Robotic Microsurgery in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical robots have innovated the microsurgical field by providing advantages that improve surgical performance. These robots have been adopted by certain specialties more than others. This study discusses the potential advantages of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery. METHOD: This study is a literature review of articles investigating "robotic microsurgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery" using the PubMed database and the Cochrane Library. RESULT: A total of nineteen relevant articles were found and 5 articles performed a direct comparison between the robotic and manual approaches. Longer operating times were reported in the robotic groups featuring higher learning curves. Reported advantages to robotic use included higher accuracy, precision and flexibility, elimination of tremor and improvement of ergonomic factors. CONCLUSION: While the results provide an outlook into the outcome of robotic platforms in this field, current research is limited and further studies are required to provide a fundamental analysis.

Correlation between patency and clinical improvement after lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) in breast cancer-related lymphedema: 12-month follow-up.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is caused by an interruption of the lymphatic system after breast cancer treatment. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), by which one or more patent lymphatic collecting vessels are connected to subcutaneous veins, shows promising results. Postoperatively, the patency of these anastomosis can be evaluated; however, little is known concerning the long-term patency after LVA in patients with BCRL. The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term patency, quality of life (QoL) and arm circumference after LVA, and to explore differences between patent and non-patent anastomosis and its correlation with clinical improvement. METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography, lymph ICF-questionnaire, and arm circumference measurement preoperatively and 12 months after the LVA procedure. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the patients showed at least one patent anastomosis after 12 months. Quality of life according to the Lymph-ICF increased significantly (p < 0.000); however, arm circumference showed no significant decrease. Sixty-five percent discontinued wearing compression stockings. The patent anastomosis group, compared with the non-patent anastomosis group showed, without significance, more improvement in QoL, arm circumference, and discontinuation of compression stockings, as well as a lower rate of infections both pre- and postoperatively, a shorter duration of lymphedema preoperatively, and a higher rate of early lymphedema and ICG stage. CONCLUSIONS: LVA showed an acceptable patency and positive correlation between a patent anastomosis and clinical improvement after 12 months. Further research with a larger study population is required to determine whether outcomes or patient characteristics significantly correlate with a patent anastomosis after LVA operation.

Visualization of Both the Superficial and Deep Lymphatic System of the Upper Extremity Using Magnetic Resonance Lymphography.

Background: The lymphatic system consists of the superficial and deep lymphatic system. Several diagnostic methods are used to assess the lymphatic system. Lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green lymphography are widely applied, both showing disadvantages, such as a poor resolution and lack of field of view. Magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) shows satisfactory temporal and spatial resolution. The aim of this study was to assess both the superficial and deep lymphatic system in the upper extremity of healthy subjects, using an MRL protocol. Methods and Results: Ten healthy volunteers underwent an MRL examination, using a three Tesla MRI unit. Water-soluble gadolinium was used as a contrast agent. MRL images were evaluated by an experienced radiologist on image quality, enhancement of veins and lymphatic vessels, and characteristics of the latter. Overall image quality was good to excellent. In all subjects, veins and lymphatic vessels could be distinguished. Superficial and deep lymphatic vessels were seen in 9 out of 10 subjects. Lymphatic vessels with a diameter between 0.9 and 4.3 mm were measured. Both veins and lymphatic vessels showed their characteristic appearance. Enhancement of veins was seen directly after contrast agent injection, which decreased over time. Lymphatic vessel enhancement slowly increased over time. Mean total MRL examination (room) time was 110 minutes (81 minutes scan time). Conclusions: The MRL protocol accurately visualizes both deep and superficial lymphatic vessels showing their characteristic appearances with high spatial resolution, indicating the MRL can be of value in diagnosing and staging peripheral lymphedema.

One-Year Outcomes of the First Human Trial on Robot-Assisted Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis, a supermicrosurgical technique, creates bypasses between the lymphatic and venous systems. The quality of lymphaticovenous anastomosis depends on the surgeon's dexterity and precision, and is subject to imperfections caused by the physiologic tremor of the human hand. A dedicated robot for microsurgery has been created to overcome these limitations (MUSA, MicroSure, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). This study describes 1-year clinical outcomes of the first-in-human trial of robot-assisted and manual lymphaticovenous anastomosis in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, women with breast cancer-related lymphedema were randomized into the robot-assisted or manual lymphaticovenous anastomosis group. Outcomes were quality of life, arm circumference, conservative treatment frequency, arm dermal backflow stage, and anastomosis patency. RESULTS: Twenty women were included, of whom eight underwent robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery and 12 underwent manual surgery. In both groups, quality of life significantly improved at 12 months (robot-assisted surgery, p = 0.045; manual surgery, p = 0.001). Arm circumference did not decrease (robot-assisted surgery, p = 0.094; manual surgery, p = 0.240). Daily use of compression garments decreased by 61.9 percent (robot-assisted surgery) and 70.2 percent (manual surgery). The frequency of manual lymphatic drainage remained similar compared with baseline. Arm dermal backflow stage was reduced in one patient in the robot-assisted group and in five cases in the manual group. Overall, 76.5 percent of the anastomoses were patent (robot-assisted surgery, 66.6 percent; manual surgery, 81.8 percent). CONCLUSIONS: After evaluating 1-year follow-up data, this study confirms the feasibility of robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery. Clinical outcomes were comparable between robot-assisted and manual lymphaticovenous anastomosis. This encourages further research using the new microsurgical robot MUSA for lymphaticovenous anastomosis and other (super)microsurgical procedures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

A systematic review of magnetic resonance lymphography for the evaluation of peripheral lymphedema.

OBJECTIVE: Visualization of the lymphatic system is necessary for both early diagnosis and associated treatments. A promising imaging modality is magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL). The aim of this review was to summarize different MRL protocols, to assess the clinical value in patients with peripheral lymphedema, and to define minimal requirements necessary for visualization of lymphatics. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in December 2018. Studies performing MRL in patients with peripheral lymphedema or healthy participants were included. Study design, population, etiology, duration of lymphedema, clinical staging, contrast agent, dose, injection site, and technical magnetic resonance imaging details were analyzed. No meta-analyses were performed because of different study aims and heterogeneity of the study populations. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies involving 1609 patients with both primary lymphedema (n = 669) and secondary lymphedema (n = 657) were included. Upper and lower limbs were examined in 296 and 602 patients, respectively. Twenty-two studies used a gadolinium-based contrast agent that was injected intracutaneously or subcutaneously in the interdigital web spaces. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted combined with T2-weighted protocols were most frequently used. T1-weighted images showed lymphatics in 63.3% to 100%, even in vessels with a diameter of ≥0.5 mm. Dermal backflow and a honeycomb pattern were clearly recognized. CONCLUSIONS: MRL identifies superficial lymphatic vessels with a diameter of ≥0.5 mm with high sensitivity and specificity and accurately shows abnormal lymphatics and lymphatic drainage patterns. Therefore, MRL could be of clinical value in both early and advanced stages of peripheral lymphedema. Minimum requirements of an MRL protocol should consist of a gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence combined with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, with acquisition at least 30 minutes after injection of contrast material.

Evaluation of a Novel Water-Based Volumetric Device for Measuring Upper Limb Lymphedema: First Experience with Healthy Volunteers.

Background: Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive disease consisting of tissue swelling resulting from excessive retention of lymphatic fluid. Measuring upper limb volume is crucial in patients to detect disease progression and to study the effects of treatment. The aim is to assess the validity and reliability of a newly developed system, Peracutus Aqua Meth, for measuring the upper limb volume compared with the gold standard water volumetry device. (In this study, the Bravometer was used). Methods and Results: Healthy volunteers were recruited in October 2017. Three measurements were performed per device. The obtained data were recorded per measurement, device, and researcher. Primary outcome was to determine the validity and reliability of the Peracutus Aqua Meth. Secondary outcomes were intra- and interrater reliability, measurement time, self-reported participant satisfaction, and influence of body mass index (BMI). Thirty-nine healthy volunteers were included. Mean differences in the validity in the Peracutus Aqua Meth and Bravometer were 47.26 and 78.16 mL, respectively (p = 0.04), with a Pearson's r of 0.99. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Peracutus Aqua Meth were both 0.99, in the Bravometer 0.96 and 0.97, respectively (p < 0.01). The Peracutus Aqua Meth required more time to measure and obtained lower scores in the participant satisfaction questionnaire. BMI was statistically associated with the measurements (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The first prototype of the Peracutus Aqua Meth is proven to be an accurate and reliable device for measuring the volume of the arm. Further improvements are needed in case of usability, time management, and participant satisfaction.