Sex differences in change of direction deficit and asymmetries in footballers with cerebral palsy.

The aims of this study were (1) to describe and examine differences in change of direction (COD) performance and the magnitude of asymmetries in para-footballers with cerebral palsy (CP) and controls and (2) to evaluate the association between COD outcomes and linear sprint performance. Twenty-eight international para-footballers with CP and thirty-nine non-impaired football players (control group) participated in this study. All participants completed a 10-m sprint and two attempts of the 505 COD test with the dominant and non-dominant leg. The COD deficit was calculated using the difference between the 505 test and the 10-m sprint time, while the asymmetry index was determined by comparing each leg's completion time and COD deficit. Players across groups showed interlimb asymmetries between the dominant and non-dominant legs in COD outcomes and deficit (p < 0.05, dg = -0.40 to -1.46), although these asymmetries imbalance were not significantly different between the sexes with and without impairment. Males with CP exhibited a faster directional COD speed and a shorter COD deficit than their female counterparts (p < 0.01, dg = -1.68 to -2.53). Similarly, the control group had faster scores than the CP groups of the same sex (p < 0.05, dg = 0.53 to 3.78). Lastly, the female CP group and male control groups showed a significant association between sprint and the COD deficit in the dominant leg (p < 0.05, r = -0.58 to 0.65). Therefore, the use of directional dominance, the COD deficit, and asymmetry outcomes could be helpful for classification purposes to assess the impact of the impairment on sport-specific activity testing according to sex.

Impact of Starting Knee Flexion Angle on Muscle Activity and Performance during Plyometrics without Jumping.

Most of the existing research has focused on jump plyometrics, where landing reaction forces must be dissipated among lower limb articulations. In contrast, the investigation of resisted plyometrics without jumping, devoid of such landing forces, remains relatively limited. This study aimed to (i) investigate the impact of resisted plyometrics without jumping at two knee flexion angles (60 and 90 degrees) on vastus muscle activity relative to limb dominance and (ii) assess strength, power, and work during the concentric-eccentric phases of these exercises. Thirty-one healthy participants underwent quantification of lower limb muscle amplitude, strength, power, and work during resisted plyometrics without jumping from both 60° and 90° knee flexion positions. After anthropometric evaluations, participants used a dynamometer with a load equal to 80% of body weight while wireless surface electromyography electrodes recorded data. Statistical analyses utilized paired t-tests or nonparametric equivalents and set significance at p ≤ 0.05. Results showed significantly higher muscle activity in the vastus medialis (VM) (dominant: 47.4%, p = 0.0008, rs = 0.90; nondominant: 54.8%, p = 0.047, rs = 0.88) and vastus lateralis (VL) (dominant: 46.9%, p = 0.0004, rs = 0.86; nondominant: 48.1%, p = 0.021, rs = 0.67) muscles when exercises started at 90° knee flexion, regardless of limb dominance. Substantial intermuscle differences occurred at both 60° (50.4%, p = 0.003, rs = 0.56) and 90° (54.8%, p = 0.005, rs = 0.62) knee flexion, favoring VM in the nondominant leg. Concentric and eccentric strength, power, and work metrics significantly increased when initiating exercises from a 90° position. In conclusion, commencing resisted plyometrics without jumping at a 90° knee flexion position increases VM and VL muscle activity, regardless of limb dominance. Furthermore, it enhances strength, power, and work, emphasizing the importance of knee flexion position customization for optimizing muscle engagement and functional performance.

Exploring the Differences Between Dominant and Nondominant Feet and Hands Bone Mineral Density.

The assessment of regional bone mineral density (BMD) has proved to be useful for illustrating the impact of focal bone demineralization diseases on bone mass. In these scenario, a common practice is to compare the affected limb with the contralateral limb. However, there are no studies comparing BMD differences between dominant vs nondominant limbs at these sites. In addition, most studies have assessed BMD in specific ROIs (regions of interests) instead of in the whole limb. The purpose of our study was to compare the BMD of dominant vs nondominant hands and feet in healthy individuals, using both the whole limb software and specific ROIs. We performed a cross-sectional analysis on untrained women and men over 18 years of age who volunteered to participate. BMD (g/cm2), bone area (cm2) and BMC (bone mineral content) (g) were measured by Lunar Prodigy DXA (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA), using 2 different approaches: whole limb/region software and specific ROIs. A total of 42 subjects (11 men and 31 women) were included. Mean age was 44.19 ± 10.49 years. BMD was greater in the dominant in comparison with the nondominant hand. The difference was 0.014 (95% CI, 0.009-0.018) for the whole hand BMD, 0.023 (95% CI, 0.003-0.044) for ROI 1, and 0.016 (95% CI, 0.003-0.029) for ROI 2. No significant differences were found between dominant and nondominant foot BMD, using the whole limb software and specific ROIs. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the differences in BMD, bone area and BMC in terms of limb dominance, supporting the usefulness of DXA as an accurate and objective complementary diagnostic or follow-up tool in focal bone demineralization diseases.

Six methods for classifying lower-limb dominance are not associated with asymmetries during a change of direction task.

Quantifying asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant limbs is a common research objective aimed at identifying systematic differences between limbs and establishing normative ranges of asymmetry. Multiple methods for classifying limb dominance exist, and it is unclear how different methods relate to directional asymmetries during change of direction (CoD). This study aimed to determine whether different methods of classifying limb dominance, including a novel CoD task-specific method, identified significant inter-limb asymmetries during a 90° CoD task. Fifty participants completed a testing battery consisting of jumping, hopping, CoD, and isokinetic dynamometry. Limb dominance was classified for each participant according to preferred kicking limb, vertical jump height, horizontal hop distance, initial force plate contact during landing, max isokinetic knee extensor strength, and turning velocity. Asymmetries in whole-body and joint-level mechanics were defined using each method. No method for classifying limb dominance was associated with consistent inter-limb biomechanical asymmetries during CoD, and no method was related to any other method. The magnitude of asymmetry relative to the magnitude of absolute asymmetry present within the cohort suggests that using these tasks to classify the dominant limb in this CoD is akin to assigning dominance to a randomly selected limb. Previous observations of group symmetry during CoD may be statistical artifacts as opposed to a true indication of normative movement. Until an appropriate means of classifying limbs during CoD is established, quantifying normative asymmetry based on limb dominance should be done with caution.

The reaction times and symmetry indices in the bilateral trunk and limb muscles in control subjects and subjects with low back pain that persisted two months or longer.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the reaction times and symmetry index (SI) of the bilateral trunk and limb muscles between control subjects and subjects with low back pain (LBP) that persisted for two months or longer. METHODS: Fifty-seven right limb dominant subjects (31 healthy control subjects and 26 subjects with LBP) participated in this study. The subjects were exposed to a slip perturbation (0.24 m/sec velocity for 1.20 cm), which caused them to move forward for 0.10 s in standing while holding a tray. The electromyography (EMG) electrodes were placed on the bilateral erector spinae (ES), rectus abdominis (RA), rectus femoris, hamstring, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, biceps brachii (BB), and triceps brachii muscles. The reaction times were analyzed, and the SI was used to compare the bilateral trunk and limb muscles for the degree of asymmetry between groups. RESULTS: The ES reaction time was significantly delayed in the control group (0.33 ± 0.22 vs. 0.22 ± 0.17; t = 2.25, p = 0.03). The SI of reaction times was significantly different on the RA (t = -2.28, p = 0.03), ES (t = -2.36, p = 0.04), and BB (t = -2.15, p = 0.04) muscles between groups. CONCLUSION: The delayed non-dominant ES reaction time might indicate a freedom of pain recurrence in the control group. Although the asymmetry increased on the RA and BB muscles in the LBP group, it decreased on the ES muscle. The asymmetries on the trunk and BB muscles were evident in the LBP group. The asymmetrical reactions in the arm-trunk muscles need to be considered for rehabilitation strategies.

The dominant leg is more likely to get injured in soccer players: systematic review and meta-analysis.

In soccer (football), dominant limb kicking produces higher ball velocity and is used with greater frequency than the non-dominant limb. It is unclear whether limb dominance has an effect on injury incidence. The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to examine the relationship between limb dominance and soccer injuries. Studies were identified from four online databases according to PRISMA guidelines to identify studies of soccer players that reported lower extremity injuries by limb dominance. Relevant studies were assessed for inclusion and retained. Data from retained studies underwent meta-analyses to determine relative risk of dominant versus non-dominant limb injuries using random-effects models. Seventy-four studies were included, with 36 of them eligible for meta-analysis. For prospective lower extremity injury studies, soccer players demonstrated a 1.6 times greater risk of injury to the dominant limb (95% CI [1.3-1.8]). Grouped by injury location, hamstring (RR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.4]) and hip/groin (RR 1.9 [95% CI 1.3-2.7]) injuries were more likely to occur to the dominant limb. Greater risk of injury was present in the dominant limb across playing levels (amateurs RR 2.6 [95% CI 2.1-3.2]; youths RR 1.5 [95% CI 1.26-1.67]; professionals RR 1.3 [95% CI 1.14-1.46]). Both males (RR 1.5 [95% CI 1.33-1.68)] and females (RR 1.5 [95% CI 1.14-1.89]) were more likely to sustain injuries to the dominant limb. Future studies investigating soccer injury should adjust for this confounding factor by using consistent methods for assigning limb dominance and tracking use of the dominant versus non-dominant limb.

Comparing the magnitude and direction of asymmetry during the squat, countermovement and drop jump tests in elite youth female soccer players.

The aims of the present study were to provide an in-depth comparison of inter-limb asymmetry and determine how consistently asymmetry favours the same limb during different vertical jump tests. Eighteen elite female under-17 soccer players conducted unilateral squat jumps (SJ), countermovement jumps (CMJ) and drop jumps (DJ) on a portable force platform, with jump height, peak force, concentric impulse and peak power as common metrics across tests. For the magnitude of asymmetry, concentric impulse was significantly greater during the SJ test compared to CMJ (p = 0.019) and DJ (p = 0.003). No other significant differences in magnitude were present. For the direction of asymmetry, Kappa coefficients revealed fair to substantial levels of agreement between the SJ and CMJ (Kappa = 0.35 to 0.61) tests, but only slight to fair levels of agreement between the SJ and DJ (Kappa = -0.26 to 0.18) and CMJ and DJ (Kappa = -0.13 to 0.26) tests. These results highlight that the mean asymmetry value may be a poor indicator of true variability of between-limb differences in healthy athletes. The direction of asymmetry may provide a useful monitoring tool for practitioners in healthy athletes, when no obvious between-limb deficit exists.

Feedforward compensation for novel dynamics depends on force field orientation but is similar for the left and right arms.

There are well-documented differences in the way that people typically perform identical motor tasks with their dominant and the nondominant arms. According to Yadav and Sainburg's (Neuroscience 196: 153-167, 2011) hybrid-control model, this is because the two arms rely to different degrees on impedance control versus predictive control processes. Here, we assessed whether differences in limb control mechanisms influence the rate of feedforward compensation to a novel dynamic environment. Seventy-five healthy, right-handed participants, divided into four subsamples depending on the arm (left, right) and direction of the force field (ipsilateral, contralateral), reached to central targets in velocity-dependent curl force fields. We assessed the rate at which participants developed predictive compensation for the force field using intermittent error-clamp trials and assessed both kinematic errors and initial aiming angles in the field trials. Participants who were exposed to fields that pushed the limb toward ipsilateral space reduced kinematic errors more slowly, built up less predictive field compensation, and relied more on strategic reaiming than those exposed to contralateral fields. However, there were no significant differences in predictive field compensation or kinematic errors between limbs, suggesting that participants using either the left or the right arm could adapt equally well to novel dynamics. It therefore appears that the distinct preferences in control mechanisms typically observed for the dominant and nondominant arms reflect a default mode that is based on habitual functional requirements rather than an absolute limit in capacity to access the controller specialized for the opposite limb.

Differences in plantarflexor function during a stretch-shortening cycle task due to limb preference.

Most healthy humans move symmetrically at gross limb level but large kinetic and kinematic asymmetries have been observed at joint level during locomotion. The aim of this study was to assess muscle function asymmetries in healthy, active adults using an adapted force sledge apparatus which isolates the plantarflexors during a stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) task. Peak force, rate of force development and SSC function of preferred and non-preferred limbs were assessed in 21 healthy, active individuals using the adapted sledge and three-dimensional motion analysis. Between-limb differences and relationships were determined using paired t-tests/Wilcoxon Signed-rank test, Cohen's dz, absolute symmetry index and Pearson's r/Spearman's rho. Significant differences with moderate effect size (ES) were observed in peak force (ES: 0.66), rate of peak force development (ES: 0.78), rate of force development in the first 50 ms (ES: 0.76), flight time (ES: 0.64) and SSC function (0.68), with no difference in contact time or duration of eccentric loading. A small ES (0.56) was observed in rate of force development in the first 30 ms. The upper range of asymmetry observed (up to 44.6%) was larger than previously reported for healthy individuals, indicating compensations occur at proximal joints during locomotion to ensure symmetrical movement.

Correlations between plantar pressure and postural balance in healthy subjects and their comparison according to gender and limb dominance: A cross-sectional descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity injuries rank among the most common injuries affecting young population, and numerous factors affect the outcomes of plantar pressure and balance assessment. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a correlation exist between plantar pressure and postural balance in healthy subjects and are there any difference in the results based on gender and limb dominance? METHODS: This study involved thirty healthy recreationally active young adults (15 females, 15 males). Plantar pressures were analyzed using the MatScan Pressure Mat System, and postural balance was evaluated using Biodex Balance System. All assessments conducted under both static and dynamic conditions. Correlations were tested by Spearman Correlation Coefficient, and comparative tests were performed for gender and limb dominance. RESULTS: Correlations were observed between plantar pressure parameters and balance scores, particularly in the dynamic conditions (p < 0.05). Gender-based differences were noted in plantar pressure parameters (p < 0.05), with females demonstrating improved balance stability scores. No significant differences were found based on limb dominance in plantar pressure and postural balance data (p > 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides valuable detailed insights into the existing literature concerning plantar pressure and postural balance assessments within the healthy population. A strong correlation was observed between plantar pressure and postural balance, and the comparisons of these assessments were affected by gender but not by limb dominance. These results could lead the way for better rehabilitation approaches by considering the correlations and differences across diverse populations.

Supraspinatus Muscle and Tendon Characteristics 1 Year After Surgical Rotator Cuff Repair Compared With Contralateral Shoulder: Data From the CUT-N-MOVE Trial.

BACKGROUND: It is necessary to better understand the structural characteristics of the supraspinatus tendon and associated muscle after rotator cuff repair and in the event of retear. PURPOSE: To study structural differences between the repaired and contralateral shoulders 1 year after rotator cuff repair in patients who received either progressive exercise therapy (PR) or usual care (UC) in a randomized controlled trial and to investigate whether there was interaction with tendon retear and limb dominance. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients with surgically repaired traumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus tendon were included. After surgery, they were randomized to PR or UC (active from postoperative week 2 or 6, respectively). The subacromial structures (acromiohumeral distance, supraspinatus tendon thickness, and vascularity) and the supraspinatus muscle thickness were examined with ultrasound at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were included. The characteristics of the 2 intervention groups (PR and UC) were comparable, including the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index score and number of retears. The authors found significantly thinner supraspinatus tendon (PR, P < .001; UC, P = .003) and reduced acromiohumeral distance (PR, P = .023; UC, P = .025) in the repaired versus the contralateral shoulders in both intervention groups. For neovascularization, there was no interlimb difference in either of the groups or between groups (PR vs UC). In patients with intact tendons, there was no interlimb difference in the muscle thickness, but in patients with tendon retear the muscle was significantly thinner on the repaired side (P = .024 and P < .001, respectively). When the dominant supraspinatus tendon was repaired (both groups), it was significantly thinner than the nondominant healthy tendon, but this difference was not seen when the nondominant supraspinatus tendon was repaired (P = .006). CONCLUSION: One year after rotator cuff surgery, the repaired supraspinatus tendon was significantly thinner and the corresponding acromiohumeral distance was reduced. In patients with retear, the supraspinatus muscle was significantly thinner on the repaired side and early initiation of tendon-loading exercises did not affect these findings. REGISTRATION: NCT02969135 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Limb dominance does not have a meaningful impact on arterial occlusion pressure.

INTRODUCTION: Limb dominancy has been suggested, by some, to influence arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). However, we hypothesized that the differences in AOP between the dominant and nondominant legs were more likely explained by differences in cuff position. AIMS: To determine the impact of limb dominance, composition, and cuff position on AOP in the context of error associated with measuring AOP twice on the same leg. METHODS: Fifty-eight adults (30 males) volunteered to have AOP measured on their dominant legs with the cuff bladder covering their inner thighs and on their nondominant legs with the bladder covering their inner and outer thighs (in random order). Thigh circumference and muscle and fat thicknesses were also measured on each leg. RESULTS: We found evidence for differences in AOP between legs [median δ of -0.222, 95% credible interval: (-0.429, -0.016)] when the cuff position was matched. The mean difference was -2.8 mmHg, and the 95% limit of agreement in a Bland-Altman plot was -24.8 to 19.0 mmHg. When plotting this alongside an error range (i.e., 95% limits of agreement) of taking the same measurement twice from our previous study (Spitz et al., 2020), 52 out of 58 measurements were within the error range. This difference was not due to the cuff position. Additionally, there was no evidence that thigh circumference or composition (muscle/fat thickness) moderated any difference between limbs. CONCLUSION: The difference in AOP between limbs is small and is mostly indistinguishable from the difference observed from taking the measurement twice on the same limb.

A novel method to quantify individual limb contributions to standing postural control.

BACKGROUND: Understanding individual limb contributions to standing postural control is valuable when evaluating populations with asymmetric function (e.g., stroke, amputations). We propose a method of quantifying three contributions to controlling the net anteroposterior center of pressure (CoP) during quiet standing: CoP moving under left and right limbs and weight shifting between the two limbs. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can these contributions to standing postural control be quantified from CoP trajectories in neurotypical adults? METHODS: Instantaneous contributions can be negative or larger than one, and integrated contributions sum to equal one. Proof-of-concept demonstrations validated these calculated contributions by restricting CoP motion under one or both feet. We evaluated these contributions in 30 neurotypical young adults who completed two (eyes opened; eyes closed) 30-s trials of bipedal standing. We evaluated the relationships between limb contributions, self-reported limb dominance, and between-limb weight distributions. RESULTS: All participants self-reported as right-limb dominant; however, a range of mean limb contributions were observed with eyes opened (Left: mean [range] = 0.52 [0.37-0.63]; Right: 0.48 [0.31-0.63]) and with eyes closed (Left: 0.51 [0.39-0.63]; Right: 0.49 [0.37-0.61]). Weight-shift contributions were small with eyes opened (0.00 [-0.01 to 0.01]) and eyes closed (0.00 [-0.01 to 0.02]). We did not identify any between-limb differences in contributions when grouped by self-reported limb dominance (p > 0.10, d < 0.31). Contributions did not significantly correlate with Waterloo Footedness scores (-0.22 < r < 0.21, p > 0.25) or between-limb weight distributions (0 < r < 0.24, p > 0.20). SIGNIFICANCE: Across neurotypical participants, we observed a notable range of limb contributions not related to self-reported limb dominance or between-limb weight distributions. With this tool, we can characterize differences in the amount of CoP motion and the underlying control strategies. Changes in limb contribution can be measured longitudinally (i.e., across rehabilitation programs, disease progression, aging) representative of limb function, which may be particularly useful in populations with asymmetric function.

Load Carriage Modes and Limb Crossing Patterns Altered Gait during Obstacle Negotiation.

Personal and environmental factors both increase the likelihood of falling injuries while negotiating obstacles. Eighteen male participants (seven older, eleven young) were recruited to walk over an obstacle with and without loads on their hands to study the effects of age, load carriage modes, and limb crossing patterns on gait during obstacle negotiation. Participants initiated tasks with either their dominant or non-dominant leg. Step length (SL), toe clearance (TC), step velocity (V), and step width (SW) were extracted from four critical steps. Results showed that during obstacle negotiation (1) older adults had more TC than younger adults, (2) hand loads affected SL and TC, (3) gait parameters are dissimilar between the dominant limb and non-dominant limb.

Effects of movement direction and limb dominance on ankle muscular force in sidestep cutting.

Sidestep cutting is a critical movement in sports. However, biomechanical research on sidestep cutting has not hitherto reached a consensus. In order to investigate the effects of limb dominance and movement direction on ankle and subtalar joints during sidestep cutting, twelve physically active male participants were recruited in the present study. Trajectory and ground reaction force data were collected by the motion capture system and force platform. Kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces information were obtained by running OpenSim. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed with movement direction and limb dominance as independent variables. We found that movement direction had a significant effect on ankle dorsiflexion angle. In contrast, the factor of limb dominance had no effect on ankle and subtalar joints angles. For ankle joint moment, the plantarflexion moment was greater by performing a 45° sidestep cutting or using the dominant limb, while the subtalar joint moment was not affected by these two variables. In terms of muscle forces, the soleus of the dominant limb generated greater plantarflexion muscle force on the sagittal plane, while the non-dominant limb tended to contract more strongly (peroneus longus and peroneus brevis) on the frontal plane to stabilize the subtalar joint. Meanwhile, a smaller sidestep cutting angle made participants generate greater plantarflexion muscle forces (soleus and gastrocnemius). In conclusion, our findings indicated that participants should take limb dominance and movement direction into consideration for enhancing athletic performance and reducing the risk of injury during sidestep cutting.

Limb preference impacts single-leg forward hop limb symmetry index values following ACL reconstruction.

Following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction limb dominance for performing tasks is not considered when making rehabilitation progression decisions. The purpose of this study was to determine if strength and functional outcomes differ between individuals who injured their preferred or nonpreferred jumping limb and to determine if these same outcomes differ between individuals who injured their preferred or nonpreferred limb used to kick a ball. A secondary purpose was to determine the association of quadriceps strength and single-leg forward hop performance with patient self-reported function. Forty individuals with ACL reconstruction (age = 20.0 ± 4.6 years, height = 174.2 ± 12.7 cm, mass = 71.2 ± 12.7 kg, time since surgery = 5.3 ± 0.8 months) were included in the study. Primary outcome measures included, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) scores, quadriceps limb symmetry index (LSI) values, and single-leg forward hop LSI values. Limb preference was defined two ways, kicking a ball and performing a unilateral jump. There were no significant differences between groups based on injury to the preferred limb to kick a ball for any of the outcome variables. Individuals who injured their nonpreferred jumping limb demonstrated significantly (p = 0.05, d = 0.77) lower single-leg forward hop LSI values (81.1% ± 19.5%) compared to individuals who injured their preferred jumping limb (94.1% ± 12.6%), but demonstrated no differences in IKDC scores or quadriceps LSI values. Quadriceps LSI and single-leg forward hop LSI explained 73% of the variance in IKDC scores, but quadriceps LSI had the strongest association (r = 0.790). These findings suggests that limb preference influences single forward hop LSI values and should be considered following ACL reconstruction.

How limb dominance influences limb symmetry in ACL patients: effects on functional performance.

BACKGROUND: Timing for return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is paramount for the avoidance of a secondary injury. A common criterion in RTS decision-making is the limb symmetry index (LSI) which quantifies (a)symmetries between the affected and unaffected limb. Limb dominance is one of many factors that may contribute to the recovery of the LSI after ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to examine how limb dominance affects the LSI of functional performance tasks nine months following ACL reconstruction (time of RTS). METHODS: At time of return to sport, n = 100 patients (n = 48 injured the dominant limb, n = 52 injured the non-dominant limb, n = 34 female, n = 66 male) with ACL reconstruction surgery performed isokinetic strength measurements of the knee extensors and flexors, and drop jumps (DJ), single leg hop for distance (SHD) and 6 m timed hop (6MTH) testings. RESULTS: The findings indicated that injury of the dominant leg led to significantly higher LSI values in maximal isokinetic knee extensor strength (p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed for maximal isokinetic knee flexor strength, DJ, SHD or 6MTH performance. Stratifying for sex revealed no significant differences. Simple regression analyses demonstrated that LSI in maximal knee extensor strength significantly predicted LSIs in DJ and SHD while explaining 14% and 18% of the respective variance. CONCLUSIONS: Given that limb dominance affects the LSI of muscle strength suggests that a differentiated interpretation of the LSI with respect to limb dominance should be considered for a safe return to sport. Monoarticular knee extensor strength and multiarticular hop test performance are interrelated and thus can show asymmetries which are not maladaptive but established during years of habituation or training.

Cognitive dual-task alters Local Dynamic Stability of lower extremity during common movements.

A dual-task paradigm is most commonly used in the field of biomechanics to understand the effect of multi-tasking or cognitive load on motor performance. The Local Dynamic Stability (LDS) is most commonly used to quantify motor performance, but there are still several unknown effects of this metric with varied task conditions and cognitive demands. Therefore, this study used motion capture to collect biomechanical data from 28 healthy collegiate participants during a walk and jog task both with and without a semantic fluency task to investigate the effects of task speed, limb dominance, and semantic fluency on LDS. This study showed that the change in ankle plantarflexion LDS during a jog was dependent on self-selected speed. Participants with slower jogging speeds increased ankle plantarflexion LDS during a dual-task, while individuals with faster jogging speeds decreased ankle plantarflexion LDS during a dual-task. This study also found that subjects compensate during gait by both increasing and decreasing LDS in different degrees of freedom of the lower extremity. This study did not find evidence of limb dominance effecting the change in LDS during a dual-task while walking or jogging. These findings reveal where healthy adults compensate for simple movement patterns while multitasking. Future work should further explore the role and relationship between trunk movement and lower extremity compensation, and could help give further context to how the LDS can be interpreted by researchers and clinicians alike.

Shape Directional Asymmetry in Hindlimb Pairs among Calves (Bos Taurus).

The aim of this study was to determine paired asymmetries (right-left) in the autopods of bovine hindlimbs using geometric morphometry (GM). A total of 28 hindlimb right-left matched autopods belonging to healthy Brown Pyrenean calves were assessed. Dorsoplantar radiographs were obtained for each autopod. The bone shape was compared on right and left pairs by means of GM techniques, using a set of 15 landmarks. The results suggest that right and left distal limbs are, despite a perceived resemblance of symmetry, differently directionally developed in shape, with right hindlimbs tending to supinate (rotate outwards) and left hindlimbs tending to pronate (rotate inwards). This unevenness is probably related to the mediolateral forces' contribution of each limb in carrying out the tasks of propulsion and control during walking, and/or a consequence of a laterality associated with a lateralized grazing posture. Our findings prompt a new reassessment of the function of each bovine hindlimb during standing and locomotion.

Effects of Limb Dominance on Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Gait at 12 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background: Patellofemoral joint complications have commonly been reported in long-term outcome studies for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the biomechanics in the early phases of rehabilitation that could be associated with the development of these abnormalities is unclear. Limb dominance may affect the biomechanics of the knee joint in patients after ACLR. Purpose: To compare knee joint loading between surgical and nonsurgical limbs at 12 weeks postoperatively in patients who underwent ACLR on either their dominant limb (ACL-D) or nondominant limb (ACL-ND). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Included were 54 patients (32 ACL-D and 22 ACL-ND). Peak and integrated patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), peak patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), and peak knee extension moment (KEM) were assessed during the stance phase of gait while participants walked on a 10-m runway at a self-selected speed. Results: The surgical limb of the ACL-D group had significantly decreased peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P < .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. The surgical limb of the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly increased peak PFJS (P = .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P = .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. For the surgical limb, the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly greater peak PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001) , (PFJRF [P<.001]) and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-D group. For the nonsurgical limb, the ACL-D group demonstrated greater peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P = .003), and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-ND group. Conclusion: Significantly larger knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-ND group and smaller knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-D group were observed compared to the contralateral nonsurgical limb, which suggests that limb dominance has a key role in loading at the knee joint during gait. Clinical Relevance: Altered knee joint loading during gait at 12 weeks after ACLR may lead to the development of patellofemoral joint abnormalities.