Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Asunto principal
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; : 107293, 2024 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39094752

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The incidence of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR GNB) is increasing, which imposes significant burden on public health. Inhalation combined with intravenous polymyxins has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, pharmacokinetic studies focusing on intravenous and inhaled polymyxin B (PMB) are limited. METHODS: This study included seven patients with MDR GNB-induced pneumonia who were treated with intravenous plus inhaled PMB from March 1 to November 30, 2022, in the intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Clinical outcomes and therapeutic drug monitoring data of PMB in both plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Median PMB concentrations in the ELF were 7.83 (0.72-66.5), 116.72 (17.37-571.26), 41.1 (3.69-133.78), and 33.82 (0.83-126.68) mg/L at 0, 2, 6, and 12 h, respectively, and were much higher than those detected in the serum. ELF concentrations of PMB at 0, 2, 6, and 12 h were higher than the minimum inhibitory concentrations of pathogens isolated from the patients. Steady-state concentrations of PMB in the plasma were > 2 mg/L in most patients. Of the patients, 57.14 % were cured and 71.43 % showed a favorable microbiological response. The incidence of side effects with PMB was low. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled plus intravenous PMB can achieve high ELF concentrations and favorable clinical outcomes without an increased adverse effect profile. This treatment approach appears promising for the treatment of patients with pneumonia caused by MDR-GNB.

2.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B ; 25(8): 711-718, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés, Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39155783

RESUMEN

This study presents a multi-center clinical data management platform that facilitates unified and structured management of real-world data and serves as an ideal tool to enhance the quality and progress of clinical research related to severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). The use of the platform enables clinical teams to obtain safe, accurate, structurally unified, traceable, scene-clear, and fully functional real-world medical data in the diagnosis, treatment, and research of acute pancreatitis (AP).


Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis , Humanos , Pancreatitis/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Manejo de Datos
3.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; : 1-12, 2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for a rapid and sensitive pathogen detection method for septic patients. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in identifying pathogens among suspected septic patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot diagnostic study to clinically validate the multiplex ddPCR panel in diagnosing suspected septic patients. A total of 100 sepsis episodes of 89 patients were included in the study. RESULTS: In comparison to blood culture, the ddPCR panel exhibited an overall sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 69.7%, ddPCR yielded an additional detection rate of 17.0% for sepsis cases overall, with a turnaround time of 2.5 h. The sensitivity of ddPCR in the empirical antibiotic treatment and the non-empirical antibiotic treatment group were 78.6% versus 80.0% (p > 0.05). Antimicrobial resistance genes were identified in a total of 13 samples. Whenever ddPCR detected the genes beta-lactamase-Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (blaKPC) or beta-lactamase-New Delhi metallo (blaNDM), these findings corresponded to the cultivation of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Dynamic ddPCR monitoring revealed a consistent alignment between the quantitative ddPCR results and the trends observed in C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to blood culture, ddPCR exhibited higher sensitivity for pathogen diagnosis in suspected septic patients, and it provided pathogen and drug resistance information in a shorter time. The quantitative results of ddPCR generally aligned with the trends seen in C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels, indicating that ddPCR can serve as a dynamic monitoring tool for pathogen load in septic patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA