Better efficacy, lower recurrence rate and decreased CD8+TRM with guselkumab treatment for generalized pustular psoriasis: A prospective cohort study from China.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe and uncommon form of psoriasis, for which treatment options are limited. There is an urgent need to expand the treatment options for GPP. Currently, adalimumab, secukinumab, and guselkumab are considered effective for GPP, but there is a lack of prospective direct comparative studies on their efficacy for GPP. We conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study on 50 GPP patients to compare the efficacy, safety, and recurrence rates of these three biologics. Adalimumab, secukinumab, and guselkumab resulted in varying degrees of improvement in patients with GPP, but guselkumab exhibited superior efficacy and a lower recurrence rate than the other two drugs. This enhanced response may be attributed to the significant reduction in CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells within GPP lesions caused by guselkumab.

Short-term effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis patients and suggestive features of axial involvement: results from a real-life multicentre cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and suggestive features of axial involvement in a prospective "real-life" multicentre cohort. METHODS: Between June 2022 and June 2023, PsA patients with axial involvement were evaluated if treated at least for 4 months with guselkumab. The effectiveness was evaluated by BASDAI, ASDAS, DAPSA, and achievement of BASDAI ≤ 4, also exploiting predictive factors. In a group of patients, MRI findings on sacroiliac joints were assessed before and after guselkumab administration. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with PsA and suggestive features of axial involvement (age 53.4 ± 11.2 years, male sex 26.9%) were treated with guselkumab. After 4 months, a significant reduction of BASDAI, ASDAS, and DAPSA was observed. A ΔBASDAI of -2.11 ± 0.43 was estimated assessing the mean difference values before and after guselkumab administration and 52.2% of patients reached a BASDAI ≤ 4. In 27 patients, MRI findings on sacroiliac joints were assessed before and after guselkumab administration. A reduction of 0.80 or larger of the sacroiliac joint lesion score was observed in the majority of patients (70.3%) based on MRI improvements, paralleling with the clinical response.No life-threatening side effects were recorded; 17.9% of patients reported minor adverse events mainly injection site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with PsA and suggestive features of axial involvement was shown. Although further studies are needed, our multicentre "real-life" study may suggest the clinical usability of guselkumab in this context.

Vaccination recommendations for adults receiving biologics and oral therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Delphi consensus from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

A narrative review of the literature: The role of biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Though there have been significant advancements in targeted therapies in skin diseases such as psoriasis or eczema, the progress in the treatment of vitiligo has been slow, with minimal studies assessing the effect of biologics, though there has been recent evidence of the effectiveness of JAK inhibition. This paper reviews the published case reports and studies for the use of systemic targeted therapies including biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Is Th17-Targeted Therapy Effective in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. The proposed pathophysiological hypotheses of SLE are numerous, involving both innate and adaptive abnormal immune responses. SLE is characterized by the overproduction of different autoantibodies that form immune complexes, which cause damage in different organs. Current therapeutic modalities are anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive. In the last decade, we have witnessed the development of many biologicals targeting different cytokines and other molecules. One of them is interleukin-17 (IL-17), a central cytokine of a proinflammatory process that is mediated by a group of helper T cells called Th17. Direct inhibitors of IL-17 are used in psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and other diseases. Evidence about the therapeutic potential of Th17-targeted therapies in SLE is scarce, and probably the most promising is related to lupus nephritis. As SLE is a complex heterogeneous disease with different cytokines involved in its pathogenesis, it is highly unlikely that inhibition of only one molecule, such as IL-17, will be effective in the treatment of all clinical manifestations. Future studies should identify SLE patients that are eligible for Th17-targeted therapy.

Guselkumab for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: Induction Results From the Phase 2 GALAXI-1 Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guselkumab, a selective p19 interleukin-23 antagonist, is approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or biologic therapy. METHODS: GALAXI-1, a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, randomized patients 1:1:1:1:1 to intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, 600 mg, or 1200 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8; intravenous ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg at week 0 and 90 mg subcutaneously at week 8; or placebo. Change from baseline in Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (primary end point), clinical remission, clinical response, Patient Reported Outcomes-2 remission, clinical-biomarker response, endoscopic response (major secondary end points), and safety in guselkumab-treated patients vs placebo were evaluated through week 12. Ustekinumab was a reference arm. RESULTS: Of 309 patients evaluated, approximately 50% had disease refractory to prior biologic therapy. At week 12, significantly greater reductions in Crohn's Disease Activity Index from baseline (least squares means: 200 mg: -160.4, 600 mg: -138.9, and 1200 mg: -144.9 vs placebo: -36.2; all, P < .05) and significantly greater proportions of patients achieved clinical remission in each guselkumab group vs placebo (Crohn's Disease Activity Index <150; 57.4%, 55.6%, and 45.9% vs 16.4%; all, P < .05). Greater proportions of patients receiving guselkumab achieved clinical response, Patient Reported Outcomes-2 remission, clinical-biomarker response, and endoscopic response at week 12 vs placebo. Efficacy of ustekinumab vs placebo was also demonstrated. Safety event rates were generally similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: At week 12, all 3 dose regimens of guselkumab induced greater clinical and endoscopic improvements vs placebo, with a favorable safety profile. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT03466411.

Guselkumab provides sustained domain-specific and comprehensive efficacy using composite indices in patients with active psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab for the treatment of active PsA utilizing composite indices. METHODS: Data were pooled from the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 (n = 381) and DISCOVER-2 (n = 739) studies. In both studies, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then Q8W; or placebo Q4W with crossover to guselkumab 100 mg Q4W at week 24. Composite indices used to assess efficacy through week 52 included Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), minimal disease activity (MDA), and very low disease activity (VLDA). Through week 24, treatment failure rules were applied. Through week 52, non-responder imputation was used for missing data. RESULTS: Greater proportions of guselkumab- than placebo-treated patients achieved DAPSA low disease activity (LDA) and remission, PASDAS LDA and VLDA, MDA, and VLDA at week 24 vs placebo (all unadjusted P < 0.05). At week 52, in the guselkumab Q4W and Q8W groups, respectively, response rates were as follows: DAPSA LDA, 54.2% and 52.5%; DAPSA remission, 18.2% and 17.6%; PASDAS LDA, 45.3% and 41.9%; PASDAS VLDA, 16.9% and 19.5%; MDA, 35.9% and 30.7%; and VLDA, 13.1% and 14.4%. In the placebo-crossover-to-guselkumab group, response rates for all composite indices increased after patients switched to guselkumab, from week 24 through week 52. CONCLUSION: Treatment with guselkumab provided robust and sustained benefits across multiple PsA domains through 1 year, indicating that guselkumab is an effective therapy for the diverse manifestations of PsA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03162796; NCT03158285.

Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: updates to a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The IL-23 p19-subunit inhibitor guselkumab has been previously compared with other targeted therapies for PsA through network meta-analysis (NMA). The objective of this NMA update was to include new guselkumab COSMOS trial data, and two key comparators: the IL-23 inhibitor risankizumab and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials up to February 2021. A hand-search identified newer agents up to July 2021. Bayesian NMAs were performed to compare treatments on ACR response, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response, modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score, and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: For ACR 20, guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) and every 4 weeks (Q4W) were comparable (i.e. overlap in credible intervals) to most other agents, including risankizumab, upadacitinib, subcutaneous TNF inhibitors and most IL-17A inhibitors. For PASI 90, guselkumab Q8W and Q4W were better than multiple agents, including subcutaneous TNF and JAK inhibitors. For vdH-S, guselkumab Q8W was similar to risankizumab, while guselkumab Q4W was better; both doses were comparable to most other agents. Most agents had comparable SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Guselkumab demonstrates better skin efficacy than most other targeted PsA therapies, including upadacitinib. For vdH-S, both guselkumab doses are comparable to most treatments, with both doses ranking higher than most, including upadacitinib and risankizumab. Both guselkumab doses demonstrate comparable ACR responses to most other agents, including upadacitinib and risankizumab, and rank favourably in the network for SAEs.

Secukinumab versus guselkumab in the complete resolution of ustekinumab-resistant psoriatic plaques: The ARROW study.

Interleukin (IL)-23-independent IL-17A production has been suggested to be involved in persistent manifestations of psoriatic disease, including anti-IL-12/23-refractory psoriatic plaques; this study aimed to test this hypothesis by investigating the clinical and molecular effects of direct IL-17A (with secukinumab) versus selective IL-23 inhibition (with guselkumab) in patients with anti-IL-12/23 (ustekinumab)-refractory psoriatic plaques. A 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, Phase IIa study (ARROW, NCT03553823) was conducted in patients with ≥1 active psoriatic plaque (total clinical score [TCS] ≥6) at screening despite treatment with ustekinumab, and a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score 1-10. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive secukinumab 300 mg (n = 20) or guselkumab 100 mg (n = 20). Biopsies from one refractory ('target plaque') were obtained at baseline and Week 16. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose ustekinumab-refractory target plaque achieved clear/almost clear status (TCS 0-2) at Week 16. Transcriptomic and histological analyses were conducted on target plaques to determine the molecular effects of direct IL-17A versus selective IL-23 inhibition. At Week 16, target plaque clear/almost clear status was achieved in 60.0% of patients treated with secukinumab versus 40.0% of patients treated with guselkumab (p = 0.1715). Molecular analyses identified that secukinumab modulated a greater proportion of psoriasis disease transcriptome genes (72.1% vs. 48.0%) and resulted in more histological responders (72.2% vs. 53.3%) compared with guselkumab. Secukinumab demonstrated a greater clinical and molecular effect on ustekinumab-refractory psoriatic plaques versus guselkumab. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that IL-23-independent IL-17 mechanisms may be relevant to the inflammation driving refractory manifestations of psoriasis.

Malignancy rates through 5 years of follow-up in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: Pooled results from the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials.

BACKGROUND: Malignancy risk surveillance among patients receiving long-term immunomodulatory psoriasis treatments remains an important safety objective. OBJECTIVE: To report malignancy rates in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab for up to 5 years versus general and psoriasis patient populations. METHODS: Cumulative rates of malignancies/100 patient-years (PY) were evaluated in 1721 guselkumab-treated patients from VOYAGE 1 and 2. Malignancy rates (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer [NMSC]) were compared with rates in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry. Standardized incidence ratios comparing malignancy rates (excluding NMSC and cervical cancer in situ) between guselkumab-treated patients and the general US population using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data were calculated, adjusting for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Of 1721 guselkumab-treated patients (>7100 PY), 24 had NMSC (0.34/100PY; basal:squamous cell carcinoma ratio, 2.2:1), and 32 had malignancies excluding NMSC (0.45/100PY). For comparison, the malignancy rate excluding NMSC was 0.68/100PY in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry. Malignancy rates (excluding NMSC/cervical cancer in situ) in guselkumab-treated patients were consistent with those expected in the general US population (standardized incidence ratio = 0.93). LIMITATIONS: Inherent imprecision in determining malignancy rates. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with guselkumab for up to 5 years, malignancy rates were low and generally consistent with rates in general and psoriasis patient populations.

Utility of nailfold capillary assessment for predicting pustulotic arthro-osteitis in palmoplantar pustulosis based on a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO) is 1 of the most serious comorbidities associated with palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). Risk factors of PAO development are not well-known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of nailfold capillary (NFC) changes in patients with PPP. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in a population of 102 PPP patients. Correlations of NFC abnormalities, including nailfold bleeding and enlarged capillaries, with the prevalence of PAO, the incidence of new PAO, and serum levels of cytokines were analyzed. RESULTS: Detailed examination revealed that of 102 PPP patients, 52 without PAO and 50 with PAO. Both nailfold bleeding and enlarged capillaries were significantly more frequent in patients with PAO (50.0% vs 92.0%, P < .0001; 50.0% vs 94.0%, P < .0001). In addition, PPP patients without PAO were prospectively observed before they developed PAO (mean 28 months [1-52 months]). Multivariate analysis suggested that these NFC abnormalities were predictors of PAO development (hazard ratio 3.37, 95% confidence interval 1.13-10.07; 3.37, 1.13-10.07) and guselkumab prevent PAO development (0.093, 0.012-0.76). The degree of NFC abnormalities correlated with the severity of PAO and serum cytokine levels. LIMITATIONS: All participants were Japanese. CONCLUSION: NFC abnormalities could be predictors of PAO in PPP patients, and their degree indicators of disease severity.

Real-world treatment persistence of four commonly prescribed biologic therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis in Australia.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Australian data comparing biologic treatments for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis are lacking. We compared persistence on therapy across four biologic therapies (adalimumab, guselkumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab) used to treat chronic plaque psoriasis. The impact of prior biologic use on persistence was also investigated. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% sample included data from adult patients prescribed ≥1 biologic of interest by a dermatologist from 1 September 2015 to 31 December 2021. Persistence was defined as continued use until 180 days without a prescription. The index date was the date of the first claim of the biologic. Persistence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods, log-rank tests, adjusted analyses using Cox's regressions, and propensity score matching. RESULTS: In total, 878 patients, with 1131 index prescriptions, were included. Guselkumab median persistence was not reached in the study period (PBS listed from February 2019). In the adjusted analysis, persistence to guselkumab was significantly greater than to adalimumab (n = 105; median 16 months, HR 2.71 (95% CI 1.94-3.8), p < 0.001), ustekinumab (n = 336; median 19 months, HR 2.91 (95% CI 2.22-3.82), p < 0.001) and secukinumab (n = 305; median 30 months, HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.36-2.38), p < 0.001). Bio-naïve patients had longer persistence on treatment than bio-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: The nationally representative PBS dataset can provide real-world insights into the persistence on biologic therapies for psoriasis in Australia, where eligibility criteria for reimbursed treatment are stringent. Persistence is an indirect marker of sustained treatment effectiveness and tolerability. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses found longer persistence for guselkumab compared to adalimumab, secukinumab or ustekinumab.

The Effectiveness of Risankizumab Following Guselkumab Failure in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a strong genetic predisposition and autoimmune component that is often treated with immunomodulators such as biologic therapy. Guselkumab is a biologic treatment option that selectively targets the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23; risankizumab is a more recently developed monoclonal antibody of the same class that targets IL-23p19. There is limited research around effective treatment response with intra class switching within IL-23-targeted therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose is to assess patient response to risankizumab after guselkumab failure for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 13 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Physical examination findings were converted to a 5-point static physicians' global assessment (sPGA) score. Baseline, 4-month, and 12-month sPGA scores were assigned from visits immediately prior to and during their course of risankizumab treatment. sPGA scores were analyzed to compare changes between baseline and 4 months and 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: Patients treated with risankizumab had lower sPGA scores after both 4 and 12 months compared to their baseline sPGA score. 46% of patients met the primary outcome of an sPGA score of 0 or 1 at 4 months of risankizumab, increasing to 90% of patients at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reflect an improvement in sPGA scores when patients are treated with risankizumab following guselkumab failure. This highlights the benefit of in-class switch to risankizumab when patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have failed multiple treatments including guselkumab.

Compositional Alteration of Gut Microbiota in Psoriasis Treated with IL-23 and IL-17 Inhibitors.

Alterations in the gut microbiota composition and their associated metabolic dysfunction exist in psoriasis. However, the impact of biologics on shaping gut microbiota is not well known. This study aimed to determine the association of gut microorganisms and microbiome-encoded metabolic pathways with the treatment in patients with psoriasis. A total of 48 patients with psoriasis, including 30 cases who received an IL-23 inhibitor (guselkumab) and 18 cases who received an IL-17 inhibitor (secukinumab or ixekizumab) were recruited. Longitudinal profiles of the gut microbiome were conducted by using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The gut microbial compositions dynamically changed in psoriatic patients during a 24-week treatment. The relative abundance of individual taxa altered differently between patients receiving the IL-23 inhibitor and those receiving the IL-17 inhibitor. Functional prediction of the gut microbiome revealed microbial genes related to metabolism involving the biosynthesis of antibiotics and amino acids were differentially enriched between responders and non-responders receiving IL-17 inhibitors, as the abundance of the taurine and hypotaurine pathway was found to be augmented in responders treated with the IL-23 inhibitor. Our analyses showed a longitudinal shift in the gut microbiota in psoriatic patients after treatment. These taxonomic signatures and functional alterations of the gut microbiome could serve as potential biomarkers for the response to biologics treatment in psoriasis.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and JAK Inhibitors: A Review of the Published Literature.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa or Verneuil's disease, is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, and debilitating skin disease of the hair follicles characterized by inflammatory, painful, deep-rooted lesions in the areas of the body characterized by the presence of the apocrine glands. Unfortunately, huge unmet needs still remain for its treatment. Objective: The purpose of our review was collecting all cases, case series, trials, and ongoing studies available in the literature on the use of this class of drugs for HS. Materials and Methods: The investigated manuscripts included trials, reviews, letters to the editor, real-life studies, case series, and reports. Manuscripts were identified, screened, and extracted for the relevant data following the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Results: We selected 56 articles of which 25 met the selection criteria for our review. Among the JAK inhibitors to date, there is only one published clinical trial in the literature (Janus kinase 1 inhibitor INCB054707), a real-life study with 15 patients up to week 24 in which upadacitinib was used and a case series where tofacitinib was successfully used. Conversely, there are several ongoing clinical trials. Conclusions: Results to date in the literature show promising levels of efficacy and the safety of JAK inhibitors in HS. Several clinical trials are underway from which it will be very important to compare the available data. There are still too few studies conducted with a low sample size, so it remains critical to investigate this issue further in the future with a real-life study involving a large sample of patients in order to provide safe and viable therapeutic alternatives for HS.

The Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Under Clinical Practice Conditions: A Spanish Multicentre Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing lesions in which high levels of interleukin (IL)-23 and T-helper 17 cells are found. Adalimumab remains the only approved treatment. Guselkumab, an antibody targeting the p19 protein subunit of extracellular IL-23, is approved for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis, but evidence on its efficacy in treating HS is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in treating moderate-severe HS under clinical practice conditions. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective observational study was carried out in 13 Spanish Hospitals including adult HS patients treated with guselkumab within a compassionate use programme (March 2020-March 2022). Data referred to patient demographic and clinical characteristics at treatment initiation (baseline), patient-reported outcomes (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), physician scores (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]) were recorded at baseline and at 16, 24, and 48 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Most (84.10%) had severe HS (Hurley III) and had been diagnosed for over ten years (58.80%). The patients had been subjected to multiple non-biological (mean 3.56) or biological (mean 1.78) therapies, and almost 90% of those treated with biologics had received adalimumab. A significant decrease in IHS4, HS-PGA, NPRS, and DLQI scores was observed from baseline to 48 weeks of guselkumab treatment (all p<0.01). HiSCR was achieved in 58.33% and 56.52% of the patients at 16 and 24 weeks, respectively. Overall, 16 patients discontinued treatment, mostly due to inefficacy (n=7) or loss of efficacy (n=3). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that guselkumab may be a safe and effective therapeutic alternative for patients with severe HS that fail to respond to other biologics.

The Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Under Clinical Practice Conditions: A Spanish Multicentre Retrospective Study. / [Artículo traducido] Efectividad de guselkumab en pacientes con hidradenitis supurativa en condiciones de práctica clínica: estudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico en España.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing lesions in which high levels of interleukin (IL)-23 and T-helper17 cells are found. Adalimumab remains the only approved treatment. Guselkumab, an antibody targeting the p19 protein subunit of extracellular IL-23, is approved for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis, but evidence on its efficacy in treating HS is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in treating moderate-severe HS under clinical practice conditions. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective observational study was carried out in 13 Spanish hospitals including adult HS patients treated with guselkumab within a compassionate use programme (March 2020-March 2022). Data referred to patient demographic and clinical characteristics at treatment initiation (baseline), patient-reported outcomes (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), physician scores (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]) were recorded at baseline and at 16, 24, and 48weeks of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Most (84.10%) had severe HS (HurleyIII) and had been diagnosed for over ten years (58.80%). The patients had been subjected to multiple non-biological (mean: 3.56) or biological (mean: 1.78) therapies, and almost 90% of those treated with biologics had received adalimumab. A significant decrease in IHS4, HS-PGA, NPRS, and DLQI scores was observed from baseline to 48weeks of guselkumab treatment (all P<.01). HiSCR was achieved in 58.33% and 56.52% of the patients at 16 and 24weeks, respectively. Overall, 16 patients discontinued treatment, mostly due to inefficacy (n=7) or loss of efficacy (n=3). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that guselkumab may be a safe and effective therapeutic alternative for patients with severe HS that fail to respond to other biologics.

Real-life efficacy of guselkumab in patients with early psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of the novel anti-IL-23 monoclonal antibody guselkumab in a real-life observational cohort of patients with early PsA. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on patients with early PsA followed by the joint dermatology-rheumatology clinics of two Italian centres starting therapy with guselkumab for severe skin involvement. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and every 24 weeks for one year, recording Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), PASI, VAS Pain, VAS Prutitus, Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) and assessing DAPSA response. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were recruited (16 women). The mean duration of skin disease was 12.5 years (CI 8; 17), but all patients had a shorter articular disease duration, 21.29 months (CI 15.9; 26.68). At baseline, all patients displayed a moderate cutaneous disease with a mean PASI of 15.2 (CI 11.7-18.6) and high disease activity, characterized by mean DAPSA of 26.84 (CI 22.49-31.19). An inflammatory low back pain was reported by five patients (20%) with a mean BASDAI 5.1 (CI 4,38-5,85) at baseline. The majority of guselkumab-treated patients (n = 18; 75%) reached DAPSA remission or DAPSA low disease activity after six months. Seventeen out of 24 patients completed 12 months of treatment, 11 of them (65%) in low disease activity, six (35%) in remission. All patients with axial disease reported improvement of inflammatory low back pain at week 24 with a mean BASDAI 2.98 (CI 2,18- 3,77). No significant side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Real-life data on a cohort of early PsA patients confirm the efficacy and safety of guselkumab on peripheral and axial manifestations.

Consistent safety profile with up to 5 years of continuous treatment with guselkumab: Pooled analyses from the phase 3 VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Guselkumab effectively treats moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cumulative safety experience of guselkumab using pooled data from the VOYAGE 1 and 2 studies through 5 years. METHODS: Patients were randomized to guselkumab, placebo with crossover to guselkumab at week 16, or adalimumab. The studies were identical through week 24. VOYAGE 1 evaluated continuous guselkumab treatment (adalimumab-crossover-to-guselkumab at week 52), while VOYAGE 2 assessed randomized withdrawal/retreatment (weeks 28-76). Open-label guselkumab treatment was administered starting at week 52 in VOYAGE 1 and week 76 in VOYAGE 2 and continued through week 252. Pooled safety data were adjusted by exposure and analyzed in the guselkumab groups, including placebo-crossover-to-guselkumab (n = 1221) and adalimumab-crossover-to-guselkumab (n = 500), through week 264. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a total of 7166 patient-years (PY). Overall, 1349 of 1721 guselkumab-treated patients (78.4%) continued treatment through week 252. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 149/100 PY and 5.01/100 PY, respectively. Rates of adverse events of interest were low: serious infections (0.85/100 PY), nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.34/100 PY), malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.45/100 PY), and major adverse cardiovascular events (0.29/100 PY). Year-to-year variability was evident, but no increasing trend was observed. LIMITATIONS: No direct treatment comparisons were possible after week 52. CONCLUSION: The safety profile remained consistent and favorable during 5 years of continuous guselkumab treatment of psoriasis.

Guselkumab effectiveness, and posology in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective bicentric experience.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, and recalcitrant skin disease of the terminal hair follicle. Therapeutic alternatives in HS are limited nowadays. Adalimumab, is the only approved biological treatment for patients with moderate to severe HS, and some patients do not reach an optimal response, or experience a progressive response loss, needing therapeutic alternatives. IL-23 pathway is also involved in HS pathogenesis, so its blockade could contribute to reach disease control. Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of extracellular IL-23, currently approved for psoriasis in adults, and recently some authors have reported its effectiveness in patients with moderate to severe HS refractory to other systemic treatments, becoming a hope for some patients. However adequate dosing and intervals have not been determined yet, so in most published series, doses approved for psoriasis are commonly used. On this topic a retrospective bicentric study including HS patients treated with guselkumab in the dermatologic departments of university hospitals Puerta de Hierro of Majadahonda (Madrid, Spain) and Doctor Peset of Valencia (Valencia, Spain) was conducted. We reported effectiveness, dosage and frequency of administration in the cohort, in order to establish the most effective dosage regimen and to clarify the potential role of guselkumab for this disease.