Improving Access to Antenatal Care for Aboriginal Women in South Australia: Evidence from a Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are two to three times more likely to experience adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes than non-Aboriginal women in Australia. Persisting health inequalities are at least in part explained by late and/or inadequate access to antenatal care. METHODS: This study draws on data collected in a population-based study of 344 women giving birth to an Aboriginal infant between July 2011 and June 2013 in South Australia to investigate factors associated with engagement in antenatal care. RESULTS: About 79.8 percent of mothers accessed antenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy, and 90 percent attended five or more antenatal visits. Compared with women attending mainstream regional services, women attending regional Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services were more likely to access antenatal care in the first trimester (Adj OR 2.5 [1.0-6.3]) and markedly more likely to attend a minimum of five visits (Adj OR 4.3 [1.2-15.1]). Women attending metropolitan Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services were also more likely to attend a minimum of five visits (Adj OR 12.2 [1.8-80.8]) compared with women attending mainstream regional services. Women who smoked during pregnancy were less likely to attend a visit in the first trimester and had fewer visits. CONCLUSIONS: Scaling up of Aboriginal Family Birthing Program Services in urban and regional areas of South Australia has increased access to antenatal care for Aboriginal families. The involvement of Aboriginal Maternal Infant Care workers, provision of transport for women to get to services, and outreach have been critical to the success of this program.

Improving Aboriginal women's experiences of antenatal care: findings from the Aboriginal families study in South Australia.

BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families experience markedly worse maternal and child health outcomes than non-Aboriginal families. The objective of this study was to investigate the experiences of women attending Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services in South Australia compared with women attending mainstream public antenatal care. METHOD: Population-based survey of mothers of Aboriginal babies giving birth in urban, regional, and remote areas of South Australia between July 2011 and June 2013. RESULTS: A total of 344 women took part in the study around 4-9 months after giving birth; 93 percent were Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders, and 7 percent were non-Aboriginal mothers of Aboriginal babies. Of these, 39 percent of women lived in a major city, 36 percent in inner or outer regional areas, and 25 percent in remote areas of South Australia. Compared with women attending mainstream public antenatal care, women attending metropolitan and regional Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services had a higher likelihood of reporting positive experiences of pregnancy care (adjOR 3.4 [95% CI 1.6-7.0] and adjOR 2.4 [95% CI 1.4-4.3], respectively). Women attending Aboriginal Health Services were also more likely to report positive experiences of care (adjOR 3.5 [95% CI 1.3-9.4]). CONCLUSIONS: In the urban, regional, and remote areas where the Aboriginal Family Birthing Program has been implemented, the program has expanded access to culturally responsive antenatal care for Aboriginal women and families. The positive experiences reported by many women using the program have the potential to translate into improved outcomes for Aboriginal families.

Initiation and duration of breastfeeding of Aboriginal infants in South Australia.

BACKGROUND: Benefits of breastfeeding are well-established. Few studies have examined initiation and duration of breastfeeding of Aboriginal infants. METHODS: Population-based study of women giving birth to an Aboriginal infant in South Australia, July 2011-June 2013. FINDINGS: 344 women took part. Participants were representative in relation to maternal age, infant birthweight and gestation. Eighty-six percent initiated breastfeeding, declining to 54% at 12 weeks postpartum. Women living in remote areas were more likely to be breastfeeding at 12 weeks than women living in Adelaide (Odds Ratio=2.6, 95% Confidence Interval 1.5-4.7). Two-thirds of women (67%) attending standard public antenatal care in regional areas and 61% attending regional Aboriginal Family Birthing Program Services were breastfeeding at 12 weeks, compared to one third of women (36%) attending standard metropolitan public antenatal care and 49% of women attending metropolitan Aboriginal Family Birthing Program Services. Less than half of women (45%) described their postnatal care as 'very good', and 40% were not always able to access support with infant feeding when needed. The most common reasons for switching to formula before 6 weeks were: low milk supply/baby not gaining weight, mastitis/sore breasts or other feeding problems. Mothers also identified their own health as a factor. CONCLUSION: While the findings must be treated with caution due to small numbers, they suggest benefits for women attending Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services in the urban environment where rates of initiation and continued breastfeeding are lowest. Provision of culturally appropriate support to Aboriginal women during and after pregnancy is key to improving outcomes.

Primary health care for Aboriginal women and children in the year after birth: findings from a population-based study in South Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent to which Aboriginal women access primary care for themselves and their infant in the year after childbirth. METHOD: Cross sectional population-based survey of women giving birth to Aboriginal babies in South Australia between July 2011 and June 2013. RESULTS: A total of 344 women took part in the study 4-9 months after giving birth. The majority had seen a primary health care practitioner since the birth: 86% had seen a Child and Family Health Service (CaFHS) nurse, 81% a general practitioner (GP), and 61% an Aboriginal health worker (AHW). Women living in remote areas were more likely to have seen primary care practitioners than women living in Adelaide (GP: OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.2; CaFHS: OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0-5.8; AHW: OR 5.2, 95% CI 2.8-9.8). Around 16% of women with gestational diabetes and 10% with hypertension had not seen a GP since the birth, and 24% of women who had a low birthweight infant had not seen a CaFHS nurse. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high prevalence of maternal and infant morbidity, a sizeable minority of women did not access primary care practitioners postpartum. Implications for public health: Stronger efforts are needed to ensure Aboriginal women and families receive appropriate postnatal follow-up.