Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Respir Res ; 24(1): 79, 2023 Mar 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36915107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We applied machine learning (ML) algorithms to generate a risk prediction tool [Collaboration for Risk Evaluation in COVID-19 (CORE-COVID-19)] for predicting the composite of 30-day endotracheal intubation, intravenous administration of vasopressors, or death after COVID-19 hospitalization and compared it with the existing risk scores. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 from March 2020 to February 2021. Patients, each with 92 variables, and one composite outcome underwent feature selection process to identify the most predictive variables. Selected variables were modeled to build four ML algorithms (artificial neural network, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, and Logistic regression) and an ensemble model to generate a CORE-COVID-19 model to predict the composite outcome and compared with existing risk prediction scores. The net benefit for clinical use of each model was assessed by decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Of 1796 patients, 278 (15%) patients reached primary outcome. Six most predictive features were identified. Four ML algorithms achieved comparable discrimination (P > 0.827) with c-statistics ranged 0.849-0.856, calibration slopes 0.911-1.173, and Hosmer-Lemeshow P > 0.141 in validation dataset. These 6-variable fitted CORE-COVID-19 model revealed a c-statistic of 0.880, which was significantly (P < 0.04) higher than ISARIC-4C (0.751), CURB-65 (0.735), qSOFA (0.676), and MEWS (0.674) for outcome prediction. The net benefit of the CORE-COVID-19 model was greater than that of the existing risk scores. CONCLUSION: The CORE-COVID-19 model accurately assigned 88% of patients who potentially progressed to 30-day composite events and revealed improved performance over existing risk scores, indicating its potential utility in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inteligencia Artificial , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Hospitalización
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 175(1): JC9, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34978858

RESUMEN

SOURCE CITATION: Svennberg E, Friberg L, Frykman V, et al. Clinical outcomes in systematic screening for atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP): a multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398:1498-1506. 34469764.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Electrocardiografía , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Morbilidad
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 175(1): JC8, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34978859

RESUMEN

SOURCE CITATION: Svendsen JH, Diederichsen SZ, Højberg S, et al. Implantable loop recorder detection of atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke (The LOOP Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398:1507-16. 34469766.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
4.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun ; 623: 44-50, 2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35870261

RESUMEN

Aging is associated with increased prevalence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, but mechanisms underlying higher susceptibility to arrhythmogenesis and means to prevent such arrhythmias under stress are not fully defined. We aimed to define differences in aging-associated susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction between young and aged hearts. VF induction was attempted in isolated perfused hearts of young (6-month) and aged (24-month-old) male Fischer-344 rats by rapid pacing before and following isoproterenol (1 µM) or global ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury with or without pretreatment with low-dose tetrodotoxin, a late sodium current blocker. At baseline, VF could not be induced; however, the susceptibility to inducible VF after isoproterenol and spontaneous VF following I/R was 6-fold and 3-fold higher, respectively, in old hearts (P < 0.05). Old animals had longer epicardial monophasic action potential at 90% repolarization (APD90; P < 0.05) and displayed a loss of isoproterenol-induced shortening of APD90 present in the young. In isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes from older but not younger animals, 4-aminopyridine prolonged APD and induced early afterdepolarizations (EADs) and triggered activity with isoproterenol. Low-dose tetrodotoxin (0.5 µM) significantly shortened APD without altering action potential upstroke and prevented 4-aminopyridine-mediated APD prolongation, EADs, and triggered activity. Tetrodotoxin pretreatment prevented VF induction by pacing in isoproterenol-challenged hearts. Vulnerability to VF following I/R or catecholamine challenge is significantly increased in old hearts that display reduced repolarization reserve and increased propensity to EADs, triggered activity, and ventricular arrhythmogenesis that can be suppressed by low-dose tetrodotoxin, suggesting a role of slow sodium current in promoting arrhythmogenesis with aging.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Fibrilación Ventricular , 4-Aminopiridina/efectos adversos , Potenciales de Acción/fisiología , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Animales , Isoproterenol/efectos adversos , Masculino , Miocitos Cardíacos , Ratas , Sodio , Tetrodotoxina/farmacología , Fibrilación Ventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Ventricular/etiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/prevención & control
5.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(1): JC7, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33395341

RESUMEN

SOURCE CITATION: Juraschek SP, Hu JR, Cluett JL, et al. Effects of intensive blood pressure treatment on orthostatic hypotension: a systematic review and individual participant-based meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2020. [Epub ahead of print.] 32909814.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Hipotensión Ortostática , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipotensión Ortostática/diagnóstico , Hipotensión Ortostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipotensión Ortostática/prevención & control
6.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(1): 167-174, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30340936

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We examined predictors of recurrent hospitalizations and the importance of these hospitalizations for subsequent mortality after incident transient ischemic attacks (TIA) that have not yet been investigated. METHODS: Adults hospitalized for TIA from 2000 through 2017 were examined for recurrent hospitalizations, days, and percentage of time spent hospitalized and long-term mortality. RESULTS: Of 266 patients hospitalized for TIA, 122 died, 212 had 826 anycondition hospitalization (59 from TIA-related conditions) corresponding to 3384 inpatient days during 1693 person-years of follow-up. Of 42 patient-level characteristics, age greater than or equal to 65 years (Incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.55), current smoking (IRR 2.15, 95% CI 1.39-3.33), concurrent heart failure (IRR 1.81, 95% CI 1.17-2.80) or anemia (IRR 1.90, 95% CI 1.40-2.48), and no prescription statin (IRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04-2.03, P = .0289) emerged as significant predictors of anycondition rehospitalization. All these variables except heart failure remained significant predictors of TIA-related rehospitalizations. All-cause mortality was significantly increased after each hospitalization from anycondition (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39), TIA-related condition (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.28-2.30), and per each day (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.05) and per 1% of follow-up time spent hospitalized from anycondition (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.34-1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Older age, current tobacco smoking, concurrent heart failure or anemia, and no prescription statin, easily measured patient-level characteristics, identifies patients with TIA at high risk for recurrent hospitalizations and the burden of these hospitalizations predicts subsequent mortality.


Asunto(s)
Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/mortalidad , Readmisión del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Stroke ; 49(3): 730-733, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29339433

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed at providing estimates of mortality associated with cardiometabolic comorbidity and incident readmission from cardiometabolic as compared with noncardiometabolic conditions after a first transient ischemic attack. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2015, patients hospitalized for a first transient ischemic attack were examined for cardiometabolic comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation), 5-year incident hospitalization, and time to death. RESULTS: Of 251 patients with transient ischemic attack, 134 (53%) had at least 1 and 55 (22%) had at least 2 cardiometabolic conditions. By 5 years, 491 readmissions (134 [27%] cardiometabolic and 357 [73%] noncardiometabolic) and 75 deaths (27 [36%] cardiometabolic and 47 [64%] noncardiometabolic) were observed. Mortality was increased with any concurrent cardiometabolic comorbidity (hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.03; P=0.0089) with multiplicative mortality risk from a combination of coronary artery disease and heart failure. Each hospitalization was associated with a 1.5-fold risk of death (95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.64; P<0.0001). Risk of cardiometabolic and noncardiometabolic mortality was correlated with the corresponding category-specific readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized for first transient ischemic attack, 5-year mortality is associated with concurrent cardiometabolic comorbidity and rates of subsequent hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Readmisión del Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
8.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 26(6): 1239-1248, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28285088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and clinical impact of chronic conditions (CCs) have increasingly been recognized as an important public health concern. We evaluated the prevalence of coexisting CCs and their association with 30-day mortality and readmission in hospitalized patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). METHODS: In a retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized for first-ever stroke and TIA, we assessed the prevalence of coexisting CCs and their predictive value for subsequent 30-day mortality and readmission. RESULTS: Study cohort comprised 6771 patients, hospitalized for stroke (n = 4068) and TIA (n = 2703), 51.4% men, with mean age of 68.2 years (standard deviation: ±15.6), mean number of CCs of 2.9 (±1.7), 30-day mortality rate of 8.6% (entire cohort), and 30-day readmission rate of 9.7% (in 2498 patients limited to Olmsted and surrounding counties). In multivariable models, significant predictors of (1) 30-day mortality were coexisting heart failure (HF) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.92), cardiac arrhythmia (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.40-2.17), coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.29-2.08), cancer (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.31-2.14), and diabetes (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01-1.62); and (2) 30-day readmission (n = 2498) were CAD (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.09-2.07), cancer (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.01-2.10), and arthritis (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.09-2.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized with stroke and TIA, CCs are highly prevalent and influence 30-day mortality and readmission. Optimal therapeutic and lifestyle interventions for CAD, HF, cardiac arrhythmia, cancer, diabetes, and arthritis may improve early clinical outcome.


Asunto(s)
Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/mortalidad , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota/epidemiología , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/mortalidad , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/terapia , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Readmisión del Paciente , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Tiempo
9.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(5): ofae197, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698896

RESUMEN

Background: We compared long-term mortality and readmission rates after COVID-19 hospitalization based on rural-urban status and assessed the impact of COVID-19 vaccination introduction on clinical outcomes by rurality. Methods: The study comprised adults hospitalized for COVID-19 at 17 hospitals in 4 US states between March 2020 and July 2022, followed until May 2023. The main analysis included all patients, whereas a sensitivity analysis focused on residents from 4 states containing 17 hospitals. Additional analyses compared the pre- and postvaccination periods. Results: The main analysis involved 9325 COVID-19 hospitalized patients: 31% were from 187 rural counties in 31 states; 69% from 234 urban counties in 44 states; the mean age was 65 years (rural, 66 years; urban, 64 years); 3894 women (rural, 41%; urban, 42%); 8007 Whites (rural, 87%; urban, 83%); 1738 deaths (rural, 21%; urban, 17%); and 2729 readmissions (rural, 30%; urban, 29%). During a median follow-up of 602 days, rural residence was associated with a 22% higher all-cause mortality (log-rank, P < .001; hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.34, P < .001), and a trend toward a higher readmission rate (log-rank, P = .038; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, .98-1.15; P = .130). The results remained consistent in the sensitivity analysis and in both pre- and postvaccination time periods. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients from rural counties experienced higher mortality and tended to be readmitted more frequently following COVID-19 hospitalization over the long term compared with those from urban counties, a difference that remained even after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.

10.
Eur Heart J Digit Health ; 5(2): 109-122, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38505491

RESUMEN

Aims: We developed new machine learning (ML) models and externally validated existing statistical models [ischaemic stroke predictive risk score (iScore) and totalled health risks in vascular events (THRIVE) scores] for predicting the composite of recurrent stroke or all-cause mortality at 90 days and at 3 years after hospitalization for first acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Methods and results: In adults hospitalized with AIS from January 2005 to November 2016, with follow-up until November 2019, we developed three ML models [random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBOOST)] and externally validated the iScore and THRIVE scores for predicting the composite outcomes after AIS hospitalization, using data from 721 patients and 90 potential predictor variables. At 90 days and 3 years, 11 and 34% of patients, respectively, reached the composite outcome. For the 90-day prediction, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.779 for RF, 0.771 for SVM, 0.772 for XGBOOST, 0.720 for iScore, and 0.664 for THRIVE. For 3-year prediction, the AUC was 0.743 for RF, 0.777 for SVM, 0.773 for XGBOOST, 0.710 for iScore, and 0.675 for THRIVE. Conclusion: The study provided three ML-based predictive models that achieved good discrimination and clinical usefulness in outcome prediction after AIS and broadened the application of the iScore and THRIVE scoring system for long-term outcome prediction. Our findings warrant comparative analyses of ML and existing statistical method-based risk prediction tools for outcome prediction after AIS in new data sets.

11.
Metab Syndr Relat Disord ; 22(5): 315-326, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708695

RESUMEN

Purpose: The type 2 diabetes (T2D) burden is disproportionately concentrated in low- and middle-income economies, particularly among rural populations. The purpose of the systematic review was to evaluate the inclusion of rurality and social determinants of health (SDOH) in documents for T2D primary prevention. Methods: This systematic review is reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We searched 19 databases, from 2017-2023, for documents on rurality and T2D primary prevention. Furthermore, we searched online for documents from the 216 World Bank economies, categorized by high, upper-middle, lower-middle, and low income status. We extracted data on rurality and the ten World Health Organization SDOH. Two authors independently screened documents and extracted data. Findings: Based on 3318 documents (19 databases and online search), we selected 15 documents for data extraction. The 15 documents applied to 32 economies; 12 of 15 documents were from nongovernment sources, none was from low-income economies, and 10 of 15 documents did not define or describe rurality. Among the SDOH, income and social protection (SDOH 1) and social inclusion and nondiscrimination (SDOH 8) were mentioned in documents for 25 of 29 high-income economies, while food insecurity (SDOH 5) and housing, basic amenities, and the environment (SDOH 6) were mentioned in documents for 1 of 2 lower-middle-income economies. For U.S. documents, none of the authors was from institutions in noncore (most rural) counties. Conclusions: Overall, documents on T2D primary prevention had sparse inclusion of rurality and SDOH, with additional disparity based on economic status. Inclusion of rurality and/or SDOH may improve T2D primary prevention in rural populations.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Prevención Primaria , Población Rural , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Factores Socioeconómicos
12.
Am J Med Qual ; 38(1): 17-22, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283056

RESUMEN

Delirium is known to be underdiagnosed and underdocumented. Delirium detection in retrospective studies occurs mostly by clinician diagnosis or nursing documentation. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of natural language processing-confusion assessment method (NLP-CAM) algorithm when compared to conventional modalities of delirium detection. A multicenter retrospective study analyzed 4351 COVID-19 hospitalized patient records to identify delirium occurrence utilizing three different delirium detection modalities namely clinician diagnosis, nursing documentation, and the NLP-CAM algorithm. Delirium detection by any of the 3 methods is considered positive for delirium occurrence as a comparison. NLP-CAM captured 80% of overall delirium, followed by clinician diagnosis at 55%, and nursing flowsheet documentation at 43%. Increase in age, Charlson comorbidity score, and length of hospitalization had increased delirium detection odds regardless of the detection method. Artificial intelligence-based NLP-CAM algorithm, compared to conventional methods, improved delirium detection from electronic health records and holds promise in delirium diagnostics.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Delirio , Humanos , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inteligencia Artificial , Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Algoritmos
13.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform ; 27(8): 3794-3805, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227914

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 patient data for composite outcome prediction often comes with class imbalance issues, i.e., only a small group of patients develop severe composite events after hospital admission, while the rest do not. An ideal COVID-19 composite outcome prediction model should possess strong imbalanced learning capability. The model also should have fewer tuning hyperparameters to ensure good usability and exhibit potential for fast incremental learning. Towards this goal, this study proposes a novel imbalanced learning approach called Imbalanced maximizing-Area Under the Curve (AUC) Proximal Support Vector Machine (ImAUC-PSVM) by the means of classical PSVM to predict the composite outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients within 30 days of hospitalization. ImAUC-PSVM offers the following merits: (1) it incorporates straightforward AUC maximization into the objective function, resulting in fewer parameters to tune. This makes it suitable for handling imbalanced COVID-19 data with a simplified training process. (2) Theoretical derivations reveal that ImAUC-PSVM has the same analytical solution form as PSVM, thus inheriting the advantages of PSVM for handling incremental COVID-19 cases through fast incremental updating. We built and internally and externally validated our proposed classifier using real COVID-19 patient data obtained from three separate sites of Mayo Clinic in the United States. Additionally, we validated it on public datasets using various performance metrics. Experimental results demonstrate that ImAUC-PSVM outperforms other methods in most cases, showcasing its potential to assist clinicians in triaging COVID-19 patients at an early stage in hospital settings, as well as in other prediction applications.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Área Bajo la Curva , Aprendizaje Automático , Pronóstico , Hospitalización
14.
AJOG Glob Rep ; 3(4): 100271, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maternal sepsis is a leading cause of maternal death in the United States. Approximately two-thirds of maternal deaths because of sepsis are related to delayed recognition or treatment. New early warning systems using a 2-step approach have been developed for the early recognition of sepsis in obstetrics; however, their performance has not been validated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the performance of 3 primary screening tools introduced by the Society of Obstetric Medicine Australia and New Zealand and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative for use in the first step of their 2-step early warning systems. The obstetrically modified quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score tool, the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome tool, and the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome 1 tool were evaluated for the early detection of sepsis in patients with clinically diagnosed chorioamnionitis. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected clinical data at a tertiary care center and an affiliated healthcare system. The electronic health records were searched to identify and verify cases with clinically diagnosed chorioamnionitis between November 2017 and September 2022. The flow sheet for every patient was reviewed to determine when criteria were met for any of the 3 tools. The performance of these tools was analyzed using their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic curve for the identification of sepsis. RESULTS: There were 545 cases that had the requisite data for inclusion in the analysis. Of note, 11 patients met the criteria for sepsis. Both the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome 1 tools had overall similar test characteristics, which were notably different from the obstetrically modified quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment tool. The screen-positive rate of the obstetrically modified quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment tool (1.5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.6%-2.9%) was lower than that of the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome tool (60.0%; 95% confidence interval, 55.7%-64.1%) and the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome 1 tool (50.0%; 95% confidence interval, 45.8%-54.3%). The sensitivities of the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome tool (100.0%; 95% confidence interval, 71.5%-100.0%) and the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome 1 tool (100.0%; 95% confidence interval, 71.5%-100.0%) were higher than that of the obstetrically modified quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment tool (18.0%; 95% confidence interval, 2.3%-51.8%). All 3 tools had high negative predictive values; however, their positive predictive values were poor. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that all 3 tools had limitations in screening for sepsis among patients with a clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis. The obstetrically modified quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment tool missed more than half of the sepsis cases and, thus, had poor performance as a primary screening tool for sepsis. Both the obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and obstetrically modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome 1 tools captured all sepsis cases; however, they tended to overdetect sepsis.

15.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0288116, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37384783

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Globally, noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), which include type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (CVD), are associated with a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Health disparities exacerbate the burden of NCDs. Notably, rural, compared with urban, populations face greater disparities in access to preventive care, management, and treatment of NCDs. However, there is sparse information and no known literature synthesis on the inclusion of rural populations in documents (i.e., guidelines, position statements, and advisories) pertaining to the prevention of T2D, hypertension, and CVD. To address this gap, we are conducting a systematic review to assess the inclusion of rural populations in documents on the primary prevention of T2D, hypertension, and CVD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched 19 databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus, from January 2017 through October 2022, on the primary prevention of T2D, hypertension, and CVD. We conducted separate Google® searches for each of the 216 World Bank economies. For primary screening, titles and/or abstracts were screened independently by two authors (databases) or one author (Google®). Documents meeting selection criteria will undergo full-text review (secondary screening) using predetermined criteria, and data extraction using a standardized form. The definition of rurality varies, and we will report the description provided in each document. We will also describe the social determinants of health (based on the World Health Organization) that may be associated with rurality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: To our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review on the inclusion of rurality in documents on the primary prevention of T2D, hypertension, and CVD. Ethics approval is not required since we are not using patient-level data. Patients are not involved in the study design or analysis. We will present the results at conferences and in peer-reviewed publication(s). TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42022369815.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipertensión , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Población Rural , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Prevención Primaria , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
16.
Am J Hypertens ; 36(1): 23-32, 2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36130108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty remains over the relationship between blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV), measured in hospital settings, and clinical outcomes following acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We examined the association between within-person systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability (SBPV) during hospitalization and readmission-free survival, all-cause readmission, or all-cause mortality 1 year after AIS. METHODS: In a cohort of 862 consecutive patients (age [mean ± SD] 75 ± 15 years, 55% women) with AIS (2005-2018, follow-up through 2019), we measured SBPV as quartiles of standard deviations (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) from a median of 16 SBP readings obtained throughout hospitalization. RESULTS: In the cumulative cohort, the measured SD and CV of SBP in mmHg were 16 ± 6 and 10 ± 5, respectively. The hazard ratios (HR) for readmission-free survival between the highest vs. lowest quartiles were 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.81) for SD and 1.29 (95% CI 0.94-1.78) for CV after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities. Similarly, incident readmission or mortality remained consistent between the highest vs. lowest quartiles of SD and CV (readmission: HR 1.29 [95% CI 0.90-1.78] for SD, HR 1.29 [95% CI 0.94-1.78] for CV; mortality: HR 1.15 [95% CI 0.71-1.87] for SD, HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.55-1.36] for CV). CONCULSIONS: In patients with first AIS, SBPV measured as quartiles of SD or CV based on multiple readings throughout hospitalization has no independent prognostic implications for the readmission-free survival, readmission, or mortality. This underscores the importance of overall patient care rather than a specific focus on BP parameters during hospitalization for AIS.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Pronóstico , Hospitalización , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología
17.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 98(1): 31-47, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603956

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and 30-day all-cause readmission and mortality between patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at 16 hospitals across 3 geographically dispersed US states. The study included 6769 adults (mean age, 74 years; 56% [5033 of 8989] men) with cumulative 8989 HF hospitalizations: 2341 hospitalizations during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1 through October 30, 2020) and 6648 in the pre-COVID-19 (October 1, 2018, through February 28, 2020) comparator group. We used Poisson regression, Kaplan-Meier estimates, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analysis to determine whether prespecified study outcomes varied by time frames. RESULTS: The adjusted 30-day readmission rate decreased from 13.1% (872 of 6648) in the pre-COVID-19 period to 10.0% (234 of 2341) in the COVID-19 pandemic period (relative risk reduction, 23%; hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.89). Conversely, all-cause mortality increased from 9.7% (645 of 6648) in the pre-COVID-19 period to 11.3% (264 of 2341) in the COVID-19 pandemic period (relative risk increase, 16%; number of admissions needed for one additional death, 62.5; hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.39). Despite significant differences in rates of index hospitalization, readmission, and mortality across the study time frames, the disease severity, HF subtypes, and treatment patterns remained unchanged (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of this large tristate multicenter cohort study of HF hospitalizations suggest lower rates of index hospitalizations and 30-day readmissions but higher incidence of 30-day mortality with broadly similar use of HF medication, surgical interventions, and devices during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the pre-COVID-19 time frame.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Pandemias , Estudios de Cohortes , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Hospitalización , Readmisión del Paciente , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia
18.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 50(5): 393-399, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36154554

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Clinical implications of readmission following initial hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are not known. We examined predictors of readmissions and impact of readmissions on subsequent mortality after first-ever AIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults aged ≥18 years who survived to discharge after hospitalization for first-ever AIS from 2003 to 2019 were included in the study. For each patient, the overall burden of hospitalizations was measured as total number of hospitalizations and aggregate days spent hospitalized during follow-up. We used Poisson regression to estimate incident rate ratios (IRR) for predictors of re-hospitalization and time-dependent Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for mortality. RESULTS: Of 908 AIS survivors, 537 died, 669 had 2,645 readmissions over 4,535 person-years follow-up. Adjusted independent predictors of cumulative readmission inlcuded being white (IRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.42), dependency on discharge (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.38), cardio-embolism (IRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18-1.45), smoking (IRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.35), anemia (IRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24-1.57), arthritis (IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31), coronary artery disease (IRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23-1.47), cancer (IRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.64-2.30), chronic kidney disease (IRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21-1.57), COPD (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.34), depression (IRR 1.50, 95% CI 1.37-1.66), diabetes mellitus (IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36-1.48), and heart failure (IRR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.34). Conversely, hyperlipidemia was associated with a lower risk of readmission (IRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.88). Mortality was significantly increased with each hospitalization and cumulative days spent in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Among survivors of AIS hospitalization, certain sociodemographic indicators, stroke-specific features, and several key comorbid conditions were associated with increased risk of readmissions, which in turn correlated with increased mortality. Therefore, lifestyle modification and optimal treatment of comorbidities are likely to improve the outcome after AIS.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Comorbilidad , Readmisión del Paciente
19.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 8(1)2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33753360

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the potential association of hyperlipidaemia (HLP) versus no HLP with all-cause mortality among patients hospitalised for pneumonia. DESIGN: Propensity score matched retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort consisted of consecutive 8553 adults hospitalised at a large academic centre with a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia from 1996 through 2015, followed until death or end of the study period, 17 August 2017. OUTCOMES: The outcome was HR for mortality at 28 days and in the long term in patients with pneumonia with concurrent HLP compared with those with no HLP. We first constructed multivariable Cox proportional regression models to estimate the association between concurrent HLP versus no HLP and mortality after pneumonia hospitalisation for the entire cohort. We then identified 1879 patients with pneumonia with concurrent HLP and propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio to 1879 patients with no HLP to minimise the imbalance from measured covariates for further analysis. RESULTS: Among 8553 unmatched patients with pneumonia, concurrent HLP versus no HLP was independently associated with lower mortality at 28 days (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.66) and at a median follow-up of 3.9 years (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.80). The risk difference in mortality was consistent between 1879 propensity score matched pairs both at 28 days (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.86) and at a median follow-up of 4 years (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96). In the subgroup of patients with clinically measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), graded inverse associations between LDL-C levels and mortality were found in both unmatched and matched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalised patients with pneumonia, a diagnosis of HLP is protective against both short-term and long-term risk of death after adjustment for other major contributors to mortality in both unmatched and propensity score matched cohorts. These findings should be further investigated.


Asunto(s)
Hiperlipidemias , Neumonía , Adulto , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
J Neurol ; 268(5): 1623-1642, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31451912

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) has influenced all aspects of human life and neurology is no exception to this growing trend. The aim of this paper is to guide medical practitioners on the relevant aspects of artificial intelligence, i.e., machine learning, and deep learning, to review the development of technological advancement equipped with AI, and to elucidate how machine learning can revolutionize the management of neurological diseases. This review focuses on unsupervised aspects of machine learning, and how these aspects could be applied to precision neurology to improve patient outcomes. We have mentioned various forms of available AI, prior research, outcomes, benefits and limitations of AI, effective accessibility and future of AI, keeping the current burden of neurological disorders in mind. DISCUSSION: The smart device system to monitor tremors and to recognize its phenotypes for better outcomes of deep brain stimulation, applications evaluating fine motor functions, AI integrated electroencephalogram learning to diagnose epilepsy and psychological non-epileptic seizure, predict outcome of seizure surgeries, recognize patterns of autonomic instability to prevent sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), identify the pattern of complex algorithm in neuroimaging classifying cognitive impairment, differentiating and classifying concussion phenotypes, smartwatches monitoring atrial fibrillation to prevent strokes, and prediction of prognosis in dementia are unique examples of experimental utilizations of AI in the field of neurology. Though there are obvious limitations of AI, the general consensus among several nationwide studies is that this new technology has the ability to improve the prognosis of neurological disorders and as a result should become a staple in the medical community. CONCLUSION: AI not only helps to analyze medical data in disease prevention, diagnosis, patient monitoring, and development of new protocols, but can also assist clinicians in dealing with voluminous data in a more accurate and efficient manner.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Algoritmos , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Tecnología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA