Designing a Fall Prediction Model for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Using Readily Available Data.

OBJECTIVE: To create a fall risk assessment tool for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) using available data and compare its predictive accuracy with that of the Morse Fall Scale (MFS). DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis from a retrospective cohort study. Using a nomogram that displayed the contributions of QI codes associated with falls in a multivariable logistic regression model, we created a novel fall risk assessment, the Inpatient Rehabilitation Fall Scale (IRF Scale). To compare the predictive accuracy of the IRF Scale and MFS, we used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. SETTING: We included data from 4 IRFs owned and operated by Intermountain Health. PARTICIPANTS: Data came from the medical records of 1699 patients. All participants were over the age of 14 and were admitted and discharged from 1 of the 4 sites between January 1 and December 31, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We assigned point values on the IRF Scale based on the adjusted associations of QI codes with falls. Using ROC curve analysis, we discovered an optimal cutoff score, sensitivity, specificity, and overall AUC of the IRF Scale and MFS. RESULTS: ROC curve analysis revealed the optimal IRF Scale cutoff score of 22.4 yielded a sensitivity of 0.74 and a specificity of 0.63. With an AUC of 0.72, the IRF Scale demonstrated acceptable accuracy at identifying patients who fell in our retrospective cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Because the IRF Scale uses readily available data, it minimizes staff assessment and outperforms the MFS at identifying patients who previously fell. Prospective research is needed to investigate if it can adequately identify in advance which patients will fall during their IRF stay.

3D-printed orthoses and prostheses for people with physical disability in rehabilitation centers: a scoping review.

AIMS: The World Health Organization points out that, by 2030, two billion people will need at least one assistive product. 3D printing can be used to meet the demands when dispensing these products. PURPOSE: This review aims to map the use of 3D printing in the manufacture of orthoses and prostheses for people with physical disability at rehabilitation centers. METHODS: Publications that deal with the use of 3D printing for the manufacture of orthoses and prostheses were used, preferably studies from 2012 to 2022. RESULTS: The majority of studies, 56.25%, were quantitative and 46.25% were evaluative research. None of the studies were characterized as developed at rehabilitation centers. 75% of them had the participation of people with physical disability. The use of 3D printing was, for the most part, for the development of assistive technologies for the upper limbs at 56.25%, while 31.25% were for the lower limbs. CONCLUSION: The assistive products developed were orthoses and prostheses for the wrist, hands, fingers, upper limbs, writing devices, sockets, knees, and feet. Although there were positive results in their performance, some limitations related to strength, stiffness, and resistance were observed.

Drug addictions in Malaysia: a mini-review on drug types, rehabilitation centers and therapeutic programs.

Drug addiction remains one of the most complex social problems worldwide that has yet to be resolved. In Malaysia, abuse of various types of drugs has been reported which warrants the government to take immediate strategies in managing drug addicts. Despite implementing various strategies to treat drug addiction, statistics show the number of relapses continues to skyrocket over the years. This calls for urgent attention to improve the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment services in Malaysia. Moreover, emerging evidence shows a change in trend in the type of drug being abused. This factor could potentially contribute to the ineffectiveness of the strategies employed in the treatment of substance abuse. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the major types of drugs commonly abused in Malaysia. Additionally, in an effort to search for ways to improve the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment services, we identified the public institutions responsible for managing drug addicts in Malaysia and discussed the therapeutic programs offered at the institutions. Review findings support the need for future research on the effectiveness of these therapeutic programs and recommend the implementation of evidence-based programs to improve the effectiveness of substance abuse treatments in Malaysia.

Vocational rehabilitation of patients after injury or with chronic illness.

Vocational rehabilitation plays a key role in the overall improvement of the quality of life for patients with chronic illness or after injury. Physicians have an important role in identifying suitable patients and recommending vocational rehabilitation as part of a comprehensive rehabilitation treatment. This article provides an overview of the use of vocational rehabilitation in the treatment of various patients with different types of illnesses and suggests criteria for selecting appropriate patients for involvement in vocational rehabilitation. The review presents the current state of vocational rehabilitation, its possibilities, limitations, and challenges for further development. One of the main challenges is the potential use of vocational rehabilitation for patients on temporary disability leave. Although employment law has allowed this possibility for 20 years, in practice, the tool of vocational rehabilitation has not yet been used for this group of individuals. The article also brings new findings revealed by research conducted within an experimental project that pilot tested the concept of so-called "vocational rehabilitation centers." The research showed, among other things, that the early involvement of individuals with disabilities in vocational rehabilitation, combined with a multidisciplinary approach, more than triples their chances of obtaining or retaining employment.

Using Quality Indicator Codes to Identify Patients' Fall Risk in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities.

OBJECTIVE: To discover if quality indicator (QI) codes are associated with patient falls in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study explored differences between patients who fell and those who did not fall. We analyzed potential associations between QI codes and falls using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. SETTING: We collected data from electronic medical records at 4 IRFs. PARTICIPANTS: In 2020, our 4 data collection sites admitted and discharged a total of 1742 patients older than 14 years . We only excluded patients (N=43) from statistical analysis if they were discharged before admission data had been assigned. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a data extraction report, we collected age, sex, race and ethnicity, diagnosis, falls, and QI codes for communication, self-care, and mobility performance. Staff documented communication codes on a 1-4 scale and self-care and mobility codes on a 1-6 scale, with higher codes representing greater independence. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (5.71%) fell in the 4 IRFs over a 12-month period. The group who fell had lower QI codes for communication, self-care, and mobility. When adjusting for bed mobility, transfer, and stair-climbing ability, low performance with understanding, walking 10 feet, and toileting were significantly associated with falls. Patients with admission QI codes below 4 for understanding had 78% higher odds of falling. If they were assigned admission QI codes below 3 for walking 10 feet or toileting, they had 2 times greater odds of falling. We did not find a significant association between falls and patients' diagnosis, age, sex, or race and ethnicity in our sample. CONCLUSIONS: Communication, self-care, and mobility QI codes appear to be significantly associated with falls. Future research should explore how to use these required codes to better identify patients likely to fall in IRFs.

Promoting Evidence-Based Practice: The Influence of Novel Structural Change to Accelerate Translational Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in clinicians' use of evidence-based practice (EBP), openness toward EBP, and their acceptance of organizational changes after a rehabilitation hospital transitioned to a new facility designed to accelerate clinician-researcher collaborations. DESIGN: Three repeated surveys of clinicians before, 7-9 months, and 2.5 years after transition to the new facility. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, nurses, therapists, and other health care professionals (n=410, 442, and 448 respondents at Times 1, 2, and 3, respectively). INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of physical (architecture, design) and team-focused (champions, leaders, incentives) changes in a new model of care to promote clinician-researcher collaborations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adapted versions of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ), the Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS), and the Organizational Change Recipients' Beliefs Scale (OCRBS) were used. Open-ended survey questions were analyzed through exploratory content analysis. RESULTS: Response rates at Times 1, 2, and 3 were 67% (n=410), 69% (n=422), and 71% (n=448), respectively. After accounting for familiarity with the model of care, there was greater reported use of EBP at Time 3 compared with Time 2 (adjusted meant2=3.51, standard error (SE)=0.05; adj. meant3=3.64, SE=0.05; P=.043). Attitudes toward EBPs were similar over time. Acceptance of the new model of care was lower at Time 2 compared with Time 1, but rebounded at Time 3 (adjusted meant1=3.44, SE=0.04; adj. meant2=3.19, SE=0.04; P<.0001; adj. meant3=3.51, SE=0.04; P<.0001). Analysis of open-ended responses suggested that clinicians' optimism for the model of care was greater over time, but continued quality improvement should focus on cultivating communication between clinicians and researchers. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerating clinician-researcher collaborations in a rehabilitation setting requires sustained effort for successful implementation beyond novel physical changes. Organizations must be responsive to clinicians' changing concerns to adapt and sustain a collaborative translational medicine model and allow sufficient time, probably years, for such transitions to occur.

Impact of telephone follow-up on COPD outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation patients: A randomized clinical trial.

Background: The educational component is a comprehensive part of Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR), and telephone follow-up (TFU) is an alternative to reinforce face-to-face education. The objective was to determine the effect of telephone follow-up on educational needs, dyspnea, quality of life and functional capacity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients undergoing PR. Methods: Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial in patients with COPD in a PR program in Cali-Colombia, allocation by randomization tables. All patients received 24 sessions of PR, which included face-to-face education sessions. In addition, the experimental group received telephone calls twice a week to reinforce the face-to-face educational content. The Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ) was used to measure disease knowledge, the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire to measure quality of life, the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale to measure dyspnea, and the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) to measure functional capacity. Results: Thirty-four patients were randomized and 31 were analyzed. PR group with conventional education (PRTE) n=15 and PR group with education plus telephone follow-up (PRTETFU) n=16. Significant improvement from baseline to endpoint in both groups: LINQ (PRTE 4±1.1, p=0.003, PRTETFU 5.8±10.6, p=0.000), mMRC (PRTE 1.6±0.3, p=0.000, PRTETFU 0.6±0.3, p=0.036) and functional capacity (PM6M: PRTE 45.9m±16.1, p=0.013, PRTETFU 62.8m±21.4, p=0.010). Analysis showed differences between groups for changes in LINQ knowledge domain after intervention, with greater improvement for PRTETFU (p=0.018). Discussion: The TFU is an alternative to reinforce the education. This study demonstrated greater positive effects for the autonomous management of the pathology. Conclusion: Adding educational reinforcement through phone calls to patients with COPD during PR leads to improved knowledge and skills for managing the disease.

Skilled Nursing and Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Use by Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Discharged Home After a Stroke: Findings From the COMPASS Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of a comprehensive transitional care model on the use of skilled nursing facility (SNF) and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) care in the 12 months after acute care discharge home following stroke; and to identify predictors of experiencing a SNF or IRF admission following discharge home after stroke. DESIGN: Cluster randomized pragmatic trial SETTING: Forty-one acute care hospitals in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: 2262 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with transient ischemic attack or stroke discharged home. The sample was 80.3% White and 52.1% female, with a mean (SD) age of 74.9 (10.2) years and a mean ± SD National Institutes of Health stroke scale score of 2.3 (3.7). INTERVENTION: Comprehensive transitional care model (COMPASS-TC), which consisted of a 2-day follow-up phone call from the postacute care coordinator and 14-day in-person visit with the postacute care coordinator and advanced practice provider. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to first SNF or IRF and SNF or IRF admission (yes/no) in the 12 months following discharge home. All analyses utilized multivariable mixed models including a hospital-specific random effect to account for the non-independence of measures within hospital. Intent to treat analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the effect of COMPASS-TC on time to SNF/IRF admission. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical and non-clinical predictors of SNF/IRF admission. RESULTS: Only 34% of patients in the intervention arm received COMPASS-TC per protocol. COMPASS-TC was not associated with a reduced hazard of a SNF/ IRF admission in the 12 months post-discharge (hazard ratio, 1.20, with a range of 0.95-1.52) compared to usual care. This estimate was robust to additional covariate adjustment (hazard ratio, 1.23) (0.93-1.64). Both clinical and non-clinical factors (ie, insurance, geography) were predictors of SNF/IRF use. CONCLUSIONS: COMPASS-TC was not consistently incorporated into real-world clinical practice. The use of a comprehensive transitional care model for patients discharged home after stroke was not associated with SNF or IRF admissions in a 12-month follow-up period. Non-clinical factors predictive of SNF/IRF use suggest potential issues with access to this type of care.

Change in Self-Care Quality Measure for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: Exclusion Criteria and Risk-Adjustment Model.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the exclusion criteria and risk-adjustment model developed for the quality measure Change in Self-Care. The exclusion criteria and risk adjustment model are used to calculate Change in Self-Care scores, allowing scores to be compared across inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). DESIGN: This national cohort study examined admission demographic and clinical factors associated with IRF patients' self-care change scores using standardized self-care data for Medicare patients discharged in calendar year 2017. SETTING: A total of 1129 IRFs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 493,209 (N=493,209) Medicare Fee-for-Service and Medicare Advantage IRF patient stays INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-care change scores using admission and discharge standardized assessment data elements from the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument. RESULTS: Approximately 53% of patients were female, and 67% were between 65 and 84 years old. The final risk-adjustment model contained 93 clinically relevant risk adjusters and explained 23.1% of variance in self-care change scores. Risk adjusters that had the greatest effect on change scores and included IRF primary diagnosis group (ie, binary risk adjusters representing 13 diagnoses), prior self-care functioning, and age older than 90 years. When split by deciles of expected scores, the ratio of the average expected and observed change scores was within 2% of 1.0 across 8 groups and within 8% at the extremes, showing good predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The risk adjustment model quantifies the relationship between IRF patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and their self-care score changes. The exclusion criteria and model are used to risk-adjust the IRF Change in Self-Care quality measure.

For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Inpatient Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of Demographics and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe differences in characteristics and outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury by inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) profit status. DESIGN: Retrospective database review using the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. SETTING: IRFs. PARTICIPANTS: Individual discharges (N=53,630) from 877 distinct rehabilitation facilities for calendar years 2016 through 2018. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographic data (age, race, primary payer source), admission and discharge FIM, FIM gain, length of stay efficiency, acute hospital readmission from for-profit and not-for-profit IRFs within 30 days, and community discharges by facility profit status. RESULTS: Patients at for-profit facilities were significantly older (69.69 vs 64.12 years), with lower admission FIM scores (52 vs 57), shorter lengths of stay (13 vs 15 days), and higher discharge FIM scores (88 vs 86); for-profit facilities had higher rates of community discharges (76.8% vs 74.6%) but also had higher rates of readmission (10.3% vs 9.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The finding that for-profit facilities admit older patients who are reportedly less functional on admission and more functional on discharge, with higher rates of community discharge but higher readmission rates than not-for-profit facilities is an unexpected and potentially anomalous finding. In general, older, less functional patients who stay for shorter periods of time would not necessarily be expected to make greater functional gains. These differences should be further studied to determine if differences in patient selection, coding and/or billing, or other unreported factors underlie these differences.

Determining the Interrater Reliability of the SOFMER Activity Score (version 2) for Individuals in Rehabilitation Centers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interrater reliability of the SOFMER Activity Score (SAS) (version 2 [v2], an 8-item [4 motor and 4 cognitive] and 5-level scale) and improve its scoring system before conducting further validation steps. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, prospective, observational, noninterventional, and multicentric study. SETTING: The study was conducted between November 2018 and September 2019 in 4 French rehabilitation centers (2 public university hospitals for adults and 2 private not-for-profit rehabilitation centers for children). PARTICIPANTS: The study included 101 participants (N=101; mean age, 44.5±25.4 years; 28.7% younger than 18 and 18.8% older than 65 years). The female/male sex ratio was 0.6. The causes for admission to the center were mainly neurologic (65%) or orthopedic (24%). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Activity limitation was rated with the SAS the same day by 2 independent multidisciplinary teams. The interrater reliabilities of the score items were assessed using weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: All weighted kappa coefficients ranged between 0.83 and 0.92, indicating "good" to "excellent" interrater reliability. Interteam score disagreements occurred in 227 of 808 scores (28%). The reason for most disagreements was unnoticed human or material aid during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the high interrater reliability of the SASv2 and allow carrying out further validation steps after minor changes to item scoring instructions and clearer definitions of some items that help improving scoring standardization. The SASv2 may then become a consistent measure of activity level for clinical research or burden of care investigations.

Rationale for a Clinical Trial That Compares Acute Stroke Rehabilitation at Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities to Skilled Nursing Facilities: Challenges and Opportunities.

In the United States, approximately 400,000 patients with acute stroke are discharged annually to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) or skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Typically, IRFs provide time-intensive therapy for an average of 2-3 weeks, whereas SNFs provide more moderately intensive therapy for 4-5 weeks. The factors that influence discharge to an IRF or SNF are multifactorial and poorly understood. The complexity of these factors in combination with subjective clinical indications contributes to large variations in the use of IRFs and SNFs. This has significant financial implications for health care expenditure, given that stroke rehabilitation at IRFs costs approximately double that at SNFs. To control health care spending without compromising outcomes, the Institute of Medicine has stated that policy reforms that promote more efficient use of IRFs and SNFs are critically needed. A major barrier to the formulation of such policies is the highly variable and low-quality evidence for the comparative effectiveness of IRF- vs SNF-based stroke rehabilitation. The current evidence is limited by the inability of observational data to control for residual confounding, which contributes to substantial uncertainty around any magnitude of benefit for IRF- vs SNF-based care. Furthermore, it is unclear which specific patients would receive the most benefit from each setting. A randomized controlled trial addresses these issues, because random treatment allocation facilitates an equitable distribution of measured and unmeasured confounders. We discuss several measurement, practical, and ethical issues of a trial and provide our rationale for design suggestions that overcome some of these issues.

Employees Receiving Inpatient Treatment for Common Mental Disorders in Germany: Factors Associated with Time to First and Full Return to Work.

Purpose In Germany, return to work (RTW) after inpatient treatment for common mental disorders (CMDs) is a complex process at the intersection of the mental healthcare system and the workplace. This study examined (1) the time to first and full RTW and (2) associated factors among employees receiving inpatient treatment for CMDs. Methods In this prospective cohort study, employees receiving inpatient psychiatric or medical rehabilitation treatment for CMDs were interviewed by phone during their last week before discharge. Follow-up interviews were conducted after 6, 12, and 18 months. Health-, personal, and work-related factors were used from baseline measurement. Parametric survival analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with time to first and full RTW. Results A total of N = 269 participants who stayed at a psychiatric clinic or a medical rehabilitation facility were included. Almost all participants (n = 252, 94%) from both treatment settings reported a first RTW and a full RTW. The time to first and full RTW was shortest among participants from medical rehabilitation (both median 6 days) and longer among participants from psychiatric treatment (median 17 days to first RTW and 73 days to full RTW). While only health-related and personal factors were associated with time to first RTW, leadership quality and needed individual RTW support were associated with time to full RTW. Conclusions More attention to work accommodation needs for RTW in clinical practice and coordinated actions towards RTW in collaboration with key RTW stakeholders in the workplace may support a timely RTW.Clinical Registration Number DRKS00010903, retrospectively registered.

Race/Ethnic and Stroke Subtype Differences in Poststroke Functional Recovery After Acute Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: Significant racial/ethnic disparities in poststroke function exist, but whether these disparities vary by stroke subtype is unknown. Study goals were to (1) determine if racial/ethnic disparities in the recovery of poststroke function varied by stroke subtype and (2) identify confounding factors associated with these racial/ethnic disparities. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 1-year Stroke Recovery in Underserved Populations Cohort Study. SETTING: Eleven inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1066 patients (n=868 with ischemic stroke and n=198 with hemorrhagic stroke, N=1066) who self-identified as White (n=813), Black (n=183), or Hispanic (n=70). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM scores at IRF admission, discharge, 3 months, and 12 months were modeled using multivariable mixed effects longitudinal regression. RESULTS: Compared with White patients, Black (-6.1 and -4.6) and Hispanic (-10.1 and -9.9) patients had significantly lower FIM scores at 3 and 12 months, respectively. A significant (P<.01) 3-way interaction (race/ethnic*subtype*time) indicated that disparities varied by stroke subtype. The stroke subtype differences were most prominent for Black-White disparities because disparities in hemorrhagic stroke were present at IRF admission (vs 3 months for ischemic stroke). Additionally, at 12 months, the magnitude of Black-White disparities was over 3 times larger for hemorrhagic stroke (-10.4) than ischemic stroke (-3.1). Age primarily influenced Black-White disparities (especially for hemorrhagic stroke), but factors that influenced Hispanic-White disparities were not identified. Sensitivity analyses showed that there were stroke subtype differences in racial/ethnic disparities for cognitive (but not motor) function, and results were robust to adjustments for missing data because of attrition. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences between stroke subtypes in the timing and magnitude of Black-White disparities in poststroke function. Age was a major confounding factor for Black-White disparities (particularly for hemorrhagic stroke). Overall, Hispanic patients had the lowest levels of poststroke function, and more work is needed to identify significant factors that influence Hispanic-White disparities.

Wildlife rehabilitation centers as a potential source of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 into native wildlife of Latin America.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the entire world, causing a great number of mortality of humans and affecting the economy, while conservation efforts are finally recognized to prevent further pandemics. The wildlife rehabilitation centers (WRCs) play a relevant role in animal welfare; nevertheless, they also represent an imminent risk of pathogen transmission between humans-to-animals and between animals. Moreover, WRCs could spread pathogens into natural habitats through the reintroduction of infectious individuals. These biosafety concerns at WRCs may increase as the economic and social impact of the COVID-19 extends. We explored the current situation of Latin American WRCs under the COVID-19 pandemic to determine the feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 introduction, amplification, and spread within these institutions. We surveyed WRCs from eight Latin American countries. We found that pandemic is affecting these institutions in many aspects: workers with symptoms compatible with COVID-19, reduced economic resources, and lack of information and support from governmental authorities. These have forced WRCs to reduce the workforce, veterinary visits, and animal food rations and to increase the number of animals released. This scenario generates a risky environment for the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, especially for felids, mustelids, and non-human primates. Therefore, it is imperative to respect quarantine periods, monitor incoming patients, increase biosecurity measures, develop and apply guidelines and recommendations for the protection of personnel and biosafety of enclosures and instruments. It is of utmost importance the proper and safer reintroduction of recovered wildlife.

La pandemia de COVID­19 ha impactado mundialmente, provocando una alta mortalidad en humanos y afectando la economía, resaltando la importancia de los esfuerzos de conservación para prevenir nuevas pandemias. Los centros de rehabilitación de vida silvestre juegan un papel relevante en el bienestar animal, sin embargo, también representan un riesgo inminente de transmisión de patógenos entre humanos a animales y entre animales. Además, los centros de rehabilitación de vida silvestre podrían propagar patógenos a hábitats naturales mediante la reintroducción de individuos infecciosos. Estas preocupaciones de bioseguridad en centros de rehabilitación de vida silvestre pueden aumentar a medida que se extiende el impacto económico y social del COVID­19. Exploramos la situación actual de centros de rehabilitación de vida silvestre latinoamericanos durante la pandemia de COVID­19 para determinar la viabilidad de la introducción, amplificación y propagación del SARS­CoV­2 dentro de estas instituciones. Encuestamos centros de rehabilitación de vida silvestre de ocho países latinoamericanos y encontramos que la pandemia está afectando a estas instituciones en muchos aspectos: trabajadores con síntomas compatibles con COVID­19, recursos económicos reducidos y falta de información y apoyo de las autoridades gubernamentales. Estos han obligado a centros de rehabilitación de vida silvestre a reducir la mano de obra, las visitas veterinarias y las raciones de alimentos para animales, así como aumentar el número de animales liberados. Este escenario genera un entorno de riesgo para la transmisión del SARS­CoV­2, especialmente para félidos, mustélidos y primates no humanos. Por lo tanto, es imperativo respetar los períodos de cuarentena, monitorear a los pacientes que ingresan, incrementar las medidas de bioseguridad, desarrollar y aplicar lineamientos y recomendaciones para la protección del personal y la bioseguridad. Es de suma importancia la reintroducción adecuada y segura de la vida silvestre recuperada.

Context matters when implementing patient centred rehabilitation models for persons with cognitive impairment: a case study.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing number of older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) that require inpatient rehabilitation, and as such patient centred rehabilitation models have been developed. However, implementing evidence-based models without attending to the fit of the model to the new context could lead to an unsuccessful outcome. Researchers collaborated with administrators and staff in one rural site to adapt a patient centred rehabilitation model of care in the Canadian province of Ontario. This paper reports on the contextual factors that influenced the implementation of the model of care. METHODS: The study takes a case study approach. One rural facility was purposefully selected for its interest in offering rehabilitation to persons with CI. Four focus group discussions were conducted to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions on the contextual factors that could affect the implementation of the rehabilitation model of care in the facility. Twenty-seven professionals with various backgrounds were purposively sampled using a maximum diversity sampling strategy. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach was used to analyze the data using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework. RESULTS: Across the domains of the CICI framework, three domains (political, epidemiological, and geographical) and seven corresponding sub-domains of the context were found to have a major influence on the implementation process. Key elements within the political domain included effective teamwork, facilitation, adequate resources, effective communication strategies, and a vision for change. Within the epidemiological domain, a key element was knowing how to tailor rehabilitation approaches for persons with CI. Infrastructure, an aspect of the geographical domain, focused on the facility's physical layout that required attention. CONCLUSIONS: The CICI framework was a useful guide to identify key factors within the context that existed and were required to fully support the implementation of the model of care in a new environment. The findings suggest that when implementing a new program of care, strong consideration should be paid to the political, epidemiological, and geographical domains of the context and how they interact and influence one another.

[Rehabilitation after multiple traumata]. / Rehabilitation nach Mehrfachverletzung.

BACKGROUND: The reintegration into the social and professional environment and the achievement of the best possible quality of life after multiple injuries can often only be achieved after a lengthy rehabilitation process and belongs in the hands of experienced doctors, therapists, and rehabilitation managers. REHABILITATION PHASES: Rehabilitation after serious accidents must be differentiated from "normal" orthopedic rehabilitation after elective surgery. The challenges of trauma rehabilitation require coordinated rehabilitation phases. This is the only way to avoid the so-called "rehab hole" between discharge from the acute clinic and the start of post-acute rehabilitation. A 6-phase model is described. After acute treatment (phase A) and any necessary early rehabilitation (phase B), phase C of post-acute rehabilitation places special demands on the rehabilitation facility. Phase D of the follow-up rehabilitation is established. The further rehabilitation (phase E) provides measures specifically tailored to the consequences of the accident, such as pain rehabilitation or activity-oriented procedures. Long-term follow-up care for previously severely injured patients is necessary (phase F). PROSPECTS: An integration of trauma rehabilitation centers into the existing trauma network remains the goal to improve the outcome after polytrauma.

Effects of a rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in Shanghai, China.

BACKGROUND: Specialized Institution-Based Rehabilitation (SIBR) is the cornerstone of care and treatment for individuals with spinal cord injury, but most people with chronic spinal cord injury (CSCI) living in China have no SIBR experience after acute care hospital discharge. In 2009, an SIBR facility was set up in Shanghai (China) to fill this important gap in care. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated rehabilitation training program among individuals with CSCI living in Shanghai. METHODS: A within-subject pre-posttest design was used to evaluate the SIBR. The sample included 455 individuals ≥1 year post-SCI, who were older than 18 years of age and were enrolled in a rehabilitation center in Shanghai, China, between 2013 and 2019. The data included individuals' sociodemographic and injury characteristics, and twenty-three indicators were used as outcome measurements to evaluate basic life skills and their applications in family and social life. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to determine which factors might have influenced the effectiveness of the SIBR. RESULTS: All basic life skills and their applications in family and social life were improved, but with variations across socio-demographics. Female individuals with CSCI had better outcomes in basic life skills than did males. In terms of basic life skills and their applications in family and social life, individuals with a low level (thoracic or lumbosacral) of injury achieved more significant functional gains than those with a higher level (cervical). The baseline score was also a relevant factor in functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Even for individuals with a long SCI history, SIBR training can improve basic life skills and the applications of those skills in family and social life settings.

Inpatient Rehabilitation Quality of Care From the Patient's Perspective: Effect of Data Collection Timing and Patient Characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, by collection time and patient characteristics, inpatient rehabilitation quality measure scores calculated using patient-reported data. DESIGN: Cohort study of rehabilitation inpatients with neurologic conditions who reported their experience of care and pain status at discharge and 1month after discharge. SETTING: Two inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with neurologic conditions (N=391). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated 18 quality measure scores using participants' responses to 55 experience of care and health status questions addressing communication, support and encouragement, care coordination, discharge information, goals, new medications, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, quietness, pain management, care transitions, overall hospital rating, willingness to recommend, and pain. RESULTS: Of the 391 participants reporting at discharge, 277 (71%) also reported postdischarge after multiple attempts by e-mail, mail, and telephone. Discharge experience of care quality scores ranged from 25% (responsiveness of hospital staff) to 75% (willingness to recommend hospital); corresponding postdischarge scores were 32% to 87%, respectively. Five of the 16 experience of care quality scores increased significantly between discharge and postdischarge. The percentage of participants reporting high pain levels at discharge did not change across time periods. Patients with less education, older age, higher motor and cognitive function, and those who were not Hispanic or black had more favorable quality measure scores. CONCLUSION: Patients' experience of care responses tended to be more favorable after discharge compared to discharge, suggesting that survey timing is important. Responses were more favorable for patients with selected characteristics, suggesting the possible need for risk adjustment if patient-reported quality measure scores are compared across IRFs.

Hospital Vertical Integration Into Subacute Care as a Strategic Response to Value-Based Payment Incentives, Market Factors, and Organizational Factors: A Multiple-Case Study.

This study explores the extent to which payment reform and other factors have motivated hospitals to adopt a vertical integration strategy. Using a multiple-case study research design, we completed case studies of 3 US health systems to provide an in-depth perspective into hospital adoption of subacute care vertical integration strategies across multiple types of hospitals and in different health care markets. Three major themes associated with hospital adoption of vertical integration strategies were identified: value-based payment incentives, market factors, and organizational factors. We found evidence that variation in hospital adoption of vertical integration into subacute care strategies occurs in the United States and gained a perspective on the intricacies of how and why hospitals adopt a vertical integration into subacute care strategy.