RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The combined application of predatory fungi and antiparasitic drugs is a sustainable approach for the integrated control of animal gastrointestinal (GI) parasites. However, literature addressing the possible interference of antiparasitic drugs on the performance of these fungi is still scarce. This research aimed to assess the in vitro susceptibility of six native coccidicidal fungi isolates of the species Mucor circinelloides and one Mucor lusitanicus isolate to several antiparasitic drugs commonly used to treat GI parasites' infections in birds, namely anthelminthics such as Albendazole, Fenbendazole, Levamisole and Ivermectin, and anticoccidials such as Lasalocid, Amprolium and Toltrazuril (drug concentrations of 0.0078-4 µg/mL), using 96-well microplates filled with RPMI 1640 medium, and also on Sabouraud Agar (SA). RESULTS: This research revealed that the exposition of all Mucor isolates to the tested anthelminthic and anticoccidial drug concentrations did not inhibit their growth. Fungal growth was recorded in RPMI medium, after 48 h of drug exposure, as well as on SA medium after exposure to the maximum drug concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings from this research suggest the potential compatibility of these Mucor isolates with antiparasitic drugs for the integrated control of avian intestinal parasites. However, further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Asunto(s)
Antiparasitarios , Mucor , Animales , Antiparasitarios/farmacología , Ivermectina/farmacología , AlbendazolRESUMEN
The unfavorable phenomenon of activated sludge bulking that occurs in sewage treatment plants (WWTPs) is caused by the over-proliferation of filamentous bacteria that should be limited by the Lecane rotifers that feed on them; however, predatory, rotiferovorous fungi that often inhabit WWTPs pose a real threat to these organisms. To solve this problem, we investigated the interaction of the fungus Clonostachys rosea, which is a known Biological Control Agent (BCA) and the predacious Zoophagus sp. in simplified laboratory culture conditions. The presence of C. rosea in the cultures reduced the number of active traps, thus translating into a much smaller number of rotifers being caught. The mycelium of C. rosea was labeled with a red fluorescent protein (RFP). The life cycle of C. rosea that were attacking Zoophagus sp. (hunting for rotifers) is described. C. rosea spores germinate into single-celled forms and penetrate the interior of the Zoophagus mycelium where they feed on the cytoplasm. Then is the mycelium produced abundantly and forms conidiophores. This type of life strategy has not been known before. The obtained results demonstrated the potential of C. rosea as a BCA that can be used to protect rotifers in the event of an infection of activated sludge by the predatory fungi that threaten the rotifer population.
Asunto(s)
Rotíferos , Purificación del Agua , Animales , Aguas del Alcantarillado , Conducta Predatoria , BacteriasRESUMEN
Our observations of predatory fungi trapping rotifers in activated sludge and laboratory culture allowed us to discover a complicated trophic network that includes predatory fungi armed with bacteria and bacteriophages and the rotifers they prey on. Such a network seems to be common in various habitats, although it remains mostly unknown due to its microscopic size. In this study, we isolated and identified fungi and bacteria from activated sludge. We also noticed abundant, virus-like particles in the environment. The fungus developed absorptive hyphae within the prey. The bacteria showed the ability to enter and exit from the hyphae (e.g., from the traps into the caught prey). Our observations indicate that the bacteria and the fungus share nutrients obtained from the rotifer. To narrow the range of bacterial strains isolated from the mycelium, the effects of bacteria supernatants and lysed bacteria were studied. Bacteria isolated from the fungus were capable of immobilizing the rotifer. The strongest negative effect on rotifer mobility was shown by a mixture of Bacillus sp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The involvement of bacteriophages in rotifer hunting was demonstrated based on molecular analyses and was discussed. The described case seems to be an extraordinary quadruple microbiological puzzle that has not been described and is still far from being understood.
Asunto(s)
Fagos de Bacillus/fisiología , Hongos/patogenicidad , Rotíferos/microbiología , Animales , Bacillus/metabolismo , Fagos de Bacillus/genética , Bacterias , Quitinasas/metabolismo , Técnicas de Cocultivo , Consorcios Microbianos , Aguas del Alcantarillado/microbiología , Simbiosis , Eliminación de Residuos LíquidosRESUMEN
The control of gastrointestinal nematodes among ruminants maintained in zoological parks remains difficult due to infective stages develop in the soil. For the purpose to improve the possibilities of the control of gastrointestinal nematodes (genera Trichostrongylus, Nematodirus, Chabertia and Haemonchus) affecting wild captive bovidae ruminants belonging to the subfamilies Antilopinae, Caprinae, Bovinae and Reduncinae, commercial pelleted feed enriched with a blend of 104-105 spores of both filamentous fungi Mucor circinelloides + Duddingtonia flagrans per kg meal was provided for a period of 3.5 years. All animals were dewormed at the beginning of the trial and also when exceeding a cut-off point of 300 eggs per gram of feces (EPG). The anthelmintic efficacy ranged between 96 and 100%. The need for repeating the administration of parasiticide treatment disappeared at the 24th month of study in the Antilopinae individuals, and at the 8th month in the Caprinae, Bovinae and Reduncinae. No side-effects were observed on the skin or in the digestive, respiratory or reproductive system. It was concluded that this strategy provides a sustainable tool for preventing the contamination of paddocks where captive ruminants are maintained, decreasing the risk of infection by gastrointestinal nematodes and consequently the need of frequent deworming.
Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos/química , Agentes de Control Biológico/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Intestinales/veterinaria , Mucor/química , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Rumiantes , Microbiología del Suelo , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Animales de Zoológico , Enfermedades Intestinales/parasitología , Enfermedades Intestinales/prevención & control , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/prevención & controlRESUMEN
The biological control of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites using predatory fungi has been recently proposed as an accurate and sustainable approach in birds. The current study aimed to assess for the first time the efficacy of using the native ovicidal fungus Mucor circinelloides (FMV-FR1) in reducing coccidia parasitism in peacocks. For this purpose, an in vivo trial was designed in the resident peacock collection (n = 58 birds) of the São Jorge Castle, at Lisbon, Portugal. These animals presented an initial severe infection by coccidia of the genus Eimeria (20106 ± 8034 oocysts per gram of feces, OPG), and thus received commercial feed enriched with a M. circinelloides suspension (1.01 × 108 spores/kg feed), thrice-weekly. Fresh feces were collected every 15 days to calculate the coccidia shedding, using the Mini-FLOTAC technique. The same bird flock served simultaneously as control (t0 days) and test groups (t15-t90 days). The average Eimeria sp. shedding in peacocks decreased up to 92% following fungal administrations, with significant reduction efficacies of 78% (p = 0.004) and 92% (p = 0.012) after 45 and 60 days, respectively. Results from this study suggest that the administration of M. circinelloides spores to birds is an accurate solution to reduce their coccidia parasitism.
Asunto(s)
Coccidiosis , Heces , Mucor , Animales , Coccidiosis/veterinaria , Coccidiosis/parasitología , Heces/parasitología , Heces/microbiología , Eimeria , Coccidios , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/parasitología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) are a group of parasites that threaten livestock yields, and the consequent economic losses have led to major concern in the agricultural industry worldwide. The high frequency of anthelmintic resistance amongst GINs has prompted the search for sustainable alternatives. Recently, a substantial number of both in vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that biological controls based on predatory fungi and ovicidal fungi are the most promising alternatives to chemical controls. In this respect, the morphological characteristics of the most representative species of these two large groups of fungi, their nematicidal activity and mechanisms of action against GINs, have been increasingly studied. Given the limitation of the independent use of a single nematophagous fungus (NF), combined applications which combine multiple fungi, or fungi and chemical controls, have become increasingly popular, although these new strategies still have antagonistic effects on the candidates. In this review, we summarize both the advantages and disadvantages of the individual fungi and the combined applications identified to date to minimize recurring infections or to disrupt the life cycle of GINs. The need to discover novel and high-efficiency nematicidal isolates and the application of our understanding to the appropriate selection of associated applications are discussed.
RESUMEN
This study assessed the anthelmintic activity of the oral administration of a free-spore culture filtrate of the nematophagous fungus (NF) Arthrobotrys musiformis (M-10) on gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes (GIN) in naturally infected lambs. The fungus was grown on potato-dextrose agar plates (PDA) and transferred to a fermented rice medium (FRM). After 40-day incubation the total amount of FRM with the growing fungi was transferred to a flask shaker with distilled water for a 24 h period. The fungus was centrifuged and filtered. Three groups of six naturally-infected lambs (>1000 epg) each were treated once as follows: Group 1) 63.8 mg/kg A. musiformis culture filtrate (CF) (per os); Group 2) Levamisole 7.5 mg/ml (intramuscularly), Group 3) 15 ml of distilled water (per os). Faecal samples were individually collected on days -2, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 after treatment. For each experimental group, mean egg shedding was calculated and transformed (log 10 [epg + 1]). Means between the fungal filtrate group and the negative control were analysed using a T-Student Test. The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was performed in groups treated with CF and Levamisole in relation to the control group (water) were 36.8-57.4% and 89-95.4%, respectively., although due to the difference between groups, no statistical significance was found (p > 0.05). The use of A. musiformis CF appears to be a good alternative treatment, although, more studies should be performed to establish the use of these fungal products as potential tools for GIN control.
Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos , Nematodos , Animales , Heces/parasitología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/parasitología , OvinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal parasites like nematodes are associated with significant impacts on animal health, causing poor growth rates, diseases and even death. Traditional parasite control includes the use of anthelmintic drugs, albeit being associated with drug resistance and ecotoxicity. In the last decade, biological control of parasites using nematophagous or predatory fungi has been increasingly studied, although systematic evidence of its efficacy is still lacking. The aim of this work was to assess the evidence of efficacy of nematophagous fungi in the control of nematodes and other gastrointestinal parasites in different animal species. METHODS: Using the PICO method (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes), we performed a systematic review on the subject to search for original papers published between January 2006 and October 2019, written in English, and indexed in PubMed/Medline. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used in the syntax. Papers were selected for detailed review based on title and abstract. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and relevant data were collected from the remaining papers. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 616 papers. Eighty-nine were submitted to a detailed review. In the end, 53 papers were included in the analysis. The studies were very heterogeneous, using different fungi, doses, frequency of administration, duration of treatment, host animals, and target parasites. Considering the 53 papers, 44 studies (83 % of the interventions) showed efficacy, with only 9 studies (17 %) showing no significant differences when compared to control. CONCLUSION: With the increasing hazards of drug resistance and ecotoxicity, biological control with predatory fungi stands out as a good tool for future parasite management, whether as a complementary treatment or as an alternative to standard parasite control.