RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The rates of suicide and opioid use disorder (OUD) among pregnant and postpartum women continue to increase. This research characterized OUD and suicide attempts among Medicaid-enrolled perinatal women and examined prenatal OUD diagnosis as a marker for postpartum suicide attempts. METHODS: Data from Oregon birth certificates, Medicaid eligibility and claims files, and hospital discharge records were linked and analyzed. The sample included Oregon Medicaid women aged 15-44 who became pregnant and gave live births between January 2008 and January 2016 (N = 61,481). Key measures included indicators of suicide attempts (separately for any means and opioid poisoning) and OUD diagnosis, separately assessed during pregnancy and the one-year postpartum period. Probit regression was used to examine the overall relationship between prenatal OUD diagnosis and postpartum suicide attempts. A simultaneous equations model was employed to explore the link between prenatal OUD diagnosis and postpartum suicide attempts, mediated by postpartum OUD diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-three prenatal suicide attempts by any means were identified. Postpartum suicide attempts were more frequent with 58 attempts, corresponding to a rate of 94.3 attempts per 100,000. Of these attempts, 79% (46 attempts) involved opioid poisoning. A total of 1,799 unique women (4.6% of the sample) were diagnosed with OUD either during pregnancy or one-year postpartum with 53% receiving the diagnosis postpartum. Postpartum suicide attempts by opioid poisoning increased from 55.5 per 100,000 in 2009 to 105.1 per 100,000 in 2016. The rate of prenatal OUD also almost doubled over the same period. Prenatal OUD diagnosis was associated with a 0.15%-point increase in the probability of suicide attempts by opioid poisoning within the first year postpartum. This increase reflects a three-fold increase compared to the rate for women without a prenatal OUD diagnosis. A prenatal OUD diagnosis was significantly associated with an elevated risk of postpartum suicide attempts by opioid poisoning via a postpartum OUD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of suicide attempt by opioid poisoning is elevated for Medicaid-enrolled reproductive-age women during pregnancy and postpartum. Women diagnosed with prenatal OUD may face an increased risk of postpartum suicides attempts involving opioid poisoning.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Intento de Suicidio , Oregon/epidemiología , Medicaid , Periodo Posparto , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Medicaid expansion on asthma-related health care services utilization and expenditures among low-income adult patients with asthma aged 26-64. METHODS: Using a pooled dataset from 2007 to 2018 Medical Expenditures Panel Surveys (MEPS), we implemented a multivariate difference-in-differences analysis, which compared changes in utilization and expenditures for asthma-related health care services among adult patients with asthma with income below 133% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) vs. above 133%-400% FPL, before and after Medicaid expansion in 2014. We used negative binomial models to analyze utilization outcomes. Expenditures were estimated using two-part models with logit as the first part and generalized linear models as the second part. Estimates were weighted for the complex multi-stage sampling design of MEPS. RESULTS: Medicaid expansion was associated with increases in both utilization and expenditures for asthma-related prescription drugs among low-income patients with asthma, by 1.8 prescription fills (p < 0.05) and $233 (p < 0.05) per year, respectively. No statistically significant association was detected for other asthma-related health care services. CONCLUSION: Medicaid expansion led to an increase in accessibility of prescription drugs among low-income asthma patients, but had no effect on other asthma-related health care services.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Medicaid , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Gastos en Salud , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Asma/terapiaRESUMEN
Cervical cancer can be prevented and highly curable if detected early. Current guidelines recommend women to receive cervical cancer screening starting at age 21. Our study aims to investigate how improving continuity of care (COC) may influence guideline concordance of cervical cancer screening. Using the eligibility and claims data, we created a person-month panel data set for women who were enrolled in Oregon Medicaid for at least 80% of the period from 2008 to 2015. We then selected our study cohort following the cervical cancer screening guidelines. Our dependent variable is whether a woman received cervical cancer screening concordant with guidelines in a given month, when she did not receive Pap test in the past 36 months and did not receive co-testing of HPV test plus Pap test in the past 60 months. We used both population-averaged logit model and conditional fixed-effect logit model to estimate the association between the guideline concordance and the COC index, after controlling for high risk, pregnancy, age, race, and ethnicity. A total of 466,526 person-month observations were included in our main models. A 0.1 unit increase of the COC score was significantly associated with a decrease in the odds of receiving guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening (population-averaged logit model: OR = 0.988, p < .001; conditional fixed-effect logit model: OR = 0.966, p < .001). Our findings remain robust to a series of sensitivity analyses. A better COC may not be necessarily beneficial to improving cervical cancer prevention. Educations for both physicians and patients should be supplemented to assure quality of preventive care.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Adulto , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Frotis Vaginal , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has the potential to improve reproductive health by allowing low-income women access to healthcare before and early in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of Oregon's Medicaid expansion on timely and adequate prenatal care. We included live births in Oregon from 2012 to 2015 and used individually-linked birth certificate and Medicaid eligibility data. Outcomes were receipt of first trimester prenatal care and receipt of adequate prenatal care. We also assessed Medicaid enrollment one month prior to pregnancy. We estimated the overall effect of Medicaid expansion on prenatal care utilization using probit regression models. Additionally, we assessed the impact of Medicaid expansion on prenatal care utilization via pre-pregnancy Medicaid enrollment using bivariate probit models. Overall, receipt of first trimester prenatal care increased post-expansion by 1.5 percentage points (p < 0.01) after expansion. Receipt of adequate prenatal care also increased significantly post-expansion with an incremental increase of 2.8 percentage points (p < 0.001). Pre-pregnancy Medicaid enrollment increased following Medicaid expansion (ß = 0.55, p < 0.001) and was associated with both timely (ß = 0.48, p < 0.001) and adequate receipt of prenatal care (ß = 0.14, p < 0.001). Using two years of post-ACA data we found that Medicaid expansion had significant positive associations with Medicaid enrollment prior to pregnancy, which subsequently increased receipt of timely and adequate prenatal care. Our study provides evidence that expanding Medicaid has positive effects on women's use of healthcare.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Oregon , Pobreza , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Postpartum care is an important strategy for preventing and managing chronic disease in women with pregnancy complications (i.e., gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP)). METHODS: Using a population-based, cohort study among Oregon women with Medicaid-financed deliveries (2009-2012), we examined Medicaid-financed postpartum care (postpartum visits, contraceptive services, and routine preventive health services) among women who retained Medicaid coverage for at least 90 days after delivery (n = 74,933). We estimated postpartum care overall and among women with and without GDM and/or HDP using two different definitions: 1) excluding care provided on the day of delivery, and 2) including care on the day of delivery. Pearson chi-square tests were used to assess differential distributions in postpartum care by pregnancy complications (p < .05), and generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of Oregon women who retained coverage through 90 days after delivery, 56.6-78.1% (based on the two definitions) received any postpartum care, including postpartum visits (26.5%-71.8%), contraceptive services (30.7-35.6%), or other routine preventive health services (38.5-39.1%). Excluding day of delivery services, the odds of receiving any postpartum care (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08-1.47) or routine preventive services (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.14-1.53) were meaningfully higher among women with GDM and HDP (reference = neither). DISCUSSION: Medicaid-financed postpartum care in Oregon was underutilized, it varied by pregnancy complications, and needs improvement. Postpartum care is important for all women and especially those with GDM or HDP, who may require chronic disease risk assessment, management, and referrals.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Atención Posnatal , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo , Oregon , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
We evaluated the effect of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion on receipt of preventive reproductive services for women in Oregon. First, we compared service receipt among continuing Medicaid enrollees pre- and post-ACA. We then compared receipt among new post-ACA Medicaid enrollees to receipt by continuing enrollees after ACA implementation. Using Medicaid enrollment and claims data, we identified well-woman visits, contraceptive counseling, contraceptive services, sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening, and cervical cancer screening among women ages 15-44 in years when not pregnant. For pre-ACA enrollees, we assessed pre-ACA receipt in 2011-2013 (nâ¯=â¯83,719) and post-ACA receipt in 2014-2016 (nâ¯=â¯103,225). For post-ACA enrollees we similarly assessed post-ACA service receipt (nâ¯=â¯73,945) and compared this to service receipt by pre-ACA enrollees during 2014-2016. We estimated logistic regression models to compare service receipt over time and between enrollment groups. Among pre-ACA enrollees we found lower receipt of all services post-ACA. Adjusted declines ranged from 7.0 percentage points (95% CI: -7.5, -6.4) for cervical cancer screening to 0.4 percentage points [-0.6, -0.2] for STI screening. In 2014-2016, post-ACA enrollees differed significantly from pre-ACA enrollees in receipt of all services, but all differences were <2 percentage points. Despite small declines in receipt of several preventive reproductive services among prior enrollees, the ACA resulted in Medicaid financing of these services for a large number of newly enrolled low-income women in Oregon, which may eventually lead to population-level improvements in reproductive health. These findings among women in Oregon could inform Medicaid coverage efforts in other states.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Medicaid , Oregon , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/economía , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Boarding of patients in hospital emergency departments (EDs) occurs routinely across the U.S. ED patients with behavioral health conditions are more likely to be boarded than other patients. However, the existing literature on ED boarding of psychiatric patients remains largely descriptive and has not empirically related mental health system capacity to psychiatric boarding. Nor does it show how the mental health system could better address the needs of populations at the highest risk of ED boarding. AIMS OF THE STUDY: We examined extent and determinants of "boarding" of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in hospital emergency departments (ED) and tested whether greater mental health system capacity may mitigate the degree of ED boarding. METHODS: We linked Oregon's ED Information Exchange, hospital discharge, and Medicaid data to analyze encounters in Oregon hospital EDs from October 2014 through September 2015 by 7,103 persons aged 15 to 64 with SMI (N = 34,207). We additionally utilized Medicaid claims for years 2010-2015 to identify Medicaid beneficiaries with SMI. Boarding was defined as an ED stay over six hours. We estimated a recursive simultaneous-equation model to test the pathway that mental health system capacity affects ED boarding via psychiatric visits. RESULTS: Psychiatric visits were more likely to be boarded than non-psychiatric visits (30.2% vs. 7.4%). Severe psychiatric visits were 1.4 times more likely to be boarded than non-severe psychiatric visits. Thirty-four percent of psychiatric visits by children were boarded compared to 29.6% for adults. Statistical analysis found that psychiatric visit, substance abuse, younger age, black race and urban residence corresponded with an elevated risk of boarding. Discharge destinations such as psychiatric facility and acute care hospitals also corresponded with a higher probability of ED boarding. Greater supply of mental health resources in a county, both inpatient and intensive community-based, corresponded with a reduced risk of ED boarding via fewer psychiatric ED visits. DISCUSSION: Psychiatric visit, severity of psychiatric diagnosis, substance abuse, and discharge destinations are among important predictors of psychiatric ED boarding by persons with SMI. A greater capacity of inpatient and intensive community mental health systems may lead to a reduction in psychiatric ED visits by persons with SMI and thereby decrease the extent of psychiatric ED boarding. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Continued investment in mental health system resources may reduce psychiatric ED visits and mitigate the psychiatric ED boarding problem.
Asunto(s)
Ocupación de Camas/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oregon , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alternative payment models, including Accountable Care Organizations and fully capitated models, change incentives for treatment over fee-for-service models and are widely used in a variety of settings. The level of payment may affect the assignment to a payment category, but to date the upcoding literature has been motivated largely incorporating financial penalties for upcoding rather than by a theoretical model that incorporates the downstream effects of upcoding on service provision requirements. AIMS OF THE STUDY: In this paper, we contribute to the literature on upcoding by developing a new theoretical model that is applicable to capitated, case-rate and shared savings payment systems. This model incorporates the downstream effects of upcoding on service provision requirements rather than just the avoidance of penalties. This difference is important especially for shared-savings models with quality benchmarks. METHODS: We test implications of our theoretical model on changes in severity determination and service use associated with changes in case-rate payments in a publicly-funded mental health care system. We model provider-assigned severity categories as a function of risk-adjusted capitated payments using conditional logit regressions and counts of service days per month using negative binomial models. RESULTS: We find that severity determination is only weakly associated with the payment rate, with relatively small upcoding effects, but that level of use shows a greater degree of association. DISCUSSION: These results are consistent with our theoretical predictions where the marginal utility of savings or profit is small, as would be expected from public sector agencies. Upcoding did seem to occur, but at very small levels and may have been mitigated after the county and providers had some experience with the new system. The association between the payment levels and the number of service days in a month, however, was significant in the first period, and potentially at a clinically important level. Limitations include data from a single county/multiple provider system and potential unmeasured confounding during the post-implementation period. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE: Providers in our data were not at risk for inpatient services but decreases in use of outpatient services associated with rate decreases may lead to further increases in inpatient use and therefore expenditures over time. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Health program directors and policy makers need to be acutely aware of the interplay between provider payments and patient care and eventual health and mental health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Further research could examine the implications of the theoretical model of upcoding in other payment systems, estimate the power of the tiered-risk systems, and examine their influence on clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención , Capitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Motivación , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Económicos , Modelos Teóricos , Sector PúblicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The inclusion of indirect spillover costs and benefits that occur in non-healthcare sectors of society is necessary to make optimal societal decisions when assessing the cost effectiveness of healthcare interventions. Education costs and benefits are relevant in the disease area of mental and behavioral disorders, but their inclusion in economic evaluations is largely neglected due to lack of methodological knowledge. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to explore, using a scoping review, the identification, measurement, and valuation methods used to assess the impact of mental and behavioural disorders on education costs and benefits. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to identify articles that were set in the education sector and assessed education costs and benefits. An adapted 5-step approach was used: (i) initating a scoping review; (ii) identifying component studies; (iii) data extraction; (iv) reporting results; (v) discussion and interpretation of findings. Results were summarized in a narrative synthesis per identification, measurement, and valuation method. RESULTS: 177 component articles were identified in the scoping review that reported 61 mutually exclusive education costs and benefits. The nomenclature used to describe the costs and benefits was poorly defined, heterogeneous in nature and largely context dependent. This was also reflected in the diverse number of measurement and valuation methods found in the component articles. DISCUSSION: This is the first study, which offers a classification of education costs and benefits and costing methods reported by studies set in the education sector. In conclusion, mental and behavioral disorders have a notable impact on a variety of different education costs and benefits. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: The classification provided in the current study gives an indication of the wide-spread impact of mental and behavioral disorders on the education sector. Hence, the inclusion of relevant education costs and benefits in economic evaluations for mental and behavioral disorders is necessary to make optimal societal decisions. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: By exploring a new area of research from a sector-specific perspective, the current study adds to the existing intersectoral cost and benefit literature base. Future research should focus on standardizing costing methods in pharmacoeconomic guidelines and assessing the relative importance of individual education costs and benefits in economic evaluations for specific interventions and diseases.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Problema de ConductaRESUMEN
Community Health Centers (CHCs) target medically underserved communities and expanded by 70% in the last decade. We know little, however, about mental health services at CHCs. We analyzed data from 2006 to 2015 and determined county-level drivers of these services. Mental health patients at CHCs fall from 2006 to 2007 but then rise consistently from 2007 to 2015. Counties with fewer physicians, greater percent insured and greater percent white population show faster growth in mental health services. Increases in mental health services at CHCs outpace general CHC growth and reflect federal efforts to integrate behavioral health care into primary care.
Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Características de la Residencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) 2010 parental insurance coverage extension to young adults aged 19 to 25 years on health insurance coverage and access to care, including racial/ethnic disparities. METHODS: We pooled data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for the periods 2007 to 2009 and 2011 to 2013 (n = 402 777). We constructed quasiexperimental difference-in-differences models in which adults aged 26 to 35 years served as a control group. Multivariable statistical models controlled for covariates guided by the Andersen model for health care utilization. RESULTS: On average, insurance rates among young adults increased 6.12 percentage points after ACA implementation (P < .001). All racial/ethnic groups experienced increases in coverage. However, the impact varied by race/ethnicity and was largest for Whites. Young adults had a 2.61 percentage point (P < .001) decrease in experiencing barriers to health care because of cost issues after the ACA, with variation by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The ACA's expansion had a significant positive effect for young adults acquiring health insurance and reducing cost-related barriers to accessing health care. However, racial/ethnic disparities in coverage and access persist. Public Health Implications. Policies not dependent on parental insurance could further increase access and reduce disparities.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Introduction Previous studies indicate that inadequate prenatal care is more common among women covered by Medicaid compared with private insurance. Increasing the proportion of pregnant women who receive early and adequate prenatal care is a Healthy People 2020 goal. We examined the impact of the implementation of Oregon's accountable care organizations, Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs), for Medicaid enrollees, on prenatal care utilization among Oregon women of reproductive age enrolled in Medicaid. Methods Using Medicaid eligibility data linked to unique birth records for 2011-2013, we used a pre-posttest treatment-control design that compared prenatal care utilization for women on Medicaid before and after CCO implementation to women never enrolled in Medicaid. Additional stratified analyses were conducted to explore differences in the effect of CCO implementation based on rurality, race, and ethnicity. Results After CCO implementation, mothers on Medicaid had a 13% increase in the odds of receiving first trimester care (OR 1.13, CI 1.04, 1.23). Non-Hispanic (OR 1.20, CI 1.09, 1.32), White (OR 1.20, CI 1.08, 1.33) and Asian (OR 2.03, CI 1.26, 3.27) women on Medicaid were more likely to receive initial prenatal care in the first trimester after CCO implementation and only Medicaid women in urban areas were more likely (OR 1.14, CI 1.05, 1.25) to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester. Conclusion Following Oregon's implementation of an innovative Medicaid coordinated care model, we found that women on Medicaid experienced a significant increase in receiving timely prenatal care.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Eficiencia Organizacional , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Oregon , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Increasing attention focuses on cardiovascular disease (CVD) among persons with SMI. We examined, among persons with SMI, whether co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD) elevates the risk of CVD death. We linked 2002-2007 Medicaid claims data on 121,817 persons with SMI to cause and date of death information. We applied a proportional hazards model that controls for co-morbidity at baseline, atypical antipsychotic prescription medications, age, gender and race/ethnicity. Results among persons with co-occurring SUD indicate a 24 % increased risk of CVD death (hazard ratio 1.24; 95 % confidence interval 1.17-1.33). We encourage further coordination of services for this population.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , California/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study investigates a relationship between overweight perception and smoking among adolescents. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), a biennial survey of a nationally representative sample of students in grades 9 through 12 in the United States. We analyze five waves of repeated cross-sections (N = 73 376) for the years 2005-2013. We estimate a recursive simultaneous-equations system in which body weight perception, which is a function of actual weight, influences smoking status. Outcome measures are binary indicators for current smoking and frequent current smoking. Perceived weight is categorized into very overweight perception, slightly overweight perception, and about the right weight/underweight perception. RESULTS: In comparison to adolescents who perceive themselves to be the right weight or underweight, adolescents who perceive themselves to be very overweight are 6.1 percentage points (pp) (standard error [SE] = 1.6pp) more likely to currently smoking and 3.3pp (SE = 1.2pp) more likely to frequently smoke. Adolescents with slightly overweight perception are 7.9pp (SE = 1.0pp) and 2.5pp (SE = 0.6pp) more likely to currently smoke and frequently smoke, respectively, as compared to those with the right weight/underweight perception. The relationships are larger for females, and appear to be mediated by weight-loss activity. DISCUSSION: In an era of tight budgets, it is crucial to address both obesity and smoking in manners that do not work at cross purposes. Strategies to combat youth smoking may be more effective if the perception of being overweight is considered an important risk factor, especially among female adolescents. IMPLICATIONS: We find that perception of being overweight is an important causal risk factor for adolescent smoking. Main findings of this study imply that even a slight change in the perception of body weight may lead to a significant change in smoking behavior among adolescents, especially among females and that the perception of being overweight induces adolescents to smoke regularly. Unlike most prior studies, we discovered a positive effect of slight overweight perception on smoking for adolescent males. Our findings emphasize the importance of addressing both obesity and smoking in manners that do not work at cross purposes.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Peso Corporal , Sobrepeso/psicología , Fumar/psicología , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Asunción de Riesgos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Estudiantes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The Oregon Public Health Policy Institute (PHPI) was designed to enhance public health policy competencies among state and local health department staff. The Oregon Health Authority funded the College of Public Health and Human Sciences at Oregon State University to develop the PHPI curriculum in 2012 and offer it to participants from 4 state public health programs and 5 local health departments in 2013. The curriculum interspersed short instructional sessions on policy development, implementation, and evaluation with longer hands-on team exercises in which participants applied these skills to policy topics their teams had selected. Panel discussions provided insights from legislators and senior Oregon health experts. Participants reported statistically significant increases in public health policy competencies and high satisfaction with PHPI overall.
Asunto(s)
Academias e Institutos , Salud Pública/educación , Curriculum , Humanos , Oregon , Salud Pública/normas , Administración en Salud Pública/educación , Administración en Salud Pública/normasRESUMEN
To control Medicaid costs, improve quality, and drive community engagement, the Oregon Health Authority introduced a new system of coordinated care organizations (CCOs). While CCOs resemble traditional Medicaid managed care, they have differences that have been deliberately designed to improve care coordination, increase accountability, and incorporate greater community governance. Reforms include global budgets integrating medical, behavioral, and oral health care and public health functions; risk-adjusted payments rewarding outcomes and evidence-based practice; increased transparency; and greater community engagement. The CCO model faces several implementation challenges. If successful, it will provide improved health care delivery, better health outcomes, and overall savings.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Medicaid/organización & administración , Capitación , Atención a la Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud Dental/organización & administración , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Medicaid/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Oregon , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Continuing its path of Medicaid program innovation, Oregon recently embarked on a major reform that gives regional coordinated care organizations (CCOs) global budgets and accountability for the physical, behavioral, and dental care of the state's Medicaid beneficiaries (Howard et al. 2014). There are some who maintain that the state's bold reform initiative is overly aggressive in scope and unrealistically optimistic in schedule and may prove to be a costly debacle to the state of Oregon. We argue that the Oregon CCO model is not only bold in its aims and timetable but also realistically achievable.
Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Control de Costos , Competencia Económica , Humanos , Medicaid , Oregon , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Spine pain (SP) is common and often disabling. Clinical practice guidelines discourage opioid treatment and outline the value of varied nonpharmacologic therapies (NPTs). This study elucidates the amount of variability in primary-care clinicians' (PCPs') prescribing of opioids and in their cases' receipt of the two most common NPTs (exercise therapy and spinal manipulation). METHOD: The design was a retrospective cohort study examining variation in the treatment of PCPs' new SP cases, classified by receipt of (a) prescription of an opioid at the initial visit; (b) exercise therapy and/or spinal manipulation within 30 days of initial visit. The study was set in the primary care clinics at military treatment facilities of the US Military Health System in the period between October 2011 and September 2016. RESULTS: The majority of cases did not receive a study treatment (66.3%); 19.6% of cases received only NPT within 30 days of initial visit; 11.5% were prescribed only an opioid at the initial visit with receipt of both NPT and opioid during early treatment rare (2.6%). Exercise therapy within 30 days exhibited more than a twofold difference in interquartile percentile rates (IQR) (median provision 15.8%, IQR 9.8%-22.1%). The other treatments exhibited even greater variation; specifically, spinal manipulation (median 8.5%, IQR 3.3%-15.8%), and opioid at initial visit (median 10.3%, IQR 4.4%-18.2%). The availability of physical therapists and doctors of chiropractic had significant association with several clinical provision rates. CONCLUSION: Among providers of spine care for a sample of Army soldiers, there was substantial variation in the early provision of exercise therapy, spinal manipulation, and opioid prescriptions. The magnitude of the case-mix adjusted variation and its association with facility availability of providers suggests that quality of care initiatives may help reduce this variation.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Manipulación Espinal , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Terapia por Ejercicio , Atención Primaria de Salud , DolorRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In November 2004, California voters passed the Mental Health Services Act, which allocated more than $3 billion for comprehensive community mental health programs. We examined whether these county-level programs, known as "full service partnerships," promoted independent living arrangements (i.e., recovery) among their clients. METHODS: We used Markov chain models to identify probabilities of residential transitions among 8 living arrangements (n = 9208 adults followed up to 4 years). We modeled these transitions on the basis of patterns of program participation and clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Interrupted program participation and substance abuse were significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of independent living and a greater probability of homelessness and incarceration. Persons with schizophrenia were the least likely to live independently, followed by persons with bipolar disorder. Compared with Whites, non-Whites were more frequently found to be homeless or in jail. CONCLUSIONS: Clients with sustained enrollment in California's comprehensive community mental health programs appear most likely to transition to independent living. The likelihood of this transition, however, shows a disparity in that ethnic minority clients appear least likely to transition to independent living.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Vida Independiente/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Ajuste Social , Adulto , California , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is an on-going concern that reductions in psychiatric inpatient bed capacity beyond a critical threshold will further exacerbate the incarceration of persons with mental illness. However, research to date to assess the proposed relationship between inpatient bed capacity and jail use has been limited in several ways. In addition, mechanisms through which changes in psychiatric bed capacity may affect jail use by persons with mental illness remain unexamined empirically. AIMS OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to test whether changes in inpatient psychiatric resources, measured by per-capita psychiatric beds, inversely affect the likelihood of jail use by persons with severe mental illness. We also examine mechanisms that link psychiatric bed supply and jail detention. METHODS: We analyze unique individual-level panel data on 41,236 adults in King County, Washington who were users of jails, the public mental health system, or the Medicaid program from 1993 to 1998. Using administrative records, we identify persons ever diagnosed with severe mental illness during the study period. Our analyses build upon a system of simultaneous equations that captures mechanisms from changes in psychiatric bed supply to jail detention. We estimate a reduced-form model and calculate the total effect of a shift in psychiatric bed supply on the likelihood of jail use by persons with severe mental illness. We also estimate a semi-reduced-form equation to examine whether changes in mental health and substance use mediate the relationship between bed supply and jail detention. We estimate linear probability models with person-level fixed effects to control for individual heterogeneity. Standard errors are adjusted for intra-cluster correlations. When an equation includes an endogenous variable, we calculate generalized method of moments estimators with instrumental variables. RESULTS: A decrease in the supply of psychiatric hospital beds is significantly associated with a greater probability of jail detention for minor charges among persons diagnosed with severe mental illness. Substance use appears to mediate this relationship. DISCUSSION: A reduction of inpatient psychiatric beds, ceteris paribus, is associated with an increase in jail detention among persons with severe mental illness via substance use problems. Further research should examine whether the magnitude of this relationship is greater for persons who have severe mental illness but are unable to obtain necessary treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: This study further confirms an identified relationship between the supply of inpatient psychiatric beds, substance use and jail detention among persons with severe mental illness. These important relationships should be incorporated in the policy planning process, especially at the time of psychiatric inpatient bed reductions.