Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Ultrasound Med ; 42(9): 2045-2055, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36929858

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Low skeletal muscle mass, strength, or somatic function are used to diagnose sarcopenia; however, effective assessment methods are still lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound in identifying patients with sarcopenia. METHODS: This study included 167 patients, 78 with sarcopenia and 89 healthy participants, from two hospitals. We evaluated clinical factors and five ultrasound imaging features, of which three ultrasound imaging features were used to create the model. In both the training and validation datasets, the sarcopenia detection performances of chosen ultrasonic characteristics and the constructed model were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The predictive performance was evaluated by area under the ROC (AUROC), calibration, and decision curves. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in muscle thickness (MT) of gastrocnemius medialis muscle (GM), flaky myosteatosis echo (FE), pennation angle (PA), average shear wave velocity (SWV) in the relaxed state (RASWV), and average SWV in the passive stretched state (PASWV) between sarcopenic and normal subjects. PA, RASWV, and PASWV were effective predictors of sarcopenia. The AUROC (95% confidence interval) for these three parameters were 0.930 (0.882-0.978), 0.865 (0.791-0.940), and 0.849 (0.770-0.928), respectively, in the training set, and 0.873 (0.777-0.969), 0.936 (0.878-0.993), and 0.826 (0.716-0.935), respectively, in the validation set. The combined model had better detection power. Finally, the calibration curve showed that the combined model had good prediction accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our model can be used to identify sarcopenia in primary medical institutions, which is valuable for the early recognition and management of sarcopenia patients.


Asunto(s)
Sarcopenia , Humanos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculo Esquelético , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Hospitales
3.
Biomater Sci ; 11(23): 7489-7511, 2023 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37873617

RESUMEN

Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is an emerging treatment method. In comparison with photodynamic therapy (PDT), SDT exhibits deep penetration, high cell membrane permeability, and free exposure to light capacity. Unfortunately, owing to inappropriate ultrasound parameter selection, poor targeting of sonosensitizers, and the complex tumor environment, SDT is frequently ineffective. In this review, we describe the approaches for selecting ultrasound parameters and how to develop sonosensitizers to increase targeting and improve adverse tumor microenvironments. Furthermore, the potential of combining SDT with other treatment methods, such as chemotherapy, chemodynamic therapy, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and immunotherapy, is discussed to further increase the treatment efficiency of SDT.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Fotoquimioterapia , Terapia por Ultrasonido , Humanos , Terapia por Ultrasonido/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Microambiente Tumoral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA