MIC)). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate an adequate penetration of ertapenem into uninfected colorectal tissue up to 8.5 h (35% of the dosing interval) after administration of 1 g intravenously.

[Emergent surgery for body packing - what happens to the drugs?]. / "Bodypacker" als chirurgischer Notfall. Wem gehört das Rauschgift?

Body packing is a well recognized method of drug trafficking by smuggling drug containers in the gastrointestinal tract. Medical professionals might get involved with body packers after presentation by law enforcement or in case of medical emergencies such as drug overdose or mechanical intestinal obstruction due to the containers within the gastrointestinal tract. Besides the medical aspects in treating these patients, physicians must be aware of all the different legal specifics in dealing with body packers. In case of medical emergencies, drug traffickers have the legal status of regular patients with respect to professional medical discretion. The question remains of what physicians should do with the drugs after surgical removal? Even though the body packer remains the legal owner of the drugs, physicians may not return the drugs, since that constitutes the criminal offence of dealing in narcotics. Returning the drugs to law enforcement authorities is also prohibited because of professional medical discretion. The only way out of this predicament is for physicians to destroy the drugs under the observation of witnesses.

The minimal-access kidney transplantation technique in living-donor transplantation: results from a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: During the last 15 years, there was tremendous progress in minimally invasive surgery and minimal-access surgery. Many conventional surgical procedures were replaced by these techniques, resulting in a wide range of benefits for the patients. In kidney transplantation, many centers choose an approach to the iliac fossa through an oblique or J-shaped incision. This might have possible disadvantages due to the extent of tissue trauma. Thus, we introduced a minimal-access kidney transplantation technique (MAKT) as a transplantation method in our center. We retrospectively analyzed this technique used for 11 living-donor kidney transplants and report here our experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2008 to July 2011, 11 living-donor kidney recipients were subjected to the MAKT and were matched (age, sex) with a historical group from our center from 2000 to 2007. To analyze the assumption of noninferiority of the MAKT in comparison to the standard approach, a matched case-control study design was chosen, with creatinine level at 1 year after transplantation as the primary outcome variable. We used a Wilcoxon signed rank test; 1-sided significance level was 2.5%. RESULTS: Eleven recipients were included. Both groups were almost similar regarding age and body mass index. Characteristics of the procedure were significantly different only for cold ischemic time (114 minutes MAKT vs 77 minutes historical group). In the MAKT group, there were no reinterventions necessary, no wound infections, no incisional hernia, no acute rejection episodes, no graft losses, and 2 lymphoceles occurred. Further, no urinary leakage or ureteral stenosis and no vascular complications were observed. The statistical analysis of the primary endpoint revealed a noninferiority of the MAKT technique (P = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the fact that this is an initial series and a retrospective analysis, the applied MAKT technique seems to be safe in terms of both graft function after 1 year and surgical complications.

Intraabdominal tissue concentration of ertapenem.

OBJECTIVES: Ertapenem, a class I carbapenem, is approved for the treatment of mild to severe intraabdominal infections, but its in vivo concentrations in intraabdominal tissues are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the concentration of ertapenem in intraabdominal tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After informed consent 48 patients, 23 female and 25 male with a median age of 58 years (34-81), requiring surgical intervention at intraabdominal organs were enrolled. Patients received 1 g of ertapenem intravenously for perioperative prophylaxis. Tissue samples were taken after resection of parts of the organs. Plasma samples were taken when tissue samples were taken. Drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. An ANCOVA test (analysis of covariance) was performed to assess organ-specific differences in ertapenem concentration and penetration ratios. RESULTS: Mean+/-SD ertapenem tissue concentration (mg/kg) was 16.0+/-8.8 in the gall bladder, 12.1+/-5.3 in the colon, 7.0+/-5.7 in the small bowel, 4.5+/-2.3 in the liver and 3.4+/-2.9 in the pancreas. The mean tissue/plasma ratio was 0.19 (colon), 0.17 (small bowel), 0.17 (gall bladder), 0.088 (liver) and 0.095 (pancreas). The ANCOVA test revealed statistically significant organ-specific differences in ertapenem tissue concentration in the gall bladder versus liver/pancreas and in tissue penetration for the colon versus liver/pancreas. CONCLUSIONS: These pharmacokinetic results support the assumption that ertapenem is suitable for the treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Human fetal lung fibroblasts: in vitro study of repetitive magnetic field exposure at 0.2, 1.0, and 1.5 T.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether repetitive exposure to magnetic fields of 0.2, 1.0, and 1.5 T affect the growth of human fetal lung fibroblasts (HFLFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cultured HFLFs were exposed to static magnetic fields of 0.2, 1.0, and 1.5 T for 1 h/d for 5 consecutive days. Control groups were kept under identical environmental conditions, apart from the magnetic field, during the experiments. Cell cycle analysis for synchronously and nonsynchronously growing cells was performed. Population doublings (PDs) were calculated. To rule out midterm effects, proliferation kinetics of the cells were analyzed for 21 days. RESULTS: Cell cycle analysis of synchronized and nonsynchronized cells did not reveal statistically significant differences between the exposed and control cells. The PDs did not indicate any growth modulation during exposure. Proliferation kinetics did not provide any hint of midterm growth modulation effects of repetitive magnetic field exposure. CONCLUSION: Repetitive magnetic field exposure does not exert any growth-modulating effect on overall cell growth and cell cycle distribution of cultured HFLFs. Midterm effects due to magnetic field exposure were not found.

Long-term effects of repetitive exposure to a static magnetic field (1.5 T) on proliferation of human fetal lung fibroblasts.

The aim of the study was to assess the effects of repetitive exposures to a static magnetic field (1.5 T) on human fetal lung fibroblast (HFL) proliferation. HFL were exposed three times a week for 1 hr to a static magnetic field for 3 weeks. Cells were subcultured every week. Population doublings (PD) and cumulative population doublings (CPD) were calculated weekly. Colony formation assays, bromodeoxyuridine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and cell cycle analysis were performed weekly. After the third week, proliferation kinetics were assessed. Over a period of 3 weeks no statistically significant differences between the PD and CPD of exposed and control cells could be detected. Clonogenic activity, DNA synthesis, cell cycle, and proliferation kinetics were not altered by magnetic field exposure. The data do not provide evidence that repetitive exposures to a static magnetic field (1.5 T) exert effects on HFL proliferation.