Characterizing the lack of diversity in musculoskeletal urgent care website content.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal urgent care centers (MUCCs) are becoming an alternative to emergency departments for non-emergent orthopedic injuries as they can provide direct access to orthopedic specialty care. However, they tend to be located in more affluent geographies and are less likely to accept Medicaid insurance than general urgent care centers. MUCCs utilize websites to drive patients to their centers, and the content may influence patients' consumer behaviors and perceptions of the quality and accessibility of the MUCCs. Given that some MUCCs target insured patient populations, we evaluated the racial, gender, and body type diversity of website content for MUCCs. METHODS: Our group conducted an online search to create a list of MUCCs in the United States. For each MUCC, we analyzed the content featured prominently on the website (above the fold). For each website, we analyzed the race, gender, and body type of the featured model(s). MUCCs were classified according to their affiliation (i.e. academic versus private) and region (i.e. Northeast versus South). We performed chi-squared and univariate logistic regression to investigate trends in MUCC website content. RESULTS: We found that 14% (32/235) of website graphics featured individuals from multiple racial groups, 57% (135/235) of graphics featured women, and 2% (5/235) of graphics featured overweight or obese individuals. Multiracial presence in website graphics was associated with the presence of women on the websites and Medicaid acceptance. CONCLUSION: MUCC website content has the potential to impact patients' perceptions of medical providers and the medical care they receive. Most MUCC websites lack diversity based on race and body type. The lack of diversity in website content at MUCCs may introduce further disparities in access to orthopedic care.

Preoperative Risk Management Programs at the Top 50 Orthopaedic Institutions Frequently Enforce Strict Cutoffs for BMI and Hemoglobin A1c Which May Limit Access to Total Joint Arthroplasty and Provide Limited Resources for Smoking Cessation and Dental Care.

BACKGROUND: Performing elective orthopaedic surgery on patients with high BMI, poorly controlled hyperglycemia, and who use tobacco can lead to serious complications. Some surgeons use cutoffs for BMI, hemoglobin A1c, and cigarette smoking to limit surgery to patients with lower risk profiles rather than engaging in shared decision-making with patients about those factors. Other studies have suggested this practice may discriminate against people of lower income levels and women. However, the extent to which this practice approach is used by orthopaedic surgeons at leading hospitals is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How often are preoperative cutoffs for hemoglobin A1c and BMI used at the top US orthopaedic institutions? (2) What services are available at the top orthopaedic institutions for weight loss, smoking cessation, and dental care? (3) What proportion of hospital-provided weight loss clinics, smoking cessation programs, and dental care clinics accept Medicaid insurance? METHODS: To investigate preoperative cutoffs for hemoglobin A1c and BMI and patient access to nonorthopaedic specialists at the top orthopaedic hospitals in the United States, we collected data on the top 50 orthopaedic hospitals in the United States as ranked by the 2020 US News and World Report 's "Best Hospitals for Orthopedics" list. We used a surgeon-targeted email survey to ascertain information regarding the use of preoperative cutoffs for hemoglobin A1c and BMI and availability and insurance acceptance policies of weight loss and dental clinics. Surgeons were informed that the survey was designed to assess how their institution manages preoperative risk management. The survey was sent to one practicing arthroplasty surgeon, the chair of the arthroplasty service, or department chair, whenever possible, at the top 50 orthopaedic institutions. Reminder emails were sent periodically to encourage participation from nonresponding institutions. We received survey responses from 70% (35 of 50) of hospitals regarding the use of preoperative hemoglobin A1c and BMI cutoffs. There was no difference in the response rate based on hospital ranking or hospital region. Fewer responses were received regarding the availability and Medicaid acceptance of weight loss and dental clinics. We used a "secret shopper" methodology (defined as when a researcher calls a facility pretending to be a patient seeking care) to gather information from hospitals directly. The use of deception in this study was approved by our institution's institutional review board. We called the main telephone line at each institution and spoke with the telephone operator at each hospital asking standardized questions regarding the availability of medical or surgical weight loss clinics, smoking cessation programs, and dental clinics. When possible, researchers were referred directly to the relevant departments and asked phone receptionists if the clinic accepted Medicaid. We were able to contact every hospital using the main telephone number. Our first research question was answered using solely the surgeon survey responses. Our second and third research questions were addressed using a combination of the responses to the surgeon surveys and specific hospital telephone calls. RESULTS: Preoperative hemoglobin A1c cutoffs were used at 77% (27 of 35) of responding institutions and preoperative BMI cutoffs were used at 54% (19 of 35) of responding institutions. In the secret shopper portion of our study, we found that almost all the institutions (98% [49 of 50]) had a medical weight loss clinic, surgical weight loss clinic, or combined program. Regarding smoking cessation, 52% (26 of 50) referred patients to a specific department in their institution and 18% (9 of 50) referred to a state-run smoking cessation hotline. Thirty percent (15 of 50) did not offer any internal resource or external referral for smoking cessation. Regarding dental care, 48% (24 of 50) of institutions had a dental clinic that performed presurgical check-ups and 46% (23 of 50) did not offer any internal resource or external referral for dental care. In the secret shopper portion of our study, for institutions that had internal resources, we found that 86% (42 of 49) of weight loss clinics, 88% (23 of 26) of smoking cessation programs, and 58% (14 of 24) of dental clinics accepted Medicaid insurance. CONCLUSION: Proceeding with TJA may not be the best option for all patients; however, surgeons and patients should come to this consensus together after a thoughtful discussion of the risks and benefits for that particular patient. Future research should focus on how shared decision-making may influence patient satisfaction and a patient's ability to meet preoperative goals related to weight loss, glycemic control, smoking cessation, and dental care. Decision analyses or time trade-off analyses could be implemented in these studies to assess patients' tolerance for risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthopaedic surgeons should engage in shared decision-making with patients to develop realistic goals for weight loss, glycemic control, smoking cessation, and dental care that consider patient access to these services as well as the difficulties patients experience in losing weight, controlling blood glucose, and stopping smoking.

Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that posterior hip precautions are unnecessary after total hip arthroplasty; however, many surgeons and patients choose to follow these precautions to some extent. In this study, we hypothesized that 20° of hip abduction would be sufficient to prevent impingement and dislocation in motions requiring hip flexion when using larger prosthetic heads (≥36 mm) when the acetabular implant is placed within a reasonable orientation (anteversion:15-25° and inclination: 40-60°). METHODS: Using a robotic hip platform, we investigated the effect of hip abduction on prosthetic and bony impingement in 43 patients. For the flexed seated position, anterior pelvic tilt angles of 10 and 20° were chosen, while anterior pelvic tilt angles of 70 and 90° were chosen for the bending forward position. An additional 10° of hip external rotation and 10 or 20° of hip internal rotation were also added to the simulation. One hip received a 32-mm head; otherwise, 36-, 40-mm, or dual-mobility heads were used. The study power was 0.99, and the effect size was 0.644. RESULTS: In 65% of the cases, bone-bone impingement between the calcar and anterior-inferior iliac spine was the main type of impingement. The absolute risk of impingement decreased between 0 and 16.3% in both tested positions with the addition of 20° hip abduction. CONCLUSION: With modern primary total hip arthroplasty stems (low neck diameter) and an overall acceptable cup anteversion angle, small degrees of hip abduction may be the only posterior hip precaution strategy required to lower the risk of dislocation among patients. Future studies can potentially investigate the concept of personalized hip precautions based on preoperative computer simulations, utilized implants, hip-spine relations, and final implant orientation.

Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers Restrict Access for Patients with Medicaid Insurance Based on Policy and Location.

BACKGROUND: As the urgent care landscape evolves, specialized musculoskeletal urgent care centers (MUCCs) are becoming more prevalent. MUCCs have been offered as a convenient, cost-effective option for timely acute orthopaedic care. However, a recent "secret-shopper" study on patient access to MUCCs in Connecticut demonstrated that patients with Medicaid had limited access to these orthopaedic-specific urgent care centers. To investigate how generalizable these regional findings are to the United States, we conducted a nationwide secret-shopper study of MUCCs to identify determinants of patient access. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of MUCCs in the United States provide access for patients with Medicaid insurance? (2) What factors are associated with MUCCs providing access for patients with Medicaid insurance? (3) What barriers exist for patients seeking care at MUCCs? METHODS: An online search of all MUCCs across the United States was conducted in this cross-sectional study. Three separate search modalities were used to gather a complete list. Of the 565 identified, 558 were contacted by phone with investigators posing over the telephone as simulated patients seeking treatment for a sprained ankle. Thirty-nine percent (216 of 558) of centers were located in the South, 13% (71 of 558) in the West, 25% (138 of 558) in the Midwest, and 24% (133 of 558) in New England. This study was given an exemption waiver by our institution's IRB. MUCCs were contacted using a standardized script to assess acceptance of Medicaid insurance and identify barriers to care. Question 1 was answered through determining the percentage of MUCCs that accepted Medicaid insurance. Question 2 considered whether there was an association between Medicaid acceptance and factors such as Medicaid physician reimbursements or MUCC center type. Question 3 sought to characterize the prevalence of any other means of limiting access for Medicaid patients, including requiring a referral for a visit and disallowing continuity of care at that MUCC. RESULTS: Of the MUCCs contacted, 58% (323 of 558) accepted Medicaid insurance. In 16 states, the proportion of MUCCs that accepted Medicaid was equal to or less than 50%. In 22 states, all MUCCs surveyed accepted Medicaid insurance. Academic-affiliated MUCCs accepted Medicaid patients at a higher proportion than centers owned by private practices (odds ratio 14 [95% CI 4.2 to 44]; p < 0.001). States with higher Medicaid physician reimbursements saw proportional increases in the percentage of MUCCs that accepted Medicaid insurance under multivariable analysis (OR 36 [95% CI 14 to 99]; p < 0.001). Barriers to care for Medicaid patients characterized included location restriction and primary care physician referral requirements. CONCLUSION: It is clear that musculoskeletal urgent care at these centers is inaccessible to a large segment of the Medicaid-insured population. This inaccessibility seems to be related to state Medicaid physician fee schedules and a center's affiliation with a private orthopaedic practice, indicating how underlying financial pressures influence private practice policies. Ultimately, the refusal of Medicaid by MUCCs may lead to disparities in which patients with private insurance are cared for at MUCCs, while those with Medicaid may experience delays in care. Going forward, there are three main options to tackle this issue: increasing Medicaid physician reimbursement to provide a financial incentive, establishing stricter standards for MUCCs to operate at the state level, or streamlining administration to reduce costs overall. Further research will be necessary to evaluate which policy intervention will be most effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers in Connecticut Restrict Patients with Medicaid Insurance Based on Policy and Location.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal urgent care centers are a new development in the urgent care landscape. Anecdotally, these centers are known to screen patients based on their insurance status, denying care to those with Medicaid insurance. It is important to know whether the practice of denying musculoskeletal urgent care to patients with Medicaid insurance is widespread because this policy could exacerbate existing musculoskeletal healthcare disparities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do musculoskeletal urgent care centers in Connecticut provide access for patients with Medicaid insurance? (2) Do musculoskeletal urgent care centers have the same Medicaid policies as the entities that own them? (3) Are musculoskeletal urgent care centers more likely to be located in affluent neighborhoods? METHODS: An online search was conducted to create a list of musculoskeletal urgent care centers in Connecticut. Each center was interviewed over the telephone using a standardized list of questions to determine ownership and Medicaid policy. Next, the entities that owned these musculoskeletal centers were called and asked the same questions about their Medicaid policy. Medicaid policy was compared between musculoskeletal urgent care centers and the practices that owned them. The median household income for each ZIP code containing a musculoskeletal urgent care center was compared with the median household income for Connecticut. The median household income was also compared between the ZIP codes of musculoskeletal urgent care centers that accepted or denied patients with Medicaid insurance. RESULTS: Of the 29 musculoskeletal urgent care centers in Connecticut, only four (13%) accepted patients regardless of their insurance type, 19 (66%) did not accept any form of Medicaid insurance, and six (21%) required that certain requisites and stipulations be met for patients with Medicaid insurance to receive access, such as only permitting a patient for an initial visit and then referring them to a local hospital system for all future encounters, or only permitting patients with Medicaid insurance who lived in the same town as the clinic. All 29 musculoskeletal urgent care centers were owned by private practice groups and nine of 14 of these groups had the same policy towards patients with Medicaid insurance as their respective musculoskeletal urgent care centers. All 29 musculoskeletal urgent care centers were co-located in a private practice clinic office. Musculoskeletal urgent care centers were located in areas with greater median household incomes than the Connecticut state median (95% CI, USD 112,322 to USD 84,613 versus the state median of USD 73,781; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most musculoskeletal urgent care centers in Connecticut do not accept patients with Medicaid insurance and have similar or stricter Medicaid policies as the groups that own them. Additionally, musculoskeletal urgent care centers were located in affluent neighborhoods. These findings are important because they suggest private practices are using musculoskeletal urgent care centers to capture patients with more favorable insurance. This is likely a result of the relatively low Medicaid reimbursement rates in Connecticut and reflects a need for an increase in either reimbursement or incentives to treat patients with Medicaid insurance. The financial impact of capturing well-insured patients from public and academic medical centers and directing Medicaid patients to these urgent care centers is not known. Additionally, although most of these 29 musculoskeletal urgent care clinics denied care to patients with Medicaid, the specific healthcare disparities caused by decreased access to care must be further studied.

Complexities of Perioperative Pain Management in Orthopedic Trauma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses both obvious and hidden barriers in trauma patient access to pain management specialists and provides some suggestions focusing on outcome optimization in the perioperative period. RECENT FINDINGS: Orthopedic trauma surgeons strive to provide patients the best possible perioperative pain management, while balancing against potential risks of opioid abuse and addiction. Surgeons often find they are ill-prepared to effectively manage postoperative pain in patients returning several months following trauma surgery, many times still dependent on opioids for pain control. Some individuals from this trauma patient population may also require the care of pain management specialists and/or consultation with drug addiction specialists. As the US opioid epidemic continues to worsen, orthopedic trauma surgeons can find it difficult to obtain access to pain management specialists for those patients requiring complex pain medication management and substance abuse counseling. The current state of perioperative pain management for orthopedic trauma patients remains troubling due to reliance on only opioid analgesics, society-associated risks of opioid medication addiction, an "underground" prescription drug marketplace, and an uncertain legal atmosphere related to opioid pain medication management that can deter pain management physicians from accepting narcotic-addicted patients and discourage future physicians from pursuing advanced training in the specialty of pain management. Additionally, barriers continue to exist among Medicaid patients that deter this patient population from access to pain medicine subspecialty care, diminishing medication management reimbursement rates make it increasingly difficult for trauma patients to receive proper opioid analgesic pain medication management, and a lack of proper opioid analgesic medication management training among PCPs and orthopedic trauma surgeons further contributes to an environment ill-prepared to provide effective perioperative pain management for orthopedic trauma patients.

The Effect of Insurance Type on Patient Access to Carpal Tunnel Release Under the Affordable Care Act.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of insurance type (Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance) on access to hand surgeons for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: The research team called 240 hand surgeons in 8 states (California, Massachusetts, Ohio, New York, Florida, Georgia, Texas, and North Carolina). The caller requested an appointment for her fictitious mother to be evaluated for CTS and possible surgical management through carpal tunnel release (CTR). Each office was called 3 times to assess the responses for Medicaid, Medicare, or Blue Cross Blue Shield. From each call, we recorded whether an appointment was given and whether there were barriers to an appointment, such as the need for a referral. RESULTS: Twenty percent of offices scheduled an appointment for a patient with Medicaid, compared with 89% for Medicare and 97% for Blue Cross Blue Shield. Patients with Medicaid had an easier time scheduling appointments (28% vs 13%) and experienced fewer requests for referrals (25% vs 67%) in states with expanded Medicaid eligibility. Neither Medicaid nor Medicare reimbursement for CTR was significantly correlated with the incidence of successful appointments. Although the difference in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements for CTR was small, the appointment success incidence for Medicare was approximately 5 times higher. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the passage of the Affordable Care Act, patients with Medicaid have reduced access to surgical care for CTS and more complex barriers to receiving an appointment. Although Medicaid was accepted at a higher rate in states with expanded Medicaid eligibility, a more robust strategy for increasing access to care may be helpful for patients with Medicaid. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Primary Care Physician and Patient Perceptions of Reimbursement for Total Knee and Hip Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The opinions of nonspecialists and patients will be important to determining reimbursements for specialists such as orthopedic surgeons. In addition, primary care physician (PCP) perceptions of reimbursements may affect utilization of orthopedic services. METHODS: We distributed a web-based survey to PCPs, asking how much they believed orthopedic surgeons were reimbursed for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We also proctored a paper-based survey to postoperative patients, asking how much orthopedic surgeons should be reimbursed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between perceived and actual reimbursement values for THA and TKA. Hospital-affiliated PCPs estimated higher reimbursements for both THA ($1657 vs $838, P < .0001 for Medicaid and $2246 vs $1515, P = .018 for Medicare) and TKA ($1260 vs $903, P = .052 for Medicaid and $2022 vs $1514, P = .049 for Medicare). Similarly, larger practices estimated higher reimbursements for both THA ($1861 vs $838, P < .0001 for Medicaid and $2635 vs $1515, P = .004 for Medicare) and TKA ($1583 vs $903, P = .005 for Medicaid and $2380 vs $1514, P = .011 for Medicare). Compared to PCPs, patients estimated that orthopedic surgeons should be paid 4 times higher for both THA ($9787 vs $2235, P < .0001) and TKA ($9088 vs $2134, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: PCPs believe that reimbursements for orthopedic procedures are higher than actual values. The effect that these perceptions will have on efforts at cost reform and utilization of orthopedic services requires further study.

Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Lung Mimicking Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

We present an unusual manifestation of a malignancy in a 61-year-old female who presented clinically and cytologically with what appeared to be clear cell renal cell carcinoma, but was found with immunohistochemistry to be clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lung. The patient presented with CT imaging demonstrating a mass in the left kidney, and cytologically, the tumor cells had high nuclear grade and clear cytoplasm. However, immunohistochemically, a positive TTF-1 nuclear stain and CK7+/CK20- profile demonstrated that these cells were of lung primary. The patient did not respond to a round of carboplatin and pemetrexed, and the patient was discharged to a hospice for pain management and palliative care.

The Effect of Insurance Type on Patient Access to Knee Arthroplasty and Revision under the Affordable Care Act.

This study evaluated access to knee arthroplasty and revision in 8 geographically representative states. Patients with Medicaid were significantly less likely to receive an appointment compared to patients with Medicare or BlueCross. However, patients with Medicaid had increased success at making an appointment in states with expanded Medicaid eligibility (37.7% vs 22.8%, P=0.011 for replacement, 42.6% vs 26.9%, P=0.091 for revision), although they experienced longer waiting periods (31.5 days vs 21.1 days, P=0.054 for replacement, 45.5 days vs 22.5 days, P=0.06 for revision). Higher Medicaid reimbursement also had a direct correlation with appointment success rate for Medicaid patients (OR=1.232, P=0.001 for replacement, OR=1.314, P=0.014 for revision).

Motorcycle Helmets: The Economic Burden of an Incomplete Helmet Law to Medical Care in the State of Connecticut.

The lack of a mandatory motorcycle helmet law leads to increased injury severity and increased health care costs. This study presents a financial model to estimate how the lack of a mandatory helmet law impacts the cost of health care in the state of Connecticut. The average cost to treat a helmeted rider and a nonhelmeted rider was $3,112 and $5,746 respectively (cost adjusted for year 2014). The total hospital treatment cost in the state of Connecticut from 2003 through 2012 was $73,106,197, with $51,508,804 attributed to nonhelmeted riders and $21,597,393 attributed to helmeted riders. The total Medicaid cost to the state of Connecticut for treating nonhelmeted patients was $18,277,317. This model demonstrates that the lack of a mandatory helmet law increases overall health care costs to the state of Connecticut, and provides a framework by which hospital costs can be reduced to contribute to the economic stability of health care economics in the state.

Orthopaedic Nurse Navigators and Total Joint Arthroplasty Preoperative Optimization: Mental Health and Housing Status-Part Five of the Movement Is Life Special ONJ Series.

Mental health and housing status have the potential to impact total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes and are common TJA eligibility criteria that prevent patients from receiving surgery. Our aim was to formulate recommendations for how nurse navigators can assist patients with managing mental health and housing concerns. Through discussions with nurse navigators and a literature search across two databases, we gathered information regarding the optimization of mental health and housing status among TJA patients. We observed a lack of standardized protocols for addressing these concerns and literature supporting an increased focus on mental health and housing status, indicating the potential for greater nurse navigator involvement in developing and implementing protocols. We recommend nurse navigators use screening tools to identify mental health and housing concerns and offer the suggested resources to support patients in an effort to improve postoperative outcomes and decrease surgical risks.

Orthopaedic Nurse Navigators and Total Joint Arthroplasty Preoperative Optimization: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease-Part 3 of the Movement Is Life Special ONJ Series.

Diabetes and cardiovascular disease are some of the most common risk factors for complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Preoperative optimization programs are dependent on nurse navigators for coordination of interventions that improve patients' health and surgical outcomes. This article uses information regarding the current practices for diabetes and cardiovascular disease management to provide recommendations for nurse navigators when managing these risk factors prior to TJA. We consulted nurse navigators and conducted a literature review to learn about strategies for addressing diabetes and cardiovascular disease in preoperative optimization programs. Nurse navigators can play a critical role in addressing these conditions by providing patient education and implementing preoperative optimization protocols that incorporate discussion regarding guidelines for diabetes and cardiovascular disease management prior to surgery. This article shares recommendations and resources for nurse navigators to help address diabetes and cardiovascular disease as part of preoperative optimization programs.

Fabricating patient-specific 3D printed drill guides to treat femoral head avascular necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN), or death of femoral head tissue due to a lack of blood supply, is a leading cause of total hip replacement for non-geriatric patients. Core decompression (CD) is an effective treatment to re-establish blood flow for patients with AVN. Techniques aimed at improving its efficacy are an area of active research. We propose the use of 3D printed drill guides to accurately guide therapeutic devices for CD. METHODS: Using femur sawbones, image processing software, and 3D modeling software, we created a custom-built device with pre-determined drill trajectories and tested the feasibility of the 3D printed drill guides for CD. A fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon used the drill guide to position an 8 ga, 230 mm long decompression device in the three synthetic femurs. CT scans were taken of the sawbones with the drill guide and decompression device. CT scans were processed in the 3D modeling software. Descriptive statistics measuring the angular and needle-tip deviation were compared to the original virtually planned model. RESULTS: Compared to the original 3D model, the trials had a mean displacement of 1.440 ± 1.03 mm and a mean angle deviation of 1.093 ± 0.749º. CONCLUSIONS: The drill guides were demonstrated to accurately guide the decompression device along its predetermined drill trajectory. Accuracy was assessed by comparing values to literature-reported values and considered AVN lesion size. This study demonstrates the potential use of 3D printing technology to improve the efficacy of CD techniques.

Orthopaedic Nurse Navigators and Total Joint Arthroplasty Preoperative Optimization: Obesity and Malnutrition-Part Four of the Movement Is Life Special ONJ Series.

Obesity and malnutrition affect many patients with osteoarthritis and can predispose patients to worse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, these modifiable risk factors can be addressed in preoperative optimization programs driven by nurse navigators. Our aim is to provide resources and recommendations for nurse navigators when addressing obesity and malnutrition among TJA patients. In addition to discussions with nurse navigators regarding obesity and malnutrition, a literature review was conducted to assess the current practice standards for management. Nurse navigators often had difficulty implementing long-term interventions, but interventions in the literature included medical and bariatric treatments for obesity and more targeted assessment of nutrition status. These findings are incorporated into our recommendations for nurse navigators. Addressing obesity and malnutrition in preoperative optimization can contribute to improved outcomes, as has been demonstrated in current practice and in the literature.

The feasibility of a novel 3D-Printed patient specific cutting guide for extended trochanteric osteotomies.

BACKGROUND: The extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is a surgical technique utilized to expose the intramedullary canal of the proximal femur, protect the soft tissues and promote reliable healing. However, imprecise execution of the osteotomy can lead to fracture, soft tissue injury, non-union, and unnecessary morbidity. We developed a technique to create patient specific, 3D-printed cutting guides to aid in accurate positioning of the ETO and improve osteotomy quality and outcomes. METHODS: Patient specific cutting guides were created based on CT scans using Synopysis Simpleware ScanIP and Solidworks. Custom 3D printed cutting guides were tested on synthetic femurs with foam cortical shells and on cadaveric femurs. To confirm accuracy of the osteotomies, dimensions of the performed osteotomies were compared to the virtually planned osteotomies. RESULTS: Use of the patient specific ETO cutting guides resulted in successful osteotomies, exposing the femoral canal and the femoral stem both in synthetic sawbone and cadaveric testing. In cadaveric testing, the guides allowed for osteotomies without fracture and cuts made using the guide were accurate within 6 percent error from the virtually planned osteotomy. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed patient specific cutting guides used to aid in ETOs proved to be accurate. Through the iterative development of cutting guides, we found that a simple design was key to a reliable and accurate guide. While future clinical trials in human subjects are needed, we believe our custom 3D printed cutting guide design to be effective at aiding in performing ETOs for revision total hip arthroplasty surgeries.

Off-the-Shelf Tibial Cone Sizes May Not Accommodate All Patients' Bone Morphology and May Lead to Cortical Breaches in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 3D Modeling Study.

Background: In revision total knee arthroplasty, tibial cones have demonstrated improved longevity and reduced incidence of aseptic loosening. Several currently available "off-the-shelf" (OTS) cone systems may not have sizes to accommodate all patient bone morphologies. Methods: Computed tomographies from one hundred primary total knee arthroplasty patients and dimensions of 4 OTS cones were obtained. Press-fit stems were positioned in 3D tibia models to fit the diaphyseal trajectory. Cones were positioned around the stem at 1, 6, and 13 mm resections measured from the trough of the medial tibial plateau, simulating proximal tibial cuts and bone loss. Tibias were examined for cortical breaching following modeled cone preparation. Results: Increased rate of breaching was observed as size and depth of the cone increased. In 2/49 (4.1%) male and 19/46 (41.3%) female tibias, cones could not be positioned without breaching. No breaches were found in 22/49 (45.0%) male and 5/46 (10.9%) female tibias. For every 1 centimeter increase in patient height, odds of breaching decreased by 12% (odds ratio: 0.88, confidence interval: 0.84, 0.92). For every size increase in cone width, odds of breaching increased by 34% (odds ratio: 1.34, confidence interval: 1.28, 1.47). Placing cones deeper also increased breaching compared to the 1 mm cut. Conclusions: In revision total knee arthroplasty, smaller OTS or custom tibial cones may be needed to fit a patient's proximal tibial geometry. This is especially true in patients not accommodated by the OTS cone sizes we tested, which impacted shorter patients and/or those with substantial bone loss requiring more tibial resection and deeper cone placement. Use of smaller or custom tibial cones should be considered where indicated.

A review of the design, manufacture, and outcomes of custom total joint replacement implants available in the United States.

Custom total joint replacement (TJA) implants, specifically designed and manufactured for each patient, have emerged as surgeons seek to improve functional outcomes of primary total joint replacement, as well as treat patients with complex primary deformities, bone defects, and revision surgeries. The purpose of this review is to present the various custom total hip and knee arthroplasty implants available in the United States for primary and revision cases, so that surgeons can understand the design considerations and manufacturing processes of custom implants, as well as their performance compared to standard implants.