Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Transplant ; 23(10): 1551-1560, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460010

RESUMEN

Kidney transplantation offers improved survival and quality of life compared to dialysis for most recipients; however, benefits for elderly patients (>70 years) remain uncertain. Using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (2009-2019), elderly transplant recipients were matched to a waitlisted dialysis patient by age, cause of end-stage kidney disease, and dialysis duration (paired controls). We censored dialysis patients at the time of transplant. Survival was compared using stratified Cox regression. Elderly transplant recipients (KTRs) (n = 465) were matched to waitlisted pairs. Transplant group mortality initially exceeded dialysis due to excess infection-related deaths (1.9 transplant versus 0.3 dialysis/100 patient-years, P = .03). Beyond month 9, a progressive survival benefit in favor of transplantation was apparent. Over a median follow-up of 1.7 years, mortality was 38% lower for KTRs (95% confidence interval 0.41-0.94, P = .02), and 5-year survival was 80% KTRs vs 53% dialysis (P < .001). Recipients of living and standard criteria donor kidneys acquired immediate survival advantage compared with dialysis, while recipients of expanded criteria donor's kidneys experienced elevated risk of death for the first 17 months. Compared with remaining on dialysis, elderly KTRs incur an increased risk of early posttransplant mortality but thereafter may anticipate progressively superior survival rates.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diálisis Renal , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Análisis por Apareamiento , Calidad de Vida , Supervivencia de Injerto , Sistema de Registros
2.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11107, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37324221

RESUMEN

Obesity is increasingly prevalent among candidates for kidney transplantation. Existing studies have shown conflicting post-transplant outcomes for obese patients which may relate to confounding bias from donor-related characteristics that were unaccounted for. We used ANZDATA Registry data to compare graft and patient survival between obese (BMI >27.5 kg/m2 Asians; >30 kg/m2 non-Asians) and non-obese kidney transplant recipients, while controlling for donor characteristics by comparing recipients of paired kidneys. We selected transplant pairs (2000-2020) where a deceased donor supplied one kidney to an obese candidate and the other to a non-obese candidate. We compared the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), graft failure and death by multivariable models. We identified 1,522 pairs. Obesity was associated with an increased risk of DGF (aRR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.44, p < 0.001). Obese recipients were more likely to experience death-censored graft failure (aHR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.49, p = 0.012), and more likely to die with function (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, p = 0.001), versus non-obese recipients. Long-term patient survival was significantly worse in obese patients with 10- and 15-year survival of 71% and 56% compared to 77% and 63% in non-obese patients. Addressing obesity is an unmet clinical need in kidney transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Riñón , Obesidad/complicaciones , Donantes de Tejidos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Factores de Riesgo , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología
3.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11567, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37799670

RESUMEN

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 66 consecutive ABO incompatible kidney transplants (ABOiKT) performed without B-cell depleting therapy. Outcomes were compared to an earlier era performed with rituximab (n = 18) and a contemporaneous cohort of ABO compatible live donor transplants (ABOcKT). Acute rejection within 3 months of transplant was significantly more common after rituximab-free ABOiKT compared to ABOiKT with rituximab (OR 8.8, p = 0.04) and ABOcKT (OR 2.9, p = 0.005) in adjusted analyses. Six recipients of rituximab-free ABOiKT experienced refractory antibody mediated rejection requiring splenectomy, and a further two incurred early graft loss with no such episodes amongst ABOiKT with rituximab or ABOcKT cohorts. Patient and graft survival were similar between groups over a median follow-up of 3.1 years. This observational evidence lends strong support to the continued inclusion of rituximab in desensitization protocols for ABOiKT.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rechazo de Injerto , Australia , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO , Supervivencia de Injerto , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10078, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35368638

RESUMEN

Background: New onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) is common in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Identifying patients at risk prior to transplant may enable strategies to mitigate NODAT, with a pre-transplant oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) suggested by the KDIGO 2020 Guidelines for this purpose. Methods: We investigated the utility of pre- and post-transplant OGTTs to stratify risk and diagnose NODAT in a retrospective, single-centre cohort study of all non-diabetic KTRs transplanted between 2003 and 2018. Results: We identified 597 KTRs who performed a pre-transplant OGTT, of which 441 had their post-transplant glycaemic status determined by a clinical diagnosis of NODAT or OGTT. Pre-transplant dysglycaemia was identified in 28% of KTRs and was associated with increasing age (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.03), and peritoneal dialysis (p < 0.001). Post-transplant dysglycaemia was common with NODAT and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) occurring in 143 (32%) and 121 (27%) patients, respectively. Pre-transplant IGT was strongly associated with NODAT development (OR 3.8, p < 0.001). Conclusion: A pre-transplant OGTT identified candidates at increased risk of post-transplant dysglycaemia and NODAT, as diagnosed by an OGTT. Robust prospective trials are needed to determine whether various interventions can reduce post-transplant risk for candidates with an abnormal pre-transplant OGTT.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Trasplante de Riñón , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Intern Med J ; 52(3): 479-484, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307932

RESUMEN

Crescents are not a well recognised feature of diabetic nephropathy. We present two cases of patients presenting with a rapid decline in renal function and subacute onset of nephrotic syndrome. Glomerulonephritis screening was negative, and renal biopsy revealed non-necrotising cellular crescents and typical features of late-stage diabetic nephropathy. We review the literature for diabetic nephropathy with crescents and explore possible underlying mechanisms.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Nefropatías Diabéticas , Glomerulonefritis , Síndrome Nefrótico , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Nefropatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Nefropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Glomerulonefritis/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino
6.
Transpl Int ; 34(12): 2431-2441, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34626503

RESUMEN

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with inferior outcomes and higher healthcare costs. DGF is currently defined as the requirement for dialysis within seven days post-transplant; however, this definition is subjective and nonspecific. Novel biomarkers have potential to improve objectivity and enable earlier diagnosis of DGF. We reviewed the literature to describe the range of novel biomarkers previously studied to predict DGF. We identified marked heterogeneity and low reporting quality of published studies. Among the novel biomarkers, serum NGAL had the greatest potential as a biomarker to predict DGF, but requires further assessment and validation through larger scale studies of diagnostic test performance. Given inadequacies in the dialysis-based definition, coupled with the high incidence and impact of DGF, such studies should be pursued.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Trasplante de Riñón , Proteínas de Fase Aguda , Biomarcadores , Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto/diagnóstico , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón , Lipocalina 2 , Lipocalinas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas
7.
BMC Urol ; 21(1): 87, 2021 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098936

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Kaposi's sarcoma is an uncommon complication in renal transplant patients, and typically presents with cutaneous lesions on the lower extremities. Penile involvement has been reported only rarely. Management of cutaneous-limited disease is primarily reduction of immunosuppression and conversion to an mTOR-inhibitor, whereas the treatment of disseminated disease in transplant patients is more variable. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old male, originally from Somalia, received a deceased-donor kidney transplant for diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy. Seven months post-transplant he presented with lower limb lesions, oedema and bilateral deep vein thromboses. He then developed a fast-growing painful lesion on his penile shaft. A biopsy of this lesion confirmed KS, and a PET scan demonstrated disseminated disease in the lower extremities, penis and thoracic lymph nodes. His tacrolimus was converted to sirolimus, and his other immunosuppression was reduced. He was treated with single agent paclitaxel chemotherapy in view of his rapidly progressing, widespread disease. The penile lesion completely resolved, and the lower extremity lesions regressed significantly. His kidney allograft function remained stable throughout treatment. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates a rare presentation of an uncommon post-transplant complication and highlights the need for a high index of suspicion of KS in transplant patients presenting with atypical cutaneous lesions. It serves to demonstrate that the use of single agent paclitaxel chemotherapy, switch to an mTORi and reduction in immunosuppression where possible produces excellent short-term outcomes, adding to the body of evidence for this management strategy in disseminated Kaposi's sarcoma.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Pene/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma de Kaposi/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino
8.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 31(12): 2887-2899, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32908001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mortality risk after kidney transplantation can vary significantly during the post-transplant course. A contemporary assessment of trends in all-cause and cause-specific mortality at different periods post-transplant is required to better inform patients, clinicians, researchers, and policy makers. METHODS: We included all first kidney-only transplant recipients from 1980 through 2018 from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. We compared adjusted death rates per 5-year intervals, using a piecewise exponential survival model, stratified by time post-transplant or time post-graft failure. RESULTS: Of 23,210 recipients, 4765 died with a functioning graft. Risk of death declined over successive eras, at all periods post-transplant. Reductions in early deaths were most marked; however, recipients ≥10 years post-transplant were 20% less likely to die in the current era compared with preceding eras (2015-2018 versus 2005-2009, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.90). In 2015-2018, cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death, particularly in months 0-3 post-transplant (1.18 per 100 patient-years). Cancer deaths were rare early post-transplant, but frequent at later time points (0.93 per 100 patient-years ≥10 years post-transplant). Among 3657 patients with first graft loss, 2472 died and were not retransplanted. Death was common in the first year after graft failure, and the cause was most commonly cardiovascular (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in death early and late post-transplant over the past 40 years represent a major achievement. Reductions in cause-specific mortality at all time points post-transplant are also apparent. However, relatively greater reductions in cardiovascular death have increased the prominence of late cancer deaths.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Causas de Muerte , Niño , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
9.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 75(5): 693-704, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31810731

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: On account of the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with kidney failure, clinical practice guidelines recommend regular screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients on the kidney transplant waitlist. To date, the cost-effectiveness of such screening has not been evaluated. A Canadian-Australasian randomized controlled trial of screening kidney transplant candidates for CAD (CARSK) is currently is being conducted to answer this question. We conducted a cost-utility analysis to determine, before completion of the trial, the cost-effectiveness of no further screening versus regular screening for asymptomatic CAD and to evaluate potential influential variables that may affect results of the economic evaluation. STUDY DESIGN: A modeled cost-utility analysis. SETTING & POPULATION: A theoretical cohort of adult Australian and New Zealand kidney transplant candidates on the waitlist. INTERVENTION: No further screening for asymptomatic CAD versus regular protocolized screening (annual or second yearly) for CAD after kidney transplant waitlisting. OUTCOMES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, reported as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). MODEL, PERSPECTIVES, & TIMEFRAME: Markov microsimulation model, health system perspective and over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: In the base case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of no further screening was $11,122 per QALY gained when compared with regular screening. No further screening increased survival by 0.49 life-year or 0.35 QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses identified the costs of transplantation in the first year and CAD prevalence as the most influential variables. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that 94% of the simulations were cost-effective below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained. LIMITATIONS: Rates of cardiovascular events in waitlisted candidates and transplant recipients are limited in the contemporary era. The results may not be generalizable to populations outside Australia and New Zealand. CONCLUSIONS: No further screening for CAD after waitlisting is likely to be cost-effective and may improve survival. Precision around CAD prevalence estimates and health care resource use will reduce existing uncertainty.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Riñón , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Modelos Económicos , Listas de Espera , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Australia , Canadá , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Nueva Zelanda , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Adulto Joven
10.
Intern Med J ; 50(4): 492-494, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270609

RESUMEN

Renal failure is a common feature of multiple myeloma affecting 20-55% of patients at the initial presentation and is being associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Renal transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma is rarely considered given the incurable nature of the disease, the risk of post-transplant disease progression and perceived high risk of infections. Here we report a 57-year-old man with end-stage renal failure attributed to presumed IgA nephropathy, with pre-existing stable multiple myeloma, who received a kidney transplant from a two haplotype-matched sibling. Transplantation has been successful and with excellent kidney function and stable multiple myeloma 6 years post-transplant. This case highlights the potential benefits of renal transplantation in highly selected patients with multiple myeloma.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal
11.
Am Heart J ; 214: 175-183, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228771

RESUMEN

Transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with kidney failure, but the need exceeds the supply of transplantable kidneys, and patients routinely wait >5 years on dialysis for a transplant. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common in kidney failure and can exclude patients from transplantation or result in death before or after transplantation. Screening asymptomatic patients for CAD using noninvasive tests prior to wait-listing and at regular intervals (ie, annually) after wait-listing until transplantation is the established standard of care and is justified by the need to avoid adverse patient outcomes and loss of organs. Patients with abnormal screening tests undergo coronary angiography, and those with critical stenoses are revascularized. Screening is potentially harmful because patients may be excluded or delayed from transplantation, and complications after revascularization are more frequent in this population. CARSK will test the hypothesis that eliminating screening tests for occult CAD after wait-listing is not inferior to regular screening for the prevention of major adverse cardiac events defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina. Secondary outcomes include the transplant rate, safety measures, and the cost-effectiveness of screening. Enrolment of 3,306 patients over 3 years is required, with patients followed for up to 5 years during wait-listing and for 1 year after transplantation. By validating or refuting the use of screening tests during wait-listing, CARSK will ensure judicious use of health resources and optimal patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Trasplante de Riñón , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/efectos adversos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Nivel de Atención , Listas de Espera
12.
Am J Transplant ; 18(12): 2977-2986, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802791

RESUMEN

Choice of immunosuppression may modify the risk of cancer after kidney transplantation, however, long-term data are lacking. Using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we compared the 9-year risk of incident cancer, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), and death attributed to cancer among participants from Australia and New Zealand in four randomized-controlled trials which compared de novo or early switch to an everolimus-containing regimen with calcineurin-inhibitor-based triple therapy. An adjusted Cox-model with random effects was used to determine such risks. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (192 everolimus, 87 control) were followed for a median of 9 years (IQR 6.7, 11.2). Compared with control, everolimus use was not associated with a reduction in the risk of incident cancer, NMSC, or cancer-related death (unadjusted HR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.49-1.48], 0.58 [0.30-1.12], and 1.18 [0.32-4.38], respectively). Subgroup analyses showed a 56% reduction for NMSC in patients randomized to everolimus + reduced-dose calcineurin-inhibitor versus control (unadjusted HR 0.44 [0.21-0.92]), which remained significant after adjusting for age, gender and smoking (adjusted HR 0.45 [0.21-0.96]). Although de novo or early switch to everolimus did not alter the 9-year risk of incident cancer or cancer-related death, everolimus with reduced-dose calcineurin-inhibitor strategy may reduce the long-term risk of NMSC.


Asunto(s)
Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Australia/epidemiología , Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Receptores de Trasplantes
14.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 23(2): 126-132, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27706879

RESUMEN

AIM: To identify risk factors for acute kidney injury following major orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: We included all patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery at University Hospital Geelong between 2008 and 2014 in the study. Out of 2188 surgeries audited, we identified cases of acute kidney injury using the RIFLE criteria and matched those to controls 2:1 for age, sex, procedure and chronic kidney disease stage. We reviewed their records for risk factors of postoperative acute kidney injury, including medications such as gentamicin, diuretics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use. We reviewed the patients' history of cardiovascular disease, chronic liver disease, hypertension and diabetes mellitus along with presence of sepsis and obesity. Associations of hypothetical risk factors were estimated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 164 cases of AKI in an elderly cohort (median age = 73 years). Controlling for baseline comorbidities, both diuretic and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use were found to be associated with a twofold risk of acute kidney injury (diuretic - OR 2.06 95% CI:1.30-3.26, P < 0.005, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use OR 2.09 95% CI:1.31-3.32, P < 0.005). A dose-effect model accounting for perioperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration demonstrated a linear relationship between the number of times these drugs were given and postoperative acute kidney injury risk (OR 1.35 95% CI:1.05-1.73, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We identified perioperative diuretics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker to be significantly associated with postoperative AKI. Further prospective studies are required to confirm this.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Diuréticos/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Victoria/epidemiología
15.
BMC Nephrol ; 19(1): 55, 2018 03 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29514605

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proteinuria is well recognised as a marker of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as a risk factor for progression of CKD among those with known CKD, and as a risk factor for cardiovascular events and death among both the general and CKD populations. Which measure of proteinuria is most predictive of renal events remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study with 144 proteinuric CKD and kidney transplant recipients attending an outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Australia. We concurrently collected morning spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR), albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and 24-h urinary protein excretion (24-UPE) from each participant at baseline. The primary outcome was a composite of death, ESKD or > 30% decline in eGFR over 5-years. Secondary outcomes were each component of the composite outcome. For each proteinuria measure, we performed a Cox Proportional Hazards model and calculated the Harrell's C-statistic and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 5 years (range 4.4-6), 85 (59%) patients met the primary composite outcome including 23 deaths (16%). The multivariable analysis showed strong evidence of an association between each log-transformed proteinuria measurement and the primary composite outcome. [Log-UPCR 1.31 (95% CI 1.18-1.63), log-UACR 1.27 (1.11-1.45) and log-24-UPE 1.43 (1.20-1.71)]. The C-Statistic were similar for all three measures of proteinuria [UPCR: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80), UACR: 0.75 (0.69-0.81), 24-UPE: 0.75 (0.69-0.81)] as were the models' AIC (671, 668 and 665 respectively). For secondary outcomes, no proteinuria measure was significantly associated with death alone ([log-UPCR = 1.18 (0.96-1.84), log-UACR = 1.19 (1.00-1.55), log-24-UPE = 1.19 (0.83-1.71)], whilst UACR and 24-UPE demonstrated marginally better association with ESKD and > 30% decline in eGFR respectively. [For ESKD, adj log-UACR HR = 1.33 (1.07-1.66). For > 30% decline in eGFR, log-24-UPE adj HR = 1.54 (1.13-2.09)]. CONCLUSION: In patients with stable, non-nephrotic CKD, all three measures of proteinuria were similarly predictive of hard clinical endpoints, defined as a composite of death, ESKD and > 30% decline in eGFR. However, which measure best predicted the outcomes individually is less certain.


Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/orina , Proteinuria/diagnóstico , Proteinuria/orina , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/orina , Factores de Tiempo , Urinálisis/normas
16.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 20(7): 506-9, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26063488

RESUMEN

Fibrillary glomerulonephritis is a rare cause of glomerulonephritis characterized by non-amyloid fibrillary deposits of unknown aetiology. It is generally considered idiopathic but may be associated with secondary causes such as monoclonal gammopathy, hepatitis B and C infections, autoimmune diseases and malignancies. We report two Australian families with apparent familial fibrillary glomerulonephritis inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, and postulate the existence of a primary familial entity. Family 1 consists of an affected father and daughter; the daughter progressed to end-stage renal failure within 18 months of diagnosis, despite immunosuppressive therapy. The father, however, remains stable at 10 months follow up. Family 2 comprises an affected mother and son; the mother commenced haemodialysis 5 years after diagnosis and subsequently underwent successful renal transplantation. The son is presently stable at last follow-up after 5 years. A further review of the second family history reveals a third family member (maternal father) dying of 'Bright's disease'. We describe their histopathology, clinical progression and treatment outcomes, and provide a review of the current understanding of this heterogeneous condition that is associated with poor renal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis/genética , Adulto , Femenino , Glomerulonefritis/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linaje
17.
Front Nephrol ; 4: 1352363, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476464

RESUMEN

Introduction: Wound complications can cause considerable morbidity in kidney transplantation. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) systems have been efficacious in reducing wound complications across surgical specialties. The aims of this study were to evaluate the use of ciNPWT, Prevena™, in kidney transplant recipients and to determine any association with wound complications. Material and methods: A single-center, prospective observational cohort study was performed in 2018. A total of 30 consecutive kidney transplant recipients deemed at high risk for wound complications received ciNPWT, and the results were compared to those of a historical cohort of subjects who received conventional dressings. Analysis for recipients with obesity and propensity score matching were performed. Results: In total, 127 subjects were included in the analysis. Of these, 30 received a ciNPWT dressing and were compared with 97 subjects from a non-study historical control group who had conventional dressing. The overall wound complication rate was 21.3% (27/127). There was no reduction in the rate of wound complications with ciNPWT when compared with conventional dressing [23.3% (7/30) and 20.6% (20/97), respectively, p = 0.75]. In the obese subset (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), there was no significant reduction in wound complications [31.1% (5/16) and 36.8% (7/19), respectively, p = 0.73]. Propensity score matching yielded 26 matched pairs with equivalent rates of wound complications (23.1%, 6/26). Conclusion: This is the first reported cohort study evaluating the use of ciNPWT in kidney transplantation. While ciNPWT is safe and well tolerated, it is not associated with a statistically significant reduction in wound complications when compared to conventional dressing. The findings from this study will be used to inform future studies associated with ciNPWT in kidney transplantation.

18.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(6)2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932337

RESUMEN

Kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk of hospitalisation and death from SARS-CoV-2 infection, and standard two-dose vaccination schedules are typically inadequate to generate protective immunity. Gut dysbiosis, which is common among kidney transplant recipients and known to effect systemic immunity, may be a contributing factor to a lack of vaccine immunogenicity in this at-risk cohort. The gut microbiota modulates vaccine responses, with the production of immunomodulatory short-chain fatty acids by bacteria such as Bifidobacterium associated with heightened vaccine responses in both observational and experimental studies. As SCFA-producing populations in the gut microbiota are enhanced by diets rich in non-digestible fibre, dietary supplementation with prebiotic fibre emerges as a potential adjuvant strategy to correct dysbiosis and improve vaccine-induced immunity. In a randomised, double-bind, placebo-controlled trial of 72 kidney transplant recipients, we found dietary supplementation with prebiotic inulin for 4 weeks before and after a third SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine to be feasible, tolerable, and safe. Inulin supplementation resulted in an increase in gut Bifidobacterium, as determined by 16S RNA sequencing, but did not increase in vitro neutralisation of live SARS-CoV-2 virus at 4 weeks following a third vaccination. Dietary fibre supplementation is a feasible strategy with the potential to enhance vaccine-induced immunity and warrants further investigation.

19.
BMJ Open ; 12(12): e062747, 2022 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36456021

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an increased risk of hospitalisation and death from COVID-19. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is our primary risk mitigation strategy, yet vaccine effectiveness in KTRs is suboptimal. Strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy are therefore required. Current evidence supports the role of the gut microbiota in shaping the immune response to vaccination. Gut dysbiosis is common in KTRs and is a potential contributor to impaired COVID-19 vaccine responses. We hypothesise that dietary fibre supplementation will attenuate gut dysbiosis and promote vaccine responsiveness in KTRs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Rapamycin and inulin for third-dose vaccine response stimulation-inulin is a multicentre, randomised, prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial examining the effect of dietary inulin supplementation prior to a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in KTRs who have failed to develop protective immunity following a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to inulin (active) or maltodextrin (placebo control), administered as 20 g/day of powdered supplement dissolved in water, for 4 weeks prior to and following vaccination. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants in each trial arm that achieve in vitro neutralisation of live SARS-CoV-2 virus at 4 weeks following a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary outcomes include the safety and tolerability of dietary inulin, the diversity and differential abundance of gut microbiota, and vaccine-specific immune cell populations and responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (approval number: 2021/HRE00354) and the Sydney Local Health District (SHLD) HREC (approval numbers: X21-0411 and 2021/STE04280). Results of this trial will be published following peer-review and presented at scientific meetings and congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001465842.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Inulina , Sirolimus , Disbiosis , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
20.
Trials ; 23(1): 780, 2022 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36109788

RESUMEN

Kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19-associated hospitalisation and death. Vaccination has been a key public health strategy to reduce disease severity and infectivity, but the effectiveness of COVID vaccines is markedly reduced in kidney transplant recipients. Urgent strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy are needed. METHODS: RIVASTIM-rapamycin is a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial examining the effect of immunosuppression modification prior to a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients who have failed to develop protective immunity to a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either remain on standard of care immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone (control) or cease mycophenolate and commence sirolimus (intervention) for 4 weeks prior to and following vaccination. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants in each trial arm who develop protective serological neutralisation of live SARS-CoV-2 virus at 4-6 weeks following a third COVID-19 vaccination. Secondary outcomes include SARS-CoV-receptor binding domain IgG, vaccine-specific immune cell populations and responses, and the safety and tolerability of sirolimus switch. DISCUSSION: Immunosuppression modification strategies may improve immunological vaccine response. We hypothesise that substituting the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus for mycophenolate in a triple drug regimen will enhance humoral and cell-mediated responses to COVID vaccination for kidney transplant recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001412820. Registered on 20 October 2021; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=382891&isReview=true.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Riñón , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inulina , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Prednisolona , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR , Tacrolimus
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA