RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The inverted peno-scrotal flap method is considered the standard method of vaginoplasty in male-to-female genital reassignment surgery. Though with numerous advantages, the method has its limitations regarding skin texture, lack of inherent lubrication, and that the tissues for creating the labia depend on the amount of tissues remaining after vaginoplasty. Our purpose was to describe the procedure and outcome of vaginoplasty applying a new technique: autologous buccal micro-mucosa free graft combined with posterior scrotal flap transfer, which could solve some of the problems the previous methods had. METHODS: Nine male-to-female transsexual patients received our new method of vaginoplasty from July 2010-October 2015. We described the details of the surgical procedure and evaluated the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: In a mean clinical follow-up period of 25.3 months and phone interview follow-up of 50.3 months, we observed that the neovaginas in the nine cases were all of sufficient volume, lined with mucosa, with natural mucosal discharge. The oral donor sites resulted in no visible scars or malfunction. Eight patients experienced uneventful postoperative periods, while one patient suffered from scrotal flap prolapse. All the patients were sexually active and reported sexual satisfaction, with no need of lubrication. CONCLUSION: The reported technique achieves the outcomes of creating a neovagina of sufficient volume, without serious stenosis in long-term follow-up. The neovagina is lined with mucosa and has appropriate lubrication as well as good sexual sensation. The reported method is easy and economical to perform and retains enough tissues for vulvoplasty to achieve a superior cosmetic appearance, with rare risk of complications and donor area malfunction. Additionally, this technique is feasible and advantageous to the patients who have insufficient peno-scrotal skin for neovaginal lining as well as those with unfavorable previous vaginoplasty. All of these indicate that this technique is a promising option for vaginoplasty in male-to-female transsexual surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres/trasplante , Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Escroto/cirugía , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Transexualidad/cirugía , Vagina/cirugía , Adulto , Autoinjertos , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción Personal , Proyectos Piloto , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Escroto/trasplante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and vaginectomy for genital reassignment surgery is a complex procedure that is usually performed with a combined vaginal and abdominal approach. The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility of laparoscopic vaginectomy in sex reassignment surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the relevant medical history, intra/postoperative complications, and surgical results of all patients diagnosed with gender dysphoria and submitted to totally laparoscopic gender confirmation surgery in our department between January 2007 and March 2015. In total, 23 patients underwent total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and vaginectomy in a single intervention. The vaginal mucosa was conserved to be used for the penile neourethra during the subsequent phalloplasty. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The surgeries had an average operating time of 155 ± 42 minutes. No intraoperative complications were registered. In all patients, the vagina was totally removed, and, in most cases (n = 20), we were able to remove laparoscopically more than 50% of the vagina. Three patients had postoperative complications. One patient presented with hemoperitoneum on the second postoperative day; another presented with prolonged urinary retention, and a third patient developed a perineal hematoma 1 month after surgery. Patients were discharged less than 72 hours after surgery, except the patient who developed a postoperative hemoperitoneum. For all patients, we obtained an adequate specimen of vaginal mucosa to reconstruct the penile neourethra for the subsequent phalloplasty. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the feasibility of laparoscopic vaginectomy in genital reassignment surgery. The procedure can be executed as a continuation of the hysterectomy with the potential advantage of the laparoscopy providing better exposure of the anatomic structures with low blood losses (less than 500 mL) and few complications. Furthermore, using this approach, adequate-sized vaginal mucosa flaps were obtained for the urethral reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Histerectomía Vaginal , Histerectomía , Laparoscopía , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Uretra/cirugía , Vagina/cirugía , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Animales , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Histerectomía Vaginal/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Ovariectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/instrumentación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with male-to-female gender dysphoria (GD) require multidisciplinary assessment and management. Nowadays, more and more patients decide to undergo genital reassignment surgery (GRS) to have aesthetic and functional external female genitalia. Different techniques of this procedure have been described. Orchiectomy, penile disassembly, creation of a neovaginal cavity, repositioning of urethral meatus, and clitorolabioplasty may be identified as the five major steps in all of these techniques. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent genital reassignment procedure for male-to-female GD at our department between November 2008 and August 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Data were collected on surgical technique, postoperative dilations protocol, complications, and functional and aesthetic outcomes. We describe and critically evaluate the surgical technique used in our department. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 14 to 46 months. Two patients developed late neovaginal stricture, and two patients experienced rectovaginal fistulae (one required surgical revision with dermal porcine graft placement). Minor complications occurred in 13 patients and included urethral stenosis, partial wound dehiscence, and minor bleeding. Secondary aesthetic revision surgery was performed in 13 cases. CONCLUSIONS: GRS can provide good functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients with male-to-female GD. However, despite a careful planning and meticulous surgical technique, secondary procedures are frequently required to improve the function and appearance of the neovagina.