Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiology ; 308(1): e222535, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462495

RESUMEN

Background Evidence regarding percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) remains limited. Purpose To compare pain relief, quality of life, and disability between PV and active control (anesthetic infiltration) interventions for chronic OVCF. Materials and Methods This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted between May 2013 and June 2019 in participants with pain due to OVCF lasting longer than 3 months with bone marrow edema present at MRI. Study participants were randomly assigned to undergo PV (n = 40) or active control intervention (n = 40). The primary outcome was pain severity, assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) (range, 0-10) during 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) score (range, 0-100) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score (range, 0-100). Outcomes were analyzed according to a longitudinal multilevel model used to test the difference between groups in change from baseline across follow-up. Results The mean age of the 80 participants (54 women) was 69 years ± 10 (SD) in the PV group and 71 years ± 10 in the active control group. VAS score was 7.6 (95% CI: 7.0, 8.2) in the PV group and 7.3 (95% CI: 6.9, 7.8) in the active control group at baseline (P = .47) and 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1, 4.8) and 5.1 (95% CI: 4.3, 6.0), respectively, at month 12 (P = .045). At month 12, the group difference from baseline was 1.3 (95% CI: 0.1, 2.6; P = .02) for VAS, 5.2 (95% CI: 0.9, 9.4; P = .02) for QUALEFFO, and 7.1 (95% CI: -3.3, 17.5; P = .18) for RMDQ, favoring the PV group. Conclusion In the treatment of pain caused by chronic OVCFs, PV is more effective for pain relief and quality of life improvement than anesthetic injection alone, with similar improvement for disability between the groups. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01963039 © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Beall and De Leacy in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Fracturas por Compresión/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Dolor/etiología , Vertebroplastia/efectos adversos , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(13): 4214-4221, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27027308

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), long-term survival can be achieved in selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM). Patient selection and outcome may be improved significantly with a tool that adequately predicts survival in these patients. This study was designed to validate the peritoneal surface disease severity score (PSDSS) in patients with colorectal PM treated with CRS + HIPEC. If performance of the PSDSS was suboptimal (c < 0.7), we aimed to develop a new prognostic model. METHODS: Patients were included if they had colorectal PM and underwent CRS + HIPEC with intended complete cytoreduction in a Dutch tertiary hospital between 2007 and 2015. Statistical analyses were performed with R-software. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC. External validation of the PSDSS showed a Harrell's c statistic of 0.62. After analysis, four parameters appeared prognostically relevant factors for overall survival: age, PCI score, locoregional lymph node status, and signet ring cell histology. The weighted relevance of these parameters was turned into a prognostic nomogram that we termed colorectal peritoneal metastases prognostic surgical score (COMPASS). The COMPASS differentiated well and showed a Harrell's c statistic of 0.72 with a calibration plot showing good agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This study externally validated the PSDSS and developed a new prognostic score, the COMPASS. This pre-cytoreduction nomogram was more accurate than PSDSS in predicting survival of patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC. It can be used as tool to assist in the decision about continuing cytoreduction and HIPEC and can provide valuable information in the follow-up period after CRS + HIPEC.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/terapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Hipertermia Inducida , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/secundario , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(3): 833-41, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26442921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe morbidity after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is, besides the obvious short-term consequences, associated with impaired long-term outcomes. The risk factors for severe morbidity in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin are poorly defined. This study aimed to identify risk factors for severe morbidity after CRS + HIPEC in patients with colorectal PC. METHODS: Patients with colorectal PC who underwent CRS + HIPEC between 2007 and 2015 were categorized and compared between those with and those without severe morbidity. Risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis. Morbidity was graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, with grade 3 or higher indicating severe morbidity. RESULTS: This study included 211 patients, of whom 53 patients (25.1%) experienced morbidity of grade 3 or higher. The identified risk factors for severe morbidity were extensive prior surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4.3], a positive recent smoking history (OR 4.0), a poor physical performance status (OR 2.9), and extensive cytoreduction (OR 1.2 per additional resection). Patients with a greater number of risk factors more often had severe morbidity and higher reoperation, readmission, and mortality rates. Furthermore, an internally validated preoperative prediction model for severe morbidity with an area under the curve of 70% was constructed. CONCLUSION: The current study identified risk factors for severe morbidity after CRS + HIPEC in patients with colorectal PC. Patients with a combination of risk factors have a substantial risk of severe morbidity and therefore should be carefully selected for CRS + HIPEC. The preoperative decision model can be a valuable additional tool in this process of patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Hipertermia Inducida , Morbilidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Pronóstico , Segunda Cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(1): 99-105, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26148758

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as treatment for patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is regarded as an extensive procedure. The risk of postoperative mortality after major abdominal surgery might be substantially higher than described by the 30-day mortality. This study aims to identify causes of 1-year mortality, thereby assessing a more accurate treatment-related mortality rate after CRS + HIPEC. METHODS: All subsequent patients with colorectal PC treated with CRS + HIPEC with complete macroscopic cytoreduction in two tertiary hospitals between April 2005 and April 2013 were included in this study. Causes of 1-year mortality were carefully analyzed and patient data were compared between patients who died or did not die within 12 months after CRS + HIPEC. RESULTS: Of the 245 included patients, 34 (13.9 %) died within 12 months after CRS + HIPEC. The overall treatment-related mortality rate was 4.9 % (n = 12), and the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 1.6 % (n = 4) and 2.4 % (n = 6), respectively. Furthermore, 18 patients (7.3 %) died due to early recurrent disease. Three patients (1.2 %) died of cardiovascular events, unrelated to CRS + HIPEC. The 1-year mortality group had more extensive peritoneal disease (p = 0.02) and the operative time in this group was longer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall treatment-related mortality was considerably higher than described by the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rate. However, even though complete macroscopic cytoreduction was achieved in every patient, the main cause of 1-year mortality was early recurrent disease. Both findings are valuable in preoperative patient selection, as well as in preoperative counseling of patients undergoing a CRS + HIPEC procedure.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Terapia Combinada/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
J Surg Oncol ; 113(5): 548-53, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27110701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: The effect of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with rectal peritoneal metastases (PM) is unclear. This case-control study aims to assess the results of cytoreduction and HIPEC in patients with rectal PM compared to colon PM patients. METHODS: Colorectal PM patients treated with complete macroscopic cytoreduction and HIPEC were included. Two colon cancer patients were case-matched for each rectal cancer patient, based on prognostic factors (T stage, N stage, histology type, and extent of PM). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between both groups. RESULTS: From 317 patients treated with complete macroscopic cytoreduction and HIPEC, 29 patients (9.1%) had rectal PM. Fifty-eight colon cases were selected as control patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Major morbidity was 27.6% and 34.5% in the rectal and colon group, respectively (P = 0.516). Median disease-free survival was 13.5 months in the rectal group and 13.6 months in the colon group (P = 0.621). Two- and five-year overall survival rates were 54%/32% in rectal cancer patients, and 61%/24% in colon cancer patients (P = 0.987). CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreduction and HIPEC in selected patients with rectal PM is feasible and provides similar outcomes as in colon cancer patients. Rectal PM should not be regarded a contra-indication for cytoreduction and HIPEC in selected patients. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:548-553. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Acta Oncol ; 55(9-10): 1183-1189, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27170100

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We conducted a population-based study to establish the incidence, treatment and overall survival over time of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with small bowel adenocarcinoma in the Netherlands between 1999 and 2013 were included (n = 1775). Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated per 100 000 person-years using the European standardized population rate. The influence of patient and tumor characteristics on the administration of chemotherapy was analyzed by means of a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was conducted to evaluate trends in treatment and survival and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors of overall survival. RESULTS: The incidence of small bowel adenocarcinomas increased, mainly due to an almost twofold increase of duodenal adenocarcinomas. Patients with locoregional duodenal tumors were less likely to undergo surgery (58%), towards 95% of the locoregional jejunal and ileal tumors (p < 0.0001). The use of chemotherapy doubled for adjuvant (7-15%) and palliative chemotherapy (19-37%). Median overall survival of patients with locoregional disease increased from 19 to 34 months (p = 0.0006), whereas median overall survival of patients with metastatic disease remained 4-5 months. Favorable prognostic factors for prolonged survival in locoregional disease, identified by multivariable survival analysis, included age <60 years, tumor stage I or II, diagnosis in 2009-2013, surgical treatment and chemotherapy. Favorable prognostic factors for prolonged survival in metastatic disease were age <50 years, jejunal tumors, surgical treatment and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Small bowel adenocarcinomas are rare tumors with an increasing incidence. The administration of adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy doubled, but median overall survival only increased for patients with locoregional disease. Given the rarity and dismal prognosis, it is important to develop international studies to determine the optimal treatment for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Neoplasias Duodenales/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Íleon/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/epidemiología , Enfermedades Raras/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Duodenales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Duodenales/patología , Neoplasias Duodenales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias del Íleon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Íleon/patología , Neoplasias del Íleon/cirugía , Incidencia , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/patología , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Enfermedades Raras/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Raras/patología , Enfermedades Raras/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
7.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(8): 2656-62, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25515200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer has improved significantly with the introduction of cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). Although a macroscopically complete resection is achieved in nearly every patient, recurrence rates are high. This study aims to identify risk factors for early recurrence, thereby offering ways to reduce its occurrence. METHODS: All patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with CRS + HIPEC and a minimum follow-up of 12 months, in April 2014, were analyzed. Patient data were compared between patients with or without recurrence within 12 months after CRS + HIPEC. Risk factors were determined using logistic regression analysis. Postoperative complications were graded according to the serious adverse events (SAEs) score, with grade 3 or higher indicating complications requiring intervention. RESULTS: A complete macroscopic cytoreduction was achieved in 96 % of all patients treated with CRS + HIPEC. Forty-six of 133 patients (35 %) developed recurrence within 12 months. An SAE ≥3 after CRS + HIPEC was the only significant risk factor found for early recurrence (odds ratio 2.3; p = 0.046). Median survival in the early recurrence group was 19.3 months compared with 43.2 months in the group without early recurrence (p < 0.001). Patients with an SAE ≥3 showed a reduced survival compared with patients without such complications (22.1 vs. 31.0 months, respectively; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Early recurrence after CRS + HIPEC is associated with a significant reduction in overall survival. This study identifies postoperative complications requiring intervention as the only significant risk factor for early recurrence, independent of the extent of peritoneal disease, highlighting the importance of minimizing the risk of postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Hipertermia Inducida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma/secundario , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
8.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(11): 3625-31, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25672564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, skeletal muscle depletion (sarcopenia) is associated with impaired postoperative recovery and decreased survival. This study aimed to determine whether skeletal muscle depletion can predict postoperative complications for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. METHODS: All consecutive patients with an available preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan who underwent CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer in two centers were analyzed. Skeletal muscle mass was determined using the L3 muscle index on the preoperative CT scan. The cutoff values defined by Prado et al. were used to classify the patients as sarcopenic or nonsarcopenic. RESULTS: Of the study's 206 patients, 90 (43.7 %) were classified as sarcopenic. The sarcopenic patients underwent significantly more reoperations than the nonsarcopenic patients (25.6 vs. 12.1 %; p = 0.012). The mean L3 muscle index was significantly lower for the patients who experienced severe postoperative complications than for the patients without severe postoperative complications (85.6 vs. 110.2 cm(2)/m(2); p = 0.008). In a multivariable logistic regression model, L3 muscle index was the only parameter independently associated with the risk of severe postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.93; 95 % confidence interval 0.87-0.99; p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Skeletal muscle mass depletion, assessed using CT-based muscle mass measurements, is associated with an increased risk of severe postoperative complications in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis and could therefore be used in preoperative risk assessment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
9.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 21(8): 2621-6, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24671638

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is diagnosed during emergency surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), further treatment with curative intent may seem futile given the known poor prognosis of both PC and emergency surgery. The aim of the current study was to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for CRC patients who previously underwent emergency surgery in the presence of PC. METHODS: All patients with synchronous PC of CRC referred to two tertiary centers between April 2005 and November 2013 were included in this study. Operative, postoperative and survival details were compared between patients presenting in an emergency or elective setting. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients with synchronous PC underwent CRS and HIPEC. Amongst these patients, 36 (24.2 %) initially presented with acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery. Acute presentation did not result in a longer interval between the initial operation and HIPEC (2.2 vs. 2.1 months; P = 0.09). When comparing operative outcomes, no significant differences were found in blood loss (P = 0.47), operation time (P = 0.39), or completeness of cytoreduction (P = 0.97). In addition, complication rates, degree and types of complication did not differ between the groups. Median survival was 36.1 months for emergency presentation compared with 32.1 in the elective group (P = 0.73). CONCLUSION: CRS + HIPEC may be performed safely in patients with PC of colorectal origin presenting with acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery. More importantly, the 5-year survival rate in these patients was equal to elective cases. This should be regarded as promising and therefore considered for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/terapia , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
10.
J Surg Oncol ; 109(8): 841-7, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24619813

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: CytoReductive Surgery (CRS) combined with Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) has an established role in the treatment of peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to describe the recurrence patterns and to evaluate treatment options and related survival. METHODS: Patients treated with CRS + HIPEC in two tertiary referral centers between April 2005 and March 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic value of several parameters was calculated using Cox Regression. RESULTS: One hundred thirty two of 287 patients (46%) with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with complete CRS and HIPEC were diagnosed with recurrent disease, after a median disease-free interval of 11.4 months. Recurrence were locoregional (43%), distant metastases (26%) or both (31%). Thirty-two of the 132 patients with recurrences (24%) were treated surgically with curative intent, which extended the median survival from 12 months to 43 months, compared to palliative treatment (best supportive care or chemotherapy; P < 0.001). Initial nodal status (P = 0.01) and the number of affected regions at initial CRS (P = 0.02) were significantly correlated to survival after disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: Disease recurrence after CRS and HIPEC is common; in selected patients, an aggressive surgical approach may be beneficial and extend survival.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Hipertermia Inducida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Anciano , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma/secundario , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metastasectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Centros de Atención Terciaria
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(10): e0042, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29517660

RESUMEN

Complications after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) result in impaired short- and long-term outcomes. However, financial consequences of complications after CRS and HIPEC in a European health care setting are unknown. This study aims to assess the consequences of complications on hospital costs after CRS and HIPEC.In this prospective observational cohort study, patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with CRS and HIPEC were included. Financial information was collected according to the Dutch manual for costs analyses. Costs were compared between patients without complications (NC), minor complications (MC), or severe complications (SC), according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.One hundred and sixty-one patients were included, of whom 42% experienced NC, 27% MC and 31% SC. Mean hospital costs were &OV0556;9.406 ±â€Š2.235 in NC patients, &OV0556;12.471 ±â€Š3.893 in MC patients, and &OV0556;29.409 ±â€Š22.340 in SC patients. The 31% of patients with severe complications accounted for 56% of all hospital costs. Hospital admission costs in SC patients were 320% higher compared to NC patients. Costs of complications were estimated to be 43% of all admission costs.Severe postoperative complications have major influence on costs after CRS and HIPEC and result in a threefold increase of hospital costs in affected patients. This finding stresses the need for adequate risk assessment of developing severe complications after CRS and HIPEC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Estudios Prospectivos
13.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 12(2): 283-9, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26686306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A gastric pouch in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery can be created after transection of the perigastric neurovascular bundle or by preserving these structures. Some surgeons choose to transect the neurovascular bundle (NBT), containing branches of the vagus nerve, because this might be related to additional weight loss, whereas others advocate preservation (NBP) to reduce postoperative complications. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effect of both techniques after primary RYGB. SETTING: All patients undergoing primary RYGB in a large bariatric center in the Netherlands between January 2010 and December 2013 were included. METHODS: Patient demographic characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications and weight loss after 1 year were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 773 consecutive patients were included (85.5% female). NBT was performed in 407 patients (52.7%), whereas NBP was performed in 366 patients. There were no missing data and 81.2% of patients completed the 1-year follow-up. Postoperative complications were found in 66 patients (8.5%). A total of 49 patients (6.3%) either had an anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, or intraabdominal abscess (NBT 8.8% versus NBP 3.6%, P = .003). Percentage total weight loss (NBT 34.5%±6.9% versus NBP 33.4%±6.9%; P = .011) differed to a lesser extent between groups, although this was significant. Neurovascular bundle transection was identified as independent factor among others for occurrence of leakage, bleeding, and abscess development (OR 2.886; 95% CI [1.466-5.683]; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Transection of the neurovascular bundle in RYGB is associated with more complications. Furthermore, weight loss is not relevantly increased. Further research is necessitated to substantiate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Epiplón/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Epiplón/irrigación sanguínea , Epiplón/inervación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Anticancer Res ; 35(2): 627-34, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25667439

RESUMEN

The Peritoneal cavity is a well-known metastatic site for several intra-abdominal malignancies, such as stomach, colon, pancreas and rectal cancer. For long, it was thought that treatment with curative intent was impossible but that was challenged by the introduction of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Although their effectiveness has been proven both experimentally and clinically, there is need for improvement. Firstly, a significant proportion of patients develop recurrent disease. Secondly, HIPEC demands presence of dedicated perfusion devices not readily available in most hospitals. Since intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy is thought to play a crucial role, new modalities to deliver effective chemotherapeutics to the peritoneum are developed. The current review aims to present an overview of the experimental data on new drug delivery systems (DDS) in peritoneal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Peritoneo/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Masculino , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Desnudos
15.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 7(3): 39-42, 2015 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25848491

RESUMEN

Malignant ascites is a common symptom in patients with peritoneal cancer. Current assumption is that an increased vascular permeability and obstruction of lymphatic channels lead to the accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity. This case report describes a severely symptomatic patient with malignant ascites. The previously healthy 73-year-old male was presented with abdominal distention causing respiratory distress. Computed tomography revealed large amounts of ascites, a recto-sigmoidal mass with locoregional lymphadenopathy and an omental cake. Biopsy taken during colonoscopy revealed an adenocarcinoma of the colon with signet cell differentiation. A widespread peritoneal carcinomatosis was found during a diagnostic laparoscopy. The extent of peritoneal disease rendered the patient not suitable for cytoreductive surgery with curative intent. The ascites proved to be refractory to ultrasound-guided paracentesis; thus, a decision was made to perform palliative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy without cytoreductive surgery. Consequently, ascites production stopped, and the respiratory distress was relieved thereafter. The postoperative recovery was uneventful. Ascites recurred eight months later, and a second hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy procedure was performed. The patient was still alive at the time of writing, 16 mo after the initial diagnosis.

16.
Anticancer Res ; 35(1): 295-300, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25550563

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate whether cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC) is a feasible and effective option for patients with urological involvement of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer (CRC-PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The characteristics of patients with CRC-PC treated with CRS+HIPEC, with or without a urological procedure, between April 2005 and June 2013 in two tertiary Centres were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (14%) out of 267 CRC-PC patients treated with CRS+HIPEC had a urological procedure during cytoreduction. The median survival was not significantly different between patients with or without a urological procedure (26.9 versus 32.1 months, p=0.29). Severe complications occurred more in patients with a urological procedure (47% versus 20%, p<0.001). In patients with a urological procedure, the most frequent complications were gastrointestinal leakage (n=9) and intra-abdominal abscess formation (n=5). CONCLUSION: Urological resections as a part of CRS+HIPEC in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin are feasible and effective. Severe complications are prevalent in these patients but survival is comparable to patients without involvement of the urinary system.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma/secundario , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos
17.
Surgery ; 157(6): 1023-7, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25818658

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is currently considered the standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei, mesothelioma and peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer. CRS + HIPEC has also been suggested as a potential treatment option in PM of the much rarer small bowel cancer. Therefore, the current study was undertaken to investigate the results of CRS + HIPEC in all HIPEC centers in The Netherlands. METHODS: From the 4 tertiary referral centers for peritoneal surface malignancies in The Netherlands, data from all patients with peritoneally metastasized small bowel carcinoma intended to undergo CRS and HIPEC were collected between January 2005 and July 2014. Primary tumor characteristics, operative details, and survival outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Sixteen of 19 patients (84.2%) who underwent explorative laparotomy underwent CRS + HIPEC. Of these patients, 81.3% were female, and primary tumors were mainly located in the ileum (50%). A complete macroscopic resection was achieved in 93.8%. Serious adverse events requiring re-intervention occurred in 25%, and no in-hospital mortality was observed. Recurrent disease was observed in 50% of patients and median survival after CRS and HIPEC was 31 months. CONCLUSION: In a select group of patients in whom a complete macroscopic resection can be achieved, survival rates comparable with those in colorectal PM are attainable with acceptable morbidity. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy needs further research.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida , Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Neoplasias Intestinales/cirugía , Intestino Delgado/patología , Intestino Delgado/cirugía , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Países Bajos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
World J Gastroenterol ; 19(43): 7489-93, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24616565

RESUMEN

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is the most frequently encountered surgical disorder of the small intestine. Up to 80% of ASBO cases resolve spontaneously and do not require invasive treatment. It is important to identify such patients that will benefit from conservative treatment in order to prevent unnecessarily exposing them to the risks associated with surgical intervention, such as morbidity and further adhesion formation. For the remaining ASBO patients, timely surgical intervention is necessary to prevent small bowel strangulation, which may cause intestinal ischemia and bowel necrosis. While early identification of these patients is key to decreasing ASBO-related morbidity and mortality, the non-specific signs and laboratory findings upon clinic presentation limit timely diagnosis and implementation of appropriate clinical management. Combining the clinical presentation findings with those from other diagnostic imaging modalities, such as abdominal X-ray, computed tomography-scan and water-soluble contrast studies, will improve diagnosis of ASBO and help clinicians to better evaluate the potential of conservative management as a safe strategy for a particular patient. Nonetheless, patients who present with moderate findings by all these approaches continue to represent a challenge. A new diagnostic strategy is urgently needed to further improve our ability to identify early signs of strangulated bowel, and this diagnostic modality should be able to indicate when surgical management is required. A number of potential serum markers have been proposed for this purpose, including intestinal fatty acid binding protein and α-glutathione S transferase. On-going research is attempting to clearly define their diagnostic utility and to optimize their potential role in determining which patients should be managed surgically.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Intestino Delgado/cirugía , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/terapia , Intestino Delgado/patología , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reoperación , Factores de Riesgo , Adherencias Tisulares , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 5(10): 264-7, 2013 Oct 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24179624

RESUMEN

Cystic lymphangiomas are rare benign tumors. Most frequently occurring in children and involving the neck or axilla, these tumors are much less common in adults and very rarely involve the abdomen. The known congenital and acquired (traumatic) etiologies result in failure of the lymphatic channels and consequent proliferation of lymphatic spaces. This case report describes a very rare case of a giant mesenteric cystic lymphangioma in an adult male with no clear etiology and successful resolution by standard radical resection. A previously healthy 44-year-old male presented with a 6-wk history of progressive upper abdominal pain, vomiting, anorexia and unintentional weight loss accompanied by rapid abdominal distension. A palpable mass was detected upon physical examination of the distended abdomen and abdominal computed tomography scan showed a giant multilobulated cystic process, measuring 40 cm in diameter. Exploratory laparotomy revealed an enormous cystic mass containing 6 L of serous fluid. The process appeared to originate from the lesser omentum and the lesser curvature of the stomach. Radical resection of the tumor was performed along with a partial gastrectomy to address potential invasion into the adjacent tissues. Histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of a multicystic lymphangioma. The postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged after 6 d. At 3-mo follow-up, the patient was in good health with no signs of recurrence.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA