Negative effects on oral motor function after submandibular and parotid botulinum neurotoxin A injections for drooling in children with developmental disabilities.

AIM: To evaluate negative effects on oral motor function after concurrent submandibular and parotid (four-gland) botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injections as a treatment for paediatric drooling. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study of 125 children (median age 7 years 7 months [interquartile range 4 years 5 months]) with developmental disabilities, including cerebral palsy, treated with four-gland injections. Most children (90.4%) were previously exposed to submandibular injections. Frequency, severity, and duration of negative effects on oral motor function (i.e. saliva swallowing, eating, drinking, articulation) were evaluated and compared to a reference cohort treated with submandibular injections. RESULTS: Negative effects on oral motor function were reported in 45 children (36.0%), predominantly manifesting as eating-related problems (64.4%). Most negative effects (62.2%) were classified as mild and resolved within 4-weeks post-injunction (53.3%). Compared to the reference cohort, frequency (36.0% vs 33.0%) and duration (53.3% vs 53.6% resolving within 4 weeks) of negative effects were comparable, although problems were more often moderately severe (33.3% vs 10.1%). INTERPRETATION: While negative effects on oral motor function were relatively common after four-gland BoNT-A injections, most problems were mild and resolved promptly. No substantial differences to a reference cohort treated with submandibular injections were observed, although further research should establish the generalizability of these findings in a treatment-naive population. Nevertheless, when submandibular injections prove ineffective, clinicians can confidently consider four-gland injections.

Predicting non-response to intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin A injections for drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

AIM: To develop robust multivariable prediction models for non-response to (1) submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injections and (2) concurrent submandibular and parotid (four-gland) injections, to guide treatment decisions for drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, including cerebral palsy. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study including 262 children (155 males/107 females, median age 7 years 11 months [IQR 5 years 1 month], range 4 years 0 months - 17 years 11 months) receiving submandibular injections and 74 children (52 males/22 females, median age 7 years 7 months [IQR 4 years 3 months], range 4 years 9 months - 18 years 8 months) receiving four-gland injections. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate associations between candidate predictors and non-response 8 weeks after injection. RESULTS: Ninety-six children (37%) were non-responders to submandibular injections, for which developmental age was the strongest predictor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.45 for developmental age <4 years or 4-6 years with IQ <70). Other characteristics that showed a trend towards an increased risk of non-response were diagnosis, sex, and head position. Thirty-four children (46%) were non-responders to four-gland injections, for which tongue protrusion (aOR 3.10; 95% CI 1.14-8.43) seemed most predictive, whereas multiple preceding submandibular injections (aOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-1.16) showed a trend towards being protective. Predictors were, however, unstable across different definitions of non-response and both models (i.e. submandibular and four-gland) had insufficient discriminative ability. INTERPRETATION: Potential predictors of non-response to BoNT-A injections were identified. Nevertheless, the developed prediction models seemed inadequate for guidance of treatment decisions. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Developmental age seemed most predictive of non-response to submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A injections. Non-response to concurrent submandibular and parotid injections was best predicted by tongue protrusion and number of previous injections. Multivariable prediction models including these clinical characteristics were unable to discriminate well. Predictors differed when non-response was defined using alternative outcome measures.

Social and emotional impact of anterior drooling in school-age children and young people with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

PURPOSE: Anterior drooling is a common comorbidity in children and young people (CYP) with neurodevelopmental disabilities. This study aimed to assess the social and emotional impact of drooling in CYP with a developmental age (DA) of 6 years and older, in whom this impact may differ from those with a lower DA due to their developing sense of self and awareness of their position within social groups. METHODS: Questionnaire data collected for routine clinical care were used to assess parental perceptions of the impact of drooling on (1) social interaction; (2) satisfaction with social interaction, appearance, family relations and life in general and (3) the way CYP expressed feelings on appearance, acceptance by peers and acceptance by adults. Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to identify associations between clinical characteristics and the social and emotional impact of drooling. RESULTS: Seventy-nine CYP with an estimated DA ≥ 6 years were included. The majority experienced frequent to constant (83%) and profuse (61%) drooling. Drooling frequently compromised social interaction with peers (49%) and adults (28%), and cognitive abilities were underestimated in 40%. Dissatisfaction with physical appearance (25%) related to drooling was noted. One-fifth of CYP reportedly expressed negative feelings on acceptance by peers related to drooling. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the substantial impact of drooling on CYP with a DA of 6 years and older, primarily through avoidance by peers and underestimated cognitive abilities, emphasizing that recognizing and addressing these social-emotional consequences should be integral to clinical care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Anterior drooling is common among children and youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities. WHAT IS NEW: • There seems to be a heightened prevalence of impaired social interaction with peers and underestimation of cognitive abilities due to drooling among children with a developmental age of at least 6 years compared to previous studies with more heterogeneous populations. • The impact of drooling can extend to domains that affect self-esteem, although this may not be fully captured with standardized questions, requiring clinicians to address these consequences in a way that is tailored to the child's experiences.

Comparing the evidence for botulinum neurotoxin injections in paediatric anterior drooling: a scoping review.

Paediatric anterior drooling has a major impact on the daily lives of children and caregivers. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) injections are considered an effective treatment to diminish drooling. However, there is no international consensus on which major salivary glands should be injected to obtain optimal treatment effect while minimizing the risk of side effects. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence for submandibular BoNT-A injections and concurrent submandibular and parotid (i.e. four-gland) injections, respectively, and assess whether outcomes could be compared across studies to improve decision making regarding the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment approach for paediatric anterior drooling. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant studies (until October 1, 2023) on submandibular or four-gland BoNT-A injections for the treatment of anterior drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Similarities and differences in treatment, patient, outcome, and follow-up characteristics were assessed. Twenty-eight papers were identified; 7 reporting on submandibular injections and 21 on four-gland injections. No major differences in treatment procedures or timing of follow-up were found. However, patient characteristics were poorly reported, there was great variety in outcome measurement, and the assessment of side effects was not clearly described.   Conclusion: This review highlights heterogeneity in outcome measures and patient population descriptors among studies on paediatric BoNT-A injections, limiting the ability to compare treatment effectiveness between submandibular and four-gland injections. These findings emphasize the need for more extensive and uniform reporting of patient characteristics and the implementation of a core outcome measurement set to allow for comparison of results between studies and facilitate the optimization of clinical practice guidelines. What is Known: • There is no international consensus on which salivary glands to initially inject with BoNT-A to treat paediatric drooling. What is New: • Concluding on the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment based on literature is currently infeasible. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures used to quantify anterior drooling.and clinical characteristics of children treated with intraglandular BoNT-A are generally insufficiently reported. • Consensus-based sets of outcome measures and patient characteristics should be developed and implemented.

Interdisciplinary assessment and treatment of paediatric drooling: two decades of experience by the Nijmegen saliva control team reflected in a stepwise algorithm.

Anterior and posterior drooling are prevalent comorbidities in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Considering the heterogeneity of the patient population and the multifactorial aetiology of drooling, an interdisciplinary and individualised treatment approach is indispensable. However, no tool for stepwise decision-making in the treatment of paediatric drooling has been developed previously. Within the Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, care for children with anterior and/or posterior drooling secondary to neurodevelopmental disabilities is coordinated by a saliva control team with healthcare professionals from six disciplines. In alignment with international literature, published guidelines, and evidence gained from two decades of experience and research by our team, this paper proposes an algorithm reflecting the assessment and treatment approach applied in our clinic. First, directions are provided to decide on the necessity of saliva control treatment, taking type of drooling, the child's age, and the severity and impact of drooling into account. Second, the algorithm offers guidance on the choice between available treatment options, highlighting the importance of accounting for child characteristics and child and caregiver preferences in clinical (shared) decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: With this algorithm, we aim to emphasise the importance of repeated stepwise decision-making in the assessment and treatment of drooling in children during their childhood, encouraging healthcare professionals to apply a holistic approach. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children with anterior or posterior drooling secondary to neurodevelopmental disabilities comprise a heterogeneous group, necessitating an individualised treatment approach. • No stepwise decision-making tool is available for the treatment of paediatric drooling. WHAT IS NEW: • Deciding on the necessity of saliva control treatment should be a conscious process, based on type of drooling, age, and drooling severity and impact. • Type of drooling, age, cognition, oral motor skills, self-awareness, posture, diagnosis, and child/caregiver preferences need to be considered to decide on the optimal treatment.

The Non-speech Oral Movement Assessment Children (NOMAC).

INTRODUCTION: Examination of oral movements is often part of an assessment undertaken by a speech and language therapist (SLT). Until now there have been no specific instruments or tests with reference values for typically developing children in Dutch that exclusively evaluate non-speech oral movements in young children. Therefore, a non-speech oral-motor observation list was designed to attempt to bridge this gap: The Non-speech Oral Movement Assessment Children (NOMAC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the NOMAC in terms of inter-rater reliability and its' construct validity. In addition, we aimed to collect reference values for the non-speech oral movements in children. METHODS: Data from typically developing Dutch children aged 2 to 8 years were collected. Inter-rater reliability was studied by estimating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was investigated by assessing the effect of age group and gender on the mean execution score per item (general linear model). To present normative data the percentage of the children performing a normal oral - motor execution was calculated. RESULTS: The study includes a total of 318 children, divided into 9 age groups. The inter-rater reliability shows a [sufficient] to [good] ICC for most items. A significant effect of the factor age group for almost all items was seen, confirming a robust construct validity. Normative data are presented with the percentage of the children performing a normal oral movement execution. CONCLUSION: Non-speech oral movements can be assessed with the NOMAC in children between 2 to 8 years old and can be compared with values obtained from a normative group. It should be used as part of a clinical feeding and speech assessment. Despite the fact that current insights indicate that oral- motor training has no value for improving mastication, swallowing and speech, it is important to know the status of non-speech oral motor capabilities. With this assessment a complete profile of the child's oral-motor abilities can be achieved, supportive for clinical decision making in SLT.

Dysphagia limit in children with cerebral palsy aged 4 to 12 years.

AIM: To assess the dysphagia limit in children with cerebral palsy (CP) according to Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS) level, sex, and age compared to typically developing children. METHOD: Seventy-seven children with CP (54 males, 23 females; mean age 7y 6mo, SD 2y 2mo, age range 4-12y) were assessed with the Maximum Volume Water Swallow Test. Median dysphagia limit in the CP group was compared with data of typically developing children. RESULTS: The dysphagia limit of children with CP differed significantly (p<0.001) from typically developing children. The latter showed a threefold higher median dysphagia limit (22mL) compared to children with CP in EDACS level I (7mL). The higher the EDACS level, the lower the dysphagia limit in children with CP. EDACS level explained 55% of the variance in the dysphagia limit of the CP group. INTERPRETATION: Where children with CP in EDACS levels IV and V showed that their capacity met the level of their performance, children in EDACS level I had the ability to perform a maximum capacity task, but still had a threefold lower median dysphagia limit than typically developing children. Establishment of the dysphagia limit should be part of general swallowing assessment in children with CP.

Posterior drooling in children with cerebral palsy and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injections, submandibular gland excision (SMGE), and bilateral submandibular duct ligation (2DL) for the control of posterior drooling in children with neurological impairment. METHOD: In a retrospective cohort, children with neurological impairment (e.g. cerebral palsy) treated between 2000 and 2016 were identified. Mean age at time of surgery was 9 years (range 1-21y). The primary outcome was posterior drooling severity by a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10) at baseline, 8-weeks, and 32-weeks follow-up. The secondary outcome was lower respiratory tract infections during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (out of 475; 47 males, 45 females) were identified. They were undergoing three different treatments: BoNT-A (n=63), SMGE (n=16), and 2DL (n=13). A significant reduction in VAS over time was observed in the total group of 92 patients. After SMGE, VAS decreased significantly from 6.82 (SD 3.40) at baseline to 2.29 (SD 1.93) at 8 weeks, and 2.17 (SD 2.58) at 32 weeks (F[2.34]=11.618, p<0.001). There was no significant decrease after both BoNT-A and 2-DL. INTERPRETATION: Posterior drooling is an unfamiliar, potentially life-threatening condition that is treatable with medication, BoNT-A injections, or surgery. Although all treatments reduced signs and symptoms of posterior drooling, there is a greater effect after SMGE compared to BoNT-A and 2-DL. What this paper adds Submandibular gland excision has better results for posterior drooling than botulinum toxin A or submandibular duct ligation.

Repeated onabotulinum neurotoxin A injections for drooling in children with neurodisability.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of repeated onabotulinum neurotoxin A injections for the treatment of drooling in children with neurodisabilities. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study, in which the first, second, and third onabotulinum neurotoxin A injection were compared within children treated between 2000 and 2020. Primary outcomes included drooling quotient, visual analogue scale (VAS), and treatment success defined as ≥50% reduction in drooling quotient and/or VAS 8 weeks after treatment. Each outcome was obtained at baseline and 8 weeks posttreatment. RESULTS: Seventy-seven children were included (mean age at first injection: 8y 3mo, SD 3y 7mo, range 3-17y; 44 males, 33 females; 51.9% with cerebral palsy, 45.5% wheelchair-bound). The objective (drooling quotient) and subjective (VAS) effect after the second injection was lower compared to the first injection. The third injection showed less objective and significantly less subjective effect compared to the first injection. An overall success rate of 74.0%, 41.6%, and 45.8% were found for the first, second, and third injection respectively. INTERPRETATION: Although onabotulinum neurotoxin A remained effective throughout the entire treatment course, there is less effect of subsequent onabotulinum neurotoxin A injections compared to the first. Although there might be a loss of effect after repeated injections, there is continued improvement for most children. What this paper adds Repeated injections show a diminished treatment effect after the second injection. A continued improvement is seen in most patients.

Surgery versus botulinum neurotoxin A to reduce drooling and improve daily life for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To compare the effect of bilateral submandibular duct ligation and botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) on drooling severity and its impact on daily life and care in children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe drooling. METHOD: This was a randomized, interventional, controlled trial in which 53 children and adolescents (31 males, 22 females, mean age 11y, range 8-22y, SD 2y 10mo) with cerebral palsy (58.5%) or other non-progressive developmental disorders (41.5%) were randomized to BoNT-A (n=26) or bilateral submandibular duct ligation (n=27). A parent questionnaire on the severity of drooling in specific positions and daily activities and the impact of drooling on daily life and care was filled out at baseline and 8 and 32 weeks posttreatment. RESULTS: Both BoNT-A and bilateral submandibular duct ligation had a positive effect on daily care, damage to electronic equipment and/or furniture, social interactions, and self-esteem. However, bilateral submandibular duct ligation had a significant greater and longer-lasting short- (8wks) and medium-term (32wks) effect on daily care, reducing damage to electronic devices, and improving social interactions and satisfaction with life in general. INTERPRETATION: This randomized controlled trial confirms reduced drooling by both BoNT-A and bilateral submandibular duct ligation, but provides new evidence on improved well-being through a reduction in drooling. Even though there is a greater risk of complications and morbidity after bilateral submandibular duct ligation, compared to BoNT-A there was a significantly greater and longer-lasting positive effect on most outcomes. What this paper adds Bilateral botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) and submandibular duct ligation had a positive effect on the well-being of individuals with moderate-to-severe drooling. Bilateral submandibular duct ligation had a greater effect on the impact of drooling during daily care than BoNT-A. Bilateral submandibular duct ligation reduced damage to electronic devices and improved social interactions and satisfaction with life.

Changes in severity and impact of drooling after submandibular gland botulinum neurotoxin A injections in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

AIMS: To examine changes in objective and subjective drooling severity measures after submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A injection in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, explore their relationship, and evaluate if clinically relevant responses relate to changes in the impact of drooling. METHOD: This longitudinal, observational cohort study involved 160 children (92 males, 68 females; 3-17y, mean 9y 1mo, SD 3y 6mo) treated between 2000 and 2012 at the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the 5-minute Drooling Quotient (DQ5) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for drooling severity pretreatment and posttreatment, and Pearson's rho to assess their association. A parent questionnaire was used to assess drooling impact in responders (defined as ≥50% reduction in DQ5 and/or ≥2 SD reduction in VAS for drooling severity 8wks postintervention) and non-responders. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve children (70%) were responders. Their mean VAS for drooling severity and DQ5 scores were significantly lower 32 weeks postintervention compared to baseline. At baseline, the VAS for drooling severity-DQ5 relationship was 'weak' (rs =0.15, p=0.060), whereas it was 'fair' at 8 weeks (rs =0.43, p=0.000) and 32 weeks (rs =0.30, p=0.000). For responders, a significant change was found regarding the impact of drooling on daily care and social interactions at 8 weeks after intervention; most of these effects were maintained at 32 weeks. INTERPRETATION: A clinically relevant response based on a combination of objective and subjective measures of drooling severity was accompanied by positive changes regarding the impact of drooling on daily care and social interactions. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Botulinum neurotoxin A injection into the submandibular glands reduced drooling severity in 70% of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Objective (5-minute Drooling Quotient) and subjective (Visual Analogue Scale for drooling severity) measures correlated 8 and 32 weeks after treatment. Objective and subjective measures complemented each other when changes in drooling severity were assessed. Reduced drooling severity was accompanied by positive changes with regard to the impact of drooling.

Submandibular duct ligation after botulinum neurotoxin A treatment of drooling in children with cerebral palsy.

AIM: To assess: (1) the effect on drooling of bilateral submandibular duct ligation as surgical therapy after the administration of submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) for excessive drooling and (2) the predictive value of treatment success with BoNT-A on treatment success after bilateral submandibular duct ligation. METHOD: This was a within-participant retrospective observational study in which 29 children with severe drooling (15 males, 14 females) received BoNT-A treatment at a mean age of 9 years 6 months (SD 2y 5mo), followed by bilateral submandibular duct ligation at a mean age of 10 years 11 months (SD 2y 4mo). Fifteen children were diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP), with 12 children classified in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels IV and V. The 14 children without CP had non-progressive developmental disorders. The primary drooling severity outcomes were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; subjective assessment) and drooling quotient (objective assessment). Measurements were taken before each intervention and again at 8 and 32 weeks. RESULTS: The VAS was significantly lower after bilateral submandibular duct ligation at follow-up compared to BoNT-A treatment (mean difference -33, p≤0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-43.3 to -22.9). The mean drooling quotient did not significantly differ between BoNT-A treatment and bilateral submandibular duct ligation at follow-up (3.3, p=0.457; 95% CI=-4.35 to 9.62) or between 8 and 32 weeks (4.7, p=0.188; 95% CI=-2.31 to 11.65). INTERPRETATION: BoNT-A treatment and bilateral submandibular duct ligation are both effective treatment modalities for drooling. At 32-week follow-up, subjective drooling severity after bilateral submandibular duct ligation was significantly lower compared to previous BoNT-A injections in participants. However, treatment success with BoNT-A is no precursor to achieving success with bilateral submandibular duct ligation. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Bilateral submandibular duct ligation is an effective therapy for drooling after treatment with botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A). Treatment success with BoNT-A is not a predictor of successful therapy with bilateral submandibular duct ligation.

Submandibular gland botulinum neurotoxin A injection for predicting the outcome of submandibular duct relocation in drooling: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: This study evaluated whether the effect of submandibular gland botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection can predict the outcome of submandibular duct relocation with sublingual gland excision (SMDR) in children with drooling. Furthermore, we compared the effectiveness of both procedures. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 42 children and adolescents (25 males, 17 females; mean [SD] age at BoNT-A injection 11y [4], range 4-20y; mean [SD] age at SMDR 15y [4], range 7-23y) with cerebral palsy or another non-progressive developmental disability who had undergone both BoNT-A injection and SMDR for drooling. Main outcomes were the drooling quotient and the visual analogue scale (VAS) on drooling severity at 8 weeks and 32 weeks follow-up. RESULTS: Failure or success of previous BoNT-A injections had no influence on success of consecutive SMDR. Relative change in main outcomes showed no significant relation between BoNT-A injection and SMDR for any follow-up measurement. After 8 weeks, SMDR was more successful than BoNT-A injection in diminishing VAS (VAS 80.0% vs 54.3%; drooling quotient 56.2% vs 51.0%). After 32 weeks, both drooling quotient (64.3% vs 29.5%) and VAS (75.7% vs 37.1%) showed significantly higher proportions of success for SMDR. INTERPRETATION: The effect of submandibular BoNT-A injection does not predict subsequent SMDR success in drooling. Furthermore, SMDR has a larger and longer-lasting positive effect on drooling than BoNT-A injections. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection effect does not predict submandibular duct relocation with sublingual gland excision outcome. Submandibular duct relocation is more effective and more permanent than BoNT-A injection.

INYECCIÓN DE NEUROTOXINA BOTULÍNICA A EN LA GLÁNDULA SUBMANDIBULAR PARA PREDECIR EL RESULTADO DE LA REUBICACIÓN DEL CONDUCTO SUBMANDIBULAR EN BABEO: UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO: OBJETIVO: Este estudio evaluó si el efecto de la inyección de neurotoxina A botulínica submandibular (BoNT-A) puede predecir el resultado de la reubicación del conducto submandibular con escisión de la glándula sublingual (SMDR) en niños con babeo. Además, comparamos la efectividad de ambos procedimientos. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en 42 niños y adolescentes (25 varones, 17 mujeres; edad media [DE] en la inyección de BoNT-A 11 años [4], rango 4-20 años; edad media [SD] a SMDR 15 años [4] rango 7-23 años) con parálisis cerebral u otra discapacidad del desarrollo no progresiva que se haya sometido a una inyección de BoNT-A y SMDR para babear. Los resultados principales fueron el cociente de babeo y la escala analógica visual (VAS) en la severidad del babeo a las 8 semanas y 32 semanas de seguimiento. RESULTADOS: El fracaso o el éxito de las inyecciones anteriores de BoNT-A no tuvo influencia en el éxito de la SMDR consecutiva. El cambio relativo en los resultados principales no mostró una relación significativa entre la inyección de BoNT-A y SMDR para cualquier medición de seguimiento. Después de 8 semanas, SMDR fue más exitoso que la inyección de BoNT-A en la VAS disminuida (VAS 80,0% vs 54,3%; cociente de babeo 56,2% vs 51,0%). Después de 32 semanas, tanto el cociente de babeo (64,3% vs 29,5%) como el VAS (75,7% vs 37,1%) mostraron proporciones significativamente más altas de éxito para SMDR. INTERPRETACIÓN: El efecto de la inyección submandibular de BoNT-A no predice el éxito posterior de SMDR en el babeo. Además, el SMDR tiene un efecto positivo mayor y más duradero en el babeo que las inyecciones de BoNT-A.

INJEÇÃO DE NEUROTOXINA BOTULÍNICA NA GLÂNDULA SUBMANDIBULAR PARA PREDIÇÃO DO RESULTADO DA RELOCACÃO DO DUCTO SUBMANDIBULAR NA SIALORRÉIA: UM ESTUDO DE COORTE RETROSPECTIVO: OBJETIVO: Este estudo avaliou se o efeito da neurotoxina botulínica A (NTBo-A) na glândula submandibular pode predizer o resultado da relocação do ducto submandibular com excisão sublingual da glândula (RDSM) em crianças com sialorréia. Ainda, comparamos a efetividade de ambos os procedimentos. MÉTODO: Um estudo de coorte retrospectivo foi realizado em 42 crianças e adolescentes (25 do sexo masculino, 17 do sexo feminino; idade média [DP] no momento da injeção de NTBo-A 11a[4], variação de 4-20a; idade média [DP] no momento da RDSM 15a [4], variação de 7-23a) com paralisia cerebral ou outra desordem não-progressiva do desenvolvimento que passaram por injeção de NTBo-A e RDSM para sialorréia. Os principais desfechos foram o quociente de sialorréia e a escala visual análoga (EVA) sobre a severidade da sialorréia no acompanhamento de 8 e 32 semanas. RESULTADOS: A falha ou sucesso da NTBo-A prévia não teve influência no sucesso da RDSM consecutiva. A mudança relativa nos principais desfechos não mostrou nenhuma relação significativa entre a injeção de NTBo-A e a RDSM para nenhuma das medidas no acompanhamento. Após 8 semanas, a RDSM foi mais bem sucedida do que a NTBo-A na redução da EVA (EVA 80,0% vs 54,3%; quociente de sialorréia 56,2% vs 51,0%). Após 32 semanas, tanto o quociente de sialorréia (64,3% vs 29,5%) quanto a EVA (75,7% vs 37,1%) mostram proporções significativamente mais altas de sucesso para a RDSM. INTERPRETAÇÃO: O efeito da injeção submandibular de NTBo-A não prediz o sucesso da RDSM subsequente na sialorréia. Ainda, a RDSM tem efeito maior e mais duradouro na sialorréia do que injeções de NTBo-A.

Effectiveness of submandibular duct relocation in 91 children with excessive drooling: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of submandibular duct relocation (SMDR) in drooling children with neurological disorders. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic Outpatient Saliva Control Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one children suffering from moderate to severe drooling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct observational drooling quotient (DQ; 0-100) and caretaker Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; 0-100). Secondary outcome measures were drooling severity (DS) and frequency rating scales. RESULTS: The DQ at baseline, 8 and 32 weeks postoperatively was 26.4, 12.3 and 10.8, respectively. VAS score decreased from 80.1 at baseline to 28.3 and 37.0 at 8 and 32 weeks after surgery. Median DS at baseline, 8 and 32 weeks was 5, 3 and 4, whereas the drooling frequency median scores were 4, 2 and 2, respectively. Five children required prolonged intubation due to transient floor of the mouth swelling, two of whom developed a ventilator-associated pneumonia. Another child developed atelectasis with postoperative pneumonia. Two more children needed tube feeding because of postoperative eating difficulties for 3 days or suprapubic catheterisation for urinary retention. Children aged 12 years or older (OR = 3.41; P = 0.03) and those with adequate stability and position of the head (OR = 2.84; P = 0.09) appeared to benefit most from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Submandibular duct relocation combined with excision of the sublingual glands appears to be relatively safe and effective in diminishing visible drooling in children with neurological disorders, particularly in children aged 12 years and older and those without a forward head posture.

Negative effects of submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A injections on oral motor function in children with drooling due to central nervous system disorders.

AIM: The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the incidence and nature of adverse effects on oral motor function after first injections of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) in submandibular glands for excessive drooling in children with central nervous system disorders; and (2) to identify independent predictors of these adverse effects. METHOD: A cohort study involved 209 children (123 males, 86 females, aged 4-27y, median 8y 4mo), who received submandibular BoNT-A injections for drooling. Adverse effects were categorized into swallowing, eating, drinking, articulation, and other problems. Univariable logistic regression was used to study differences in patients with and without adverse effects. Possible predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Transient adverse effects occurred in 33% of the 209 BoNT-A treatments. Almost 80% of these were mild, versus 8.7% severe. Approximately 54% of the adverse effects spontaneously resolved within 4 weeks; 3% still existed after 32 weeks. A diagnosis of cerebral palsy, higher range of BoNT-A dosage, and a pre-treatment drooling quotient <18% were found to be independent predictors of adverse effects. INTERPRETATION: Before using submandibular BoNT-A injections for drooling, potential adverse effects should be discussed. Oral motor function needs to be monitored, because existing dysphagia may be worsened. The identified clinical predictors could be helpful to optimize patient selection.

Quantitative ultrasound of submental and masticatory muscles in children with cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE: Quantitative muscle ultrasound (QMUS) is potentially valuable as a diagnostic tool in central neurological disorders, as it provides information about changes in muscle architecture. This study aimed to investigate whether ultrasound images of the submental and masticatory muscles in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) differ from those obtained in a reference group, and whether observed ultrasound abnormalities differ between subgroups of children with different Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS) levels to support its construct validity. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 25 children with spastic CP aged 3-18 years. QMUS of selected muscles was performed. Muscle thickness and echogenicity in the CP group were compared to previously collected reference values, and between different EDACS levels within the CP group. RESULTS: Median echogenicity of all muscles was significantly higher in children with CP than in healthy controls. The temporalis muscle was significantly thinner in the CP group. There were no differences in muscle thickness or echogenicity between EDACS levels. CONCLUSION: QMUS is able to detect abnormal architecture of submental and masticatory muscles in children with spastic CP, but the interpretation of abnormalities in relation to the severity of mastication and swallowing problems needs further investigation.

The when, why, and how of using glycopyrronium to diminish drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: Implications for clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Despite the established efficacy of glycopyrronium bromide in reducing drooling among children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, evidence on its impact on the daily lives of children and parents and effectiveness in a real-world setting are scarce, especially among long-term users. This study explored timing and duration of glycopyrronium treatment, effect and impact on daily life, and occurrence of side effects to inform clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at a national referral centre for drooling, including 61 children with nonprogressive neurodevelopmental disabilities, treated with glycopyrronium for anterior and/or posterior drooling between 2011 and 2021. Data were obtained from medical records and supplemented by structured telephone interviews with parents. RESULTS: Anterior drooling severity decreased in 82% of the included children. Changes in the impact of drooling on burden of care, social interaction, and self-esteem were reported in 55%, 31%, and 36%, respectively. Side effects were noted for 71% of cases, yet only 36% of parents deemed these as outweighing the positive impact of treatment. A substantial majority (77%) of the included children were long-term users (≥6 months). Among these, 38% of parents reported decreasing effectiveness and 27% noticed more prominent side effects over time. CONCLUSIONS: Glycopyrronium demonstrated potential in mitigating the impact of drooling on daily life, although variations were observed in the specific aspects and extent of improvement. The real-world context of our study provides important insights for refining clinical practices, emphasizing the need for balanced consideration of treatment benefits and potential side effects to facilitate shared decision-making.

Long-term effects of submandibular gland excision on drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: A cross-sectional study.

AIM: Submandibular gland excision (SMGE) is suitable for the management of drooling in patients with non-progressive neurodisabilities. We aimed to investigate the long-term effects of SMGE. METHOD: Patients who had SMGE between 2007 and 2018 were included. Main outcomes were a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Drooling Severity (DS), and Drooling Frequency (DF) collected at baseline, 8 weeks, 32 weeks and with a median of 313 weeks after SMGE (long-term). Secondary outcomes were satisfaction with the procedure, Drooling Quotient (DQ) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: We included thirty-five patients in the long-term analysis with a mean age of 14.5 years. A baseline VAS score of 80.4 was found, which improved on the long-term (mean difference -21.8, t(26) = 4.636, p < 0.0005)). DS and DF decreased significantly at the long-term compared to baseline (Z = -4.361, p < 0.0001 for DS, Z = -3.065, p = 0.002 for DF). Twenty-three out of 35 (66%) patients would recommend the procedure to peers. INTERPRETATION: This study indicates a long-term stable effect on drooling after SMGE in patients with anterior drooling. Recurrence of drooling occurs due to unknown reasons, nevertheless most caregivers and/or patients are still satisfied and would recommend the procedure to others.

Accurate assessment of drooling severity with the 5-minute drooling quotient in children with developmental disabilities.

AIM: The aims of this study were to examine whether objective measurements of the 10-minute drooling quotient (DQ10) and the 5-minute drooling quotient (DQ5) are interchangeable; to assess agreement between the measurements and their accuracy in classifying drooling severity; and to develop a time-efficient clinical assessment. METHOD: The study cohort included 162 children (61 females, 101 males; mean age 11 y 6 mo, SD 4 y 5 mo, range 3 y 9 mo-22 y 1 mo) suffering from moderate to profuse drooling. One hundred and twenty-four had cerebral palsy and 38 had other developmental disabilities. Seventy-four of the participants were ambulant and 88 non-ambulant. The original DQ10 was recalculated into a 5-minute score (DQ5). Assessments were undertaken while the participants were in a rest situation (DQ(R)) and while they were active (DQ(A)). Agreement in scores was quantified using intraclass correlations and Bland-Altman plots. To classify drooling, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare accuracy of the DQ10 and DQ5 at rest and during activity. RESULTS: Agreement between DQ10A, and DQ5(A), and between DQ10(R) and DQ5(R) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.90). Moderate agreement existed between DQ(A) and DQ(R). DQ(A) scores were more accurate in classifying children's drooling behaviour. For DQ5(A), a cut-off point of 18 or more (drooling episodes/observation time) might indicate 'constant drooling'. INTERPRETATION: The DQ10 and DQ5 can be used interchangeably. DQ(A) is most discriminative for drooling severity. For evaluating treatment efficiency the cut-off point can be used. For clinical and research purposes, the DQ5 is time efficient and cost saving while validity, and intrarater and interrater reliability are preserved.

Clinical practice: swallowing problems in cerebral palsy.

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common physical disability in early childhood. The worldwide prevalence of CP is approximately 2-2.5 per 1,000 live births. It has been clinically defined as a group of motor, cognitive, and perceptive impairments secondary to a non-progressive defect or lesion of the developing brain. Children with CP can have swallowing problems with severe drooling as one of the consequences. Malnutrition and recurrent aspiration pneumonia can increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Early attention should be given to dysphagia and excessive drooling and their substantial contribution to the burden of a child with CP and his/her family. This review displays the important functional and anatomical issues related to swallowing problems in children with CP based on relevant literature and expert opinion. Furthermore, based on our experience, we describe a plan for approach of investigation and treatment of swallowing problems in cerebral palsy.