RESUMEN
Personalized medicine can reduce adverse effects, enhance drug efficacy, and optimize treatment outcomes, which represents the essence of personalized medicine in the pharmacy field. Protein drugs are crucial in the field of personalized drug therapy and are currently the mainstay, which possess higher target specificity and biological activity than small-molecule chemical drugs, making them efficient in regulating disease-related biological processes, and have significant potential in the development of personalized drugs. Currently, protein drugs are designed and developed for specific protein targets based on patient-specific protein data. However, due to the rapid development of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, it is now widely recognized that a canonical protein actually includes multiple proteoforms, and the differences between these proteoforms will result in varying responses to drugs. The variation in the effects of different proteoforms can be significant and the impact can even alter the intended benefit of a drug, potentially making it harmful instead of lifesaving. As a result, we propose that protein drugs should shift from being targeted through the lens of protein (proteomics) to being targeted through the lens of proteoform (proteoformics). This will enable the development of personalized protein drugs that are better equipped to meet patients' specific needs and disease characteristics. With further development in the field of proteoformics, individualized drug therapy, especially personalized protein drugs aimed at proteoforms as a drug target, will improve the understanding of disease mechanisms, discovery of new drug targets and signaling pathways, provide a theoretical basis for the development of new drugs, aid doctors in conducting health risk assessments and making more cost-effective targeted prevention strategies conducted by artificial intelligence/machine learning, promote technological innovation, and provide more convenient treatment tailored to individualized patient profile, which will benefit the affected individuals and society at large.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Proteómica , Humanos , Proteómica/métodos , Medicina de Precisión , Espectrometría de MasasRESUMEN
Energy metabolism is a hub of governing all processes at cellular and organismal levels such as, on one hand, reparable vs. irreparable cell damage, cell fate (proliferation, survival, apoptosis, malignant transformation etc.), and, on the other hand, carcinogenesis, tumor development, progression and metastazing versus anti-cancer protection and cure. The orchestrator is the mitochondria who produce, store and invest energy, conduct intracellular and systemically relevant signals decisive for internal and environmental stress adaptation, and coordinate corresponding processes at cellular and organismal levels. Consequently, the quality of mitochondrial health and homeostasis is a reliable target for health risk assessment at the stage of reversible damage to the health followed by cost-effective personalized protection against health-to-disease transition as well as for targeted protection against the disease progression (secondary care of cancer patients against growing primary tumors and metastatic disease). The energy reprogramming of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) attracts particular attention as clinically relevant and instrumental for the paradigm change from reactive medical services to predictive, preventive and personalized medicine (3PM). This article provides a detailed overview towards mechanisms and biological pathways involving metabolic reprogramming (MR) with respect to inhibiting the synthesis of biomolecules and blocking common NSCLC metabolic pathways as anti-NSCLC therapeutic strategies. For instance, mitophagy recycles macromolecules to yield mitochondrial substrates for energy homeostasis and nucleotide synthesis. Histone modification and DNA methylation can predict the onset of diseases, and plasma C7 analysis is an efficient medical service potentially resulting in an optimized healthcare economy in corresponding areas. The MEMP scoring provides the guidance for immunotherapy, prognostic assessment, and anti-cancer drug development. Metabolite sensing mechanisms of nutrients and their derivatives are potential MR-related therapy in NSCLC. Moreover, miR-495-3p reprogramming of sphingolipid rheostat by targeting Sphk1, 22/FOXM1 axis regulation, and A2 receptor antagonist are highly promising therapy strategies. TFEB as a biomarker in predicting immune checkpoint blockade and redox-related lncRNA prognostic signature (redox-LPS) are considered reliable predictive approaches. Finally, exemplified in this article metabolic phenotyping is instrumental for innovative population screening, health risk assessment, predictive multi-level diagnostics, targeted prevention, and treatment algorithms tailored to personalized patient profiles-all are essential pillars in the paradigm change from reactive medical services to 3PM approach in overall management of lung cancers. This article highlights the 3PM relevant innovation focused on energy metabolism as the hub to advance NSCLC management benefiting vulnerable subpopulations, affected patients, and healthcare at large. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00357-5.
RESUMEN
Relevance: The proteasome is a crucial mechanism that regulates protein fate and eliminates misfolded proteins, playing a significant role in cellular processes. In the context of lung cancer, the proteasome's regulatory function is closely associated with the disease's pathophysiology, revealing multiple connections within the cell. Therefore, studying proteasome inhibitors as a means to identify potential pathways in carcinogenesis and metastatic progression is crucial in in-depth insight into its molecular mechanism and discovery of new therapeutic target to improve its therapy, and establishing effective biomarkers for patient stratification, predictive diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and personalized treatment for lung squamous carcinoma in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM; 3P medicine). Methods: This study identified differentially expressed proteasome genes (DEPGs) in lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC) and developed a gene signature validated through Kaplan-Meier analysis and ROC curves. The study used WGCNA analysis to identify proteasome co-expression gene modules and their interactions with the immune system. NMF analysis delineated distinct LUSC subtypes based on proteasome gene expression patterns, while ssGSEA analysis quantified immune gene-set abundance and classified immune subtypes within LUSC samples. Furthermore, the study examined correlations between clinicopathological attributes, immune checkpoints, immune scores, immune cell composition, and mutation status across different risk score groups, NMF clusters, and immunity clusters. Results: This study utilized DEPGs to develop an eleven-proteasome gene-signature prognostic model for LUSC, which divided samples into high-risk and low-risk groups with significant overall survival differences. NMF analysis identified six distinct LUSC clusters associated with overall survival. Additionally, ssGSEA analysis classified LUSC samples into four immune subtypes based on the abundance of immune cell infiltration with clinical relevance. A total of 145 DEGs were identified between high-risk and low-risk score groups, which had significant biological effects. Moreover, PSMD11 was found to promote LUSC progression by depending on the ubiquitin-proteasome system for degradation. Conclusions: Ubiquitinated proteasome genes were effective in developing a prognostic model for LUSC patients. The study emphasized the critical role of proteasomes in LUSC processes, such as drug sensitivity, immune microenvironment, and mutation status. These data will contribute to the clinically relevant stratification of LUSC patients for personalized 3P medical approach. Further, we also recommend the application of the ubiquitinated proteasome system in multi-level diagnostics including multi-omics, liquid biopsy, prediction and targeted prevention of chronic inflammation and metastatic disease, and mitochondrial health-related biomarkers, for LUSC 3PM practice. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00352-w.
RESUMEN
Background: Alternative splicing (AS) occurs in the process of gene post-transcriptional process, which is very important for the correct synthesis and function of protein. The change of AS pattern may lead to the change of expression level or function of lung cancer-related genes, and then affect the occurrence and development of lung cancers. The specific AS pattern might be used as a biomarker for early warning and prognostic assessment of a cancer in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM; 3PM). AS events of immune-related genes (IRGs) were closely associated with tumor progression and immunotherapy. We hypothesize that IRG-AS events are significantly different in lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) vs. controls or in lung squamous cell carcinomas (LUSCs) vs. controls. IRG-AS alteration profiling was identified to construct IRG-differentially expressed AS (IRG-DEAS) signature models. Study on the selective AS events of specific IRGs in lung cancer patients might be of great significance for further exploring the pathogenesis of lung cancer, realizing early detection and effective monitoring of lung cancer, finding new therapeutic targets, overcoming drug resistance, and developing more effective therapeutic strategies, and better used for the prediction, diagnosis, prevention, and personalized medicine of lung cancer. Methods: The transcriptomic, clinical, and AS data of LUADs and LUSCs were downloaded from TCGA and its SpliceSeq databases. IRG-DEAS events were identified in LUAD and LUSC, followed by their functional characteristics, and overall survival (OS) analyses. OS-related IRG-DEAS prognostic models were constructed for LUAD and LUSC with Lasso regression, which were used to classify LUADs and LUSCs into low- and high-risk score groups. Furthermore, the immune cell distribution, immune-related scores, drug sensitivity, mutation status, and GSEA/GSVA status were analyzed between low- and high-risk score groups. Also, low- and high-immunity clusters and AS factor (SF)-OS-related-AS co-expression network and verification of cell function of CELF6 were analyzed in LUAD and LUSC. Results: Comprehensive analysis of transcriptomic, clinical, and AS data of LUADs and LUSCs identified IRG-AS events in LUAD (n = 1607) and LUSC (n = 1656), including OS-related IRG-AS events in LUAD (n = 127) and LUSC (n = 105). A total of 66 IRG-DEAS events in LUAD and 89 IRG-DEAS events in LUSC were identified compared to controls. The overlapping analysis between IRG-DEASs and OS-related IRG-AS events revealed 14 OS-related IRG-DEAS events for LUAD and 16 OS-related IRG-DEAS events for LUSC, which were used to identify and optimize a 12-OS-related-IRG-DEAS signature prognostic model for LUAD and an 11-OS-related-IRG-DEAS signature prognostic model for LUSC. These two prognostic models effectively divided LUAD or LUSC samples into low- and high-risk score groups that were closely associated with OS, clinical characteristics, and tumor immune microenvironment, with significant gene sets and pathways enriched in the two groups. Moreover, weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) and nonnegative matrix factorization method (NMF) analyses identified four OS-relevant subtypes of LUAD and six OS-relevant subtypes of LUSC, and ssGSEA identified five immunity-relevant subtypes of LUAD and five immunity-relevant subtypes of LUSC. Interestingly, splicing factors-OS-related-AS network revealed hub molecule CELF6 was significantly related to the malignant phenotype in lung cancer cells. Conclusions: This study established two reliable IRG-DEAS signature prognostic models and constructed interesting splicing factor-splicing event networks in LUAD and LUSC, which can be used to construct clinically relevant immune subtypes, patient stratification, prognostic prediction, and personalized medical services in the PPPM practice. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00366-4.
RESUMEN
Background: DNA methylation is an important mechanism in epigenetics, which can change the transcription ability of genes and is closely related to the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer (OC). We hypothesize that DNA methylation is significantly different in OCs compared to controls. Specific DNA methylation status can be used as a biomarker of OC, and targeted drugs targeting these methylation patterns and DNA methyltransferase may have better therapeutic effects. Studying the key DNA methylation sites of immune-related genes (IRGs) in OC patients and studying the effects of these methylation sites on the immune microenvironment may provide a new method for further exploring the pathogenesis of OC, realizing early detection and effective monitoring of OC, identifying effective biomarkers of DNA methylation subtypes and drug targets, improving the efficacy of targeted drugs or overcoming drug resistance, and better applying it to predictive diagnosis, prevention, and personalized medicine (PPPM; 3PM) of OC. Method: Hypermethylated subtypes (cluster 1) and hypomethylated subtypes (cluster 2) were established in OCs based on the abundance of different methylation sites in IRGs. The differences in immune score, immune checkpoints, immune cells, and overall survival were analyzed between different methylation subtypes in OC samples. The significant pathways, gene ontology (GO), and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of the identified methylation sites in IRGs were enriched. In addition, the immune-related methylation signature was constructed with multiple regression analysis. A methylation site model based on IRGs was constructed and verified. Results: A total of 120 IRGs with 142 differentially methylated sites (DMSs) were identified. The DMSs were clustered into a high-level methylation group (cluster 1) and a low-level methylation group (cluster 2). The significant pathways and GO analysis showed many immune-related and cancer-associated enrichments. A methylation site signature based on IRGs was constructed, including RORC|cg25112191, S100A13|cg14467840, TNF|cg04425624, RLN2|cg03679581, and IL1RL2|cg22797169. The methylation sites of all five genes showed hypomethylation in OC, and there were statistically significant differences among RORC|cg25112191, S100A13|cg14467840, and TNF|cg04425624 (p < 0.05). This prognostic model based on low-level methylation and high-level methylation groups was significantly linked to the immune microenvironment as well as overall survival in OC. Conclusions: This study provided different methylation subtypes for OC patients according to the methylation sites of IRGs. In addition, it helps establish a relationship between methylation and the immune microenvironment, which showed specific differences in biological signaling pathways, genomic changes, and immune mechanisms within the two subgroups. These data provide ones to deeply understand the mechanism of immune-related methylation genes on the occurrence and development of OC. The methylation-site signature is also to establish new possibilities for OC therapy. These data are a precious resource for stratification and targeted treatment of OC patients toward an advanced 3PM approach. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00359-3.