A retrospective observational study to evaluate the clinical outcomes and routine management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with idelalisib and rituximab in the UK and Ireland (RETRO-idel).

Idelalisib (IDL) is an oral first-in-class phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor approved for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) alongside rituximab (R) since 2014. However, little data exist on routine practice. The RETRO-idel was a protocol-led, retrospective study of 110 patients [n = 27 front-line (1L)] who received IDL-R. The primary end-point was clinical overall response rate (ORR). The median (range) follow-up of the whole cohort was 30·2 (0·1-51·9) months. The median (range) age was 72 (48-89) years. Tumour protein p53-disruption was common [100% 1L, 32·5% relapsed/refractory (R/R)]. The best ORR (intention-to-treat) was 88·2% (1L 96·3%, R/R 85·5%). Overall, the median event-free survival (mEFS) was 20·3 months and time-to-next treatment was 29·2 months. The mEFS for 1L patients was 18·7 months and R/R patients was 21·7 months. The 3-year overall survival was 56·1% (95% confidence interval 45·7-65·3). IDL was discontinued in 87·3% (n = 96). More patients discontinued due to adverse events in the front-line setting (1L 63·0% vs. R/R 44·6%) and due to progressive disease in R/R patients (20·5% vs. 3·7% in 1L). Lower respiratory tract infection/pneumonia were reported in 34·5% (Grade ≥3, 19·1%), diarrhoea in 30·9% (Grade ≥3, 6·4%), and colitis in 9·1% (Grade ≥3, 5·5%). Overall, these data describe clear efficacy for IDL-R in routine practice. No new safety signals were identified, although careful management of known toxicities is required.

Phase 1b study to investigate the safety and tolerability of idelalisib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: Idelalisib is an orally administered, highly selective inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-δ. In this phase 1b study, the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of idelalisib, an oral inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-δ, were evaluated in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: In total, six patients (follicular lymphoma: n = 3, chronic lymphocytic leukemia: n = 3) were enrolled to receive idelalisib 150 mg twice daily. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (n = 5), gastritis (n = 3), insomnia (n = 3) and pyrexia (n = 3). The most common ≥grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (n = 2), increased transaminase levels (n = 2) and decreased appetite (n = 2). The maximum idelalisib plasma concentrations (Cmax) were achieved at 2.50 h (range: 1.50-4.00 h). The mean idelalisib plasma concentrations decreased over time but remained detectable in most patients at 12 h. All enrolled patients underwent efficacy evaluation by investigators, and five patients (follicular lymphoma: n = 2, chronic lymphocytic leukemia: n = 3) achieved partial response. The median duration of partial response was 14.5 months (range: 3.7-31.3 months). CONCLUSION: Idelalisib 150 mg twice daily was considered tolerable in Japanese patients with follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia.(Clinical trial registration: NCT02242045).

Decomposing Pearson's χ2 test: A linear regression and its departure from linearity.

In case-control genetic association studies, a standard practice is to perform the Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test under the assumption of the additive model because of its robustness. We could even identify situations in which it outperformed the analysis model consistent with the underlying inheritance mode. In this article, we analytically reveal the statistical basis that leads to the phenomenon. By elucidating the origin of the CA trend test as a linear regression model, we decompose Pearson's χ2 -test statistic into two components-one is the CA trend test statistic that measures the goodness of fit of the linear regression model, and the other measures the discrepancy between data and the linear regression model. Under this framework, we show that the additive coding scheme, as well as the multiplicative coding scheme, increases the coefficient of determination of the regression model by increasing the spread of data points. We also obtain the conditions under which the CA trend test statistic equals the MAX statistic and Pearson's χ2 -test statistic.

Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test: Location and Dispersion.

In genetic case-control association studies, a standard practice is to perform the Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test with 1 degree-of-freedom (d.f.) under the assumption of an additive model. However, when the true genetic model is recessive or near recessive, it is outperformed by Pearson's χ2 test with 2 d.f. In this article, we analytically reveal the statistical basis that leads to the phenomenon. First, we show that the CA trend test examines the location shift between the case and control groups, whereas Pearson's χ2 test examines both the location and dispersion shifts between the two groups. Second, we show that under the additive model, the effect of location deviation outweighs that of the dispersion deviation and vice versa under a near recessive model. Therefore, Pearson's χ2 test is a more robust test than the CA trend test, and it outperforms the latter when the mode of inheritance evolves to the recessive end.

Randomized phase 1 study of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ inhibitor idelalisib in patients with allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110δ isoform (PI3K p110δ) activity is essential for mast cell activation, suggesting that inhibition of PI3K p110δ might be useful in treating allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effect of the PI3K p110δ-selective inhibitor idelalisib on allergic responses. METHODS: This phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study was conducted with the Vienna Challenge Chamber. Grass pollen-induced allergic symptoms were documented during screening. Eligible subjects received idelalisib (100 mg twice daily) or placebo for 7 days, with allergen challenge on day 7. After a 2-week washout period, subjects received the alternate treatment and repeated allergen challenge. Study measures included safety, nasal and nonnasal symptoms, nasal airflow, nasal secretions, basophil activation, and plasma cytokine levels. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with allergic rhinitis received idelalisib/placebo (n = 21) or placebo/idelalisib (n = 20). Idelalisib treatment was well tolerated. Mean total nasal symptom scores were lower during the combined idelalisib treatment periods compared with placebo (treatment difference [idelalisib - placebo], -1.78; 95% CI, -2.53 to -1.03; P < .001). Statistically significant differences were also observed for the combined treatment periods for total symptom scores, nasal airflow, nasal secretion weight, and nasal congestion scores. The percentage of ex vivo-activated basophils (CD63(+)/CCR3(+) cells; after stimulation with grass pollen) was substantially lower for idelalisib-treated compared with placebo-treated subjects. Plasma CCL17 and CCL22 levels were reduced after idelalisib treatment. CONCLUSION: Idelalisib treatment was well tolerated in patients with allergic rhinitis and appears to reduce allergic responses clinically and immunologically after an environmental allergen challenge.

Site-selective sulfur anchoring produces sintering-resistant intermetallic ORR electrocatalysts for membrane electrode assemblies.

Intermetallic compounds are emerging as promising oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts for fuel cells due to their typically higher activity and durability compared to disordered alloys. However, the preparation of intermetallic catalysts often requires high-temperature annealing, which unfortunately leads to adverse sintering of the metal nanoparticles. Herein, we develop a scalable site-selective sulfur anchoring strategy that effectively suppresses alloy sintering, ensuring the formation of efficient intermetallic electrocatalysts with small sizes and high ordering degrees. The alloy-support interactions are precisely modulated by selectively modifying the alloy-support interfaces with oxidized sulfur species, thus simultaneously blocking both the nanoparticle migration and Oswald ripening pathways for sintering. Using this strategy, sub-5 nm PtCo intermetallic electrocatalysts enclosed by two atomic layers of Pt shells have been successfully prepared even at a metal loading higher than 30 wt%. The intermetallic catalysts exhibit excellent ORR performances in both rotating disk electrode and membrane electrode assembly conditions with a mass activity of 1.28 A mgPt-1 at 0.9 V (vs. RHE) and a power density of 1.0 W cm-2 at a current density of 1.5 A cm-2. The improved performances result from the enhanced Pt-Co electronic interactions and compressive surface strain generated by the highly ordering structure, while the atomic Pt shells prevent the dissolution of Co under highly acidic conditions. This work provides new insights to inhibit the sintering of nanoalloys and would promote the scalable synthesis and applications of platinum-based intermetallic catalysts.

A comparison of the likelihood ratio test and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests for detecting association of rare variants.

In a recent paper in this journal, the use of variance-stabilising transformation techniques was proposed to overcome the problem of inadequacy in normality approximation when testing association for a low-frequency variant in a case-control study. It was shown that tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations are more powerful than Fisher's exact test while controlling for type I error rate. Earlier in the journal, another study had shown that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is superior to Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's χ(2) test in testing association for low-frequency variants. Thus, it is of interest to make a direct comparison between the LRT and the tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations. In this commentary, we show that the LRT and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests have comparable power greater than Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's χ(2) test.

Neoadjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by ixabepilone or paclitaxel in early stage breast cancer and evaluation of ßIII-tubulin expression as a predictive marker.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II trial was designed to compare the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) induced by neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin (AC) followed by ixabepilone or paclitaxel in women with early stage breast cancer (BC). Expression of ßIII-tubulin as a predictive marker was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with untreated, histologically confirmed primary invasive breast adenocarcinoma received four cycles of AC followed by 1:1 randomization to either ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion) every 3 weeks for four cycles (n = 148) or weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (1-hour infusion) for 12 weeks (n = 147). All patients underwent a core needle biopsy of the primary cancer for molecular marker analysis prior to chemotherapy. ßIII-Tubulin expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of pCR in the ixabepilone treatment arm (24.3%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 18.6-30.8) and the paclitaxel treatment arm (25.2%; 90% CI, 19.4-31.7). ßIII-Tubulin-positive patients obtained higher pCR rates compared with ßIII-tubulin-negative patients in both treatment arms; however, ßIII-tubulin expression was not significantly associated with a differential response to ixabepilone or paclitaxel. The safety profiles of both regimens were generally similar, although neutropenia occurred more frequently in the ixabepilone arm (grade 3/4: 41.3% vs. 8.4%). The most common nonhematologic toxicity was peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant treatment of early stage BC with AC followed by ixabepilone every 3 weeks or weekly paclitaxel was well tolerated with no significant difference in efficacy. Higher response rates were observed among ßIII-tubulin-positive patients.

Palladium atomic layers coated on ultrafine gold nanowires boost oxygen reduction reaction.

Palladium-based nanocatalysts play an important role in catalyzing the cathode oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) for fuel cells working under alkaline conditions, but the performance still needs to be improved to meet the requirements for large-scale applications. Herein, Au@Pd core-shell nanowires have been developed by coating Pd atomic layers on ultrafine gold nanowires and display outstanding electrocatalytic performance towards alkaline ORR. It is found that Pd overlayers with atomic thickness can be coated on 3 nm Au nanowires under CO atmosphere and completely cover the surfaces. The obtained ultrafine Au@Pd nanowires exhibit an electrochemical active area (ECSA) of 68.5 m2/g and a mass activity of 0.91 A/mg (at 0.9 V vs. RHE), which is around 3.1 and 15.2 times higher than that of commercial Pd/C. The activity loss of the ultrafine Au@Pd nanowire after 10,000 cycles of accelerated degradation tests is only ∼20 %, demonstrating its much better stability compared to commercial Pd/C. Further characterizations combined with density functional theory (DFT) calculations demonstrate that the electronic interactions between Pd atomic layers and underlying Au can increase the electronic density of Pd and promote the efficient activation of oxygen, thus leading to the improved ORR performance.

Tolerability and Efficacy of the Anticluster of Differentiation 47 Antibody Magrolimab Combined With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated AML: Phase Ib Results.

PURPOSE: Magrolimab is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody against cluster of differentiation 47, an antiphagocytic signal used by cancer cells to evade phagocytosis. Azacitidine upregulates prophagocytic signals on AML cells, further increasing phagocytosis when combined with magrolimab. We report final phase Ib data for magrolimab with azacitidine in patients with untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated AML, including TP53-mutant AML, received magrolimab intravenously as an initial dose (1 mg/kg, days 1 and 4), followed by 15 mg/kg once on day 8 and 30 mg/kg once weekly or every 2 weeks as maintenance. Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and proportion with complete remission (CR). RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were enrolled and treated; 72 (82.8%) had TP53 mutations with a median variant allele frequency of 61% (range, 9.8-98.7). Fifty-seven (79.2%) of TP53-mutant patients had European LeukemiaNet 2017 adverse-risk cytogenetics. Patients received a median of 4 (range, 1-39) cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included constipation (49.4%), nausea (49.4%), and diarrhea (48.3%). Thirty (34.5%) experienced anemia, and the median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.9 g/dL (range, -3.6 to 2.5 g/dL). Twenty-eight (32.2%) patients achieved CR, including 23 (31.9%) patients with TP53 mutations. The median overall survival in TP53-mutant and wild-type patients were 9.8 months and 18.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Magrolimab with azacitidine was relatively well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with AML ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, including those with TP53 mutations, warranting further evaluation of magrolimab with azacitidine in AML. The phase III randomized ENHANCE-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04778397) and ENHANCE-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05079230) studies are recruiting frontline patients with AML.

Blindly using Wald's test can miss rare disease-causal variants in case-control association studies.

There are four tests--the likelihood ratio (LR) test, Wald's test, the score test and the exact test--commonly employed in genetic association studies. On comparison of the four tests, we found that Wald's test, popular in genome-wide screens due to its low computational demands, exhibited a paradoxical behaviour in that the test statistic decreased as the effect size of the variant increased, resulting in a loss of power. The LR test always achieved the most significant P-values, followed by the exact test. We further examined the results in a real data set composed of high- and low-cholesterol subjects from the Dallas Heart Study (DHS). We also compared the single-variant LR test with two multi-variant analysis approaches--the burden test and the C-alpha test--in analysing the sequencing data by simulation. Our results call for caution in using Wald's test in genome-wide case-control association studies and suggest that the LR test is a better alternative in spite of its computational demands.

A comparison of approaches to control for confounding factors by regression models.

A common technique to control for confounding factors in practice is by regression adjustment. There are various versions of regression modeling in the literature, and in this paper we considered four approaches often seen in genetic association studies. We carried out both analytical and simulation studies comparing the bias of effect size estimates and examining the test sizes under the null hypothesis of no association between an outcome and an exposure. Further, we compared the methods in a nonsynonymous genome-wide scan for plasma lipoprotein(a) levels using a dataset from the Dallas Heart Study. We found that a widely employed approach that models the covariate-adjusted outcome and the exposure leads to an infranominal test size and underestimation of the exposure effect size. In conclusion, we recommend either using multiple regression models or modeling the covariate-adjusted outcome and the covariate-adjusted exposure to control for confounding factors.

Phase Ib Study of the BET Inhibitor GS-5829 as Monotherapy and Combined with Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase Ib study (1604) was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GS-5829, an oral bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor, alone and in combination with enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A phase I study (1599) in solid tumors/lymphoma was also conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with confirmed mCRPC and disease progression despite abiraterone and/or enzalutamide treatment were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation paradigm starting at 2 mg daily with GS-5829 alone and in combination with 160 mg daily enzalutamide. The primary efficacy endpoint was nonprogression rate at week 24; secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen reduction from baseline, progression-free survival, and GS-5829 pharmacokinetics (PK). PK and safety were also evaluated in Study 1599. RESULTS: Thirty-one men, with a median of five prior regimens, received at least 1 dose of study drug in Study 1604. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported in 94% of patients; 16% discontinued for TEAEs. There were no dose-dependent increases in the AUCtau or Cmax after once-daily administration of GS-5829 2 to 9 mg, and biomarkers CCR2 inhibition and HEXIM1 induction were increased only at higher doses of monotherapy. A high degree of interpatient variability existed across all doses in PK and pharmacodynamic parameters. The proportion with nonprogression at week 24, estimated by Kaplan-Meier model, was 25% (95% confidence interval, 10-42) for all treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: GS-5829 was generally tolerated but demonstrated limited efficacy and lack of dose proportional increases in plasma concentrations in patients with mCRPC.

Distribution of model-based multipoint heterogeneity lod scores.

The distribution of two-point heterogeneity lod scores (HLOD) has been intensively investigated because the conventional χ(2) approximation to the likelihood ratio test is not directly applicable. However, there was no study investigating th e distribution of the multipoint HLOD despite its wide application. Here we want to point out that, compared with the two-point HLOD, the multipoint HLOD essentially tests for homogeneity given linkage and follows a relatively simple limiting distribution ½χ²0+ ½χ²1, which can be obtained by established statistical theory. We further examine the theoretical result by simulation studies.

Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of Adverse Event-Triggered Idelalisib Interruption and Dose Reduction on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Idelalisib is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ inhibitor approved for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma, a type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Idelalisib-triggered adverse events (AEs) may be managed with treatment interruption and/or dose reduction, potentially extending therapy duration and increasing the likelihood of continued response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analyses were conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes after AE-induced idelalisib interruption for 125 patients with iNHL and 283 with CLL. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer for patients with iNHL who experienced ≥ 2 interruptions versus those with 0 interruptions who discontinued idelalisib or study because of AEs (hazard ratio 0.33; P = .0212). Both PFS and overall survival were longer for patients with CLL with ≥ 2 interruptions versus 0 interruptions in those who discontinued therapy because of an AE (hazard ratio PFS 0.50, overall survival 0.41; P < .005). Clinical benefits persisted for patients with CLL who experienced treatment interruption after receiving idelalisib for ≥ 6 months. Supplementing interruption with dose reduction did not worsen clinical outcomes. However, time off therapy of ≥ 8% may diminish the clinical benefit of treatment interruption. CONCLUSION: Idelalisib interruption and dose reduction were associated with enhanced clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory iNHL or CLL who experienced an AE, supporting this management strategy when indicated.

No increased bleeding events in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with idelalisib.

The advent of novel B-cell receptor pathway targeting agents like ibrutinib dramatically changed management of B-cell malignancies. However, with concomitant anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy, ibrutinib is associated with increased bleeding. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine the role of AC/AP therapy in patients with idelalisib-treated B-cell malignancies and to establish if it contributes to increased bleeding events. Data from two idelalisib trials (rituximab ± idelalisib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL] and idelalisib monotherapy in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma [iNHL]) were analyzed. Antithrombotic therapy was common (36%-63%), with comparable bleeding incidence across treatment groups (14%-19%; p = 0.56). Bleeding events of grade ≥3 occurred in 0.9% and 3.2% of the idelalisib-treated CLL and iNHL cohorts, respectively. Our findings demonstrate no increase in bleeding events with simultaneous AC/AP treatment and idelalisib use. Hemorrhagic risk is prevalent in these patients and an important consideration when evaluating available treatment options. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01539512 and NCT01282424.

Idelalisib immune-related toxicity is associated with improved treatment response.

Idelalisib is associated with increased occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Clinical observations suggest a correlation between immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced irAEs and survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors; however, this relationship in hematologic malignancies is not well understood. In a post hoc analysis of 3 registrational trials, we explored the relationship between Grade ≥3 diarrhea/colitis and alanine/aspartate transaminase (ALT/AST) elevation incidences and efficacy endpoints in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with idelalisib. Grade ≥3 diarrhea/colitis was associated with higher overall response rate (ORR) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) for all subgroups. Grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevations were associated with improved duration of response and overall survival for all subgroups and improved ORR and PFS for patients with FL or iNHL. Our analysis in hematologic malignancies showed a trend correlating idelalisib-induced Grade ≥3 irAEs with improved efficacy.

Outcomes of patients with up to 6 years of follow-up from a phase 2 study of idelalisib for relapsed indolent lymphomas.

The phase 2 study of idelalisib monotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs) was completed in 2018; final efficacy and safety data with up to 6.7 years long-term follow-up are reported. Patients with iNHL refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent were enrolled and received 150 mg idelalisib twice daily (N = 125). Idelalisib resulted in an overall response rate of 57.6% with 34.4% continuing therapy for ≥12 months. The median progression-free survival and duration of response were 11.0 and 11.8 months for follicular lymphoma, 22.2 and 20.4 months for lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM), and 6.6 and 18.4 months for marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Median overall survival after extended follow-up was 48.6 (95% CI 33.9, 71.7) months. Long-term follow-up did not reveal new safety concerns. These data indicate beneficial outcomes with longer follow-up after idelalisib for treatment of iNHL including in patients with LPL/WM and MZL.

A plasma-derived extracellular vesicle mRNA classifier for the detection of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: According to the global cancer burden data released in 2020, breast cancer (BC) has become the most common cancer in the world. Similar to those of other cancers, the present methods used in clinic for diagnosing early BC are invasive, inaccurate, and insensitive. Hence, new non-invasive methods capable of early diagnosis are needed. METHODS: We applied next-generation sequencing and analyzed the messenger RNA (mRNA) profiles of plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from 14 BC patients and 6 patients with benign breast lesions. We used 3 regression models, namely support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminate analysis (LDA), and logistic regression (LR), to develop classifiers for use in making predictive BC diagnoses; and used 259 plasma samples, including those obtained from 144 patients with BC, 72 patients with benign breast lesions, and 43 healthy women, which were divided into training groups and validation groups to verify their performances as classifiers by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the classifiers were cross-validated with the leave-1-out cross-validation (LOOCV) method. RESULTS: Among all combinations assessed with the 3 different regression models, an 8-mRNA combination, named EXOBmRNA, exhibited high performance [accuracy =71.9% and AUC =0.718, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.652 to 0.784] in the training cohort after LOOCV was performed, showing the largest AUC in the SVM model. The mRNAs in EXOBmRNA were HLA-DRB1, HAVCR1, ENPEP, TIMP1, CD36, MARCKS, DAB2, and CXCL14. In the validation cohort, the AUC of EXOBmRNA was 0.737 (95% CI: 0.636 to 0.837). In addition, gene function and pathway analyses revealed that different levels of gene expression were associated with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a high-performing predictive classifiers including 8 mRNAs from plasma extracellular vesicles for diagnosing breast cancer.

Evaluation of the CLL-IPI in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in idelalisib phase-3 trials.

The CLL-IPI is a risk-weighted prognostic model for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but has not been evaluated in patients with relapsed CLL or on novel therapies. We evaluated the CLL-IPI in 897 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL in 3 randomized trials testing idelalisib (PI3Kδ inhibitor). The CLL-IPI identified patients as low (2.2%), intermediate (12.8%), high (48.7%), and very high (36.2%) risk and was prognostic for survival (log-rank p < .0001; C-statistic 0.706). Of CLL-IPI factors, age >65, ß2-microglobulin >3.5mg/L, unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene, and deletion 17p/TP53 mutation were independently prognostic, but Rai I-IV or Binet B/C was not. The CLL-IPI is prognostic for survival in relapsed CLL and with idelalisib therapy. However, low/intermediate risk is uncommon, and regression parameters of individual factors in this risk-weighted model appear different in relapsed CLL. Reassessment of the weighting of the individual variables might optimize the model in this setting.