CT and Functional Outcomes of Primarily Ligamentous and Combined Ligamentous-Bony Lisfranc Injuries: A Retrospective Review.

Lisfranc injuries have been rising in incidence and can cause significant and lasting morbidity. There is no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for these injuries, be they primarily ligamentous or combined (bony and ligamentous). No study has ever followed Lisfranc injury patients postoperatively using advanced imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of primarily ligamentous and combined osseous and ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated operatively with reduction and fixation. We performed a retrospective review of all Lisfranc injuries treated operatively in a single institution over a 6-year period. Injuries were classified as primarily ligamentous or combined by independent evaluation of available computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. Outcomes were measured using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). CT of 29 patients was performed at last follow-up to evaluate reduction and degenerative changes. Of the 56 patients identified, 38 were available for follow-up. The average follow-up was 3.8 years. There were 26 combined injuries and 12 primarily ligamentous injuries. Outcomes were excellent in all patients and there was no statistical difference in SMFA scores in any category between the groups. On follow-up CT, all injuries were anatomically reduced, and 26 of 29 patients had degenerative changes. Our results support that reduction and stable fixation of Lisfranc injuries may be suitable treatment regardless of classification as combined or primarily ligamentous. Future larger-scale prospective studies should be pursued to supplement existing data.

Platelet-rich plasma in fibrin matrix to augment rotator cuff repair: a prospective, single-blinded, randomized study with 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Application of autologous platelet-rich plasma in fibrin matrix (PRPFM) improves tendon healing in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We performed a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study of 76 patients, with an α level of 5% and power of 80%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients were divided into 2 randomized groups. The treatment group underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with PRPFM. The control group did not receive the PRPFM treatment. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months and 24 months postoperatively with validated clinical outcome scores, and dynamometer examination. A magnetic resonance imaging scan was performed at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The 2 randomized groups were homogeneous. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) scores were not statistically different at any time interval. The WORC scores changed from 1257 to 139 in the control group and from 1106 to 99 in the PRPFM group over the 24-month study period. On the Simple Shoulder Test, improvement over the study period was noted from 45% to 96% in the control group and from 49% to 96% in the PRPFM group. Strength of the supraspinatus at 24 months by dynamometer testing was 99.8% in the control group and 96.3% in the PRPFM group. Infraspinatus strength was 104% in the control group and 103% in the PRPFM group. The secondary outcome of retear occurred at a rate of 19% for the double-row technique and 7.4% for the PRPFM technique at 6 months. All our results were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no benefit from PRPFM used for rotator cuff repair according to the WORC Index, Simple Shoulder Test, and shoulder strength index.

The angle of inclination of the native ACL in the coronal and sagittal planes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the angle of inclination of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in both the sagittal and coronal planes and to evaluate these findings based on sex, height, BMI, and skeletal maturity. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for the study included patients undergoing routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee at a single outpatient orthopedic center who had an intact ACL on MRI. Measurements of the angle of inclination were made on MRIs in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Patients were compared based on sex, height, BMI, and skeletal maturity. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighty-eight patients were included (36 skeletally immature/152 skeletally mature; 98 male/90 female). The overall angle of inclination was 74.3° ± 4.8° in the coronal plane and 46.9° ± 4.9° in the sagittal plane. Skeletally immature patients (coronal: 71.8° ± 6.1°; sagittal: 44.7° ± 5.5°) were significantly different in both coronal and sagittal planes (P = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively) from skeletally mature patients (coronal: 75.3° ± 4.7°; sagittal: 47.4° ± 4.7°). There were no differences based on sex, height, or BMI. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences between the angle of inclination findings in this study and other studies, which could be due to MRI and measurement techniques. Clinically, skeletal maturity may be important to account for when using the ACL angle of inclination to evaluate anatomic ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic retrospective study, Level of evidence III.

Part I: An anatomic-based tunnel in the fibular head for posterolateral corner reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: Currently, there are no studies that clearly define a method for the placement of the fibular tunnel between the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) insertions when performing an anatomic-based posterolateral corner reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to use magnetic resonance-based anatomic landmarks to describe the orientation of a fibular tunnel between the FCL and PFL insertions. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 105 patients with normal posterolateral corner knee anatomy was identified by a musculoskeletal radiologist, and the FCL and popliteofibular insertions were labelled. Three experienced providers independently evaluated the images. In the axial plane, the Cobb angle of a fibular tunnel from the FCL to the popliteofibular insertion was measured using the tibial tubercle as a reference. In the sagittal plane, the same tunnel was measured in reference to the lateral tibial plateau. RESULTS: In the axial plane, the average Cobb angle for an anatomic-based fibular tunnel was 48.1° ± 10.7° (ICC(2,1) = 0.76, p < 0.01) externally rotated to the tibial tubercle. In the sagittal plane, the average Cobb angle for an anatomic-based fibular tunnel was 59.8° ± 11.9° (ICC(2,1) = 0.81, p < 0.01) cranial, referenced from the lateral tibial plateau. The average length of the fibular tunnel was 2.0 ± 0.4 cm (ICC(2,1) = 0.78, p < 0.01), at the point of the fibular insertion. The distance from the midpoint of the fibular tunnel to the posterolateral wall of the fibular head was 0.8 ± 0.2 cm (ICC(2,1) = 0.63, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MRI can be used to identify the orientation between the FCL and PFL insertions to create an anatomic-based fibular tunnel, which is 50° externally rotated from the tibial tubercle in the axial plane and placed in a cranial direction of 60° relative to the lateral joint line. The clinical relevance of this study is that this information may aid surgeons in placing a fibular tunnel connecting the FCL and PFL insertions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Flouroscopic arthrography versus MR arthrography of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints for the detection of tears of the plantar plate and joint capsule: a prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Derangements of the plantar plate and joint capsule are an underrecognized cause of lesser metatarsalgia. Fluoroscopic arthrography and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography are both used for diagnosis. Currently there are no studies comparing the effectiveness of these two modalities. METHODS: Patients suspected of having plantar plate or capsular tears underwent both fluoroscopic arthrography and MR arthrography; the imaging findings were then compared and correlated with intraoperative findings, when available, to evaluate the effectiveness of the different imaging modalities. Forty consecutive patients underwent both fluoroscopic and MR arthrography. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 40 patients (80%) were found to have tears of the plantar plate, joint capsule, or both. MR arthrography identified all 32 tears. Four cases in the first 29 patients, 13.8%, demonstrated discrepancy where a tear was identified only on the MR arthrogram. A midpoint review of the data was performed. Of the 4 missed tears they were all noted to be plantar lateral in location. Four other patients in this group had plantar lateral tears that were not missed. These patients had an additional steep lateral oblique image on fluoroscopic arthrography, which showed the plantar lateral tear. Therefore an additional steep lateral oblique image was performed routinely capturing these small tears in the last 11 patients. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography was more accurate in identifying tears of the plantar plate and capsule than fluoroscopic arthrography. Fluoroscopic arthrography with additional views, like a steep lateral oblique view, was found to be as reliable, and more cost-effective, than MR arthrography. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.