Bilateral septal pacing in combination with coronary venous pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Conventional right ventricular pacing combined with coronary venous pacing (CVP) is a mainstay for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, QRS duration of conventional CRT may be frequently more than 130 ms. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of QRS narrowing by bilateral septal pacing (BSP) in combination with CVP for CRT (BSP-CRT). METHODS: Fourteen patients with QRS > 130 ms of conventional CRT after failure of physiological conduction system pacing were enrolled. Electrophysiologic characteristics were compared among different modes of CRT during procedure. BSP which was defined as capture of both sides of interventricular septum manifested as shortened R wave peak time without a right bundle branch block QRS pattern. RESULTS: BSP-CRT were successfully achieved in 85.7% (12/14) patients. QRS duration at baseline was 185 ± 13 ms and significantly narrowed to 156 ± 9 ms during conventional CRT (n = 14, P < .001), to 143 ± 7 ms during left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) in combination with CVP for CRT (LVSP-CRT) (n = 9, P < .001), and further to 122 ± 10 ms during BSP-CRT (n = 12, P < .001). Notably, among 7 patients in whom both LVSP and BSP were achieved, BSP-CRT outperformed LVSP-CRT at QRS narrowing by 16% (P < .001). At 3-month follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 29 ± 6% to 41 ± 8% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: BSP-CRT resulted in superior acute electrical synchronization to conventional CRT and might be considered as an alternative to conventional CRT with QRS more than 130 ms.

A simple and practical criterion for determining a failed His-bundle pacing.

AIMS: To establish a simple criterion for determining a failed His-bundle pacing (HBP). This criterion states that if stimulus to QRS end interval is longer than His-bundle potential to QRS end interval ('S-QRSend > H-QRSend') then a failed HBP can be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed retrospective analysis on 737 pacing tests around His-bundle in 241 patients and prospective analysis on 400 tests in 123 patients. A successful HBP is defined as that whole His-bundle is captured with or without capture of adjacent ventricular myocardium, otherwise, a failed HBP was considered. The output criteria and effective refractory period criteria were used as the gold standards for determining a successful HBP. The gold standards are that if decreasing the pacing output or pacing cycle length to a certain level results in duration or morphology changes of QRS, then a successful HBP is ascertained. In retrospective analysis of patients with normal His-Purkinje conduction, a failed HBP was determined in 31% (154/492) of pacing tests according to 'S-QRSend > H-QRSend'; all of them were validated by the gold standards (specificity = 100%). In prospective study, a failed HBP was confirmed according to the simple criterion with 100% accuracy in 33% (79/241) pacing tests. This simple criterion was also suitable for patients with His-Purkinje conduction disease although cases with 'S-QRSend > H-QRSend' rarely occurred. CONCLUSION: A failed HBP can be easily and reliably determined solely by 'S-QRSend > H-QRSend' in more than 30% pacing tests.

An individualized criterion for left bundle branch capture in patients with a narrow QRS complex.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing (LBBP) is a physiological pacing; however, the accuracy of current electrocardiographic criteria for LBBP remains inadequate. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish a novel individualized criterion to improve the accuracy of LBBP determination in patients with a narrow QRS complex. METHODS: Patients in whom both LBBP and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) were acquired during operation were enrolled. LBB conduction time (LBBCT) was measured from LBB potential (LBBpo) to intrinsic QRS onset. LBBpo-V6RWPT, Native-V6RWPT, and Paced-V6RWPT were respectively measured from LBBpo, intrinsic QRS onset, and stimulus to R-wave peak in V6. ΔV6RWPT was the difference value between Paced-V6RWPT and Native-V6RWPT. The accuracy of ΔV6RWPT criterion for determining LBBP was evaluated. RESULTS: In all 71 enrolled patients, ΔV6RWPT was <30 ms during LBBP (21.3 ± 4.6 ms; range 9.3-28.3 ms) but was >30 ms during LVSP (38.5 ± 4.6 ms; range 31.1-47.0 ms). The probability distribution of ΔV6RWPT was well separated between LBBP and LVSP. Sensitivity and specificity of the novel criterion of "ΔV6RWPT <30 ms" for determining LBBP both were 100%. However, the optimal cutoff value of Paced-V6RWPT for validation of LBBP was 64.2 ms, and sensitivity and specificity were 84.5% and 97.2%, respectively. Paced-V6RWPT during LBBP was equivalent to LBBpo-V6RWPT in all patients. There was a strong linear correlation between Native-V6RWPT and LBBpo-V6RWPT (r = 0.796; P <.001). CONCLUSION: ΔV6RWPT could be an accurate individualized criterion for determining LBB capture with high sensitivity and specificity and was superior over the fixed Paced-V6RWPT criterion.

Bioactive metabolites from Phoma species, an endophytic fungus from the Chinese medicinal plant Arisaema erubescens.

Through bioassay-guided fractionation, the EtOAc extract of a culture broth of the endophytic fungus Phoma species ZJWCF006 in Arisaema erubescens afforded a new α-tetralone derivative, (3S)-3,6,7-trihydroxy-α-tetralone (1), together with cercosporamide (2), ß-sitosterol (3), and trichodermin (4). The structures of compounds were established on the basis of spectroscopic analyses. Compounds 1, 2, and 3 were obtained from Phoma species for the first time. Additionally, the compounds were subjected to bioactivity assays, including antimicrobial activity, against four plant pathogenic fungi (Fusarium oxysporium, Rhizoctonia solani, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and Magnaporthe oryzae) and two plant pathogenic bacteria (Xanthomonas campestris and Xanthomonas oryzae), as well as in vitro antitumor activities against HT-29, SMMC-772, MCF-7, HL-60, MGC80-3, and P388 cell lines. Compound 1 showed growth inhibition against F. oxysporium and R. solani with EC50 values of 413.22 and 48.5 µg/mL, respectively. Additionally, compound 1 showed no cytotoxicity, whereas compound 2 exhibited cytotoxic activity against the six tumor cell lines tested, with IC50 values of 9.3 ± 2.8, 27.87 ± 1.78, 48.79 ± 2.56, 37.57 ± 1.65, 27.83 ± 0.48, and 30.37 ± 0.28 µM, respectively. We conclude that endophytic Phoma are promising sources of natural bioactive and novel metabolites.

Cycle length criteria for His-bundle capture are capable of determining pacing types misclassified by output criteria.

BACKGROUND: His-bundle pacing is currently defined according to the output criteria. However, potential nonselective His-bundle pacing (NSHBP) might be misclassified as right ventricular pacing by the output criteria. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use the novel cycle length (CL) criteria by decremental CL pacing to determine the type of pacing and to differentiate NSHBP from right ventricular pacing in particular. METHODS: His-bundle pacing was performed in 212 patients with normal His-Purkinje conduction (group 1) and 39 patients with His-Purkinje conduction disease for correction of the condition (group 2). The CL criteria state that if decreasing the CL to a certain level results in QRS morphology changes, then NSHBP is ascertained. RESULTS: NSHBP was obtained in 170 patients in group 1 and 22 patients in group 2. In group 1, NSHBP was validated in 160 patients by both output criteria and CL criteria. NSHBP was misclassified as right ventricular pacing by the output criteria but was correctly classified by CL criteria in the remaining 10 patients (6%). In group 2, NSHBP was all validated by both criteria. Among the 192 patients with NSHBP, the shortest CL (318 ± 29 ms; range 270-470 ms) with which a stimulus can be conducted along the His bundle was at least 20 ms longer than that of surrounding myocardium (264 ± 16 ms; range 250-330 ms) for each patient, suggesting potentially high sensitivity of the CL criteria. CONCLUSION: CL criteria can determine the types of cardiac pacing independently and can avoid misclassification by output criteria.