Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urology ; 159: 214-221, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34624362

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique, feasibility and short-term outcomes of buccal mucosa grafts in robotic lower urinary tract reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed 9 patients who underwent single-port robotic posterior urethroplasty with buccal mucosa graft from May-December 2019. Variables included patient demographics, diagnosis/etiology, and intraoperative parameters. Intraabdominal or extraperitoneal transvesical approaches are used for the stricture via supraumbilical access, and if necessary, perineal dissection is performed. Cystoscopy identifies the extent of stenosis. Anastomosis is completed with buccal mucosal graft and rectus abdominis, omental or gracilis flaps as needed. RESULTS: The mean age was 65.4 years. Robotic urethroplasty with buccal mucosa graft was performed for vesicourethral anastomotic strictures (n = 7), urethral strictures (n = 4), pubic fistula after robotic posterior urethroplasty (n = 1), and anastomotic distraction (n = 1). Strictures occurred after prostate cancer treatments (n = 8) and trauma (n = 1). All patients had prior failed endoscopic interventions: balloon dilatation, resection/incision of bladder neck, internal urethrotomy under direct vision, urethral stents, and posterior urethroplasty. Mean defect length was 3.9 cm. Five of 9 patients had ancillary procedures including rectus abdominis (n = 3), omental or gracilis (both n = 1) flap harvests. No intraoperative complications occurred. Median operative time was 377 minutes, blood loss was 200 mL, and length of stay was 2 days. Postoperative 30-day complications included urinary tract infection, epididymitis, anemia, recurrent stricture, and small bowel obstruction requiring surgery (all n = 1). Median follow-up was 11.7 months. CONCLUSION: Buccal mucosa grafts with ancillary maneuvers such as flap interposition or adjacent tissue transfer in robotic lower tract reconstruction is durable, safe, and comparable to open approaches.


Asunto(s)
Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Anciano , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos
2.
Urol Clin North Am ; 49(3): 507-518, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35931440

RESUMEN

With the widespread dissemination of robotic surgical platforms, pathologies that were previously deemed challenging can now be treated more reliably with minimally invasive procedures via the robot. The advantages of precise articulation for dissection and suturing, tremor reduction, three-dimensional magnified visualization, and small incisions allow for the management of diverse lower urinary tract (LUT) disease. These may include recurrent or refractory bladder neck stenoses or intracorporeal urinary diversion with excellent perioperative and functional outcomes. Here, we review the recent literature comprising of developments in robotic-assisted LUT genitourinary reconstruction, with a view toward emerging technologies and future trends in techniques.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Derivación Urinaria , Sistema Urinario , Cistectomía/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Derivación Urinaria/métodos
3.
Urology ; 159: 221, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35027180
4.
Urology ; 161: 157-158, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34954216
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA