Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Versus Without Large Artery Atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: RICAMIS trial (The Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke) has demonstrated efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in acute ischemic stroke. We conducted a post hoc analysis of RICAMIS to investigate whether large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) subtype contributed to the outcomes. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the RICAMIS trial. Patients randomized to RIC group and Control group in full analysis set of RICAMIS were classified into LAA and non-LAA subtypes. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome at 90 days, defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1. Compared with patients receiving usual care, we investigated the association of RIC effect with outcomes in stroke subtypes and the interaction between RIC effect and stroke subtypes. The primary analysis was adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Among 1773 patients, 516 were assigned to LAA subtype (229 in the RIC group and 287 in the control group) and 1257 to non-LAA subtype (633 in the RIC group and 624 in the control group). Median age was 65 years, and 34.2% were women. A higher proportion of primary outcome was found to be associated with RIC treatment in LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, 11.4% [95% CI, 3.6%-19.2%]; P=0.004), but not in non-LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, 4.1% [95% CI, -1.1% to 9.3%]; P=0.12). There was no significant interaction between RIC effect and stroke subtypes (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LAA subtype may benefit from RIC after stroke with respect to excellent functional outcome at 90 days. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03740971.

Effect of Argatroban Plus Intravenous Alteplase vs Intravenous Alteplase Alone on Neurologic Function in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Previous studies suggested a benefit of argatroban plus alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, robust evidence in trials with large sample sizes is lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy of argatroban plus alteplase for AIS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label, blinded end point randomized clinical trial including 808 patients with AIS was conducted at 50 hospitals in China with enrollment from January 18, 2019, through October 30, 2021, and final follow-up on January 24, 2022. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to the argatroban plus alteplase group (n = 402), which received intravenous argatroban (100 µg/kg bolus over 3-5 minutes followed by an infusion of 1.0 µg/kg per minute for 48 hours) within 1 hour after alteplase (0.9 mg/kg; maximum dose, 90 mg; 10% administered as 1-minute bolus, remaining infused over 1 hour), or alteplase alone group (n = 415), which received intravenous alteplase alone. Both groups received guideline-based treatments. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) of 0 to 1 at 90 days. All end points had blinded assessment and were analyzed on a full analysis set. Results: Among 817 eligible patients with AIS who were randomized (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-71] years; 238 [29.1%] women; median [IQR] National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 9 [7-12]), 760 (93.0%) completed the trial. At 90 days, 210 of 329 participants (63.8%) in the argatroban plus alteplase group vs 238 of 367 (64.9%) in the alteplase alone group had an excellent functional outcome (risk difference, -1.0% [95% CI, -8.1% to 6.1%]; risk ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.88-1.10]; P = .78). The percentages of participants with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal hematoma type 2, and major systemic bleeding were 2.1% (8/383), 2.3% (9/383), and 0.3% (1/383), respectively, in the argatroban plus alteplase group and 1.8% (7/397), 2.5% (10/397), and 0.5% (2/397), respectively, in the alteplase alone group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke, treatment with argatroban plus intravenous alteplase compared with alteplase alone did not result in a significantly greater likelihood of excellent functional outcome at 90 days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03740958.