Advancing glenohumeral dysplasia treatment in brachial plexus birth injury: the end-to-side spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer technique.

PURPOSE: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a common injury with the spectrum of disease prognosis ranging from spontaneous recovery to lifelong debilitating disability. A common sequela of BPBI is glenohumeral dysplasia (GHD) which, if not addressed early on, can lead to shoulder dysfunction as the child matures. However, there are no clear criteria for when to employ various surgical procedures for the correction of GHD. METHODS: We describe our approach to correcting GDH in infants with BPBIs using a reverse end-to-side (ETS) transfer from the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. This technique is employed in infants that present with GHD with poor external rotation (ER) function who would not necessitate a complete end-to-end transfer and are still too young for a tendon transfer. In this study, we present our outcomes in seven patients. RESULTS: At presentation, all patients had persistent weakness of the upper trunk and functional limitations of the shoulder. Point-of-care ultrasounds confirmed GHD in each case. Five patients were male, and two patients were female, with a mean age of 3.3 months age (4 days-7 months) at presentation. Surgery was performed on average at 5.8 months of age (3-8.6 months). All seven patients treated with a reverse ETS approach had full recovery of ER according to active movement scores at the latest follow-up. Additionally, ultrasounds at the latest follow-up showed a complete resolution of GHD. CONCLUSION: In infants with BPBI and evidence of GHD with poor ER, end-to-end nerve transfers, which initially downgrade function, or tendon transfers, that are not age-appropriate for the patient, are not recommended. Instead, we report seven successful cases of infants who underwent ETS spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for the treatment of GHD following BPBI.

The Outcome of Spinal Accessory Nerve Transfer to the Musculocutaneous Nerve in Birth Brachial Plexus Palsy.

PURPOSE: Patients with brachial plexus birth injury with limited intraplexal donors require the use of extraplexal donors. Concern regarding the potential for respiratory problems resulting from the harvest of intercostal nerves or the phrenic nerve suggests the need for other options. Transfer of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is one option for restoring elbow flexion in adult patients; however, there are few reports of the results of this transfer in brachial plexus birth injury. This study aimed to report the result of SAN transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) in brachial plexus birth injury. METHODS: Patients who had undergone SAN to MCN nerve transfer were included in this study. Patients were classified according to Narakas classification. The chart was reviewed for the time for recovery of elbow flexion according to the Active Movement Scale (AMS). RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent SAN to MCN transfers with interpositional sural nerve grafts. Mean birthweight was 4,070 grams (range: 3,300-4,670). Mean time to operation was 6.5 months (range: 4-10). Of the 11 patients, two were of Narakas type 3, whereas the others were of type 4. One patient did not recover elbow flexion and underwent later tendon transfer, whereas the other 10 patients reached AMS grade M6 recovery. The median time for AMS grade M1 elbow flexion recovery was eight months (interquartile range: 6.2-8.8) and for AMS grade M5 was 26 months (interquartile range: 14.2-36.5). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal accessory nerve to MCN transfer with an interposition nerve graft is a viable option for restoring elbow flexion. However, long-term outcomes of this procedure have yet to be fully demonstrated. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series IV.

Spinal accessory nerve anatomy in the posterior cervical triangle: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in the posterior cervical triangle, especially in relation to adjacent anatomical landmarks, along with a systematic review of the current literature with a meta-analysis of the data. Overall, 22 cadaveric and three prospective intraoperative studies, with a total of 1346 heminecks, were included in the analysis. The major landmarks relevant to the entry of the SAN at the posterior border of the SCM muscle (PBSCM) were found to be the mastoid apex, the great auricular point (GAP), the nerve point (NP), and the point where the PBSCM meets the upper border of the clavicle. The SAN was reported to enter the posterior cervical triangle above GAP in 100% of cases and above NP in most cases (97.5%). The mean length of the SAN along its course from the entry point to its exit point from the posterior triangle of the neck was 4.07 ± 1.13 cm. The SAN mainly gave off 1 or 2 branches (32.5% and 31%, respectively) and received either no branches or one branch in most cases (58% and 23%, respectively) from the cervical plexus during its course in the posterior cervical triangle. The major landmarks relevant to the entry of the SAN at the anterior border of the TPZ muscle (ABTPZ) were found to be the point where the ABTPZ meets the upper border of the clavicle and the midpoint of the clavicle, along with the mastoid apex, the acromion, and the transverse distance of the SAN exit point to the PBSCM. The results of the present meta-analysis will be helpful to surgeons operating in the posterior cervical triangle, aiding the avoidance of the iatrogenic injury of the SAN.

Phrenic Nerve as an Alternative Donor for Nerve Transfer to Restore Shoulder Abduction in Severe Multiple Root Injuries of the Adult Brachial Plexus.

PURPOSE: Nerve transfer is the gold standard to restore shoulder abduction in acute brachial plexus injuries. The aim of this study was to compare the phrenic nerve (Ph) to the spinal accessory nerve (XI) as the donor nerve for this purpose. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 136 patients with acute brachial plexus injuries who received a nerve transfer of the shoulder with either the Ph (94 patients) or XI (42 patients). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups based on the recipient nerve. The maximum degree of shoulder abduction was recorded after 2 years of postoperative follow-up. A generalized estimating equation model was performed to examine the variables affecting shoulder abduction over time. RESULTS: The maximum degrees of shoulder abduction achieved were 61.9° ± 38.7° in patients with Ph and 51.1° ± 37.3° in patients with XI. More than M3 shoulder abduction was achieved by 67% of patients with Ph versus 59% of patients with XI. The regression analysis showed that the age at the time of surgery correlated more with the functional outcome over time than the choice of donor nerve. CONCLUSIONS: In multiple root brachial plexus injuries, the Ph exhibited similar outcomes to the XI for shoulder abduction. Our routine exploration of the supraclavicular plexus exposes the Ph conveniently for nerve transfer. The phrenic nerve should be considered as an alternative when the XI is not available or is reserved for secondary reconstruction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Treatment of neurogenic scapular winging: a systematic review on outcomes after nonsurgical management and tendon transfer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Scapular winging is a rare condition of the shoulder girdle that presents challenging treatment decisions for clinicians. To inform clinical practice, clinicians need guidance on what the best treatment decision is for their patients, and such recommendations should be based on the total evidence available. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to systematically review the evidence regarding nonsurgical management and tendon transfer surgery of patients with neurologic scapular winging due to serratus anterior (SA) or trapezius (TP) palsy. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, and Academic Search Premier were searched up to April 5, 2022, for studies reporting on clinical outcomes after nonsurgical management and tendon transfer surgery of scapular winging due to weakness of the SA or TP muscle. The Integrated quality Criteria for Review Of Multiple Study (ICROMS) tool was used to classify the quality of the studies. Primary outcomes were the fraction of patients with spontaneous recovery after nonsurgical management and improvement in shoulder function, pain scores, and shoulder scores after tendon transfer surgery. Data were pooled if data on the same outcome were available for at least 3 studies, using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three (10 moderate-quality [MQ] and 13 low-quality) studies were included. Six studies (3 MQ; 234 shoulders) reported on outcomes after nonsurgical management of SA palsy, whereas 12 (6 MQ; 221 shoulders) and 6 studies (1 MQ; 80 shoulders) evaluated the outcomes of tendon transfer for SA or TP palsy (1 study addressed both). Spontaneous recovery of scapular winging with nonsurgical management varied between 21% and 78% across studies after a median follow-up of 72 months. For surgical management of SA palsy, pooling data in a meta-analysis showed that patients on average improved by 47° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-61, P ≤ .001) in active forward flexion, had lower visual analog scale scores for pain (mean difference [MD]: -3.0, 95% CI: -4.9 to -1.0, P = .003), and had substantial improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (MD: 24, 95% CI: 9-39, P = .002) and Constant scores (MD: 45, 95% CI: 39-51, P ≤ .001). Patients with TP palsy on average improved by 36° (95% CI: 21-51, P ≤ .001) in active forward flexion after tendon transfer. Statistical pooling was not possible for other outcome measures as insufficient data were available. CONCLUSION: A substantial part of nonsurgically managed patients with scapular winging seem to have persistent complaints, which should be part of the information provided to patients. Data pooling demonstrated significant improvements in shoulder function, pain scores, and shoulder scores after tendon transfer surgery, but higher quality evidence is needed to allow for more robust recommendations and guide clinical decision-making on when to perform such functional surgery.

Needle electromyography abnormalities in the upper trapezius muscle in neuromuscular disorders.

BACKGROUND: : Needle electromyography (EMG) abnormalities in the trapezius muscle (TM) can be seen in neuromuscular disorders. The aim was to determine the characteristics of needle EMG abnormalities observed in the TM in neuromuscular disorders. METHODS: The data of patients who applied to the Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory of University of Health Sciences Adana City Training and Research Hospital between December 2018 and October 2021 were reviewed. Polio survivors, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, patients with sensorimotor polyneuropathy, patients with spinal cord lesions involving C2/C3/C4 segments, patients with spinal accessory nerve (SAN) lesions, neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) patients, and patients with myopathy were included. Needle EMG findings of the upper TM of the patients were analyzed. Positive sharp waves, fibrillation potentials, fasciculation potentials, myotonic discharges, and motor unit action potential (MUAP) changes were considered needle EMG abnormalities. RESULTS: Eighty-one polio survivors, 23 ALS patients, 39 patients with sensorimotor polyneuropathy, 10 patients with cervical spinal lesions, eight NA patients, seven patients with SAN lesions, and three patients with myopathy were included in the study. Fifteen (65.2%) ALS patients, 18 (22.2%) polio survivors, three (30%) patients with cervical spinal lesions, two (5.1%) patients with sensorimotor neuropathy, one (12.5%) NA patient, seven (100%) patients with SAN lesions, and two (66.7%) patients with myopathies had at least one needle EMG abnormality in the TM. Fasciculation potentials in the TM were seen in 10 (43.5%) ALS patients. In four patients with SAN lesions and one polio survivor, MUAP could not be obtained from the TM. DISCUSSION: There may be more frequent needle EMG abnormalities, particularly in ALS patients and patients with SAN lesions. Since the number of patients with myopathy included in this study was low, it is difficult to comment on the needle EMG features of the TM for these patients. In addition, this study indicated that fasciculation potentials in the TM are typical in ALS patients and that MUAP may not be obtained from the TM in patients with SAN lesions.

The supraclavicular nerve.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe a new method for studying the supraclavicular nerve (SCN) conduction and to report four cases with SCN lesions. METHODS: The SCN was antidromically recorded with a pair of self-adhesive electrodes located in the middle of the clavicle. Stimulation (<5 mA) was delivered 7 cm proximally with a bar electrode. To facilitate recording, it was explained to the participant that they would feel a very faint electrical sensation locally and an electrical tingle upward (ear) or downward (shoulder/clavicle). Each participant was asked to say when the tingling moved downward. RESULTS: In normal subjects, median values were 16 µV (range: 9-33) for sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude; 1.2 ms (range: 1-1.5) for onset latency; and 1.25 (range: 1-1.7) for side-to-side amplitude ratio. In the four patients, the SCN SNAP was absent on the pathological side and normal on the healthy side. All four patients complained of unilateral neuropathic hypoesthesia on the anterior aspect of the neck, chest, and shoulder that occurred after radical neck surgery for thyroid or larynx cancer (x3) and first rib resection (x1). DISCUSSION: A comparison with previous reports shows that this simple method provides similar or highest SNAP amplitudes. SCN lesions are rare, and rarely referred for electrodiagnosis, and often overlooked. However, the SCN conduction study, which causes very slight inconvenience (low-intensity stimulation), allows a better understanding of the origin of the complaints and permits the patient to benefit of more suitable treatment.

Preoperative ultrasound accurately characterizes surgically confirmed extracranial spinal accessory nerve injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound and MRI in surgically confirmed spinal accessory nerve injuries and present the benefits of a multimodality image review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 38 consecutive patients referred to a peripheral nerve surgical practice at an academic teaching hospital with surgically confirmed spinal accessory nerve injuries. All cases were reviewed for patient demographics, date and cause of injury, preoperative EMG, and surgical diagnosis and management. Additionally, prospective interpretation of preoperative ultrasound and MRI reports were reviewed for concordance or discordance with the surgical diagnosis. RESULTS: Iatrogenic injury was present in 37 (97%) cases and most commonly a result of an excisional lymph node biopsy (68%). Surgically confirmed spinal accessory nerve injury diagnoses consisted of 25 (66%) stump neuromas and 13 (34%) incomplete nerve injuries. Nine months was the average time from injury to surgery. Twenty-nine patients underwent preoperative ultrasound and/or MRI evaluation: 12 ultrasound only, 10 MRI only, and seven with both ultrasound and MRI. Eighteen (95%) preoperative ultrasound reports compared to four (24%) preoperative MRI reports were concordant with the surgical diagnosis. In the seven cases with both preoperative ultrasound and MRI, six had discordant ultrasound and MRI imaging diagnoses for which the ultrasound was concordant with the surgical diagnoses in all cases. CONCLUSION: Preoperative ultrasound more accurately characterizes spinal accessory nerve injuries compared to MRI and should serve as the modality of choice when a spinal accessory nerve injury is suspected.

Intraoperative spinal accessory nerve monitoring in neck dissections.

BACKGROUND: The identification and preservation of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is essential in neck surgeries due to possible complications. We report the technique to intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of SAN in functional neck dissections. METHOD: SAN was monitored by needle electrodes placed on the trapezius muscle. Preoperative and postoperative nerve mapping was performed. CONCLUSION: IONM for spinal accessory nerve in patients undergoing neck dissection is a useful technique that can be valuable for neck surgeries where spinal nerve injury is at risk.

The most commonly injured nerves at surgery: A comprehensive review.

Iatrogenic nerve injury during surgery is a major source of concern for both patients and surgeons. This study aimed to identify the nerves most commonly injured during surgery, along with the commonly associated operative procedures. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify nerves commonly injured during surgery, along with the surgical procedure associated with the injury. The following 11 nerves, ranked in order with their associated surgical procedures, were found to be the most commonly injured: (a) intercostobrachial nerve in axillary lymph node dissections and transaxillary breast augmentations, (b) vestibulocochlear nerve in cerebellopontine tumor resections and vestibular schwannoma removals, c) facial nerve in surgeries of the inner ear and cheek region, (d) long thoracic nerve in axillary lymph node dissections, (e) spinal accessory nerve in surgeries of the posterior triangle of the neck and cervical lymph node biopsies, (f) recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgeries, (g) genitofemoral nerve in inguinal hernia and varicocele surgeries, (h) sciatic nerve in acetabular fracture repairs and osteotomies, (i) median nerve in carpal tunnel release surgeries, (j) common fibular nerve in varicose vein and short saphenous vein surgeries, and (k) ulnar nerve in supracondylar fracture surgeries. Although the root cause of iatrogenic nerve injury differs for each nerve, there are four unifying factors that could potentially decrease this risk for all peripheral nerves. These four influencing factors include knowledge of potential anatomical variations, visual identification of at-risk nerves during the procedure, intraoperative nerve monitoring, and expertise of the surgeon.

Outcomes of Shoulder Functions in Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer in Brachial Plexus Injury: A Comparison between Anterior and Posterior Approach.

Background Restoration of shoulder functions is important in brachial plexus injury (BPI). The functional outcomes of spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer by the anterior supraclavicular approach and the posterior approach is a matter of debate. This article aims to compare the outcomes of the shoulder functions by the SAN to the SSN transfer using the two approaches. Methods Retrospective data was collected in 34 patients who underwent SAN to SSN transfer from January 2016 to June 2018. Group A included 16 patients who underwent nerve transfers by anterior approach, and Group B included 18 patients who underwent nerve transfers by posterior approach. Functional outcomes were measured by grading the muscle power as per the British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading (graded as M) and the range of motions (ROM) of the shoulder at 6 months and 18 months. Results Early recovery was seen in group B with 7 patients (39%) showing M1 abduction power at 6 months as compared with one patient (6%) in group A . This difference was statistically significant ( p value = 0.04). At 18 months, 10 patients (62%) in group A had good recovery (MRC grade ≥3), while 13 patients (72%) in group B had a good recovery. This difference was not found to be statistically significant (Fisher exact test p value = 0.71) There was no statistical difference in the outcomes of ROM in shoulder abduction, external rotation, and motor power at 18 months of follow-up. Conclusions Early recovery was observed in the anterior approach group at 6 months, however, there was no significant difference in the outcomes of shoulder functions in muscle power and ROM in the two groups at 18 months of follow-up.

2b or not 2b? Shoulder function after level 2b neck dissection: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Selective neck dissection (SND) is a mainstay of head and neck cancer treatment. A common sequela is shoulder syndrome from spinal accessory nerve (SAN) trauma. Extensive dissection in neck levels 2 and 5 leads to SAN dysfunction. However, it is not known whether limited level 2 dissection reduces SAN injury. The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled trial was to determine whether omitting level 2b dissection would improve shoulder-related quality of life and function. METHODS: Patients with head and neck cancers undergoing surgery were randomized 1:1 to SND without level 2b dissection (group 1) or with it (group 2) on their dominant-hand side. Patients, caregivers, and assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) score after 6 months. An a priori calculation of the minimally important clinical difference in the NDII score was determined to establish a sample size of 15 patients per group (power = 0.8). Secondary outcomes included shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) and SAN nerve conduction. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00765791). RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled, and 30 were included (15 per group). Six months after the surgery, group 2 demonstrated a significant median decrease in the NDII from the baseline (30 points) and in comparison with group 1, whose NDII dropped 17.5 points (P = .02). Shoulder ROM and SAN conduction demonstrated significant declines in group 2 (P ≤ .05). No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Level 2b should be omitted in SND when this is oncologically safe and feasible. This allows for an optimal balance between function and cancer cure.

Voluntary winging of the scapula: Proposed diagnostic criteria.

We report a series of 10 patients with unilateral, dynamic, winged scapula (WS), without cause, that was diagnosed as voluntary winging of the scapula (VWS). We compared clinical, electrodiagnostic, and other examination data for 10 patients with VWS and 146 with dynamic WS-related neuromuscular disorders, to establish a detailed pattern of the VWS subtype. In VWS, electrodiagnostic and other examinations did not reveal any neuromuscular or orthopedic cause. Winging was dynamic, obvious, neither medial nor lateral, and mainly involved the inferior angle of the scapula, in young patients. VWS never appeared during floor push-ups. Patients could produce WS at will with the index and healthy shoulder, between 25° and 65° of anterior elevation, or with shoulder internal rotation. VWS is a benign disorder that can be distinguished from neuromuscular WS by normal electrodiagnostic results for muscles and nerves of both shoulders and two specific clinical tests.

Usefulness of ultrasonography for diagnosing iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve palsy after lymph node needle biopsy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) palsy is rare in clinical settings. Iatrogenicity is the most common cause, with cervical lymph node biopsy accounting for > 50% of cases. However, SAN palsy after lymph node needle biopsy is extremely rare, and the injury site is difficult to identify because of the tiny needle mark. CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with left neck pain and difficulty abducting and shrugging her left shoulder after left cervical lymph node needle biopsy. Five weeks earlier, a needle biopsy had been performed at the surgery clinic because of suspected histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis. No trace of the needle biopsy site was found on the neck, but ultrasonography (US) showed SAN swelling within the posterior cervical triangle. At 3 months after the injury, her activities of daily living had not improved. Therefore, we decided to perform a surgical intervention after receiving informed consent. We performed neurolysis because the SAN was swollen in the area consistent with the US findings, and nerve continuity was preserved. Shoulder shrugging movement improved at 1 week postoperatively, and the trapezius muscle manual muscle testing score recovered to 5 at 1 year postoperatively. The swelling diameter on US gradually decreased from 1.8 mm preoperatively to 0.9 mm at 6 months. CONCLUSION: We experienced a rare case in which US was useful for iatrogenic SAN palsy. Our results suggest that preoperative US is useful for localization of SAN palsy and that postoperative US for morphological evaluation of the SAN can help assess recovery.

Differences in strength fatigue when using different donors in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of elbow flexion strength fatigue, rather than the maximal power of strength, after brachial plexus re-innervation with phrenic and spinal accessory nerves. We designed a simple but specific test to study whether statistical differences were observed among those two donor nerves. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe brachial plexus palsy for which either phrenic nerve (PN) or spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer was performed. A dynamometer was used to determine the maximal contraction strength. One and two kilograms circular weights were utilized to measure isometrically the duration of submaximal and near-maximal contraction time. Statistical analysis was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included: 21 with a PN transfer while 7 with a SAN transfer for elbow flexion. The mean time from trauma to surgery was 7.1 months for spinal accessory nerve versus 5.2 for phrenic nerve, and the mean follow-up was 57.7 and 38.6 months, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a quicker fatigue for the PN, such that patients with the SAN transfer could hold weights of 1 kg and 2 kg for a mean of 91.0 and 61.6 s, respectively, while patients with transfer of the phrenic nerve could hold 1 kg and 2 kg weights for just a mean of 41.7 and 19.6 s, respectively. Both differences were statistically significant (at p = 0.006 and 0.011, respectively). Upon correlation analysis, endurances at 1 kg and 2 kg were strongly correlated, with r = 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that phrenic to musculocutaneous nerve transfer showed an increased muscular fatigue when compared with spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous transfer. Further studies designed to analyze this relation should be performed to increase our knowledge about strength endurance/fatigue and muscle re-innervation.

The extent of brachial plexus injury: an important factor in spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer outcomes.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between extent of brachial plexus injury and shoulder abduction/external rotation outcomes after spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting outcomes on patients undergoing SAN to SSN nerve transfer. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: age under 18, nerve transfer for reanimation of the shoulder other than SAN to SSN, and less than 12 months of follow-up postoperatively. Pooled analysis was performed, and primary outcomes were Medical Research Council (MRC) score and range of motion (ROM) for shoulder abduction and external rotation. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between extent of brachial plexus injury and shoulder abduction/external rotation outcomes after SAN to SSN transfer. A multivariate logistic regression analysis model including age, injury to surgery interval, and extent of injury as factors was also created.Results: Univariate logistic regression analysis showed greater extent of injury to be a predictor of poorer shoulder abduction outcomes (OR: 0.502; 95% CI: 0.260-0.971, p = 0.040). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed this association (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.236-0.877, p = 0.019). Extent of injury was not significantly associated with external rotation outcomes on univariate analysis (OR: 0.435; 95% CI: 0.095-1.995, p = 0.284) or multivariate analysis (OR: 0.445; 95% CI: 0.097-2.046, p = 0.298). Age and injury to surgery interval were not significantly associated with postoperative outcomes.Conclusions: More extensive brachial plexus injuries are associated with inferior outcomes after SAN to SSN transfer. A potential explanation for this finding includes lost contribution of muscles from the shoulder girdle that receive innervation from outside of the upper brachial plexus. The relationship between extent of injury and postoperative outcomes is important to recognize when determining and discussing operative intervention with patients.

Ultrasound in the management of iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve palsy at the posterior cervical triangle area.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application of ultrasound in the management of iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve palsy at the posterior cervical triangle area. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared ultrasonographic results with intraoperative findings in patients with iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve palsy during the time period from 2014 to 2018 at our hospital. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included. Ultrasound detected nerve transections in 9 patients and continuities in 2 patients. The ultrasonographic results were consistent with the intraoperative findings. Furthermore, ultrasound was able to accurately reveal lesion location in 8 of 9 patients with nerve transections. DISCUSSION: Ultrasound provides direct images about nerve lesions contributing to the diagnosis of iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve palsy at the posterior cervical triangle area and also reveals lesion location, assisting in formulating suitable surgical plans preoperatively. We recommend that ultrasound be integrated into the preoperative evaluation. Muscle Nerve 59:64-69, 2019.

Evaluation of a high-signal lesion posterior to the intracranial vertebral artery using 3D balanced fast-field echo imaging.

Previous reports have identified a small, benign, high-signal lesion (HSL) posterior to the intracranial vertebral artery and associated with the ipsilateral spinal accessory nerve (SAN) using 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D FLAIR) imaging as an emerging new entity. To elucidate the relationship between HSLs and SAN, 76 patients with 86 HSLs were evaluated using 3D FLAIR and 3D balanced fast-field echo (3D bFFE imaging). All HSLs showed contact with ipsilateral SAN on both the sequences. 3D bFFE imaging clearly distinguished between the two structures unlike 3D FLAIR. Moreover, SAN was surrounded by HSLs on 3D bFFE images, which may be a characteristic of this entity.

Suprascapular Ligament Release From an Anterior Approach: An Anatomic Feasibility Study.

PURPOSE: The results of spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfers have been less reliable than other nerve transfers in the upper limb, possibly owing to compression of the nerve by the suprascapular ligament. The posterior approach has been advocated to allow for release of the ligament. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a ligament release is possible from the anterior approach. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen cadavers were dissected to determine whether the ligament could be approached and released from the anterior approach. Complete ligament release was demonstrated by subluxation of the nerve out of the suprascapular notch. RESULTS: Ligament release was achieved in all specimens, although in one, confirmation of complete release required a posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: Release of the suprascapular ligament to eliminate a potential source of compression of the suprascapular nerve during spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer is possible through an anterior approach. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Release of the suprascapular ligament through an anterior approach allows this procedure to be performed through the same approach as brachial plexus exploration and spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer. This method could reduce surgical time and patient repositioning and avoid additional incisions.

The surgical anatomy of the dorsal scapular nerve: a triple-tendon transfer perspective.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic or traumatic injury to the spinal accessory nerve is a rare but debilitating injury. An effective treatment, known as the Eden-Lange modification triple-tendon transfer procedure, involves the transfer of the rhomboid major (RM), rhomboid minor (Rm), and levator scapulae (LS). Careful detachment of their insertions is necessary to avoid injury of the dorsal scapular nerve (DSN). This study evaluated the surgical anatomy and safety of the DSN relative to this procedure. METHODS: The study used 12 cadavers (22 shoulders). The RM, Rm, and LS were detached from their insertions, and the DSN was dissected. Measurements were taken to evaluate the anatomy of each relative to the triple-tendon transfer procedure. Additional measurements were taken to identify "danger zones" for DSN injury, regarding detachment of RM, Rm, and LS from their respective insertions. RESULTS: Measurements of the 22 shoulders included in the study showed wide variation in anatomy. The minimum distance between the scapula and the DSN at the vertebral scapular border was 0.7 cm, suggesting that care and precision are needed to perform this technique. The region where the DSN crosses the superior border of the Rm was shown to be the greatest "danger zone" of this technique, with a mean distance to the scapula of 1.61 ± 0.53 cm CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into the surgical anatomy of the DSN relative to a rare but successful procedure used to treat trapezius paralysis. The results of this study can inform the surgeon regarding potential anatomic considerations when performing the triple-tendon transfer.