Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 24(12): 2386-2388, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30457535

RESUMEN

Leptospirosis is found worldwide, except in northern regions. We report a case associated with a backcountry adventure race in Manitoba, Canada. Initially, nonspecific symptomatology and diagnostic pitfalls contributed to a delay in identification. Careful attention needs to be paid to exposure to and risk for leptospirosis in northern and temperate climates.


Asunto(s)
Leptospira , Leptospirosis/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Canadá , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Humanos , Leptospirosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Leptospirosis/transmisión , Masculino , Adulto Joven
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(7): e2326366, 2023 07 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37523190

RESUMEN

Importance: Practice guidelines often provide recommendations in which the strength of the recommendation is dissociated from the quality of the evidence. Objective: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial infective endocarditis (IE) that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. Evidence Review: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In April 2022 a call to new and existing members was released electronically (social media and email) for the next WikiGuidelines topic, and subsequently, topics and questions related to the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial IE were crowdsourced and prioritized by vote. For each topic, PubMed literature searches were conducted including all years and languages. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were crafted discussing the risks and benefits of different approaches. Findings: A total of 51 members from 10 countries reviewed 587 articles and submitted information relevant to 4 sections: establishing the diagnosis of IE (9 questions); multidisciplinary IE teams (1 question); prophylaxis (2 questions); and treatment (5 questions). Of 17 unique questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for 1 question: 3 randomized clinical trials have established that oral transitional therapy is at least as effective as intravenous (IV)-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuideline method for clinical guideline development, oral transitional therapy was at least as effective as IV-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Several randomized clinical trials are underway to inform other areas of practice, and further research is needed.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Humanos , Consenso , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/terapia , Endocarditis Bacteriana/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 37: 101823, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32755674

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International travel is an important risk factor for colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). Antimicrobial use during travel likely amplifies this risk, yet to what extent, and whether it varies by antimicrobial class, has not been established. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review that included prospective cohorts reporting both receipt of systemic antimicrobials and acquired ESBL-PE isolated from stool or rectum during international travel. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to estimate odds of acquiring ESBL-PE due to antimicrobials during travel, overall and by antimicrobial class. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. The study population was mainly female travellers from high income countries recruited primarily from travel clinics. Participants travelled most frequently to Asia and Africa with 10% reporting antimicrobial use during travel. The combined odds ratio (OR) for ESBL-PE acquisition during travel was 2.37 for antimicrobial use overall (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69 to 3.33), but there was substantial heterogeneity between studies. Fluoroquinolones were the antibiotic class associated with the highest combined OR of ESBL-PE acquisition, compared to no antimicrobial use (OR 4.68, 95% CI, 2.34 to 9.37). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of ESBL-PE colonization during travel is increased substantially with exposure to antimicrobials, especially fluoroquinolones. While a small proportion of colonized individuals will develop a resistant infection, there remains the potential for onward spread among returning travellers. Public health efforts to decrease inappropriate antimicrobial usage during travel are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , África , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Asia , Enterobacteriaceae , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Heces , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Viaje , beta-Lactamasas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA