Molecular subtyping based on immune cell marker genes predicts prognosis and therapeutic response in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Lung adenocarcinoma (LA) is one of the most common malignancies and is responsible for the greatest number of tumor-related deaths. Our research aimed to explore the molecular subtype signatures of LA to clarify the correlation among the immune microenvironment, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic response. METHODS: The LA immune cell marker genes (LICMGs) identified by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis were used to discriminate the molecular subtypes and homologous immune and metabolic traits of GSE72094 LA cases. In addition, the model-building genes were identified from 1441 LICMGs by Cox-regression analysis, and a LA immune difference score (LIDscore) was developed to quantify individual differences in each patient, thereby predicting prognosis and susceptibility to immunotherapy and chemotherapy of LA patients. RESULTS: Patients of the GSE72094 cohort were divided into two distinct molecular subtypes based on LICMGs: immune activating subtype (Cluster-C1) and metabolically activating subtype (cluster-C2). The two molecular subtypes have distinct characteristics regarding prognosis, clinicopathology, genomics, immune microenvironment, and response to immunotherapy. Among the LICMGs, LGR4, GOLM1, CYP24A1, SFTPB, COL1A1, HLA-DQA1, MS4A7, PPARG, and IL7R were enrolled to construct a LIDscore model. Low-LIDscore patients had a higher survival rate due to abundant immune cell infiltration, activated immunity, and lower genetic variation, but probably the higher levels of Treg cells in the immune microenvironment lead to immune cell dysfunction and promote tumor immune escape, thus decreasing the responsiveness to immunotherapy compared with that of the high-LIDscore patients. Overall, high-LIDscore patients had a higher responsiveness to immunotherapy and a higher sensitivity to chemotherapy than the low-LIDscore group. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtypes based on LICMGs provided a promising strategy for predicting patient prognosis, biological characteristics, and immune microenvironment features. In addition, they helped identify the patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Biomarkers for Early Diagnostic of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Type-2 Diabetes Patients: A Multicentre, Retrospective, Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are common age-associated disorders and T2DM patients show an increased risk to suffer from AD, however, there is currently no marker to identify who in T2DM populations will develop AD. Since glycogen synthase kinase-3ß (GSK-3ß) activity, ApoE genotypes and olfactory function are involved in both T2DM and AD pathogenesis, we investigate whether alterations of these factors can identify cognitive impairment in T2DM patients. METHODS: The cognitive ability was evaluated using Minimum Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was diagnosed by Petersen's criteria. GSK-3ß activity in platelet, ApoE genotypes in leucocytes and the olfactory function were detected by Western/dot blotting, the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the biomarkers for MCI diagnosis were calculated by logistic regression. The diagnostic capability of the biomarkers was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses. FINDINGS: We recruited 694 T2DM patients from Jan. 2012 to May. 2015 in 5 hospitals (Wuhan), and 646 of them met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. 345 patients in 2 hospitals were assigned to the training set, and 301 patients in another 3 hospitals assigned to the validation set. Patients in each set were randomly divided into two groups: T2DM without MCI (termed T2DM-nMCI) or with MCI (termed T2DM-MCI). There were no significant differences for sex, T2DM years, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary disease, complications, insulin treatment, HbA1c, ApoE ε2, ApoE ε3, tGSK3ß and pS9GSK3ß between the two groups. Compared with the T2DM-nMCI group, T2DM-MCI group showed lower MMSE score with older age, ApoE ε4 allele, higher olfactory score and higher rGSK-3ß (ratio of total GSK-3ß to Ser9-phosphorylated GSK-3ß) in the training set and the validation set. The OR values of age, ApoE ε4 gene, olfactory score and rGSK-3ß were 1.09, 2.09, 1.51, 10.08 in the training set, and 1.06, 2.67, 1.47, 7.19 in the validation set, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of age, ApoE ε4 gene, olfactory score and rGSK-3ß were 0.76, 0.72, 0.66, 0.79 in the training set, and 0.70, 0.68, 0.73, 0.79 in the validation set, respectively. These four combined biomarkers had the area under the curve (AUC) of 82% and 86%, diagnostic accuracy of 83% and 81% in the training set and the validation set, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Aging, activation of peripheral circulating GSK-3ß, expression of ApoE ε4 and increase of olfactory score are diagnostic for the mild cognitive impairment in T2DM patients, and combination of these biomarkers can improve the diagnostic accuracy.