The Lung Microbiome Predicts Mortality and Response to Azithromycin in Lung Transplant Recipients with Chronic Rejection.

Rationale: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death after lung transplant, and azithromycin has variable efficacy in CLAD. The lung microbiome is a risk factor for developing CLAD, but the relationship between lung dysbiosis, pulmonary inflammation, and allograft dysfunction remains poorly understood. Whether lung microbiota predict outcomes or modify treatment response after CLAD is unknown. Objectives: To determine whether lung microbiota predict post-CLAD outcomes and clinical response to azithromycin. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using acellular BAL fluid prospectively collected from recipients of lung transplant within 90 days of CLAD onset. Lung microbiota were characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and droplet digital PCR. In two additional cohorts, causal relationships of dysbiosis and inflammation were evaluated by comparing lung microbiota with CLAD-associated cytokines and measuring ex vivo P. aeruginosa growth in sterilized BAL fluid. Measurements and Main Results: Patients with higher bacterial burden had shorter post-CLAD survival, independent of CLAD phenotype, azithromycin treatment, and relevant covariates. Azithromycin treatment improved survival in patients with high bacterial burden but had negligible impact on patients with low or moderate burden. Lung bacterial burden was positively associated with CLAD-associated cytokines, and ex vivo growth of P. aeruginosa was augmented in BAL fluid from transplant recipients with CLAD. Conclusions: In recipients of lung transplants with chronic rejection, increased lung bacterial burden is an independent risk factor for mortality and predicts clinical response to azithromycin. Lung bacterial dysbiosis is associated with alveolar inflammation and may be promoted by underlying lung allograft dysfunction.

Lung Re-transplantation after prolonged veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in a child with chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) may be used as a bridge to lung transplantation in selected patients with end-stage respiratory failure. Historically, ECMO use in this setting has been associated with poor outcomes Puri V et.al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 140:427. More recently, technical advances and the implementation of rehabilitation and ambulation while awaiting transplantation on ECMO have led to improved surgical and post-transplant outcomes Kirkby S et.al, J Thorac Dis, 6:1024. METHODS: We illustrate the case of a 6-year-old child who received prolonged ECMO support as a bridge to lung re-transplantation secondary to Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD). RESULTS: Early rehabilitation was key in improving the overall pre-transplant conditioning during ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenges associated with awake/ambulatory ECMO, the use of this strategy as a bridge to lung transplantation is feasible and has resulted in improved pre-transplant conditioning and post-transplant outcomes.

Risk of Bronchial Complications After Lung Transplantation With Respiratory Corynebacteria. Results From a Monocenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Corynebacterium spp. are associated with respiratory infections in immunocompromised hosts. A link with bronchial complications after lung transplantation (LTx) has been suggested. We aimed to assess the link between respiratory sampling of Corynebacterium spp. and significant bronchial complication (SBC) after LTx. We performed a single center retrospective study. Inclusion of LTx recipients with at least one respiratory Corynebacterium spp. sample (July 2014 to December 2018). Subjects were matched to unexposed LTx recipients. Primary outcome was SBC occurrence after Corynebacterium spp. isolation. Secondary outcomes were Corynebacterium spp. persistent sampling, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) onset and all-cause mortality. Fifty-nine patients with Corynebacterium spp. sampling with 59 without isolation were included. Corynebacterium spp. identification was not associated with SBC occurrence (32.4% vs. 21.6%, p = 0.342). Previous SBC was associated with further isolation of Corynebacterium spp. (OR 3.94, 95% CI [1.72-9.05]). Previous SBC and corticosteroids pulses in the last 3 months were the only factors associated with increased risk of Corynebacterium spp. isolation in multivariate analysis. Corynebacterium spp. sampling was significantly associated with CLAD onset (27.1% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.021). Corynebacterium spp. isolation was not associated with SBC but with higher risk of CLAD. Whether CLAD evolution is affected by Corynebacterium spp. eradication remains to be investigated.

The fraction of sensitization among lung transplant recipients in a transplant center in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody testing was approved by the Japanese government in 2018. As such, there was no longitudinal data regarding the HLA-sensitization of lung transplant (LTX) patients in Japan. We therefore set out to measure anti-HLA antibodies from all our LTX patients during their annual follow-up to characterize the sensitization status in the Japanese population. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted for consecutive LTX recipients who underwent transplantation from January 2000 to January 2020 at Tohoku University Hospital (TUH). The serum from the recipients was screened for anti-HLA antibody with the panel-reactive assay (PRA) and the donor-specific antibodies (DSA). RESULTS: Sensitization was reviewed in 93 LTX recipients, showing 23 positive (24.7%) and 70 negative (75.3%) PRA. More sensitized recipients were found in recent transplantations (60.9% (14/23), ≤5 years post LTX) than in older transplantations (17.4% (4/23), 5-10 years or 21.7% (5/23), ≥10 years post LTX) (p = 0.04). Even fewer recipients had DSA (5.4%, 5/93), among whom 4/5 (80%) were recently transplanted. CONCLUSION: The rate of PRA positive LTX recipients in our population was lower compared with those in previous reports from US and Europe. More sensitized LTRs were found in recent transplantations than the older cohort, and DSA was identified primarily in the recent recipients. Due to several limitations, it is still unclear whether the sensitization would be related the development of CLAD or survival, yet this study would be fundamental to the future anti-HLA body study in Japanese population.

Complement system in lung transplantation.

The complement system is a cascade of multiple proteins that have been known to mediate inflammatory response. This tightly regulated system has been recognized to play a role in adaptive immunity via humoral and cell-mediated processes. There is evidence from animal and human studies that the complement system is involved in various outcomes of solid organ transplantation. Most of the studies have been done in the field of kidney transplantation. In this paper, we review the studies looking at lung transplantation. The complement cascade appears to have a prominent role in mediating lung allograft damage in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion injury, humoral rejection, as well as chronic allograft dysfunction. In this review, we look at the available data regarding the role of complement in these outcomes and propose some ideas about future direction of research in this field.

The Immunopathology of Pulmonary Rejection after Murine Lung Transplantation.

To improve outcomes following lung transplantation, it is essential to understand the immunological mechanisms that result in chronic graft failure. The associated clinical syndrome is termed chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which is known to be induced by alloimmune-dependent (i.e., rejection) and alloimmune-independent factors (e.g., infections, reflux and environmental factors). We aimed to explore the alloimmune-related mechanism, i.e., pulmonary rejection. In this study, we use a murine orthotopic left lung transplant model using isografts and allografts (C57BL/6 or BALB/c as donors to C57BL/6 recipients), with daily immunosuppression (10 mg/kg cyclosporin A and 1.6 mg/kg methylprednisolone). Serial sacrifice was performed at days 1, 7 and 35 post-transplantation (n = 6 at each time point for each group). Left transplanted lungs were harvested, a single-cell suspension was made and absolute numbers of immune cells were quantified using multicolor flow cytometry. The rejection process followed the principles of a classic immune response, including innate but mainly adaptive immune cells. At day 7 following transplantation, the numbers of interstitial macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells, NK cells, NKT cells, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T and B cells were increased in allografts compared with isografts. Only dendritic cells and CD4+ T cells remained elevated at day 35 in allografts. Our study provides insights into the immunological mechanisms of true pulmonary rejection after murine lung transplantation. These results might be important in further research on diagnostic evaluation and treatment for CLAD.

Ventilatory capacity in CLAD is driven by dysfunctional airway structure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) encompasses three main phenotypes: bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) and a Mixed phenotype combining both pathologies. How the airway structure in its entirety is affected in these phenotypes is still poorly understood. METHODS: A detailed analysis of airway morphometry was applied to gain insights on the effects of airway remodelling on the distribution of alveolar ventilation in end-stage CLAD. Ex vivo whole lung µCT and tissue-core µCT scanning of six control, six BOS, three RAS and three Mixed explant lung grafts (9 male, 9 female, 2014-2021, Leuven, Belgium) were used for digital airway reconstruction and calculation of airway dimensions in relation to luminal obstructions. FINDINGS: BOS and Mixed explants demonstrated airway obstructions of proximal bronchioles (starting at generation five), while RAS explants particularly had airway obstructions in the most distal bronchioles (generation >12). In BOS and Mixed explants 76% and 84% of bronchioles were obstructed, respectively, while this was 22% in RAS. Bronchiolar obstructions were mainly caused by lymphocytic inflammation of the airway wall or fibrotic remodelling, i.e. constrictive bronchiolitis. Proximal bronchiolectasis and imbalance in distal lung ventilation were present in all CLAD phenotypes and explain poor lung function and deterioration of specific lung function parameters. INTERPRETATION: Alterations in the structure of conducting bronchioles revealed CLAD to affect alveolar ventilatory distribution in a regional fashion. The significance of various obstructions, particularly those associated with mucus, is highlighted. FUNDING: This research was funded with the National research fund Flanders (G060322N), received by R.V.

Airway oscillometry parameters in baseline lung allograft dysfunction: Associations from a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD), the failure to achieve ≥80%-predicted spirometry after lung transplant (LTx), is associated with impaired survival. Physiologic abnormalities in BLAD are poorly understood. Airway oscillometry measures respiratory system mechanics and may provide insight into understanding the mechanisms of BLAD. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe and measure the association between airway oscillometry parameters [Reactance (Xrs5, Ax), Resistance (Rrs5, Rrs5-19)] (1) stable LTx recipients, comparing those with normal spirometry and those with BLAD; and (2) in recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), comparing those with normal baseline spirometry and those with BLAD. METHODS: A multi-center cross-sectional study was performed including bilateral LTx between January 2020 and June 2021. Participants performed concurrent airway oscillometry and spirometry. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to measure the association between oscillometry parameters and BLAD. RESULTS: A total of 404 LTx recipients performed oscillometry and 253 were included for analysis. Stable allograft function was confirmed in 149 (50.2%) recipients (92 (61.7%) achieving normal spirometry and 57 (38.3%) with BLAD). Among stable LTx recipients, lower Xrs5 Z-Score (aOR 0.50 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.001) was independently associated with BLAD. CLAD was present in 104 (35.0%) recipients. Among recipients with CLAD, lower Xrs5 Z-Score (aOR 0.73 95% CI 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02) was associated with BLAD. CONCLUSIONS: Oscillometry provides novel physiologic insights into mechanisms of BLAD. The independent association between Xrs5 and BLAD, in both stable recipients and those with CLAD suggests that respiratory mechanics, in particular abnormal elastance, is an important physiologic feature. Further longitudinal studies are needed to understand the trajectory of oscillometry parameters in relation to allograft outcomes.

Intra-subject variability in oscillometry correlates with acute rejection and CLAD post-lung transplant.

Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of death post-lung transplantation, with acute cellular rejection (ACR) being the biggest contributing risk factor. Although patients are routinely monitored with spirometry, FEV1 is stable or improving in most ACR episodes. In contrast, oscillometry is highly sensitive to respiratory mechanics and shown to track graft injury associated with ACR and its improvement following treatment. We hypothesize that intra-subject variability in oscillometry measurements correlates with ACR and risk of CLAD. Methods: Of 289 bilateral lung recipients enrolled for oscillometry prior to laboratory-based spirometry between December 2017 and March 2020, 230 had ≥ 3 months and 175 had ≥ 6 months of follow-up. While 37 patients developed CLAD, only 29 had oscillometry at time of CLAD onset and were included for analysis. These 29 CLAD patients were time-matched with 129 CLAD-free recipients. We performed multivariable regression to investigate the associations between variance in spirometry/oscillometry and the A-score, a cumulative index of ACR, as our predictor of primary interest. Conditional logistic regression models were built to investigate associations with CLAD. Results: Multivariable regression showed that the A-score was positively associated with the variance in oscillometry measurements. Conditional logistic regression models revealed that higher variance in the oscillometry metrics of ventilatory inhomogeneity, X5, AX, and R5-19, was independently associated with increased risk of CLAD (p < 0.05); no association was found for variance in %predicted FEV1. Conclusion: Oscillometry tracks graft injury and recovery post-transplant. Monitoring with oscillometry could facilitate earlier identification of graft injury, prompting investigation to identify treatable causes and decrease the risk of CLAD.

Long-term management and outcome of lung transplantation in Japan.

The long-term survival after lung transplantation (LT) is favorable in Japan. However, long-term survivors after LT are subject to late complications, including chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), malignancy, infection, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) because of the need for lifelong immunosuppression. The rates of single cadaveric LT (CLT) and living-donor lobar LT (LDLLT) are higher than that of bilateral CLT in Japan. Here, we will describe the management of late complications and long-term outcome after LT in Japan. Attention should be paid to not only the phenotype of CLAD but also the difference in CLAD after CLT and after LDLLT as well as the timing of lung re-transplantation for advanced CLAD, especially after single CLT. Since post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is the most common malignancy after LT, infection monitoring for infection-related malignancies and appropriate screening are keys to the early diagnosis and treatment of malignancy after LT. The long-term management of infection after LT is also important, especially with regard to community-acquired pathogens, Aspergillus, and cytomegalovirus. When providing long-term care after LT, physicians should be aware of CKD and the timing of renal replacement therapy in cases with severe CKD. The widespread use of computed tomography and dialysis in Japan are beneficial for long-term survivors of LT. The similar survival outcomes of single CLT and LDLLT, compared with bilateral CLT, might contribute to improved long-term survival in Japan. Pulmonologists are encouraged to become further involved in long-term management after LT in Japan.

Roles and practice of living-related lobar lung transplantation.

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) was first performed in the USA and thereafter it was introduced in Japan in 1998 as an alternative modality to brain-dead donor lung transplantation (BDLT). Although the LDLLT procedure was employed for rapidly deteriorating patients who were hospitalized and mechanically ventilated at the time of transplantation, LDLLT demonstrated better or comparable post-transplant outcomes in comparison to BDLT. Less injured lobar grafts and a significantly shorter graft ischemic time possibly contributed to a significantly lower incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after LDLLT in comparison to BDLT. In standard LDLLT, patients obtained lobar grafts from two different donors, and thus most patients developed chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) only in the unilateral lung graft. This indicates that the contralateral unaffected lung graft could reserve lung function after the unilateral development of CLAD. In our transplant program, the incidence of CLAD per donor in LDLLT (14.4%) was also significantly lower in comparison to BDLT (24.7%). The 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates after LDLLT were 90.9%, 75.5% and 57.2%, respectively, which were equivalent to those after BDLT (92.9%, 73.4% and 62.2%). The inherent surgical risk to the living donors should always be considered. In our experience, living-donor surgery was associated with a complication rate of 12.7%, and importantly, all living donors finally returned to their previous social lives. Precise functional and anatomical size matching between donor lobar graft and recipient could provide a favorable pulmonary function after LDLLT. We recently established multimodal surgical approaches, such as native upper lobe-sparing, right-to-left horizontally rotated, segmental, and single-lobe transplantation, in order to resolve the issue of size mismatch between the donor lobar graft and the recipient.

Extracellular vesicles: a potential new player in antibody-mediated rejection in lung allograft recipients.

Identification of recipients with pre-existing antibodies and cross-matching of recipient sera with donor lymphocytes have reduced the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after human lung transplantation. However, AMR is still common and requires not only immediate intervention but also has long-term consequences including an increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). The mechanisms resulting in AMR remain largely unknown due to the variation in clinical and histopathological features among lung transplant recipients; however, several reports have demonstrated a strong association between the development of antibodies against mismatched donor human leucocyte antigens [donor-specific antibodies (DSAs)] and AMR. In addition, the development of antibodies against lung self-antigens (K alpha1 tubulin and collagen V) also plays a vital role in AMR pathogenesis, either alone or in combination with DSAs. In the current article, we will review the existing literature regarding the association of DSAs with AMR, along with clinical diagnostic features and current treatment options for AMR. We will also discuss the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in the immune-related pathogenesis of AMR, which can lead to CLAD.

Immune responses of lung transplant recipients against SARS-CoV-2 and common respiratory coronaviruses: Evidence for pre-existing cross-reactive immunity.

Humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses in lung transplant recipients are unknown. We measured antibodies and T cell responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 and nucleocapsid antigens and spike antigens from common respiratory coronaviruses (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1) after vaccination or infection of LTxRs. 148 LTxRs from single center were included in this study: 98 after vaccination and 50 following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antibodies were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The frequency of T cells secreting IL2, IL4, IL10, IL17, TNFα, and IFNγ were enumerated by enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Our results have shown the development of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in infected LTxRs (39/50) and vaccinated LTxRs (52/98). Vaccinated LTxRs had higher number of T cells producing TNFα but less cells producing IFNγ than infected LTxRs in response to the nucleocapsid antigen and other coronavirus spike antigens. We didn't find correlation between the development of antibodies and cellular immune responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein after vaccination. Instead, LTxRs have pre-existing cellular immunity to common respiratory coronaviruses, leading to cross-reactive immunity against SARS-CoV-2 which likely will provide protection against SARS-Cov-2 infection.

B Cell Immunity in Lung Transplant Rejection - Effector Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.

Allograft rejection remains the major hurdle in lung transplantation despite modern immunosuppressive treatment. As part of the alloreactive process, B cells are increasingly recognized as modulators of alloimmunity and initiators of a donor-specific humoral response. In chronically rejected lung allografts, B cells contribute to the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures and promote local alloimmune responses. However, B cells are functionally heterogeneous and some B cell subsets may promote alloimmune tolerance. In this review, we describe the current understanding of B-cell-dependent mechanisms in pulmonary allograft rejection and highlight promising future strategies that employ B cell-targeted therapies.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction is associated with an early increase of circulating cytotoxic CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells, selectively inhibited by the immune check-point HLA-G.

BACKGROUND: Survival after lung transplantation (LTx) still remains limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), thought to represent a form of chronic rejection. We investigated whether the immune checkpoint HLA-G/ILT2 expressed by peripheral T-cell subpopulations could predict CLAD. METHODS: We used data for 150 LTx recipients from COLT (Cohort-For-Lung-Transplantation) cohort with ≥1 available blood sample at 1-, 6-, or 12-months post-Tx. Analysis of T cells by flow cytometry focused on the ILT2 receptor of HLA-G and other markers (CD57, CD25, CD127). T-cell subset analyses compared stable patients and those with CLAD at 3 years post-LTx. RESULTS: With data for 78 stable and 72 CLAD patients, among 21 T-cell subsets expressing ILT2, only CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells were associated with outcome. At 1-month post-Tx, low proportion of CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells was associated with reduced 3-year incidence of CLAD (CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells ≤ first IQR [25%] vs > first IQR, log-rank test, p = 0.028). Furthermore, the incidence of CLAD was higher with >2.6- vs ≤2.6-fold increased proportion of CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells over the first year post-LTx (3-year freedom frequencies: 27% [95%CI: 8-50] vs 64% [95%CI: 48-77] (log-rank test, p = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, increased proportion of CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells over the first year predicted CLAD (hazard ratio 1.25; 95%CI: 1.09-1.44; p = 0.001). Focusing on CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells, we demonstrated ex vivo that they are cytotoxic CD4+ T cells, selectively inhibited by HLA-G. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that an early increase of CD4+CD57+ILT2+ T cells after LTx may be associated with CLAD onset.

Novel approaches for long-term lung transplant survival.

Allograft failure remains a major barrier in the field of lung transplantation and results primarily from acute and chronic rejection. To date, standard-of-care immunosuppressive regimens have proven unsuccessful in achieving acceptable long-term graft and patient survival. Recent insights into the unique immunologic properties of lung allografts provide an opportunity to develop more effective immunosuppressive strategies. Here we describe advances in our understanding of the mechanisms driving lung allograft rejection and highlight recent progress in the development of novel, lung-specific strategies aimed at promoting long-term allograft survival, including tolerance.

Lung retransplantation in the modern era.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains the leading cause of long-term morbidity and mortality for lung transplant recipients. Lung retransplantation currently represents the only therapeutic option for patients for refractory allograft dysfunction. However, debate remains regarding both the efficacy and ethicality of lung retransplantation in light of the shortage of lung allografts. The aim of this review is to discuss the available literature on lung retransplantation in the current era. Through this we hope to provide insight into ideal patient selection, donor organ selection, surgical approaches, and future considerations within the field in order to improve outcomes and best address organ utilization while a waitlist continues to exist. Lung retransplantation in select patients can offer comparable survival outcomes to primary lung transplantation. However, several risk factors including retransplantation with the first year of primary transplantation, older age, poor functional status, and ICU level requirements prior to transplantation are associated with worsened outcomes. Donor organ selection considerations are comparable to those in primary lung transplantation. However, surgical approach is often impacted by dense pleural and mediastinal adhesions in the recipient which increase the complexity of the hilar dissection. The postoperative course is often more complex for patients undergoing retransplantation compared to those undergoing primary lung transplant as well. However, pending more data on long term outcomes in lung retransplantation and the potential impact of retransplant recipients on waitlist mortality, lung retransplantation should remain in use primarily for the treatment of chronic graft dysfunction in carefully selected patients.

Viral infections in lung transplantation.

Viral infections account for up to 30% of all infectious complications in lung transplant recipients, remaining a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality. Impact of viral infections is not only due to the direct effects of viral replication, but also to immunologically-mediated lung injury that may lead to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. This has particularly been seen in infections caused by herpesviruses and respiratory viruses. The implementation of universal preventive measures against cytomegalovirus (CMV) and influenza (by means of antiviral prophylaxis and vaccination, respectively) and administration of early antiviral treatment have reduced the burden of these diseases and potentially their role in affecting allograft outcomes. New antivirals against CMV for prophylaxis and for treatment of antiviral-resistant CMV infection are currently being evaluated in transplant recipients, and may continue to improve the management of CMV in lung transplant recipients. However, new therapeutic and preventive strategies are highly needed for other viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or parainfluenza virus (PIV), including new antivirals and vaccines. This is particularly important in the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, for which several unanswered questions remain, in particular on the best antiviral and immunomodulatory regimen for decreasing mortality specifically in lung transplant recipients. In conclusion, the appropriate management of viral complications after transplantation remain an essential step to continue improving survival and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.

Use of donor-derived-cell-free DNA as a marker of early allograft injury in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) to predict the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). However, the association between PGD and degree of allograft injury remains poorly defined. In this study, we leverage a novel biomarker for allograft injury, percentage donor-derived cell-free DNA (%ddcfDNA), to study the association between PGD, degree of allograft injury, and the development of CLAD. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited 99 lung transplant recipients and collected plasma samples on days 1, 3, and 7 for %ddcfDNA measurements. Clinical data on day 3 was used to adjudicate for PGD. %ddcfDNA levels were compared between PGD grades. In PGD patients, %ddcfDNA was compared between those who developed CLAD and those who did not. RESULTS: On posttransplant day 3, %ddcfDNA was higher in PGD than in non-PGD patients (median [IQR]: 12.2% [8.2, 22.0] vs 8.5% [5.6, 13.2] p = 0.01). %ddcfDNA correlated with the severity grade of PGD (r = 0.24, p = 0.02). Within the PGD group, higher levels of %ddcfDNA correlated with increased risk of developing CLAD (log OR(SE) 1.38 (0.53), p = 0.009). PGD patients who developed CLAD showed ∼2-times higher %ddcfDNA levels than patients who did not develop CLAD (median [IQR]: 22.4% [11.8, 27.6] vs 9.9% [6.7, 14.9], p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: PGD patients demonstrated increased early posttransplant allograft injury, as measured by %ddcfDNA, in comparison to non-PGD patients, and these high %ddcfDNA levels were associated with subsequent development of CLAD. This study suggests that %ddcfDNA identifies PGD patients at greater risk of CLAD than PGD alone.

An update on chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a significant challenge and the major determinant of morbidity and mortality post lung transplantation (LTx). The definition of CLAD has evolved significantly over the last ten years, reflecting better understanding of pathophysiology and different phenotypes. While there is an agreed consensus approach to CLAD, questions remain regarding the limitations of lung function parameters as well as the role of imaging and histopathology. Here we present a current snapshot of the definition of CLAD, its evolution and future directions.