Gastrointestinal symptoms in kidney transplant recipients: what about silent sufferers?

CONTEXT: Transplantation improves health-related quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, primarily because of adverse effects of medication, among other gastrointestinal symptoms, health-related quality of life is not completely restored to normal. Although many patients have various gastrointestinal symptoms only a small proportion may be reported spontaneously. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in kidney transplant recipients, also the difference between spontaneously reported symptoms and symptoms elicited by specific questioning was assessed. The burden of these symptoms in daily life also was analyzed. DESIGN: A single-center, sequential, mixed method study to assess the difference between spontaneous patient reports of gastrointestinal symptoms and active screening by a questionnaire in kidney transplant patients. PATIENTS: In February 2008, patients received a questionnaire on gastrointestinal symptoms; notes in medical records were consulted for patients scoring less than 100. In June 2008, those patients received a second, extended questionnaire aimed to assess the burden of gastrointestinal symptoms in daily life. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 513 patients eventually proved to have gastrointestinal symptoms. Completed questionnaires were compared with notes in the patients' files of the past year. A total of 51 of these 92 patients appeared to have not mentioned their gastrointestinal symptoms during the outpatient clinic visits. Of these 51 patients, 37 reported a significant impact of gastrointestinal symptoms on daily life. CONCLUSIONS: The silent sufferer exists. Specific questioning helps to improve communication concerning bothersome gastrointestinal symptoms. To assess the burden of these symptoms, a validated questionnaire should be developed.

Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression early after renal transplantation: an interim analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic allograft nephropathy is the main cause of long-term renal transplant failure. Chronic use of calcineurin inhibitors contributes to its pathogenesis. Here, we report on a multicenter randomized trial to study the effects of withdrawal of cyclosporine A (CsA) from a triple immunosuppressive regimen containing CsA, prednisolone (P), and mycophenolate sodium (MPS) early after transplantation. METHODS: Patients continued on P/CsA, P/MPS, or P and everolimus (EVL). Before withdrawal, a transplant biopsy was performed ensuring no subclinical rejection was present. Drug levels were closely monitored. The primary outcome was interstitial graft fibrosis and hyalinosis. Secondary outcome was among others graft rejection. RESULTS: According to trial regulations, an interim analysis was performed after enrollment of half of the intended number of patients (n=113). Mean follow-up was 14+/-5 months from transplantation and 8+/-5 months from conversion. After conversion, acute rejection percentages were 3% in the P/CsA group, 22% in the P/MPS group, and 0% in the P/EVL group (P<0.009). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that switching immunosuppressive therapy from P/CsA/MPS to therapy with P/CsA or P/EVL at 6 months after renal transplantation is effective in preventing rejection. Double therapy with P/MPS after withdrawal of P/CsA resulted in an increase in severe acute rejection episodes. These results were the immediate reason to halt the P/MPS arm. Serum creatinine values at the latest follow-up (8+/-5 months after conversion and 14+/-5 months after transplantation) in the P/EVL group were lower than in the P/CsA group.