Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Comp Eff Res ; 8(12): 951-960, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31441319

RESUMEN

Aim: This study evaluated the patient experience of receiving subcutaneous chemotherapy at home via a unique 'Cancer Treatment at Home' outreach service adapted by the UK Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust. Patients & methods: The service involved using highly trained nurses to deliver cancer treatments to patients in their own homes. Patient outcomes were monitored over 12 months via the Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy at Home (SACT) survey using handheld electronic devices. Results: Of the 56 participating cancer patients, 53 provided responses. Patients received subcutaneous trastuzumab, denosumab, pembrolizumab, fulvestrant and goserelin. Overall, 96% of respondents were 'very satisfied' and 4% 'satisfied' with the service. All respondents would recommend the service to others. Conclusion: The 'Cancer Treatment at Home' service has improved the patient experience for cancer care and has been recognized nationally for its achievements.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Atención a la Salud/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Fulvestrant/administración & dosificación , Goserelina/administración & dosificación , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/enfermería , Seguridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Cough ; 6: 9, 2010 Oct 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20925935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cough is a common and distressing symptom in lung cancer patients. The clinical management of cough in lung cancer patients is suboptimal with limited high quality research evidence available. The aim of the present paper is to present a clinical guideline developed in the UK through scrutiny of the literature and expert opinion, in order to aid decision making in clinicians and highlight good practice. METHODS: Two systematic reviews, one focusing on the management of cough in respiratory illness and one Cochrane review specifically on cancer, were conducted. Also, data from reviews, phase II trials and case studies were synthesized. A panel of experts in the field was also convened in an expert consensus meeting to make sense of the data and make clinical propositions. RESULTS: A pyramid of cough management was developed, starting with the treatment of reversible causes of cough/specific pathology. Initial cough management should focus on peripherally acting and intermittent treatment; more resistant symptoms require the addition of (or replacement by) centrally acting and continuous treatment. The pyramid for the symptomatic management starts from the simpler and most practical regimens (demulcents, simple linctus) to weak opioids to morphine and methadone before considering less well-researched and experimental approaches. CONCLUSION: The clinical guidelines presented aim to provide a sensible clinical approach to the management of cough in lung cancer. High quality research in this field is urgently required to provide more evidence-based recommendations.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA