Chemoselective Hydrogenolysis of Urethanes to Formamides and Alcohols in the Presence of More Electrophilic Carbonyl Compounds.

The development of methods for the chemical recycling of polyurethanes is recognized as an urgent issue. Herein, we report the Ir-catalyzed hydrogenolysis of the urethane C-O bond to produce formamides and alcohols, where both formamides and ester and amide functionalities are tolerated. The chemoselectivity observed is counterintuitive to the generally accepted electrophilicity order of carbonyl compounds. Hydrogenolysis of urea and isocyanurate, potential byproducts in the polycondensation process of polyurethanes, is also achieved alongside the selective degradation of polyurethanes themselves, which affords diformamides and diols. The time-course of the hydrogenative polyurethane degradation reveals that the bond cleavage occurs not from the terminal, but from any part of the polymer chain. The present catalysis offers a novel method for the recycling of polyurethane-containing polymer waste.

Development of irreversible pancreatic ductal change triggered by pancreatic duct stenting in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stent-induced ductal change is a complication of endoscopic pancreatic stent placement for chronic pancreatitis, potentially leading to irreversible changes that may contribute to pancreatic dysfunction. This study aimed to examine the long-term outcomes of stent-induced ductal change and evaluate factors that correlate with the development of irreversible ductal changes. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2022, 52/223 patients with chronic pancreatitis in whom an S-type plastic stent was successfully placed from the main papilla for duct stricture were detected with stent-induced ductal change on pancreatography at stent removal. We retrospectively investigated the clinical features of patients whose main pancreatic duct was reassessed by endoscopic pancreatography after >1 month without stent and whose residual stent-induced ductal change was irreversible. RESULTS: The patients with chronic pancreatitis with stent-induced ductal change (n = 28) (elevated change, 15; stricture change, 13) were evaluated using follow-up pancreatography. Eleven patients (39.3%) showed residual change associated with stent-induced ductal change, the degree of which was partial improvement, no change, and obstructive change in one, seven, and three patients, respectively. Stricture changes during stent removal and duration of stent placement that triggered ductal changes were significantly associated with the development of residual ductal changes. CONCLUSIONS: Irreversible stent-induced ductal change in patients with chronic pancreatitis was associated with stricture changes in the main pancreatic duct and continued plastic-stent placement. Careful evaluation of the pancreatic duct is required during plastic-stent placement. Early plastic-stent removal may result in an effective response to the development of stent-induced ductal change.

Current status and future perspectives for endoscopic treatment of local complications in chronic pancreatitis.

Chronic pancreatitis is a progressive disease characterized by irregular fibrosis, cellular infiltration, and parenchymal loss within the pancreas. Chronic pancreatitis treatment includes lifestyle modifications based on disease etiology, dietary adjustments appropriate for each stage and condition, drug therapy, endoscopic treatments, and surgical treatments. Although surgical treatments of symptomatic chronic pancreatitis provide good pain relief, endoscopic therapies are recommended as the first-line treatment because they are minimally invasive. In recent years, endoscopic therapy has emerged as an alternative treatment method to surgery for managing local complications in patients with chronic pancreatitis. For pancreatic stone removal, a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic extraction is used. For refractory pancreatic duct stones, intracorporeal fragmentation techniques, such as pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy, offer additional options. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound has become the primary treatment modality for pancreatic pseudocysts, except in the absence of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. This review focuses on the current status of endoscopic therapies for common local complications of chronic pancreatitis, including updated information in the past few years.

Comparison of the incidence of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity following the change from trough-guided dosing to AUC-guided doing using trough-only data.

OBJECTIVES: Although use of AUC-guided vancomycin dosing was recommended in the revised 2020 consensus guideline, collection of multiple vancomycin serum samples to calculate AUC may cause clinical complications. AUC calculated from trough-only data (one-point AUC-guided dosing) has not been sufficiently validated. The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity following the change from trough-guided to one-point AUC-guided dosing. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, prospective cohort study to compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity between a trough-guided dosing group and one-point AUC-guided dosing group. RESULTS: One-point AUC-guided dosing significantly decreased the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with trough-guided dosing (2.8% versus 17.4%, P = 0.002). Further, Kaplan-Meier plots for cumulative incidence of the AKI-free rate indicated that the onset of AKI was significantly longer in the one-point AUC-guided dosing group than in trough-guided dosing (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.5-27.4; P = 0.011). Moreover, multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that implementation of one-point AUC-guided dosing was a significant protective factor against the incidence of AKI (age-adjusted HR, 0.164; 95% CI, 0.04-0.69; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with trough concentration-guided dosing, AUC-guided dosing using one-point sampling markedly reduced the incidence of AKI, without additional serum sampling.

Perceptions toward issues in cancer care for people with mental illness among psychiatric care providers: A questionnaire study.

OBJECTIVES: To reduce cancer care disparities in people with mental illness, this study aimed to quantify psychiatric care providers' perceptions regarding issues that are insufficiently addressed or difficult to address. METHODS: Psychiatric care providers at 23 psychiatric hospitals in Japan were surveyed using mail questionnaires. Respondents were asked to rate 15 items with four categories related to insufficiencies/difficulties in cancer care for patients with mental illness on a five-point Likert scale. We analyzed the proportion of respondents who answered "insufficient/difficult" for each item. RESULTS: A total of 255 (76.3%) psychiatric care providers responded. For questions related to the skills and attitudes of psychiatric professionals, 48.3%-58.4% of respondents perceived that efforts for supporting cancer screening and treatment were insufficient. For the questions related to collaborations between cancer and psychiatric care providers, 75.3% of respondents perceived that inpatient visits between psychiatric and cancer hospitals were insufficient. For the questions related to in-psychiatric-hospital medical systems, 50.2%-87.2% of respondents perceived that support for screening, diagnosis/treatment, and palliative care for psychiatric inpatients were insufficient/difficult. 41.9%-57.4% of respondents perceived that social services in the community were insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarified the level of insufficiency/difficulty perceived by psychiatric care providers regarding issues related to cancer care for people with mental illness. Psychiatric care providers are required to have knowledge and skills in cancer screening and treatment. To improve access to cancer prevention, treatment, and palliative care, it may be helpful to establish systems to promote coordination between cancer hospitals and psychiatric hospitals.

Focal pancreatic ductal change induced by 10-Fr S-type plastic stent in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stent-induced ductal change (SIDC) is a complication of endoscopic pancreatic stenting (EPS) in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). However, the evaluation of SIDC associated with S-type pancreatic plastic stent (PS) and large-caliber PS, such as 10 Fr, is limited. This study aimed to analyze the SIDC of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) associated with 10-Fr S-type PS in patients with CP. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2021, 132 patients with CP in whom a 10-Fr S-type PS had been installed by EPS were retrospectively reviewed. The SIDC incidence rate was examined, and the clinical features of patients with and without SIDC were investigated, including the outcomes for detected SIDC. RESULTS: Stent-induced ductal change during EPS was confirmed in 41 patients (31.1%) of 132 patients at a site coincident with the PS tip or distal flap in the MPD. All patients were asymptomatic during the development of SIDC. Morphological changes in the MPD were detected as elevated (75.6%) or bearing stricture changes (24.4%). A total of 90.2% of SIDC developed after the first 10-Fr PS installation. No significant differences were noted between the patients with and without SIDC. The outcomes of continued PS installment for SIDC showed persistence and secondary change. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-induced ductal change-associated 10-Fr PS installation was performed in just under one-third of the patients, indicating a substantial incidence rate and a possible development of SIDC from early stages onwards. More emphasis should be placed on SIDC as the complication.

Long-term outcomes of duckbill-type anti-reflux metal stents versus conventional covered metal stents in reinterventions after covered biliary metal stent dysfunction in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The use of duckbill-type anti-reflux metal stents (DMS) in reinterventions after covered metal stent (CMS) dysfunction has been reported in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the superiority of DMS over conventional CMS (c-CMS) has not been established. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of DMS as a second stent in comparison with c-CMS. METHODS: We investigated consecutive patients with distal MBO due to unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent reintervention after dysfunction of initial biliary CMS at our institution. We compared causes of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), adverse events (AEs), and reintervention rates of DMS and c-CMS in this stenting. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included (DMS 41 and c-CMS 35). While overall RBO rates were similar between the two groups (46% vs. 63%, p = 0.172), RBO due to non-occlusion cholangitis tended to be less frequent in the DMS group than in the c-CMS group (2% vs. 14%, p = 0.089). Median TRBO was significantly longer in the DMS group (286 days vs. 112 days, p = 0.029). DMS was identified as the only significant risk factor for TRBO (hazard ratio, 0.52; p = 0.044). Overall AE rates were significantly lower in the DMS group (2% vs. 23%, p = 0.010), with non-occlusion cholangitis being the most common AE in the c-CMS group. Endoscopic reintervention was successfully performed in all patients in both groups, despite failed stent removal in 15% of patients in DMS group. CONCLUSIONS: DMS was associated with a significantly longer TRBO and lower rate of AEs compared with c-CMS in reinterventions after initial CMS dysfunction. DMS may be preferable to c-CMS as a second stent after biliary CMS dysfunction.

Outcomes after partially covered self-expandable metal stent placement for recurrent duodenal obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of partially covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) as an additional stent after recurrent duodenal obstruction (RDO) have not been elucidated. In this study, we compared outcomes of partially covered and uncovered SEMS placement after RDO in patients with malignant duodenal obstruction and explored factors affecting re-recurrent obstruction and overall survival in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing SEMS placement for RDO at a cancer institute in Japan from July 2014 to June 2021. Clinical variables and outcomes of patients undergoing partially covered and uncovered SEMS placement were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent SEMS placement after RDO, for which the COMVI stent was used in 38 cases and uncovered stents were used in 23 cases. Stent ingrowth was the most common cause of RDO (51.4%). Stent migration only occurred after partially covered stent placement (20% vs. 0%, p = 0.018). Choice of SEMS had no impact on time to re-RDO (median 2.8 vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.776) or overall survival (median 2.6 vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.703). Median overall survival was longer in patients receiving chemotherapy after second stenting (4.6 vs. 1.8 months, p < 0.001) and shorter in those with early RDO, regardless of the SEMS used. Use of the partially covered stent had no impact on survival or time to RDO. CONCLUSIONS: While outcomes after partially covered SEMS placement for RDO were not significantly different from uncovered SEMS, migration remains a concern when they are used as a second stent. Chemotherapy after second stenting was associated with longer overall survival but not with longer time to re-RDO.

Early-onset pancreatic cancer: Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Early-onset pancreatic cancer (≤50 years, EOPC) is uncommon. This study aims to characterize the clinical and survival characteristics of EOPC in comparison to late-onset pancreatic cancer (>50 years, LOPC). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated consecutive PC patients treated at our institution between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed and compared clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of EOPC and LOPC. RESULTS: Of 1646 PC patients identified (768 resectable/borderline resectable; 248 locally advanced; 630 metastatic), 127 (8%) had EOPC. Current smoking and heavy drinking were associated with EOPC. EOPC presented at a more advanced stage and had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios than LOPC. Survival outcomes were similar between the two groups, both in the entire cohort and in each resectability group. In patients undergoing resection, EOPC tended to have a higher N stage (p = 0.099) and had a higher pathological stage (stage IV, 20% vs. 7%, p = 0.005) and a lower rate of macroscopically curative resection (80% vs. 93%, p = 0.006). Liver recurrence was more commonly observed in EOPC (42% vs. 23%, p = 0.015). In the metastatic cohort, combination chemotherapy regimens were more frequently administered in EOPC as first-line treatment (79% vs. 64%, p = 0.028). Both median PFS (4.4 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.647) and OS (11.5 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.183) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: EOPC presented with a more aggressive tumor biology. Survival outcomes were similar to LOPC due to more intensive treatment.

Issues of cancer care in people with mental disorders as perceived by cancer care providers: A quantitative questionnaire survey.

OBJECTIVES: To reduce cancer care disparities, this study aimed to clarify the difficulties in cancer care for people with mental disorders as perceived by cancer care providers. METHODS: Cancer care providers at 17 designated cancer hospitals in Japan were surveyed using mail questionnaires. Respondents were asked to rate 29 items related to difficulties or insufficiencies in cancer care for patients with mental disorders on a five-point Likert scale. We analyzed the proportion of respondents who answered "difficult/insufficient" in each item. We also calculated the proportions of responders stratified according to the presence of psychiatric support systems within their hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 388 (58.4%) cancer care providers responded. Among the issues related to "difficulties in diagnosing and treating cancer," support for decision-making, assessment of treatment adherence, and assessment of physical symptoms were perceived as most difficult (73.5%-81.5% of respondents). Among the issues related to 'difficulties or insufficiencies in collaboration among multidisciplinary health care providers,' the issue of advance consultation and sharing information with the patient's primary psychiatric care provider was perceived as most difficult (52.2%). Among the issues related to "insufficiencies of in-hospital and community medical systems," education to provide reasonable accommodation was perceived as most insufficient (47.4%). The perceived difficulties of over half of the issues varied significantly between hospitals depending on the level of psychiatric support systems. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarified the difficulties of cancer care in patients with mental disorders as perceived by cancer care providers. Some issues may be resolved by psychiatric liaison teams.