Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 92
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Hematol ; 99(5): 854-861, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375893

RESUMEN

Current guidelines suggest a 3-month anticoagulant treatment course for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT), but shorter durations of treatment are frequently prescribed in clinical practice. We investigated whether a 6-week treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) at intermediate dosage can be an effective and safe alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with IDDVT (non-inferiority trial). In a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, 260 outpatients with symptomatic IDDVT were randomly assigned to receive either LMWH followed by VKA for 12 weeks or LMWH 1 mg/kg subcutaneously twice a day for 2 weeks followed by 1 mg/kg subcutaneously once a day for 4 weeks. The follow-up was 6 months and the primary endpoint was the composite measure of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) defined as: recurrence or extension of IDDVT, proximal DVT, and pulmonary embolism (PE). The study was stopped prematurely due to slow recruiting rates. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 14 patients receiving LMWH (10.8%) and in five patients receiving VKA (3.8%); risk difference was 0.069 (95% CI: 0.006-0.132), hazard ratio 2.8 (95% CI: 1.04-7.55). There was one PE in the VKA group and one proximal DVT in the LMWH group. IDDVT recurrence was 10.0% in the LMWH group versus 3.1% in the VKA group (p = .024). Two patients had clinically relevant bleedings (1.6%) in the LMWH group versus one (0.8%) in VKA group (p = .56). In conclusion, VKA for 12 weeks seems superior to LMWH for 6 weeks in reducing the risk of VTE recurrences in our cohort of outpatients with IDDVT.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Mesentérica , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia
2.
N Engl J Med ; 375(16): 1524-1531, 2016 10 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27797317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of pulmonary embolism among patients hospitalized for syncope is not well documented, and current guidelines pay little attention to a diagnostic workup for pulmonary embolism in these patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic workup for pulmonary embolism in patients admitted to 11 hospitals in Italy for a first episode of syncope, regardless of whether there were alternative explanations for the syncope. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was ruled out in patients who had a low pretest clinical probability, which was defined according to the Wells score, in combination with a negative d-dimer assay. In all other patients, computed tomographic pulmonary angiography or ventilation-perfusion lung scanning was performed. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients (mean age, 76 years) were included in the study. A diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was ruled out in 330 of the 560 patients (58.9%) on the basis of the combination of a low pretest clinical probability of pulmonary embolism and negative d-dimer assay. Among the remaining 230 patients, pulmonary embolism was identified in 97 (42.2%). In the entire cohort, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 17.3% (95% confidence interval, 14.2 to 20.5). Evidence of an embolus in a main pulmonary or lobar artery or evidence of perfusion defects larger than 25% of the total area of both lungs was found in 61 patients. Pulmonary embolism was identified in 45 of the 355 patients (12.7%) who had an alternative explanation for syncope and in 52 of the 205 patients (25.4%) who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary embolism was identified in nearly one of every six patients hospitalized for a first episode of syncope. (Funded by the University of Padua; PESIT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01797289 .).


Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Síncope/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico
3.
Thromb J ; 17: 24, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31889915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) accounts for an estimated 900,000 cases per year in the US alone and constitutes a considerable burden on healthcare systems across the globe. OBJECTIVE: To understand why the burden is so high, qualitative and quantitative research was carried out to gain insights from experts, guidelines and published studies on the unmet clinical needs and therapeutic strategies in VTE prevention and treatment in three populations identified as being at increased risk of VTE and in whom VTE prevention and treatment were regarded as suboptimal: pregnant women, the elderly and obese patients. METHODOLOGY: A gap analysis methodology was created to highlight unmet needs in VTE management and to discover the patient populations considered most at risk. A questionnaire was devised to guide qualitative interviews with 44 thrombosis and haemostasis experts, and a review of the literature on VTE in the specific patient groups from 2015 to 2017 was completed. This was followed by a Think Tank meeting where the results from the research were discussed. RESULTS: This review highlights the insights gained and examines in detail the unmet needs with regard to VTE risk-assessment tools, biomarkers, patient stratification methods, and anticoagulant and dosing regimens in pregnant women, the elderly and obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, in pregnant women at high risk of VTE, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the therapy of choice, but it remains unclear how to use anticoagulants when VTE risk is intermediate. In elderly patients, evaluation of the benefit of VTE prophylaxis against the bleeding risk is particularly important, and a head-to-head comparison of efficacy and safety of LMWH versus direct oral anticoagulants is needed. Finally, in obese patients, lack of guidance on anticoagulant dose adjustment to body weight has emerged as a major obstacle in effective prophylaxis and treatment of VTE.

4.
Thromb J ; 17: 6, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011294

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice shows that venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a substantial burden in medical patients, and awareness and advocacy for its primary and secondary prevention remains inadequate. Specific patient populations, such as those with cancer and the critically ill, show elevated risk for VTE, bleeding or both, and significant gaps in VTE prophylaxis and treatment exist in these groups. OBJECTIVE: To present novel insights and consolidated evidence collected from experts, clinical practice guidelines and original studies on the unmet needs in thromboprophylaxis, and on the treatment of VTE in two high-risk patient groups: patients with cancer and the critically ill. METHODOLOGY: To identify specific unmet needs in the management of VTE, a methodology was designed and implemented that assessed gaps in prophylaxis and treatment of VTE through interviews with 44 experts in the field of thrombosis and haemostasis, and through a review of current guidelines and seminal studies to substantiate the insights provided by the experts. The research findings were then analysed, discussed and consolidated by a multidisciplinary group of experts. RESULTS: The gap analysis methodology identified shortcomings in the VTE risk assessment tools, patient stratification approaches for prophylaxis, and the suboptimal use of anticoagulants for primary prophylaxis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, patients with cancer need better VTE risk assessment tools to tailor primary thromboprophylaxis to tumour types and disease stages, and the potential for drug-drug interactions needs to be considered. In critically ill patients, unfractionated heparin is not advised as a first-line treatment option, and the strength of evidence is increasing for direct oral anticoagulants as a treatment option over low-molecular-weight heparins.

5.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 56(6): 922-927, 2017 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28160007

RESUMEN

Objective: In this multicentre study, we aimed to evaluate the capacity of a computer-assisted automated QCT method to identify patients with SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) with high mortality risk according to validated composite clinical indexes (ILD-Gender, Age, Physiology index and du Bois index). Methods: Chest CT, anamnestic data and pulmonary function tests of 146 patients with SSc were retrospectively collected, and the ILD-Gender, Age, Physiology score and DuBois index were calculated. Each chest CT underwent an operator-independent quantitative assessment performed with a free medical image viewer (Horos). The correlation between clinical prediction models and QCT parameters was tested. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Most QCT parameters had a statistically different distribution in patients with diverging mortality risk according to both clinical prediction models (P < 0.01). The cut-offs of QCT parameters were calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and most of them could discriminate patients with different mortality risk according to clinical prediction models. Conclusion: QCT assessment of SSc-ILD can discriminate between well-defined different mortality risk categories, supporting its prognostic value. These findings, together with the operator independence, strengthen the validity and clinical usefulness of QCT for assessment of SSc-ILD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Esclerodermia Sistémica/mortalidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/mortalidad
6.
Thromb J ; 15: 13, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28490974

RESUMEN

Recently, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) authorized the introduction and marketing of Thorinane® and Inhixa®, biosimilars of the Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin. The authorization path is considerably different from the guidelines published by the EMA in 2009, as well as from the recommendations from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis published in 2013. Indeed, both of them recommended that LMWHs biosimilars therapeutic equivalence should be demonstrated in at least one adequately designed clinical trial. Shortly after enoxaparin biosimilars approval, EMA published a revised version of its guideline, no longer requiring the execution of a clinical study in patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. Also the assessment of safety shows some relevant flaws, as it relies only on a 20 healthy volunteers study, clearly underpowered to draw any conclusions about the safety profile of the drug. In our opinion, the approach taken by EMA for approval of enoxaparin biosimilars raises serious concerns about their actual, clinical "similarity". On these grounds, with the endorsement of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET) and the Italian Society for Angiology and Vascular Medicine (SIAPAV), we elaborated the present document aimed at reviewing and reappraising some critical points regarding the introduction of biosimilars of LMWH in Europe. Moreover, we would strongly advise the Italian National Health Authorities not to entrust safety assessment to the post-marketing surveillance only, but to promote well designed and powered studies aimed at establish the actual efficacy and safety of LMWH biosimilars.

7.
Mod Rheumatol ; 25(5): 724-30, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25736361

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) related to systemic sclerosis (SSc) is assessed with pulmonary functional tests (PFTs) and semi-quantitative scores based on extent of ILD detectable on chest computed tomography (CT). CT quantitative indexes (QCTIs) are promising tools to assess extent of ILD. This study's aim is to evaluate the validity of QCTI compared with that of chest CT standard evaluation and PFTs. Moreover, QCTI differences between patients' subgroups according to prognostic stratifications were investigated. METHODS: ILD-SSc of patients from six rheumatological clinics was routinely assessed with chest CT and PFTs. Patients were clustered according to prognosis based on functional and/or radiological examinations. Finally, chest CTs were processed with OsiriX in order to obtain QCTI. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven SSc patients were enrolled. QCTI correlation between extent of ILD and PFTs range from - 0.60 to 0.58 and from - 0.54 to 0.52, respectively. The majority of QCTI have a different distribution in patients' subgroups based on prognosis. Most of QCTI discriminate patients with an ILD severity leading to a poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: QCTI assessment of ILD-SSc is comparable to the evaluation based on chest CT and/or PFTs. QCTI values corresponding to severe ILD were identified. QCTIs are excellent candidates for a new and more reliable SSc-ILD assessment.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico
8.
J Clin Med ; 13(6)2024 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38541986

RESUMEN

Anticoagulation represents the first line treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion can be considered as a possible therapeutic strategy when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, to avoid embolization from the lower limbs to pulmonary circulation. Other possible indications are debated among experts. Both permanent and retrievable caval filters are available in clinical practice. Retrievable filters can be removed when no longer necessary, as their use may be indicated only for a limited amount of time. Moreover, caval filter insertion is not devoid of possible complications, particularly in cases of permanent or long-dwelling filters. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to review the appropriateness of caval filter use and to define the best timing for retrieval.

9.
J Vasc Surg ; 55(5): 1247-54, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22542339

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of acute aortic aneurysm rupture or dissection (AARD) requires specific medical expertise, diagnostic techniques, and therapeutic options, not always available in all hospitals through the entire week. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether an association exists between weekday (WD) or weekend (WE) admission and mortality for patients with ARRD. METHODS: Based on the database of routinely collected hospital admissions of the region of Emilia Romagna (RER) of Italy, we examined the discharge sheets of all patients with AARD (January 1999 to December 2009). The risk of in-hospital death was calculated for admissions on the WE compared with the admissions during a WD. RESULTS: The analysis considered 4559 events in 4461 patients. AARD admissions were most frequent on Monday (14.7%) and Friday (14.8%) and less frequent on Saturday (12.6%). The percentage of events admitted on Sunday/holiday was 15.0%, whereas the distribution of death rate with respect to day of admission was significantly different (χ(2) = 23.472; P < .001) with the highest frequency peak on Sunday/holiday (17.4%) and the lowest on Tuesday (12.9%). WE admissions were associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (43.4%) than WD admissions (36.9%, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that WE admission was an independent risk factor for increased in-hospital mortality odds ratio 1.318; 95% confidence interval, 1.144-1.517; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that hospitalization for AARD on WE is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate than hospitalization on WD. Further studies are needed to investigate whether ensuring optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approaches during the entire week might improve the overall survival of patients with ARRD.


Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
10.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 33(2): 176-85, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22648490

RESUMEN

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is the third most common cardiovascular pathology after coronary disease and cerebrovascular diseases and is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the general population. Full-dose anticoagulation is the standard therapy for VTE, both the acute phase and the prolonged treatment. The latest guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians recommend treatment with a full-dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux, vitamin K antagonist (VKA), or systemically administered thrombolytics for most of the patients with objectively confirmed VTE. Catheter-guided thrombolysis and thrombosuction are interventional approaches that should be used only in selected populations; interruption of the inferior vena cava (IVC) with a filter can be performed to prevent life-threatening PE in patients with VTE and contraindications to anticoagulant treatment, bleeding complications during antithrombotic treatment, or VTE recurrences, despite optimal anticoagulation. This review summarizes the currently available literature regarding interventional approaches in VTE treatment (vena cava filters, catheter-guided thrombolysis, thrombosuction), discusses their efficacy and safety, and reviews the appropriate indications for their use in daily clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Humanos , Trombolisis Mecánica/efectos adversos , Trombolisis Mecánica/métodos , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/patología , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/patología
11.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 34(2): 208-13, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22466929

RESUMEN

Anticoagulant prophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a worldwide established procedure in hip and knee replacement surgery. Despite available anticoagulant prophylaxis, patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have a high incidence of venous VTE. In spite of their proven efficacy, the currently available anticoagulants have limitations that driven to develop new oral agents that directly target specific factors in the coagulation cascade, such as direct thrombin inhibitors and direct Factor Xa inhibitors, in an attempt to overcome some of the drawbacks with the traditional agents. Apixaban is a potent, selective direct inhibitor of the coagulation factor Xa, recently approved in Europe for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Apixaban has been extensively studied worldwide in about 12,000 patients in four clinical studies that have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of apixaban respect to enoxaparin for the prevention of thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery. Three of these trials involved 7,337 patients who undergo TKR: one phase II trial (APROPOS Study) and two large phase III trials (ADVANCE 1 and ADVANCE 2 Studies). ADVANCE 1 demonstrated that when compared with enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily for efficacy, apixaban did not meet the prespecified statistical criteria for noninferiority, but its use was associated with lower rates of clinically relevant bleeding. ADVANCE 2 showed that apixaban was superior to the European standard dose of enoxaparin of 40 mg once daily in term of efficacy, with a similar incidence of major bleeding. This review focuses the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral apixaban for the prevention of VTE in adult patients following TKR surgery.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Enoxaparina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología
12.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 33(3): 258-66, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22240968

RESUMEN

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Parenteral anticoagulant treatment with full-dose unfractioned heparin, low-molecular-weight-heparin, or fondaparinux, followed by oral treatment with the vitamin K antagonists, is recommended for the majority of patients. However, in the presence of contraindications to anticoagulant treatment, bleeding complications during antithrombotic treatment, or VTE recurrences despite optimal anticoagulation, interruption of the inferior vena cava with a filter is a potential option aimed to prevent life-threatening PE. Currently, the vast majority of filters implanted worldwide are of the permanent type, but their use is associated with a number of long term complications. Non-permanent filters represent an important alternative, and in particular retrievable filters are an attractive option because they may be either left in place permanently or safely retrieved after a quite long period when they become unnecessary. In this review, we summarize the currently available literature regarding retrievable vena cava filters and we discuss current evidences on their efficacy and safety. Moreover, the appropriate indications for their use in daily clinical practice are reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/instrumentación , Filtros de Vena Cava/normas , Trombosis de la Vena/cirugía , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Humanos , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/patología , Tromboembolia Venosa/cirugía , Trombosis de la Vena/patología
13.
TH Open ; 5(3): e239-e250, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34263110

RESUMEN

Background Isolated distal deep vein thromboses (IDDVT) are frequently diagnosed; however, their natural history and real risk of complications are still uncertain. Though treatment is still not well standardized, international guidelines recommend no more than 3 months of anticoagulation therapy. We investigated how Italian clinicians treat IDDVT patients in their real life in our country. Methods Baseline characteristics and clinical history of the patients enrolled in the prospective, observational, multicenter START-Register for a first IDDVT or proximal DVT (PDVT) were analyzed. Results Overall, 412 IDDVT patients were significantly younger, with better renal function, and more frequent major transient risk factors, when compared with 1,173 PDVT patients. The anticoagulation duration was >180 days in 52.7% of IDDVT patients (70.7% in PDVT). During treatment, bleeding occurred in 5.6 and 2.8% patient-years in IDDVT and PDVT, respectively ( p = 0082). Bleeding was more frequent in IDDVT than PDVT patients treated with warfarin (6.8 vs. 3.2 patient-years, p = 0.0228, respectively). Thrombotic complications occurred in 1.1 and 2.4% patient-years in IDDVT and PDVT patients, respectively. Analyzing together the two groups, 66.1% of bleeds and 86.1% thrombotic complications occurred after 90 days anticoagulation treatment. Conclusion The large majority of IDDVT patients received anticoagulation for more than 3 months. Most bleeding and thrombotic complications occurred after the first 90 days of anticoagulation therapy. These results indicate that an extended anticoagulation beyond 90 days in IDDVT patients is associated with increased risk of complications. Whether an extended treatment may lower recurrences after anticoagulation withdrawal should be assessed by specifically designed studies.

14.
Ann Intern Med ; 150(9): 577-85, 2009 May 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19414836

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether tailoring the duration of anticoagulation on the basis of the persistence of residual thrombi on ultrasonography reduces the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the administration of conventional fixed-duration treatment in adults with proximal DVT. DESIGN: Parallel, randomized trial from 1999 to 2006. Trained physicians who assessed outcomes were blinded to patient assignment status, but patients and providers were not. SETTING: 9 university or hospital centers in Italy. PATIENTS: 538 consecutive outpatients with a first episode of acute proximal DVT at completion of an uneventful 3-month period of anticoagulation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned (stratified by center and secondary vs. unprovoked DVT by using a computer-generated list that was accessible only to a trial nurse) to fixed-duration anticoagulation (no further anticoagulation for secondary thrombosis and an extra 3 months for unprovoked thrombosis) or flexible-duration, ultrasonography-guided anticoagulation (no further anticoagulation in patients with recanalized veins and continued anticoagulation in all other patients for up to 9 months for secondary DVT and up to 21 months for unprovoked thrombosis). For the primary outcome assessment, 530 patients completed the trial. MEASUREMENTS: The rate of confirmed recurrent VTE during 33 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 46 (17.2%) of 268 patients allocated to fixed-duration anticoagulation and 32 (11.9%) of 270 patients allocated to flexible-duration anticoagulation developed recurrent VTE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.99]). For patients with unprovoked DVT, the adjusted HR was 0.61 (CI, 0.36 to 1.02) and 0.81 (CI, 0.32 to 2.06) for those with secondary DVT. Major bleeding occurred in 2 (0.7%) patients in the fixed-duration group and 4 (1.5%) patients in the flexible-duration group (P = 0.67). LIMITATIONS: The trial lacked a double-blind design. The sample size was not powered to detect differences in bleeding between groups and to detect effectiveness of the intervention in the subgroups of patients with unprovoked and secondary DVT. Patients with previous thromboembolism, permanent risk factors for thrombosis, and thrombophilic abnormalities other than factor V Leiden and prothrombin mutation were excluded. CONCLUSION: Tailoring the duration of anticoagulation on the basis of ultrasonography findings reduces the rate of recurrent VTE in adults with proximal DVT. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Prevención Secundaria , Ultrasonografía , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen
15.
Blood Transfus ; 18(1): 49-57, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31184579

RESUMEN

The risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) persists after interruption of the initial anticoagulation therapy. New evidence shows that direct oral anticoagulants are effective for extended treatment of VTE and may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. The optimal duration of anticoagulation after VTE is, however, controversial and complicated by the need for individualised assessment and balance between thrombosis and bleeding risks. Three direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran) have been studied for extended treatment of VTE. Dabigatran was shown to be safer than vitamin K antagonists and similarly effective for the prevention of recurrent VTE. Dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban resulted in significant decreases in the rate of recurrent symptomatic VTE when compared to placebo, without a statistically significant difference in the risk of major bleeding. The latest guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians suggest the use of low-dose aspirin to prevent VTE recurrence in patients who want to stop anticoagulation. In the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 EINSTEIN CHOICE trial, once-daily rivaroxaban at doses of 20 mg or 10 mg and 100 mg of aspirin were compared in VTE patients for whom there was clinical equipoise for extended anticoagulation. Either a treatment dose (20 mg) or a prophylactic dose (10 mg) of rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of VTE recurrence without a significant increase in bleeding risk compared with aspirin. The EINSTEIN CHOICE trial included patients with provoked or unprovoked VTE. Patients with VTE provoked by minor persistent or minor transient risk factors enrolled in this trial had not-negligible VTE recurrence rates. These new findings on extended therapy suggest the possibility of anticoagulation regimens at intensities tailored to the patients' risk profiles and VTE characteristics, with a shift of the risk-benefit balance in favour of extended treatment.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Dabigatrán/administración & dosificación , Glicosaminoglicanos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores
16.
Intern Emerg Med ; 15(3): 447-452, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31667697

RESUMEN

The novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been shown to be at least as effective as and safer than conventional anticoagulants for the initial and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolic disorders. However, the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with the DOACs is unknown. With the adoption of the Villalta scale, we assessed the rate of PTS at the end of the follow-up period in a consecutive series of 309 outpatients with acute proximal DVT who had received at least 3 months of treatment with a DOAC and had been followed-up for up to 3 years. The rate of PTS development was compared with that recorded in a historical cohort of 1036 consecutive patients who had been treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and had received a similar follow-up examination. Logistic regression analysis, including propensity scoring to adjust for differing probabilities of undergoing VKA/DOAC, was used to identify predictors of PTS. PTS developed in 87 patients (28.2%) treated with the DOACs (severe in 12), and in 443 patients (42.8%) treated with VKAs (severe in 61). After adjusting for estimated propensity score, age, gender, concomitant symptoms of pulmonary embolism, duration of anticoagulation and development of residual vein thrombosis, the risk of PTS in the DOAC-treated patients was reduced by 54% in comparison to patients treated with conventional anticoagulation (odds ratio 0.46; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.63). We conclude that in comparison to VKAs, the use of the direct oral anticoagulants has the potential to offer a more favorable prognosis in terms of PTS development.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Postrombótico/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Postrombótico/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vitamina K/uso terapéutico
17.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 15(3): 309-15, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18544594

RESUMEN

Many studies showed that the occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events exhibits a seasonal variation. As for venous thromboembolism (VTE), not univocal results are available, and studies are mainly retrospective. We aimed to confirm the existence of a seasonal pattern in the occurrence of VTE on a large prospective population. The analysis considered consecutive cases of VTE enrolled into the MASTER Registry in 25 Italian hospitals, between January 2002 and November 2004. The total population consisted of 2119 subjects (1056 men, mean age 59 +/- 18 years). The total sample was divided into subgroups by gender, age (<40, 41-60, 61-80, > or = 80 years), type of event (first episode; proximal or distal; upper or lower limb; idiopathic or secondary deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or both), and underlying risk factors, eg, cancer, previous VTE, estroprogestinic therapy, lack of prophylaxis, immobilization, surgery, pregnancy or puerperium, and medical diseases. Cases were grouped according to season and month of occurrence, and the data were analyzed by either the chi(2) test for goodness of fit and chronobiological analysis. VTE was most frequent in Autumn and less frequent in Spring (32.9% vs 19%, respectively, chi(2) = 90.62; P < .001). This pattern was shown for most subgroups. Chronobiological analysis identified a significant rhythmic annual pattern, with a main September-October peak for several subgroups (men, age 41-60 and 61-80 years, secondary event, previous VTE, immobilization), and a trend for most of the others. It is possible that subjects at increased risk could perhaps deserve appropriate or potentiated VTE prophylaxis in certain periods of the year.


Asunto(s)
Estaciones del Año , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control
18.
Minerva Med ; 110(3): 251-258, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30990000

RESUMEN

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. For over a decade, the gold standard of treatment and secondary prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has been represented by low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), which are currently recommended as the first-line treatment for CAT. Among the LMWHs that were more extensively tested in patients with CAT, tinzaparin is a LMWH produced by the enzymatic degradation of porcine-derived unfractionated heparin. The efficacy of tinzaparin in this setting is supported by well-grounded evidence. However, there is a need to discuss the positioning of tinzaparin in the continuously evolving treatment scenario of VTE therapy in cancer patients. In this paper, which was developed by a group of clinicians with wide experience in the treatment of VTE in cancer patients, we discuss the current therapeutic options and the role of tinzaparin for the treatment of CAT.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Tinzaparina/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología
19.
Eur J Intern Med ; 69: 64-70, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500936

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) often have leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT); sometimes, however, a DVT is not detected (isolated PE, I-PE). We aimed at assessing the proportion of patients with I-PE, and their characteristics and clinical evolution compared to those with DVT with/without PE (DVT/PE). METHODS: Among 3573 patients included in the START2-Register for a venous thromboembolic event, 2880 (80.6%) had DVT/PE, the remaining I-PE (19.4%). RESULTS: Patients with I-PE were older [(≥75 years, OR 1.4 (95%CI 1.13-1.69)], and more frequently females [OR 1.4 (1.19-1.67)]. Young females (aged ≤ 50 years) with an index event occurring during hormonal contraception (HC), were more prevalent in I-PE [OR 1.96 (1.26-3.03)]. At multivariate analysis, age > 75 years, female sex, heart failure, cancer and use of HC were risk factors significantly associated with I-PE, whereas thrombophilic alterations were associated with DVT/PE. During a follow-up of 4504 years (during anticoagulation), the rate of bleeding events was 1.1% patient/years and 1.0% patient/years in I-PE and DVT/PE, respectively. Venous thromboembolic events were equally prevalent in DVT/PE or I-PE (1.94% vs 0.86%, ns), whereas arterial complications were more prevalent in the latter group (1.01% vs 0.28%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: I-PE and DVT/PE have important differences. Older age, female sex, heart failure and cancer, were risk factors for I-PE; thrombophilic alterations were associated with DVT/PE. HC use was more frequent in the I-PE group. The prevalence of arterial complications was higher in patients with I-PE. Further studies, specifically designed on this issue, are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología
20.
RMD Open ; 5(1): e000820, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30886735

RESUMEN

Objectives: This multicentre study aimed to investigate the overall mortality of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to compare CPFE-SSc characteristics with those of other SSc subtypes (with interstitial lung disease-ILD, emphysema or neither). Methods: Chest CTs, anamnestic data, immunological profile and pulmonary function tests of patients with SSc were retrospectively collected. Each chest CT underwent a semiquantitative assessment blindly performed by three radiologists. Patients were clustered in four groups: SSc-CPFE, SSc-ILD, SSc-emphysema and other-SSc (without ILD nor emphysema). The overall mortality of these groups was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the stratified log-rank test; Kruskal-Wallis test, t-Student test and χ² test assessed the differences between groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We enrolled 470 patients (1959 patient-year); 15.5 % (73/470) died during the follow-up. Compared with the SSc-ILD and other-SSc, in SSc-CPFE there was a higher prevalence of males, lower anticentromere antibodies prevalence and a more reduced pulmonary function (p<0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates a significantly worse survival in patients with SSc-CPFE (HR vs SSc-ILD, vs SSc-emphysema and vs other-SSc, respectively 1.6 (CI 0.5 to 5.2), 1.6 (CI 0.7 to 3.8) and 2.8 (CI 1.2 to 6.6). Conclusions: CPFE increases the mortality risk in SSc along with a highly impaired lung function. These findings strengthen the importance to take into account emphysema in patients with SSc with ILD.


Asunto(s)
Enfisema Pulmonar/complicaciones , Enfisema Pulmonar/mortalidad , Fibrosis Pulmonar/complicaciones , Fibrosis Pulmonar/mortalidad , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/mortalidad , Anciano , Biomarcadores , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Enfisema Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Fibrosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA