RESUMEN
Objective: To prove that the "sports rehabilitation bed" is a device aimed at improving the precision of stretching, which can help to reduce the difficulty of rehabilitation therapy, cut down the manpower input of rehabilitation therapy, and shorten the therapy duration as well. Methods: This was a clinical comparative study. Twenty patients who underwent stretching therapy in Sichuan Province Orthopedic Hospital from June 2020 to August 2020 were randomly selected to carry out a control study on both lower extremities. The experimental group was given sports rehabilitation bed to assist rehabilitation therapy, while the control group was given conventional bare-handed stretching rehabilitation therapy. The stretching angle, stretching value, and the effective rate of stretching therapy between the two groups to analyze the clinical value of the new sports rehabilitation therapy bed. Results: The stretching angle in the experimental group when using the sports rehabilitation therapy bed for stretching was lower than the conventional bare-handed stretching in the control group (T<0, P=0.05), with a statistically significant difference; the stretching values of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group(P<0.01), with a statistically significant difference. Moreover, the response rate of stretching therapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05), with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Sports rehabilitation therapy beds can results in the advantages of effectively preventing iatrogenic injury in the process of stretching, and providing a more accurate and convenient stretching therapy method than the current commonly used bare-handed stretching for sports rehabilitation and intervention.
RESUMEN
Objective: The study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of breathing training combined with core stability training in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP). Methods: This was a retrospective study. Of 60 included patients with CNLBP admitted by the Sichuan Province Orthopedic Hospital between December 2020 and February 2022. Random number table method was used to divide thirty patients to a control group, and the rest 30 to an observation group. The control group received core stability training, while the observation group underwent breathing training in addition to the exact treatment provided for the control group. To assess the utility of breathing and core stability training for CNLBP treatment, intergroup comparisons were made for clinical outcomes, the VAS, SF- 36, and SCODI scores before treatment and at three and seven weeks post-treatment, and static and dynamic low-back muscular endurance before and after treatment. Results: The observation group had an overall response rate (ORR) of 96.67%, significantly higher than that (73.33%) of the control group (p< 0.05). Following the intervention, the VAS and SCODI scores declined in both groups; The SF-36 score was elevated in both groups, and likewise. At the end of treatment, both groups exhibited improved static and dynamic muscular endurance of the low back, and the improvement was significantly more distinct in the observation group (p< 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with core stability training as a sole treatment, breathing training combined with core stability training can yield better outcomes, ameliorate lumbar spine function, relieve pain and enhance low-back muscular endurance in patients with CNLBP.
RESUMEN
Objective: Low back pain (LBP) has been associated with education in previous observational studies, but the causality remains unclear. This study aims to assess the impact of education on LBP and to explore mediation by multiple lifestyle factors. Design: Univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed to examine the overall effect of education on LBP. Subsequently, multivariable MR was conducted to assess both the direct effect of education on LBP and the influence of potential mediators. Indirect effects were estimated using either the coefficient product method or the difference method, and the proportion of mediation was calculated by dividing the indirect effect by the total effect. The observational study utilized data from the NHANES database collected between 1999 and 2004, and included 15,580 participants aged 20 years and above. Results: Increasing education by 4.2 years leads to a 48% reduction in the risk of LBP (OR=0.52; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.59). Compared to individuals with less than a high school education, those with education beyond high school have a 28% lower risk of LBP (OR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.83). In the MR study, smoking accounts for 12.8% (95% CI: 1.04% to 20.8%) of the total effect, while BMI accounts for 5.9% (95% CI: 2.99% to 8.55%). The combined mediation effect of smoking and BMI is 27.6% (95% CI: 23.99% to 32.7%). In the NHANES study, only smoking exhibits a mediating effect, accounting for 34.3% (95% CI: 21.07% to 41.65%) of the effect, while BMI does not demonstrate a mediating role. Conclusions: Higher levels of education provide a protective effect against the risk of LBP. Additionally, implementing interventions to reduce smoking and promote weight loss among individuals with lower levels of education can also decrease this risk.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Fumar , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/genética , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Encuestas Nutricionales/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adulto , EscolaridadRESUMEN
Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of a preoperative combined with postoperative moderate-intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) of the operative side in patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA) who are undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study seeks to evaluate the impact of this combined intervention on muscle strength, gait, balance, and hip joint function in a controlled, measurable, and objective manner. Additionally, the study aims to compare the outcomes of this combined intervention with those of preoperative or postoperative muscle strength training conducted in isolation. Methods: A total of 90 patients with HOA scheduled for unilateral primary THA were randomly assigned to three groups: Pre group (preoperative PRT), Post group (postoperative PRT), and Pre& Post group (preoperative combined with postoperative PRT) focusing on hip flexion, extension, adduction, and abduction of operated side. Muscle strength, gait parameters, balance, and hip function were assessed at specific time points during a 12-month follow-up period. Results: All three groups showed significant improvements in muscle strength, with the Pre& Post group demonstrating the most pronounced and sustained gains. Gait velocity and cadence were significantly improved in the Pre& Post group at 1-month and 3-month postoperative follow-ups compared to the other groups. Similarly, the Pre& Post group exhibited superior balance performance at 3-month and 12-month postoperative follow-ups. The Harris Hip Score also showed better outcomes in the Pre& Post group at all follow-up intervals. Conclusion: Preoperative combined with postoperative moderate-intensity PRT in HOA patients undergoing THA led to superior improvements in muscle strength, gait, balance, and hip joint function compared to preoperative or postoperative PRT alone. This intervention shows significant promise in optimizing postoperative rehabilitation and enhancing patient outcomes following THA.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Marcha , Fuerza Muscular , Osteoartritis de la Cadera , Equilibrio Postural , Entrenamiento de Fuerza , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/rehabilitación , Masculino , Femenino , Entrenamiento de Fuerza/métodos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest physical activity (PA) enhances intelligence, while sedentary behavior (SB) poses a risk. However, causality remains unclear. METHODS: We extracted genetic instruments from large genome-wide association studies summary data and employed an inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach within a random-effects model as the primary method of Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to estimate the overall effect of various physical activity statuses on intelligence. To assess IVW stability and MR sensitivity, we also utilized supplementary methods including weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO. Furthermore, multivariable MR analysis was conducted to examine the independent effects of each physical activity trait on intelligence. RESULTS: The MR primary results indicated that LST was negatively associated with intelligence (ß = -0.133, 95%CI: -0.177 to -0.090, p = 1.34×10-9), while SBW (ß = 0.261, 95% CI: 0.059 to 0.463, p = 0.011) may have a positive effect on intelligence; however, MVPA and SC did not show significant effects on intelligence. Inverse causality analyses demonstrated intelligence significantly influenced all physical activity states. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights a bidirectional causal relationship between physical activity states and intelligence.
Asunto(s)
Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Causalidad , Ejercicio Físico , Inteligencia/genéticaRESUMEN
Objective: We aim to investigate the effects of different exercise intensities and volumes on Phlegm-dampness constitution (PDC). Methods: The rats were fed with high-fat food and lived in 75%-85% humidity for 6 weeks to establish the model of PDC. Then PDC rats were screened and intervened by varying exercise intensities for 8 weeks. Weight, constitution scores, blood and liver tissues were collected to detect the concentration of serum total cholesterol (Tch), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), homocysteine (Hcy), blood glucose (GLU), alanine transaminase (ALT) and percentage of lipid droplet area in liver tissue (PLDA). Results: The weight, Tch, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, Hcy, GLU, and ALT of rats in moderate-intensity exercise group returned to normal. The rats with high-intensity or low-intensity exercise did not recover as well as moderate-intensity. Conclusion: Different exercise intensities and volumes have different effects on PDC, moderate-intensity exercise over an 8-week intervention is most appropriate.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: At the end of 2019, peoples normal lives were disrupted by a sudden plague (COVID-19), the huge impact of COVID-19 on society has never been appeared. How to effectively prevent and treat COVID-19 is a concern for all health care workers. Exercise as a green and cheap complementary therapy, which has been proven to improve the immune capacity of the body and prevent infection. The main purpose of this study is to provide a reliable methodological guidance and credible evidence for exercise on COVID-19 therapeutic. METHODS: This protocol is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. We will search the following database sources for the Randomized controlled trials: the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Chinese Science and the Wanfang Database. All randomized controlled trials of exercise therapy for COVID-19 in the above database will be considered for inclusion, and high-quality articles will be screened for data extraction and analysis, to summarize the therapeutic effect of exercise on COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: In this study, we hope to find strong evidence for the treatment of COVID-19 by exercise. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of our study will provide credible evidence to judge whether exercise is an effective intervention on the COVID-19 patients therapeutic, and guide future researches.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020200883.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Neumonía Viral/terapia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , SARS-CoV-2 , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) has become a major global public health problem. Its high incidence rate and high disability rate are so damaging both to individuals and communities. At present, many countries' clinical guidelines recommend exercise therapy. Breath therapy is one of the exercise therapies, playing an important role in exercise therapy. Some studies have shown that breath therapy has a considerable therapeutic effect on low back pain, but there is no specific conclusion. The aim of our study is to answer the question: if breath therapy is effective and safe for CNLBP? METHODS: The following databases will be searched: English databases (including Web of Science, the Cochrane Library (Central), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Allied and Alternative Medicine) and Chinese databases (including Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang data and Chinese Scientific Journals Database [VIP]). The literature search will be constructed around search terms for breath therapy, search terms for chronic nonspecific low back pain and search terms for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcomes were related to duration, intensity, attack frequency of pain, and the secondary outcomes were related to physical function, quality of life, and adverse events related to interventions. Endnote software 9.1 will be applied in selecting study, Review Manager software 5.3 will be applied in analyzing and synthesizing. RESULTS: The results will provide evidence to judge whether breath therapy is effective and safe for CNLBP. CONCLUSION: Our research will provide reliable evidence of breath therapy for CNLBP. REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020156340.