Impact of delays in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer on outcome.

BACKGROUND: In head and neck cancer (HNC), the relationship between a delay in starting radiotherapy (RT) and the outcome is unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of the amount of time before treatment intervention (TTI) and the growth kinetics of individual tumors on treatment outcomes and survival. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-two HNC patients with 273 primary tumors, treated with definitive (chemo) RT, were retrospectively analyzed. The TTI was defined as the time interval between the date of histopathologic diagnosis and the first day of the RT course. Volumetric data on 57 tumors were obtained from diagnostic and RT planning computer tomography (CT) scans in order to calculate the tumor growth kinetic parameters. RESULTS: No significant association between locoregional control or cause-specific hazards and TTI was found. The log hazard for locoregional recurrence linearly increased during the first 40 days of waiting for RT, although this was not significant. The median tumor volume relative increase rate and tumor volume doubling time was 3.2%/day and 19 days, respectively, and neither had any impact on locoregional control or cause-specific hazards. CONCLUSION: The association between a delay in starting RT and the outcome is complex and does not harm all patients waiting for RT. Further research into imaging-derived kinetic data on individual tumors is warranted in order to identify patients at an increased risk of adverse outcomes due to a delay in starting RT.

Skin Reaction to Cetuximab as a Criterion for Treatment Selection in Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: It can be hypothesized that in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer and prominent cetuximab (CMb)-induced skin rash, immunoradiotherapy would result in a survival advantage over chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (CP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After a loading dose of CMb, one weekly cycle of CMb and CP concurrently with RT, patients who developed a grade ≥2 rash proceeded with immunoradiotherapy, and those with a grade 0-1 rash had chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: A grade 3-4 allergic reaction to CMb developed in 11/39 (28.2%) patients and further recruitment was stopped. These patients proceeded treatment with CP. In early assessment of skin rash 10/28 patients qualified for chemoradiotherapy and 18/28 patients for immunoradiotherapy. There was no difference in survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Rate of serious CMb-induced hypersensitivity reactions was unacceptably high. Even though immunoradiotherapy was administered only to the prognostically most favorable group of patients, it resulted in no advantage over chemoradiotherapy.

TPF induction chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation with cisplatin and cetuximab in unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel, cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy and concomitant immunochemoradiotherapy with cetuximab and cisplatin in unresectable head and neck carcinoma. METHODS: Treatment consisted of TPF induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) day 2; cisplatin, 75 mg/m(2) day 2; and 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) days 1-4; 4 cycles), followed by radiotherapy (RT) and concomitant weekly cetuximab, (250 mg/m(2), after a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Twenty-five of 30 patients completed 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy. Six or more concomitant infusions of cisplatin and cetuximab were administered in 13 of 25 and 18 of 25 patients, respectively. The 2-year locoregional control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 47%, 47%, and 50%, respectively. Patients with grade ≥ 2 skin reaction to cetuximab had a superior outcome. CONCLUSION: The tested regimen was effective; however, cetuximab and low-dose cisplatin after induction TPF increased the treatment toxicity. A grade ≥ 2 skin rash correlated with improved efficacy.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for palpable melanoma metastases to the groin: when to irradiate?

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of and criteria for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with palpable melanoma metastases to the groin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with palpable metastases to the groin who were treated with therapeutic nodal dissection during 2000 to 2006 were identified in a prospective institutional database. RESULTS: In 101 patients, 103 therapeutic nodal dissections were performed; 37 of these were treated with PORT to a median equivalent dose (eqTD(2)) of 50.6 Gy (range, 50-72 Gy). In the surgery-only and PORT groups, 2-year regional control rates were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76-95%) and 91% (95% CI, 81-100%), respectively (p = 0.395). Of five recurrences in radiation-treated patients, four were of dermal type, and in three of these cases, no bolus over the operative scar was used. PORT improved 2-year regional control (46% [95% CI, 11-82%] vs. 82% [95% CI, 63-100%], p = 0.022) among patients in which the sum of risk factors present (i.e., risk factor score) was ≥2. In multivariate analysis, risk-factor score (<2 vs. ≥2: HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.00-8.56; p < 0.0001) and PORT (yes vs. no: HR, 7.81; 95% CI, 2.83-21.74; p = 0.050) was predictive for regional control and on logistic-regression testing, number of involved lymph nodes was predictive for systemic dissemination (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: PORT should follow therapeutic nodal dissection in cases with two or more adverse factors. More conventional fractionation (≤2.5 Gy), cumulative eqTD(2) <60 Gy and use of bolus over the operative scar are recommended.