Appropriateness of Diagnosis and Management for Otitis Media With Effusion in Pediatric Urgent Care Clinics.

BACKGROUND: Otitis media with effusion (OME)'s clinical presentation is often confused with acute otitis media (AOM) by clinicians. Despite OME guidelines recommending watchful waiting with no antibiotics, rates of antibiotic use remain elevated. The aim of this study was to determine the clinician diagnosis validity and the rates of antibiotics prescribed among pediatric OME patients evaluated in 3 urgent care clinics within a pediatric health care system. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a random sample of encounters for children aged 0 to 18 years with a billing diagnosis of OME in 2019. We recorded clinical symptoms, antibiotic prescribed, and the clinicians' diagnosis. We used the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines to assign an AOM diagnosis and compared those with the clinicians' final diagnoses using Pearson χ 2 . RESULTS: Of the 912 eligible charts, clinicians' final diagnoses were as follows: AOM for 271 (29.7%) patients, OME for 638 (70.0%) patients, and no ear pathology for 3 (0.3%) patients. Antibiotics were prescribed for 519 (56.9%) patients; of those, only 242 (46.6%) had a final clinician diagnosis of AOM. Antibiotic prescribing rates were higher when a clinician diagnosed AOM compared with OME (89.3% vs 43.2%; P < 0.001). Per American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, up to 273 (29.9%) patients qualified for an AOM diagnosis, but those were not the same as those diagnosed with AOM by clinicians ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating children with a billing diagnosis of OME, a third fit a diagnosis of AOM. Clinicians commonly misdiagnosed AOM, but also prescribed antibiotics to almost half of those they diagnose with OME.

Improving Emergency Department Use of Safety-Net Antibiotic Prescriptions for Acute Otitis Media.

OBJECTIVES: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common reason for pediatric antibiotic prescriptions. The 2013 American Academy of Pediatrics' AOM guidelines recommend observation for nonsevere AOM. Our aim was to increase the percentage safety-net antibiotic prescription (SNAP) offered to patients 6 months of age or older diagnosed with AOM in 2 pediatric emergency departments (EDs) from a baseline of 0.5% to 15% in 20 months. METHODS: This is a quality improvement study at a quaternary pediatric medical center with 2 locations, both with EDs. A random chart review revealed that 27.5% of patients diagnosed with AOM in the ED would qualify for a SNAP, but only 0.5% were offered it. Quality improvement interventions were designed to improve safety-net antibiotic prescribing. Both EDs conducted multiple interventions, including algorithm development, provider education, and electronic medical record aids. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients offered a SNAP for AOM. RESULTS: A total of 8226 children 6 months of age or older were diagnosed with AOM in our 2 EDs during the 20-month intervention period. The percentage offered a SNAP increased at both EDs. One ED had a single shift in the mean to 7.9%, whereas the other had 2 shifts in the mean, an initial shift to 5.1% and a second to 7.3%. Providers consistently used the algorithm and electronic medical record aids. CONCLUSIONS: Safety-net antibiotic prescriptions in conjunction with parent education was effective in reducing the use of immediate antibiotic prescriptions in children with AOM in 2 pediatric EDs. Offering a SNAP can reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics, which in turn may decrease antibiotic-related adverse events and antibiotic resistance.

Improving the evaluation of novice advanced practice nurse transition.

BACKGROUND: Novice advanced practice registered nurses (RNs) experience decreased self-confidence, anxiety, and identity confusion in their first year of practice, which leads to poor job satisfaction and turnover. Advanced practice RN fellowship programs, developed to bridge the gap from the RN to the advanced practice role, lack standardized measures for program evaluation. LOCAL PROBLEM: A large Midwestern pediatric hospital's advanced practice nurse fellowship program lacks a structured program evaluation. METHODS: A quasi-experimental evidence-based improvement project was implemented to evaluate fellowship program outcomes for novice nurse practitioner transition and retention. INTERVENTIONS: All novice advanced practice RNs (APRNs) were enrolled in the site's 12-month APRN fellowship program. The transition experiences of enrollees who completed the fellowship program were assessed using the novice nurse practitioner role transition scale. In addition, role transition scores were compared for two subgroups: fellows in acute care and fellows in primary care roles. Fellowship participant retention 1 year after hire was measured. RESULTS: Postintervention data showed that most fellowship graduates had a positive transition experience as evidenced by at least a 4.33/6.0 mean total novice nurse practitioner role transition score. There was not a statistically significant difference between the transition scores of the acute care fellows and primary care fellows. CONCLUSIONS: The APRN fellowship program was effective in promoting a successful role transition from RN to novice APRN. Similar APRN fellowship programs may benefit from using this tool for program evaluation.