RESUMEN
Considering patient room shortages and prevalence of other communicable diseases, reassessing the isolation of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is imperative. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the secondary CDI transmission rate in a hospital in South Korea, where patients with CDI were not isolated. Using data from a real-time locating system and electronic medical records, we investigated patients who had both direct and indirect contact with CDI index patients. The primary outcome was secondary CDI transmission, identified by whole-genome sequencing. Among 909 direct and 2,711 indirect contact cases, 2 instances of secondary transmission were observed (2 [0.05%] of 3,620 cases), 1 transmission via direct contact and 1 via environmental sources. A low level of direct contact (113 minutes) was required for secondary CDI transmission. Our findings support the adoption of exhaustive standard preventive measures, including environmental decontamination, rather than contact isolation of CDI patients in nonoutbreak settings.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Humanos , Infecciones por Clostridium/transmisión , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Trazado de ContactoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Our objective was to describe circumstances of SARS-CoV-2 household transmission and to identify factors associated with a lower risk of transmission in a nationwide case-control study in France. METHODS: In a descriptive analysis, we analysed cases reporting transmission from someone in the household (source case). Index cases could invite a non-infected household member to participate as a related control. In such situations, we compared the exposures of the index case and related control to the source case by conditional logistic regression matched for household, restricted to households in which the source case was a child, and the index case and related control were the infected child's parents. RESULTS: From October 27, 2020 to May 16, 2022, we included 104 373 cases for the descriptive analysis with a documented infection from another household member. The source case was mostly the index case's child (46.9%) or partner (45.7%). In total, 1026 index cases invited a related control to participate in the study. In the case-control analysis, we included 611 parental pairs of cases and controls exposed to the same infected child. COVID-19 vaccination with 3 + doses versus no vaccination (OR 0.1, 95%CI: 0.04-0.4), isolation from the source case (OR 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4-0.97) and the ventilation of indoor areas (OR 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4-0.9) were associated with lower risk of infection. CONCLUSION: Household transmission was common during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in France. Mitigation strategies, including isolation and ventilation, decreased the risk of secondary transmission within the household. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04607941.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , PadresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Strict isolation of COVID-19 patients to prevent cross infection may inadvertently cause serious adverse outcomes including psychological harm, limitations to care, increased incidence of delirium, deconditioning and reduced quality of life. Previous research exploring the staff perspective of the effect of isolation on patients is limited. The aim of this study is to understand staff perceptions and interpretations of their experiences of the care and treatment of isolated patients and the impact of isolation on patients, families, and staff. METHOD: This qualitative, exploratory study is set in a major metropolitan, quaternary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data was collected in focus groups with clinical and non-clinical staff and analysed using content analysis. The hospital ethics committee granted approval. Each participant gave informed verbal consent. RESULTS: Participants included 58 nursing, medical, allied health, and non-clinical staff. Six main themes were identified: 1) Communication challenges during COVID-19; 2) Impact of isolation on family; 3) Challenges to patients' health and safety; 4) Impact on staff; 5) Challenging standards of care; 6) Contextual influences: policy, decision-makers and the environment. CONCLUSION: Isolating patients and restricting visitors resulted in good pandemic management, but staff perceived it came at considerable cost to staff and consumers. Innovative communication technology may facilitate improved connection between all parties. Mental health support is needed for patients, families, and staff. Further research using a co-design model with input from patients, families and staff is recommended to determine appropriate interventions to improve care. Preventing the spread of infection is essential for good pandemic management, but the cost to consumers and staff must be mitigated. Preparation for future pandemics must consider workforce preparedness, adapted models of care and workflow.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Humanos , Pandemias , Calidad de Vida , Aislamiento de PacientesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rapid electrocardiography diagnosis within 10 minutes of presentation is critical for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients in the emergency department (ED). However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted the emergency care system. Screening for COVID-19 symptoms and implementing isolation policies in EDs may delay the door-to-electrocardiography (DTE) time. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1,458 AMI patients who presented to a single ED in South Korea from January 2019 to December 2021. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and ED isolation policies on DTE time and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We found that the mean DTE time increased significantly from 5.5 to 11.9 minutes (P < 0.01) in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and 22.3 to 26.7 minutes (P < 0.01) in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Isolated patients had a longer mean DTE time compared to non-isolated patients in both STEMI (9.2 vs. 24.4 minutes) and NSTEMI (22.4 vs. 61.7 minutes) groups (P < 0.01). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the effect of COVID-19 duration on DTE ≥ 10 minutes was 1.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-2.47), and the aOR for isolation status was 5.62 (95% CI, 3.54-8.93) in all patients. We did not find a significant association between in-hospital mortality and the duration of COVID-19 (aOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.52-1.56) or isolation status (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.71-3.68). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that ED screening or isolation policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to delays in DTE time. Timely evaluation and treatment of emergency patients during pandemics are essential to prevent potential delays that may impact their clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Factores de Tiempo , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , ElectrocardiografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Delirium is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but environmental and behavioral factors may decrease the risk of developing delirium and thus must be considered. To investigate trends in delirium prevalence and examine associations of visitor restrictions with delirium diagnoses among all patients hospitalized during and prior to the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective epidemiological assessment. METHODS: The medical records of all patients (n = 33,141) hospitalized within a three-hospital academic medical center system in a large Midwestern metropolitan area from March 20, 2019, through March 19, 2021, were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of delirium during COVID-19 was 11.26% (confidence interval [CI]: 10.79%, 11.73%) compared to 9.28% (CI: 8.82%, 9.73%) before COVID-19. From our adjusted logistic regression analyses, we observed that the odds of delirium among non-isolated patients were significantly higher during COVID-19 visitor restrictions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.354; 95% CI: 1.233, 1.488; P < 0.0001) than before. The odds of delirium among isolated patients were not significantly higher during COVID-19 visitor restrictions (aOR: 1.145; 95% CI: 0.974, 1.346; P = 0.1006) than before. CONCLUSIONS: Medically isolated patients remained at high risk of developing delirium both prior to and during COVID-19 era visitor restrictions. However, non-medically isolated patients had a significantly increased risk of delirium during the social isolation of visitor restrictions compared to prior to visitor restrictions.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Delirio , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/etiologíaRESUMEN
Hospital isolation is common for people during infectious disease outbreaks. Anxiety, stress, depression and other psychosocial outcomes have been reported due to these measures. However, there is scarce evidence about the experience of being isolated and about best practices for empathic clinical care in these circumstances. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of isolation on patients hospitalized during an infectious disease outbreak. A systematic review and meta-ethnography was carried out. A search strategy was applied to the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases on April 14, 2021 and again May 2, 2022. Data synthesis was conducted using Noblit and Hare's method of qualitative thematic synthesis. Twenty reports were included in this review: 16 qualitative, two mixed-methods (only the qualitative part was analyzed), plus 2 personal view pieces. They described the experiences of a total of 337 people hospitalized and isolated with an infectious disease. Following analysis and coding of data, four themes emerged: 1) Feelings triggered by isolation; 2) Coping strategies; 3) Connection/disconnection; 4) Factors that influence the experience of isolation. Despite a sensitive search strategy, limited studies represent patient experiences using qualitative methods. The experience of isolation among patients hospitalized during an outbreak is characterized by fear, perceived stigma, and a sense of disconnection from others and the outside world due to a lack of information. Fostering a person-centered care model could help hospitalized patients develop adaptive mechanisms that minimize the impact of isolation.
RESUMEN
An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with no definitive source and potential exposure to variants of concern was declared at a childcare center in Ontario, Canada, in March 2021. We developed a robust outbreak management approach to detect, contain, and interrupt this outbreak and limit propagation among children.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Niño , Cuidado del Niño , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
We evaluated daily rapid antigen test (RAT) data from 323 COVID-19-positive university students in Connecticut, USA, during an Omicron-dominant period. Day 5 positivity was 47% for twice-weekly screeners and 26%-28% for less-frequent screeners, approximately halving each subsequent day. Testing negative >10 days before diagnosis (event time ratio (ETR) 0.85 [95% CI 0.75-0.96]) and prior infection >90 days (ETR 0.50 [95% CI 0.33-0.76]) were significantly associated with shorter RAT positivity duration. Symptoms before or at diagnosis (ETR 1.13 [95% CI 1.02-1.25]) and receipt of 3 vaccine doses (ETR 1.20 [95% CI 1.04-1.39]) were significantly associated with prolonged positivity. Exit RATs enabled 53%-74% of students to leave isolation early when they began isolation at the time of the first positive test, but 15%-22% remained positive beyond the recommended isolation period. Factors associated with RAT positivity duration should be further explored to determine relationships with infection duration.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Humanos , Universidades , Políticas , EstudiantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient isolation is widely used as a strategy for prevention and control of infection but may have unintended consequences for patients. Early recognition and response to acute deterioration is an essential component of safe, quality patient care and has not been explored for patients in isolation. OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were to (i) describe the timing, frequency and nature of clinical deterioration during hospital admission for patients with isolation precautions for infection control and (ii) compare the characteristics of patients who did and did not deteriorate during their initial period of isolation precautions for infection control. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted across three sites of a large Australian health service. The study sample were adult patients (≥18 years) admitted into isolation precautions within 24 h of admission from 1 July 2019 to 31 December 2019. RESULTS: There were 634 patients who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. One in eight patients experienced at least one episode of clinical deterioration during their time in isolation with most episodes of deterioration occurring within the first 2 days of admission. Timely Medical Emergency Team calls occurred in almost half the episodes of deterioration; however, the same proportion (47.2%) of deterioration episodes resulted in no Medical Emergency Team activation (afferent limb failure). In the 24 h preceding each episode of clinical deterioration (n = 180), 81.6% (n = 147) of episodes were preceded by vital signs fulfilling pre-Medical Emergency Team criteria. Patients who deteriorated during isolation for infection control were older (median age 74.0 vs 71.0 years, P = 0.042); more likely to live in a residential care facility (21.0% vs 7.2%, P = 0.006); had a longer initial period of isolation (4.0 vs 2.9 days, P = < 000.1) and hospital length-of-stay (median 4.9 vs 3.2 days, P = < 0.001) and were more likely to die in hospital (12.3% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients in isolation precautions experienced high Medical Emergency Team afferent limb failure and most fulfilled pre-Medical Emergency Team criteria in the 24 h preceding episodes of deterioration. Timely recognition and response to clinical deterioration continue to be essential in providing safe, quality patient care regardless of the hospital-care environment.
Asunto(s)
Deterioro Clínico , Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Signos Vitales/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The physical isolation of patients colonised or infected with multi-drug resistant organisms is a requirement in hospitals considering the risk of infecting other patients, healthcare workers and visitors. However, how these patients experience isolation in the current environment is not fully understood from the literature. AIMS: To explore and interpret the lived experience of the source isolation in patients infected with MDROs within an Australian setting. DESIGN: Hermeneutic phenomenology was utilised as the philosophical framework. METHODS: Unstructured in-depth face to face interviews were conducted with 20 patients infected with multi-drug resistant organisms who were physically isolated. Data was collected from February-2018 to January-2019 at two large teaching hospitals in the Sydney metropolitan area. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, analysed using thematic analysis by three researchers, and then subsequently interpreted, drawing insights from the relevant phenomenological notions. RESULTS: Three key findings emerged from the study as: Living in a changed space - developed from the participants' struggle to cope with being physically confined to a room that made them feel imprisoned. Living in a changed body - emerged from the participants who described their bodies as 'different' because of bacteria that conventional medicine could not destroy permanently but kept relapsing. Striving to survive - developed from participants who spoke about means of enduring some unfavourable experiences. CONCLUSION: The essence of the lived experience of the phenomenon of source isolation from the perspectives of patients who become infected with MDROs emerged as Being-in-a-changed-world. IMPACT: While source isolation is an important procedure for preventing and controlling transmissible infection; it often results in adverse psychological experiences. An understanding of this finding from the patients' perspectives is essential for nurses and other healthcare workers involved in their care to maintain a balance between infection control isolation and psychological needs.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Australia , Personal de Salud , Hermenéutica , Humanos , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the pandemic, primary care systems prioritised attention to COVID-19 patients; chronically ill patients, such as people with Type 2 Diabetes were obliged to take more responsibility for their own care. We aimed to analyse the experiences of patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus during the stay-at-home order that was in place during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and identify the strategies and resources used in managing their care. METHOD: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study. The participants were ten patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus who experienced strict lockdown during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia, Spain, selected using intentional sampling. We recorded semi-structured interviews with the participants and conducted thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified 14 subthemes, which we then grouped into three overarching themes: 1) anxiety, fear, and vulnerability (anxiety, fear, vulnerability, rethinking life, loneliness, sadness), 2) insufficient diabetes monitoring by the health system (health care received, glycaemic control, view of treatment by health providers) and proactive self-care (changes in daily routine, diet, physical activity, medication, personal protective equipment & social distancing). CONCLUSION: Despite the exceptional nature of the situation and the stress, worry, and changes in their daily lives, many respondents reported that they had successfully modified their lifestyles. Self-care was effective during confinement and was based on a process of adaptation using the resources available, without face-to-face contact with primary care health staff. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These results can help to guide the design and implementation of self-care-focused strategies and also to explore new ways of empowering patients without access to health care personnel.
RESUMEN
AIM: To examine the need for information and communication technology (ICT)-based nursing care in improving patient management during the pandemic. BACKGROUND: Maintaining traditional approaches to nursing in the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic predisposes health care systems to a risk of diminished quality of care. Using ICT (real-time videoconferencing, mobile robots and artificial intelligence) could reduce burnout and infection risks by minimizing face-to-face contact. METHOD: Qualitative descriptive design with content analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 24 participants (14 nurses, six medical/nursing informatics experts and four technology experts) were interviewed. Three main themes were extracted: emerging challenges for nurses due to COVID-19, impact of new technology on patient and nurse experiences and concerns with implementation of technology. CONCLUSION: A significant portion of nurses' work was unrelated to professional nursing, causing burnout. ICT could help reduce nurses' burden by facilitating environmental management and non-contact communication and providing emotional support for patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Establishing an ICT-based nursing care system that considers the physical environment and communication infrastructure of health care institutions, user's digital health literacy and user safety to effectively manage non-nursing care-related activities and undertake tasks that can be delegated may improve the quality of care for quarantined patients and reduce risk of cross-infection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Inteligencia Artificial , COVID-19/epidemiología , Comunicación , Investigación Cualitativa , TecnologíaRESUMEN
During April 2020-August 2020, a preemptive testing strategy combined with accessible isolation and symptom screening among people experiencing homelessness in congregant living settings in San Diego, California, contributed to a low incidence proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (0.9%). Proactively addressing challenges specific to a vulnerable population may prove impactful.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE. To reduce staff exposure to infection and maintain operational efficiency, we have developed a protocol to image patients using portable chest radiography through the glass of an isolation room. This technique is safe and easy to implement. Images are of comparable quality to standard portable radiographs. CONCLUSION. This protocol, used routinely by our department during the COVID-19 pandemic, can be applied to any situation in which the patient is placed in isolation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Aislamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
An outbreak of SARS-CoV2 infection in a Barcelona prison was studied. One hundred and forty-eight inmates and 36 prison staff were evaluated by rt-PCR, and 24.1% (40 prisoners, two health workers and four non-health workers) tested positive. In all, 94.8% of cases were asymptomatic. The inmates were isolated in prison module 4, which was converted into an emergency COVID unit. There were no deaths. Generalised screening and the isolation and evaluation of the people infected were key measures. Symptom-based surveillance must be supplemented by rapid contact-based monitoring in order to avoid asymptomatic spread among prisoners and the community at large.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Control de Infecciones , Prisiones , Salud Pública , Cuarentena , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Portador Sano/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Personal de Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prisioneros , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remote Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities have potential to be severely impacted by COVID-19, with multiple factors predisposing to increased transmission and disease severity. Our modelling aims to inform optimal public health responses. METHODS: An individual-based simulation model represented SARS-CoV2 transmission in communities ranging from 100 to 3500 people, comprised of large, interconnected households. A range of strategies for case finding, quarantining of contacts, testing, and lockdown were examined, following the silent introduction of a case. RESULTS: Multiple secondary infections are likely present by the time the first case is identified. Quarantine of close contacts, defined by extended household membership, can reduce peak infection prevalence from 60 to 70% to around 10%, but subsequent waves may occur when community mixing resumes. Exit testing significantly reduces ongoing transmission. Concurrent lockdown of non-quarantined households for 14 days is highly effective for epidemic control and reduces overall testing requirements; peak prevalence of the initial outbreak can be constrained to less than 5%, and the final community attack rate to less than 10% in modelled scenarios. Lockdown also mitigates the effect of a delay in the initial response. Compliance with lockdown must be at least 80-90%, however, or epidemic control will be lost. CONCLUSIONS: A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak will spread rapidly in remote communities. Prompt case detection with quarantining of extended-household contacts and a 14 day lockdown for all other residents, combined with exit testing for all, is the most effective strategy for rapid containment. Compliance is crucial, underscoring the need for community supported, culturally sensitive responses.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Australia/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , ARN Viral , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perception of self-isolation at home in patients with cancer during the lockdown period resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted through an online survey of patients with cancer who were sheltering at home from 29th March to 3rd May 2020. Perception of self-isolation was assessed using the ISOLA scale, after evaluation of its psychometric properties. Content analysis was used to analyse two open-ended questions. RESULTS: The participants were 195 adult patients with cancer (female = 76%; mean age = 50.3 ± 11.2; haematological malignancy = 51.3%). They reported moderate isolation-related suffering (M = 2.64 ± 0.81), problems in their relationships with others (M = 3.31 ± 1.13) and difficulties in their relationships with themselves (M = 3.14 ± 1.06). Patients who experienced significantly more social problems were older, had less education and were living without minor children. Overall, four main categories emerged from the qualitative content analysis: (1) lack of freedom and social life, (2) uncertainty and worries, (3) feeling supported and (4) dealing with isolation. CONCLUSION: Living with cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic was often perceived as an isolating experience, primarily in terms of detachment from loved ones.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Escolaridad , Composición Familiar , Neoplasias/psicología , Aislamiento Social/psicología , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Características de la Residencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Participación Social/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine factors related to delayed isolation of patients hospitalized with active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 130 immunocompetent hospitalized patients with active pulmonary TB who had positive sputum culture results from January 2015 to December 2017 were reviewed. Delayed isolation of pulmonary TB was defined as failure to initiate airborne isolation within the first 3 days of hospitalization. Clinical and microbiologic characteristics of the patients and radiologic features on chest radiography (n = 130) and chest CT (n = 118) were retrospectively reviewed. Findings were compared between patients with early isolation and those with delayed isolation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of delayed isolation. RESULTS. Forty-four patients (34%) had delayed isolation after initial hospitalization. On univariate and multivariate analyses, atypical presentation of active pulmonary TB on CT (odds ratio, 7.203; 95% CI, 2.203-23.551; p = 0.001) and concurrent lung parenchymal diseases on CT (odds ratio, 14.605; 95% CI, 3.274-65.155; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of delayed isolation of patients with active pulmonary TB. CONCLUSION. Awareness of the factors related to delayed diagnosis of active pulmonary TB is important to avoid an unexpected in-hospital outbreak of TB and control the disease. Atypical presentation of active pulmonary TB and concurrent lung parenchymal diseases on CT are significant factors related to delayed isolation of hospitalized patients with active pulmonary TB.
Asunto(s)
Aislamiento de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Torácica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to determine the most cost-effective strategy for the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care units (ICUs) in areas with limited health resources. The study was conducted in 12 ICUs of four hospitals. The total cost for the prevention of MDROs and the secondary attack rate (SAR) of MDROs for each strategy were collected retrospectively from 2046 subjects from January to December 2017. The average cost-effectiveness ratio (CER), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were calculated. Hand hygiene (HH) had the lowest total cost (2149.6 RMB) and SAR of MDROs (8.8%) while single-room isolation showed the highest cost (33 700.2 RMB) and contact isolation had the highest SAR of MDROs (31.8%). The average cost per unit infection prevention was 24 427.8 RMB, with the HH strategy followed by the environment disinfection strategy (CER = 21 314.67). HH had the highest iterative cost effect under willingness to pay less than 2000 RMB. Due to the low cost for repeatability and obvious effectiveness, we conclude that HH is the optimal strategy for MDROs infections in ICUs in developing countries. The cost-effectiveness of the four prevention strategies provides some reference for developing countries but multiple strategies remain to be examined.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Desinfección , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Control de Infecciones/economía , Aislamiento de Pacientes , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
We analysed consecutive RT-qPCR results of 537 symptomatic coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients in home quarantine. Respectively 2, 3, and 4 weeks after symptom onset, 50%, 25% and 10% of patients had detectable RNA from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In patients with mild COVID-19, RNA detection is likely to outlast currently known periods of infectiousness by far and fixed time periods seem more appropriate in determining the length of home isolation than laboratory-based approaches.