Understanding transitions in care for people with major lower limb amputations from inpatient rehabilitation to home: a descriptive qualitative study.

PURPOSE: To understand how people with major limb amputation experience the transition in care from inpatient rehabilitation to the community. METHOD: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Individuals were eligible if they had undergone a major lower limb amputation and had been discharged from inpatient rehabilitation to the community within one to twelve months. Interviews explored participants' experiences and factors associated with the transition in care. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Nine individuals with major lower limb amputation participated. Five themes were identified to describe the transition in care experience: (a) Preparedness: differing experiences during inpatient rehabilitation; (b) Challenges with everyday tasks: "everything has to be thought out"; (c) Importance of coping strategies; "gradually you accept it more and more" (d) Importance of support and feeling connected; "if I needed anything, they're right there" and (e) Not everyone has access to the same resources: "left to your own devices". CONCLUSIONS: The identified themes concurrently influenced the transition from inpatient rehabilitation to the community. Common challenges during the initial transition were identified. Areas of improvement within inpatient rehabilitation included individualized care, discussions surrounding expectations, and better access to ongoing community support.Implication for rehabilitationTransition in care are difficult and vulnerable times for people with major lower limb amputation, especially when transitioning home following inpatient rehabilitation.Rehabilitation should prepare individuals for completing meaningful tasks in the home and community.Access to ongoing support in the community in the form of practical and emotional support can ease the challenges of transitioning home.

Effect of a Multimodal Lifestyle Intervention on Sleep and Cognitive Function in Older Adults with Probable Mild Cognitive Impairment and Poor Sleep: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep is common among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and may contribute to further cognitive decline. Whether multimodal lifestyle intervention that combines bright light therapy (BLT), physical activity (PA), and good sleep hygiene can improve sleep in older adults with MCI and poor sleep is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a multimodal lifestyle intervention on sleep in older adults with probable MCI and poor sleep. METHODS: This was a 24-week proof-of-concept randomized trial of 96 community-dwelling older adults aged 65-85 years with probable MCI (<26/30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and poor sleep (>5 on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]). Participants were allocated to either a multimodal lifestyle intervention (INT); or 2) education + attentional control (CON). INT participants received four once-weekly general sleep hygiene education classes, followed by 20-weeks of: 1) individually-timed BLT; and 2) individually-tailored PA promotion. Our primary outcome was sleep efficiency measured using the MotionWatch8© (MW8). Secondary outcomes were MW8-measured sleep duration, fragmentation index, wake-after-sleep-onset, latency, and PSQI-measured subjective sleep quality. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in MW8 measured sleep efficiency at 24-weeks (estimated mean difference [INT -CON]: 1.18%; 95% CI [-0.99, 3.34]), or any other objective-estimate of sleep. However, INT participants reported significantly better subjective sleep quality at 24-weeks (estimated mean difference: -1.39; 95% CI [-2.72, -0.06]) compared to CON. CONCLUSION: Among individuals with probable MCI and poor sleep, a multimodal lifestyle intervention improves subjective sleep quality, but not objectively estimated sleep.

Buying time: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial to improve sleep quality and cognitive function among older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that good quality sleep is associated with preserved cognitive function and reduced dementia risk in older adults. Sleep complaints are especially common among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and this may contribute to their increased risk for progression to dementia. Thus, improving their sleep may be important for maintaining their cognitive health. Chronotherapy is a set of intervention strategies that can improve sleep quality through strengthening the entrainment of the biological clock to the solar light-dark cycle, and includes strategies such as (1) bright light therapy (BLT); (2) physical activity (PA); and (3) good sleep hygiene. Of these strategies, BLT is the most potent and is based on providing individualized timing to entrain circadian rhythms. Thus, a personalized chronotherapy intervention of individually timed BLT and individually tailored PA promotion, in conjunction with general sleep hygiene education may promote older adult sleep quality. We therefore aim to carry out a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the efficacy of such a personalized chronotherapy intervention to improve sleep quality among older adults with MCI. METHODS/DESIGN: This was a 24-week RCT of a personalized chronotherapy intervention aimed to primarily improve sleep quality as measured by the MotionWatch8©. Participants in the personalized chronotherapy group (INT) will receive four once-weekly, general sleep hygiene education classes, followed by 20 weeks of (1) individually timed BLT and (2) bi-weekly, individually tailored PA counseling phone calls in conjunction with receiving a consumer-available PA tracker-the Fitbit® Flex™. Ninety-six adults (aged 65-85 years) classified as having MCI (i.e., Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) ≥ 24; Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≤ 26; without dementia or significant functional impairment) will be randomized to either INT or a waitlist control group (CON). DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will help determine if a personalized chronotherapy intervention that includes individually timed BLT and individually tailored PA promotion, along with general sleep hygiene education can promote sleep quality among older adults at increased risk for dementia. Our results will help inform best practices for promoting sleep quality among older adults with MCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02926157 . Registered on 6 October 2016.