Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 26(2): e191-e198, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35602280

RESUMEN

Introduction Idiopathic rhinitis is a nonallergic and noninfectious rhinitis characterized mainly by nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea, resulting from an autonomic imbalance. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) demonstrated its action in reducing rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction when injected into the nasal turbinates or septum. Objective To analyze the effects of intranasal BTX-A injection to control the symptoms of idiopathic rhinitis and its possible adverse effects. Method Patients with idiopathic rhinitis were divided into two groups. Group A had 15 participants (8 female and 6 male), of ages from 47 to 84 years (mean 66.57 years), and these received 60 U of Dysport (Ipsen Ltd, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK) in each inferior nasal turbinate; group B had 12 participants (1 male and 11 female), of ages from 50 to 76 years (mean 60 years), and they received 1 ml of 0.9% saline. The individuals were reevaluated in the 1 st , 2 nd , 4 th , 8 th , and 12 th weeks after injection by a questionnaire, accompanied by nasal inspiratory peak flow and acoustic rhinometry. Results Group A showed significant improvement, mainly regarding the symptoms of sneezing/itching and nasal obstruction, over time and when compared to group B. Acoustic rhinometry confirmed the improvement in nasal obstruction. There was no relationship between the nasal peak flow data and the nasal obstruction score. No major adverse effects have been reported. Conclusion The injection of botulinum toxin in the inferior nasal turbinates of patients with idiopathic rhinitis reduces the symptoms of sneezing, itching, nasal obstruction, and runny nose without significant adverse effects, suggesting that it is an option in the treatment of these patients.

2.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 73(5): 704-12, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18094814

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Mucociliary transport dysfunctions can impair the quality of life of patients suffering from chronic rhinossinusitis and lead to severe consequences such as alterations in respiratory physiology or even death as in cases of cystic fibrosis and primary ciliary dyskinesia. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the physiology of the mucociliary apparatus and how its components (cilia, mucus-periciliary layer and its interaction) affect the clearance of respiratory secretions. AIMS: This paper aims to review and to discuss different techniques for studying mucociliary transport and their clinical and experimental applicability. CONCLUSIONS: The methods listed in this revision provide us with valuable information about different aspects of the mucociliary transport. Some of the methods listed are more suitable for clinical practice and present reproducible results. Others, show only applicability in experimental settings due to technical difficulties or financial limitations. However, it is important to emphasize that up to now there is no method that can evaluate ciliary beating frequency (CBF) in vivo and in situ. Such a method would become a valuable tool in the scientific scenario and in the clinical practice, supporting the diagnosis of ciliary dyskinesias and avoiding the use of invasive procedures to corroborate the clinical suspicion.


Asunto(s)
Depuración Mucociliar/fisiología , Animales , Humanos , Valores de Referencia , Reología , Viscosidad
3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 128(1): 27-31, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12574755

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of allergic rhinitis in chronic otitis media (otitis media with effusion [OME] and chronic perforation of the tympanic membrane) in São Paulo, Brazil and whether there is any association between these diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied 51 patients followed in the otologic group of the Otorhinolaryngology Division of the University of São Paulo Hospital. The patients were divided into 3 groups: allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophils syndrome (NARES), and patients with types of rhinitis or without rhinitis. We analyzed the age, gender, intensity of the nasal disease, surgical procedure, and surgical results in each group. RESULTS: We found about 50% of patients presenting with nasal disease and nasal eosinophilia (33.33% of allergic and 15.69% of NARES). CONCLUSION: Nasal disease has an impact on otologic middle ear disease, considering that the normal nasal mucosa do not have eosinophils.


Asunto(s)
Eosinofilia/epidemiología , Otitis Media/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Otitis Media/diagnóstico , Otitis Media/cirugía , Pruebas del Parche , Pronóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Timpanoplastia/métodos
4.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 75(5): 673-9, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19893935

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Allergic rhinitis affects 10-30% of the population, negatively impacting one's quality of life and productivity. It has been associated with sinusitis, otitis media, sleep disorders, and asthma. Rupatadine is a second generation antihistamine with increased affinity to histamine receptor H1; it is also a potent PAF (platelet-activating factor) antagonist. It starts acting quite quickly, offers long lasting effect, and reduces the chronic effects of rhinitis. AIM: this study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of rupatadine in the treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis. MATERIALS AND METHOD: this is a multi-centric open prospective study. This study included 241 patients from 13 centers in Brazil and was held between October of 2004 and August of 2005. Signs and symptoms of rhinitis and tolerance to medication were analyzed after one and two weeks of treatment. RESULTS: reduction on general scores from 8.65 to 3.21 on week 2 (p<0.001). All signs and symptoms improved significantly in the first day of treatment (p<0.001), except for nasal congestion and secretion, which improved from the second day of treatment (p<0.001). Adverse events occurred in 19.9% of the cases, 27.7% on week 1. CONCLUSION: rupatadine effectively controls persistent allergic rhinitis; it is safe and presents low incidence of side effects.


Asunto(s)
Ciproheptadina/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1 no Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Ciproheptadina/efectos adversos , Ciproheptadina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1 no Sedantes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA