[Deviant language development following cochlear implantation? Applicability of the parent questionnaire ELFRA-2]. / Abweichende Sprachentwicklung nach Cochleaimplantation? Zur Anwendbarkeit des Elternfragebogens ELFRA-2.

BACKGROUND: The parent questionnaire ELFRA-2 is considered a valid tool for early detection of delayed language development in 2-year-old children. Applicability for children treated with cochlear implants (CI) is to be investigated. METHODS: By means of the ELFRA-2 we documented longitudinally for up to 24 months post implantation language development in 27 children treated before 3 years of age. The critical developmental criteria (related to age) were applied to CI children (related to duration of CI use) and gender-related normative data were taken as a reference. RESULTS: Only two boys were identified as showing a language delay after 2 years of CI use. However, using normative data 11-44% of the children performed below average. Development in girls was faster than in boys. The influence of preoperative hearing experience declined over time. CONCLUSION: The critical developmental criteria of ELFRA-2 have proved to be unreliable for the identification of varying development after CI. Modified and gender-related evaluation is necessary.

Cochlear implantation in children under the age of two: the MHH experience with the CLARION cochlear implant. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

This paper examines reports on the selection criteria, the surgical procedure, and the postoperative performance for children under the age of 2 implanted with the CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant (1.2 device). Eighteen children have been implanted since 1996 with a mean age at implantation of 18 months (range 11 to 23 months). All children were selected by means of a standardized preoperative diagnostic protocol. The surgical procedure used in older children was modified depending on the head and mastoid size, skull thickness, and recurrent otitis media. Auditory perception was tested prior to as well as 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following implantation by means of a standardized age-adapted test protocol. The electrode array was inserted without difficulty in all cases, with no complications to date. On average, auditory performance improved over time up to 18 months after implantation. Closed-set test scores increased by 25% to 55% in 18 months. Open-set test scores began to show improvement between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Overall, our experience indicates that cochlear implantation in children under the age of 2 is relatively safe and reliable. The Clarion 1.2 device surgery can be performed without complications. Auditory performance results support the effectiveness of early implantation.

Speech perception results for children implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant at the Medical University of Hannover.

The perception of speech of 167 children implanted with a CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant (1.2 device) was evaluated preimplantation and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postimplantation. The children were between 15 months and 15 years of age. The test materials consisted of 8 tests involving syllable structure, single- and 2-syllable words, differentiation of word pairs, and sentences. Two difficulty levels were used, depending on developmental age (<7, and 7 to 15 years). There was an improvement in test scores over time for both age groups. The younger children (particularly those under age 4) improved steadily over the first 2 years, while the older children tended to plateau between 12 and 18 months after implantation. These findings demonstrate that deaf children up to 15 years old benefit from cochlear implants. Children under 4 years of age may even have the ability to compensate for delays in speech development before they reach school age.

Comparative study of English- and German-speaking children with the Clarion cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of English-speaking and German-speaking children with Clarion cochlear implants on the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prelingually deafened German-speaking children and English-speaking children with Clarion cochlear implants were assessed on the MAIS pre- and postoperatively. Data were analyzed in terms of the absolute score, preoperatively and at two postoperative intervals, and the improvement score. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Preoperatively, the MAIS scores of German-speaking children were slightly lower than those of English-speaking children. Postoperatively, this difference became more pronounced. Substantial deviation within each group of subjects was suggested by the size of the standard deviations.

[Test set for the evaluation of hearing and speech development after cochlear implantation in children]. / Evaluationsset zur Hör-/Sprachentwicklung nach Cochlea-Implantation bei Kindern.

BACKGROUND: Since autumn 1998 the multicenter interdisciplinary study group "Test Materials for CI Children" has been compiling a uniform examination tool for evaluation of speech and hearing development after cochlear implantation in childhood. METHODS USED: After studying the relevant literature, suitable materials were checked for practical applicability, modified and provided with criteria for execution and break-off. For data acquisition, observation forms for preparation of a PC-version were developed. RESULTS: The evaluation set contains forms for master data with supplements relating to postoperative processes. The hearing tests check supra-threshold hearing with loudness scaling for children, speech comprehension in silence (Mainz and Göttingen Test for Speech Comprehension in Childhood) and phonemic differentiation (Oldenburg Rhyme Test for Children), the central auditory processes of detection, discrimination, identification and recognition (modification of the "Frankfurt Functional Hearing Test for Children") and audiovisual speech perception (Open Paragraph Tracking, Kiel Speech Track Program). The materials for speech and language development comprise phonetics-phonology, lexicon and semantics (LOGO Pronunciation Test), syntax and morphology (analysis of spontaneous speech), language comprehension (Reynell Scales), communication and pragmatics (observation forms). The MAIS and MUSS modified questionnaires are integrated. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation set serves quality assurance and permits factor analysis as well as controls for regularity through the multicenter comparison of long-term developmental trends after cochlear implantation.