Effect of a Medication Disposal Pouch versus Usual Care on Post Discharge Disposal of Unused Opioids: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine frequency of disposal of unused opioids after surgical procedures based on medication disposal pouch use or usual care, and patient factors associated with disposal. DESIGN: Two-group experimental design and convenience sample. METHODS: Same-day surgery adults who received opioid orders were randomized to usual care or usual care plus a medication disposal pouch for opioid disposal. Opioid disposal and pain characteristics were collected by telephone at 30±10 days post discharge. Other data were abstracted from a hospital database. Data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's Chi-Square and Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regression models were built to identify predictors of disposal of unused opioids. FINDINGS: Of 221 adults, mean age was 58.5 years and 50.2% were female. Overall, 121 received medication disposal pouches and 100 received usual care. Among those with a filled prescription, there was no between-group difference in the number of patients who used all of their opioid medication (disposal pouch group, 29.5%; usual care group, 21.7%). Of 74 disposal pouch and 65 usual care patients who did not use all opioid medications, 23.0% and 13.8%, respectively, disposed of opioids, and of the 23.0% of patients who disposed of medications in the disposal pouch group, 94.1% used the medication disposal pouch. After controlling for 7 factors, the odds of disposal of unused opioids increased among patients who received the intervention, had lower pain scores on the worst day of postoperative pain, and had a history of renal diagnoses (versus those with gastrointestinal diagnoses). CONCLUSIONS: Although opioid medication disposal rates were higher in the medication disposal pouch group; overall rates of disposal of unused opioid medications were low. More research is needed to learn important factors and methods associated with opioid disposal.

Association of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring With Nurses' Confidence in Patient Readiness for Postanesthesia Discharge.

PURPOSE: To determine if end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) value increased nurses' perceptions of confidence in patients' readiness for postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional, comparative, one-group (pre-post) design. METHODS: Nurses completed 2 assessments of confidence in readiness for discharge, before and after etCO2 monitoring. Patient (discharge pain level, body mass index, sleep apnea history, and opioid use) and nurse factors were assessed. Analyses included descriptive and comparative statistics. FINDINGS: Of 133 patients, mean (standard deviation) etCO2 was 36.1 (5.7) mm Hg. Nurses' confidence in readiness for discharge differed before and after etCO2 assessment. Confidence score decreased when etCO2 was low (P = .003) or high (P = .005), compared with normal values. In linear regression, etCO2 remained a factor in nurses' confidence in readiness for discharge (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a PACU, etCO2 monitoring changed nurses' perceptions of confidence in patients' readiness for discharge.

Staff Perceptions of Decision-Making in a Shared Governance Culture.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in the shared decision-making perceptions of clinical nurses between initial implementation of a shared governance model and perceptions 3 years later after the model has matured. BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making empowers nurses to have a voice in their practice and supports engagement and retention. METHODS: A prospective, 2-group comparative design was conducted using the Index of Professional Nursing Governance, a validated, reliable tool. After comparing data univariately, a multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the impact of nurse characteristics on shared decision-making responses. RESULTS: Mean overall shared decision-making score (P = .23) and domain scores (P values between .055 and .63) did not increase in 2015 compared with 2012. After adjusting for differences in nurse characteristics between groups, overall score (P = .017) and 3 of 6 domain scores improved: professional control of work, structures for decisions and access to information (all P values between .005 and .031). CONCLUSION: As shared governance became established, shared decision-making scores increased.

Development and Implementation of a Procedural Sedation Course for Registered Nurses.

Procedural sedation is the administration of medication to obtund, dull, or reduce the intensity of pain or awareness associated with a therapeutic or diagnostic procedure. Because registered nurses play a key role in ensuring patient safety during procedural sedation, it is essential they have the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe, quality care. This paper describes the development, implementation, and outcomes of a course designed for nurses providing care to patients undergoing procedural sedation.