Prevalence, Diagnosis, Perioperative Monitoring and Treatment of Right Ventricular Dysfunction and/or Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Cardiac Surgical Patients in Germany-A Postal Survey.

Background Sparse data are available on the prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery in Germany as well as on the intensity and modalities used for diagnosis, perioperative monitoring, and treatment of these comorbidities. Methods A postal survey including questions on the prevalence of preoperative right ventricular dysfunction and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2009 was sent to 81 German heart centers. Total 47 of 81 (58%) heart centers returned the questionnaires. The centers reported data on 51,095 patients, and 49.8% of the procedures were isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Results Data on the prevalence of preoperative pulmonary hypertension and/or right ventricular dysfunction were not available in 54% and 64.6% of centers. In the remaining hospitals, 19.5% of patients presented right heart dysfunction and 10% pulmonary arterial hypertension. Preoperative echocardiography was performed in only 45.3% of the coronary artery bypass grafting cases. Preoperative pharmacologic treatment of pulmonary hypertension or right ventricular dysfunction with oral sildenafil, inhaled prostanoids, or nitric oxide was initiated in 71% and 95.7% of the centers, respectively. Intra- and postoperative treatment was most frequently accomplished with phosphodiesterase-III inhibitors. Conclusion The prevalence of preoperative right heart dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension in cardiac surgical patients in Germany seems to be substantial. However, in more than 50% of the patients, no preoperative data on right ventricular function and pulmonary arterial pressure are available. This may lead to underestimation of perioperative risk and inappropriate management of this high-risk population.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: an analysis of differences between survivors and non-survivors.

OBJECTIVES: Over the last decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become a promising option for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In this single-center observational cohort study, data from a patient group with severe ARDS treated with ECMO was analyzed. METHODS: Data from 46 patients [median age 54 years (18 to 72), male: 65.2%] were evaluated retrospectively between January 2009 and September 2015. RESULTS: Diagnosis leading to ARDS was pneumonia in 63.1% of the patients. The median SOFA Score was 13 (10 to 19) and the median LIS was 3.5 (2.67 to 4). The median duration of ECMO support was 12 days (1 to 86). Twenty-eight patients (60.9%) were successfully weaned from ECMO and 22 patients survived (47.8%). Non-survivors needed significantly more frequent renal replacement therapy (37.5% vs. 18.2%; p<0.01) and transfusion of red blood cell concentrates [0.4 units (0.3 to 1.2) vs. 0.9 units (0.5 to 1.6); p<0.01] during ECMO support compared to patients who survived. CONCLUSION: This report suggests that ECMO currently allows treatment of severe ARDS with presumed improved survival. The incidence rate of acute kidney injury and transfusion are associated with adverse outcomes.

[S3-Guideline: Recommendations for intra-aortic balloon pumping in cardiac surgery]. / S3-Leitlinie "Einsatz der intraaortalen Ballongegenpulsation in der Herzchirurgie".

Although intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) is the most frequently used mechanical cardiac assist device in cardiothoracic surgery, there are only guidelines for substantive sections of aortic counterpulsation including prophylactic and postoperative use. In contrast, evidence-based recommendations are still lacking concerning intraoperative use, management, contraindication and other relevant issues. According to international surveys, important aspects of IABP usage show a wide variation in clinical practice. The results of a national questionnaire performed before initiation of this guideline confirmed these findings and demonstrated a clear need for the development of a consensus-based guideline. Therefore, the presented multidisciplinary S-3-guideline was developed under the direction of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Thorax-, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, DGTHG) to make evidence-based recommendations for the usage of aortic counterpulsation after cardiothoracic surgery according to the requirements of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and the Medical Centre for Quality (Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität - (ÄZQ)). Main topics discussed in this guideline involve IABP support in the prophylactic, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative setting as well as the treatment of right heart failure, contraindications, anticoagulation, monitoring, weaning, and limitations of IABP therapy. The presented 15 key messages of the guideline were approved after two consensus meetings under moderation of the AWMF with participation of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care (DIVI) and the German Society for Cardiovascular Engineering (DGfK).

Incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and therapeutic strategies in pediatric cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: We identified the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and the antiheparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery and documented the differences in the anticoagulation management for the extracorporeal circulation. METHODS: Between January 2001 and September 2003, 559 cardiac procedures with extracorporeal circulation in 415 patients with congenital heart defects were performed in our institution. Because the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requires previous exposition to heparin, only the 144 patients undergoing a scheduled second procedure on extracorporeal circulation were screened preoperatively. Of these 144 patients, 41 underwent also a third procedure and were screened before each procedure for presence of antiheparin-PF4 antibodies and for clinical signs of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: The incidence of antiheparin-PF4 antibodies during the study period was 1.4% (2 of 144 patients). Patients with clinically significant heparin-induced thrombocytopenia could not be identified. Outside the study protocol, 2 more patients with antiheparin-PF4 antibodies were found. In these 4 patients, surgery was performed using lepirudin (Schering, Berlin, Germany) instead of the usual heparin management for extracorporeal circulation. Three of these 4 patients had an uneventful procedure and postoperative course. In 1 patient after total cavopulmonary connection, a reoperation was necessary on the seventh postoperative day owing to partial thrombosis of the lateral tunnel. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and of antiheparin-PF4 antibodies in patients undergoing repeated cardiac surgery is low. In antiheparin-PF4 antibody positive patients, the complete avoidance of heparin can be achieved and may account for an uneventful perioperative course.