A qualitative approach to assess the opinion of physicians about the challenges and prospects of pharmacogenomic testing implementation in clinical practice in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) constitutes an important part of personalized medicine and has several clinical applications. PGx role in clinical practice is known, however, it has not been widely adopted yet. In this study, we aim to investigate the perspectives of Greek physicians regarding the implementation of PGx testing in clinical practice and the key issues associated with it. METHODS: Fourteen interviews were conducted with physicians of various specialties for which PGx applications are available. A semi-structured interview guide was utilized based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) context and the Diffusion of Innovation model. Transcripts were coded independently and compared by two members of the research team. Descriptive statistics were generated using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Six main themes emerged: awareness and use of PGx testing; source of information; key stakeholders of the PGx supply chain, their interactions and change agents; clinical benefit and significance of PGx testing; barriers and lack of reimbursement; and recommendations to boost the PGx adoption rate. Most respondents were aware of PGx applications, but only three had already recommended PGx testing. Peer-reviewed journals along with clinical guidelines were regarded as the most used source of information while stakeholders of the PGx supply chain were discussed. PGx was considered that promote patient-centered care, enhance medication clinical effectiveness, decrease the risk of side effects, and reduce healthcare costs. Lack of reimbursement, scarcity of resources, and high PGx cost were the foremost barriers affecting PGx adoption. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that if case PGx testing is reimbursed and physicians' training is reinforced, PGx implementation will be boosted and improved shortly.

Chemotherapy-related adverse effects with anthracycline and taxane-containing regimens in patients with localized Breast cancer: a descriptive study : Mohammed VI University Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, Marrakech, Morocco.

BACKGROUND: Although the side effects of chemotherapy are frequently described in research studies, there is little evidence on how common they are in everyday clinical care. This study's goal was to assess the most prevalent short-term side effects experienced by patients with localized breast cancer, undergoing chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxane-containing treatments, at the medical oncology department of the Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Morocco. METHODS: This was a descriptive study. We conducted a listening session at the outpatient department of the hospital with the help of a structured questionnaire. The session engaged 122 women who had undergone cycles of chemotherapy. A chi-square test was used to compare the incidence and relative risk of short side effects with both anthracycline and taxane-containing regimens. RESULTS: The average age of participants was 49.1 years. In both regimens, the findings highlighted the frequency and relative risk of the following adverse effects: systemic symptoms (fever, asthenia and sleep disorder), gastrointestinal toxicity (Vomiting, nausea, diarrhoea, constipation, mucositis and loss of appetite), dermatological toxicity (Skin reactions on hands/feet, nail toxicity, allergies, alopecia and peripheral edema), neurological toxicity (neuropathy), arthromyalgia and ocular toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to be conscious of the significance of these adverse effects. They must also know how to manage them. Likewise, the listening approach highlights its importance in the daily follow-up and monitoring of patients.

How do experts determine where to intervene on test ordering? An interview study.

OBJECTIVES: Lab testing is a high-volume activity that is often overused, leading to wasted resources and inappropriate care. Improving test ordering practices in tertiary care involves deciding where to focus scarce intervention resources, but clear guidance on how to optimize these resources is lacking. We aimed to explore context-sensitive factors and processes that inform individual decisions about laboratory stewardship interventions by speaking to key interest holders in this area. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with test-ordering intervention development experts and authors of test-ordering guidance documents to explore five broad topics: 1) processes used to prioritize tests for intervention; 2) factors considered when deciding which tests to target; 3) measurement of these factors; 4) interventions selected; 5) suggestions for a framework to support these decisions. Transcripts were double coded using directed-content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 14 intervention development experts. Experts noted they frequently consider test volume, test value, and patient care when deciding on a test to target. Experts indicated that quantifying many relevant factors was challenging. Processes to support these decisions often involved examining local data, obtaining buy-in, and relying on an existing guideline. Suggestions for building a framework emphasized the importance of collaboration, consideration of context and resources, and starting with "easy wins" to gain support and experience. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insight into the factors and processes experts consider when deciding which tests to target for intervention and can inform the development of a framework to guide the selection of tests for intervention and guideline development.

Cancer-related cognitive impairment in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents and venetoclax chemotherapy: a longitudinal descriptive study.

PURPOSE: To explore cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine chemotherapy. METHODS: This study is a longitudinal, qualitative descriptive study. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 11 older adults with AML at cycle 2, cycle 4, and cycle 7 of chemotherapy. An early end-of-study interview was conducted for those who changed treatment plans during the study follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 22 transcripts were included for thematic analysis. Four themes emerged: (1) CRCI experiences, (2) impact of CRCI, (3) CRCI coping strategies, and (4) perceived CRCI-related factors. Older adults with AML experienced challenges in memory, language, and attention both intermittently and daily. These cognitive changes impacted their emotion, daily activities, social connection, and their caregivers' responsibilities. Hence, these older adults with AML developed problem-solving and emotional coping strategies to cope with CRCI. Older adults with AML also identified demographic, physiology/clinical, psychological, and other factors that might contribute to CRCI. CONCLUSION: This study offers important insight for clinicians to understand how older adults with AML experience CRCI and how it impacts their daily routines. It indicates that clinicians should ask patients about their experience with cognitive changes at each encounter to provide support or coping strategies as needed to prevent CRCI from further hindering their quality of life.

Experiences of patients with endometriosis with a digital health application: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a frequent disease in women of reproductive age in which the endometrium occurs outside the uterine cavity. Multimodal treatment approaches are necessary due to loss of quality of life and the chronic nature of the disease. Digital health applications (DiGa) are becoming increasingly important. This research project investigates how a healthcare app can influence the subjective experience of illness in patients with endometriosis. METHODS: Empiric data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative focussed interview analysis. Reliability was ensured by joint interdisciplinary and interprofessional evaluation of the interviews by experts and those affected. RESULTS: Ten patients with endometriosis and the prescribed healthcare app Endo-App© were examined. Categories were defined from the superordinate categories "Factors influencing the experience of illness" and "Evaluation of the app". The app provided reliable information, promoted self-efficacy through exercises and strengthened the perception of the individuality of the illness. It helped to minimise nocebo effects from internet research and enabled a positive change of perspective. Patients criticised the time required for data input and had data protection concerns. The educational elements were often seen as redundant. Some patients only used the app briefly, or not at all. CONCLUSION: Once a DiGa has been prescribed, it may be useful to explain its use on an outpatient basis and validate regular use. Blind re-prescribing of DiGas should be avoided. Younger patients with a recent diagnosis or patients following rehabilitation may benefit more from prescribing.

Patients' perspectives of the digital counselling competence of healthcare professionals-A qualitative descriptive study.

AIM: To describe the perspectives of patients using digital services on the digital counselling competence of healthcare professionals. DESIGN: A descriptive qualitative interview study. METHODS: The analysed data were collected in Finland during the spring of 2023 via 11 individual, semi-structured interviews from participants who had received video-mediated counselling. The interviews were carried out online through Microsoft Teams and adhered to an interview guide using main and ancillary questions. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: The patients' perspectives of healthcare professionals' digital counselling competence were related to five categories: (1) competence in preparing for video-mediated counselling, (2) digital competence in implementing the video-mediated counselling, (3) competence in interacting with the patient during the video-mediated counselling, (4) competence in supporting the patient's self-management in video-mediated counselling and (5) competence in self-development as a digital counsellor. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that healthcare professionals need to possess a wide range of digital counselling competencies when providing video-mediated counselling. This study thus lays the groundwork for future studies of patients' perspectives of healthcare professionals' digital counselling competence. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The results of this study can be used to develop healthcare professionals' digital counselling competence and patient-centered care. The presented insights can also be used to map further research topics. REPORTING METHOD: The Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist was used when reporting the results. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients who had experience in using digital services participated in the data collection of this study. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? Healthcare professionals may well need to develop new competencies as counselling is increasingly moving to digital environments. What were the main findings? The main areas of digital counselling competence that emerged from the patients' perspectives were competence in preparing for video-mediated counselling, digital competence, competence in interacting with the patient, competence in supporting self-management and competence in self-development as a digital counsellor. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research can be used to build and develop healthcare professionals' digital counselling competence, as well as improve the delivery of patient-centered care.

Some hope for a dimensional assessment? A critical review of psychometric validated (semi-)structured interview to assess eating disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Given that eating disorders (EDs) are considered one of the deadliest mental illnesses, the development of appropriate assessment instruments is a necessity. Despite the extensive literature on assessing EDs, there has been a lack of focus on semi-structured interviews. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of psychometrically validated semi-structured interviews for EDs. METHODS: Included studies (N = 24) were required to present a semi-structured interview for EDs that has been validated through a psychometric process. The APA PsycNet, MEDLINE, APA Psycinfo, Pubmed, and Health & Psychosocial Instruments databases were searched. The literature search included publications through May 2024, with no earliest year restriction. RESULTS: A total of six instruments were identified and reviewed in terms of conceptual design, purpose and content, psychometric characteristics, and strengths and limitations. Three main findings were highlighted: (a) only half of the instruments are up to date; (b) the instruments are based on either a categorical or a mixed categorical-dimensional approach; and (c) the predominance of the categorical approach. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed regarding the conceptual approaches of the instrument to provide clinical and research implications. Despite the many strengths of the instrument, additional psychometric research is needed.

A qualitative inquiry to explore management of distal radius fracture by certified hand therapists.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are extremely common in middle-aged and elderly. Certified Hand Therapists (CHT) are experts in managing hand injuries including DRF. PURPOSE: Using qualitative methodology, this study examined practice patterns among CHT and understand prevalent common patterns in managing DRF. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: This study utilized a qualitative descriptive method with an inductive approach to discern the practices of CHT in managing DRF. A purposive sample of practicing CHT was assembled. A semi-structured interview guide facilitated qualitative interviews using open-ended questions to assess practices of CHT in the domains of assessment, interventions, and appropriateness for discharge. Two student physical therapists transcribed the interviews, which were verified by a third rater for accuracy. Thematic content analysis guided the coding and analyses of the interview data. A two-phase coding process was conducted using Nvivo software. Two study authors developed initial codebook and completed subsequent analysis of transcripts. RESULTS: Of the 12 participants, five were PT and seven were OT with an average experience of 14.1 years as a CHT. Practice patterns across domains were largely consistent among CHT. All CHTs reported inquiring about severity of displacement of DRF, orthopedic management, comorbidities, and medical history as well as examining wrist/hand range of motion (ROM), grip strength (GS), and wrist functions (n = 12). A large majority administered outcome measures and performed sensory and integumentary assessment. Patient education regarding injury and exercises was the key element for interventions. Adequate gains in GS, wrist functions, wrist ROM, and ability to use wrist/hand for functional tasks were the key benchmarks for discharge from care. DISCUSSION: Most practice behaviors were common among CHTs while managing DRF. Some variations exist depending whether their primary discipline is PT or OT. The results highlight knowledge-to-action gap, where most CHTs do not integrate fall-risk management in DRF. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified common practice patterns among CHTs in managing DRF while also identifying opportunity to improve practice by integrating assessment of balance and fall-risk.

"Asthma is a very bully disease" - patient experiences of living with chronic respiratory diseases in Cape Town, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Chronic respiratory diseases are common in Cape Town, South Africa. Yet the experiences of how adults with these conditions, such as asthma or COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), negotiate the health system are poorly understood. Qualitative methodology lends itself to investigate this question. AIM OF STUDY: To explore the "emic" experiences of adults with CRDs in Cape Town when they were negotiating the health system using semi-structured interviews. METHODS: Interviews were conducted following informed consent with purposively sampled adults who had attended public hospitals in Cape Town with chronic respiratory disease flare-ups. This work was nested in the quantitative "Diagnosing Airways Disease" study. The topic guide explored patients' experiences of accessing healthcare including receiving and interpretations of the diagnosis and management, and impacts on daily life. Interviews were conducted in Afrikaans, isiXhosa, or English; transcribed, and translated into English and thematically analysed until saturation. RESULTS: Thirty-two interviews (16 in Afrikaans, 8 in isiXhosa, 8 in English) were completed in 2022. 17 women and 15 men participated. Most participants were older than 50 years (25/32), and most were unemployed (13/32) or retired (11/32). The identified themes were: Perceived causes of illness; experiences of healthcare; perceived risks and barriers when accessing healthcare; and impact on earnings. The perceived causes of their illness and risks were structural, and included air pollution, poor quality housing, occupational exposures, limited healthcare services, and fear of violence. These factors led to self-treatment, sharing of medicines, and delay in receiving a diagnosis. Many paid privately for treatments or services to overcome identified shortcomings of the public healthcare system, and many reported additional significant indirect costs. Being ill had a profound impact on income. The identified themes were explored through the lens of "structural violence", where "social structures stop individuals … from reaching their full potential" (Galtung, 1969). CONCLUSION: In Cape Town structural elements such as stretched healthcare professionals, insufficiently enforced policies on e.g., housing or work-place exposures, poverty and crime made it difficult for participants to successfully navigate their illness experience. It forced some to pay out of pocket to receive perceived better healthcare privately.

Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the structured interview of personality organization (STIPO-CH).

BACKGROUND: Kernberg originally proposed the psychoanalytic concept of personality organization (PO), which measures personality pathology from a dimensional approach with multiple scales and can be evaluated using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO) from six domains: identity, object relations, primitive defenses, coping vs. rigidity, aggression, and moral values. The present study translated the original version into the Chinese STIPO (STIPO-CH) version and evaluated its reliability and validity. METHODS: The STIPO-CH was administered to 49 non-clinical subjects. They also completed the Chinese version of the Inventory of Personality Organization and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory to evaluate criterion-related reliability. Interrater reliability was assessed with intraclass correlations. An item analysis was carried out to explore the structure and internal consistency. RESULTS: Interrater reliability (intraclass correlations) ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Results suggested acceptable internal consistency for identity and moral values. The correlations between STIPO-CH domains and self-report questionnaires indicated that construct validity and criterion-related validity were acceptable to good. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study presents preliminary psychometric properties of STIPO-CH. Limitations regarding the sample, interviewers, and cultural differences are discussed. Future research is highly recommended.

[Factors influencing analgesic use patterns in patients with chronic tumor-associated pain. : A qualitative pilot study considering different groups of medications]. / Einflussfaktoren auf das Einnahmeverhalten von Analgetika bei Patient*innen mit chronischen tumorassoziierten Schmerzen : Eine qualitative Pilotstudie unter Berücksichtigung verschiedener Medikamentengruppen.

BACKGROUND: Patients are surviving tumor diseases longer and longer due to the improvement of tumor-specific therapy and pain is a common symptom. The gold standard for tumor-associated chronic pain is multimodal therapy. Non-adherence causes high costs and may put patients at risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the adherence behavior and subjective treatment compliance of patients with tumor-associated chronic pain. The focus was on the patients' perspective. Different groups of medications, such as NOPA, opioids, co-analgesics and cannabinoids, as well as non-drug treatments were included. METHODS: Semistructured guided interviews with 10 patients with chronic tumor pain were conducted within a qualitative research approach. The interviews were recorded and transcribed. The evaluation was using a focused content structuring interview analysis according to Kuckartz and Rädiker. RESULTS: Five main categories were defined. The central category based on the research question was "Adherence behavior from the patient's perspective." The category "Medication therapy" formed the framework of the study. Other main categories were "History of illness", "Relationship with treatment providers" and "Attitudes and beliefs". A total of 77 additional subcategories were formed and interpreted. Adherence behavior from the patients' perspective differed between the different medication groups. A palliative setting influenced treatment decisions and adherence. The medication regimens used were complex and dynamic, especially when there were multiple practitioners involved. Furthermore, there was ambiguity in the use of cannabinoids. Non-drug therapies were marginalized by patients. From the point of view of the patients interviewed, it was not so much the treatment providers who influenced their adherence behavior, but rather their own experiences, attitudes, and convictions. DISCUSSION: The study included all medication groups and non-drug therapies equally, complementing previous literature in a qualitative setting. Adherence factors known from previous research were reflected in the subjective perception of the group of patients with chronic pain after tumor diseases. Marginalization of non-medication methods could be explained by the fact that multimodal therapy approaches were too rarely constantly used and controlled in the phase of chronification. Therefore, drug and non-drug therapies should be applied even more consistently to patients with tumor-associated pain.

Perceptions and Experiences of High-Intensity Interval Training in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Big HIIT?

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered a novel and time-efficient method to reduce cardiovascular disease risk, a leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant recipients. However, research in this population is severely limited. The aim of this study was to understand kidney transplant recipients' perceptions and experiences of HIIT and their readiness to participate in HIIT. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted in adults with a kidney transplant (n = 13; 53±13 years). Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to framework analysis. Overall, participants had a good knowledge of HIIT and were open to participation. Acknowledgment of the superior benefits to cardiovascular, mental, and general health, as well as the lower time commitment, were all motivators for participation. There were some heightened concerns around damaging the kidney and 'knowing your limits. Personalization, physician's approval, and supervision were all important factors in participation. This study provides evidence that HIIT would be, in principle, largely accepted by recipients of a kidney transplant. However, several considerations are also identified in the present study, which would be essential to the success of any future efficacy trial or rehabilitation program.

Comparing Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms Reported via Questionnaires Versus a Novel Structured Interview.

OBJECTIVE: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) symptoms are typically assessed via questionnaires in research, yet questionnaires may be more prone to biases than direct clinical interviews. We compared mTBI symptoms reported on two widely used self-report inventories and the novel Structured Interview of TBI Symptoms (SITS). Second, we explored the association between acquiescence response bias and symptom reporting across modes of assessment. METHOD: Level 1 trauma center patients with mTBI (N = 73) were recruited within 2 weeks of injury, assessed at 3 months post-TBI, and produced nonacquiescent profiles. Assessments collected included the SITS (comprising open-ended and closed-ended questions), Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 (SCAT-3) symptom checklist, and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form True Response Inconsistency (TRIN-r) scale. RESULTS: Current mTBI symptom burden and individual symptom endorsement were highly concordant between SITS closed-ended questions, the RPQ, and the SCAT-3. Within the SITS, participants reported significantly fewer mTBI symptoms to open-ended as compared to later closed-ended questions, and this difference was weakly correlated with TRIN-r. Symptom scales were weakly associated with TRIN-r. CONCLUSIONS: mTBI symptom reporting varies primarily by whether questioning is open- vs. closed-ended but not by mode of assessment (interview, questionnaire). Acquiescence response bias appears to play a measurable but small role in mTBI symptom reporting overall and the degree to which participants report more symptoms to closed- than open-ended questioning. These findings have important implications for mTBI research and support the validity of widely used TBI symptom inventories.

Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence online engine in migraine: A multi-center study.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the concordance in migraine diagnosis between an online, self-administered, Computer-based, Diagnostic Engine (CDE) and semi-structured interview (SSI) by a headache specialist, both using International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria. BACKGROUND: Delay in accurate diagnosis is a major barrier to headache care. Accurate computer-based algorithms may help reduce the need for SSI-based encounters to arrive at correct ICHD-3 diagnosis. METHODS: Between March 2018 and August 2019, adult participants were recruited from three academic headache centers and the community via advertising to our cross-sectional study. Participants completed two evaluations: phone interview conducted by headache specialists using the SSI and a web-based expert questionnaire and analytics, CDE. Participants were randomly assigned to either the SSI followed by the web-based questionnaire or the web-based questionnaire followed by the SSI. Participants completed protocols a few minutes apart. The concordance in migraine/probable migraine (M/PM) diagnosis between SSI and CDE was measured using Cohen's kappa statistics. The diagnostic accuracy of CDE was assessed using the SSI as reference standard. RESULTS: Of the 276 participants consented, 212 completed both SSI and CDE (study completion rate = 77%; median age = 32 years [interquartile range: 28-40], female:male ratio = 3:1). Concordance in M/PM diagnosis between SSI and CDE was: κ = 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.91). CDE diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity = 90.1% (118/131), 95% CI: 83.6%-94.6%; specificity = 95.8% (68/71), 95% CI: 88.1%-99.1%. Positive and negative predictive values = 97.0% (95% CI: 91.3%-99.0%) and 86.6% (95% CI: 79.3%-91.5%), respectively, using identified migraine prevalence of 60%. Assuming a general migraine population prevalence of 10%, positive and negative predictive values were 70.3% (95% CI: 43.9%-87.8%) and 98.9% (95% CI: 98.1%-99.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The SSI and CDE have excellent concordance in diagnosing M/PM. Positive CDE helps rule in M/PM, through high specificity and positive likelihood ratio. A negative CDE helps rule out M/PM through high sensitivity and low negative likelihood ratio. CDE that mimics SSI logic is a valid tool for migraine diagnosis.

The Mini-SIPS: development of a brief clinical structured interview guide to diagnosing DSM-5 Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome and training outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The Mini-SIPS, a condensed version of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS), is intended to efficiently identify for clinicians the minimum information needed to support a DSM-5 Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome (APS) diagnosis. METHODS: The instrument and the DSM-5 criteria are accessible through the online training program. RESULTS: Most individuals (67.5%) in the first 212 to complete the training program indicated an intended use of the Mini-SIPS exclusively for clinical purposes. Performance on the post-training quiz was excellent for those with and without prior training in structured diagnostic interviewing. CONCLUSION: The Mini-SIPS, and accompanying training program, are offered as public-domain clinical resources to the mental health community.

"It's still our child". A qualitative interview study with parent carers in forensic mental health.

The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of parents in forensic mental health services with regard to their cooperation with healthcare professionals and their role as parent carers. 15 participants were interviewed using qualitative, in-depth interviews and transcripts were analysed thematically. The identified themes were 'Medical dominance', 'Interactions with healthcare professionals', and 'Advocating for their daughter/son'. The themes were associated with the overall theme 'perceived impact on the parents' everyday lives'. The results suggest that parent carers perceive a malalignment between the institutional medicalised treatment focus and the need for an integrated holistic approach, which would include them as partners.

Initial development of a patient-reported outcome measure of disability due to Katakori via evaluating patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness.

[Purpose] "Katakori" refers to a nonspecific symptom, including discomfort or dull pain, that is experienced around the occiput and that extends through the cervical spine to the acromion and scapular area. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome measure of disability due to Katakori, namely the Katakori Disability Index, via evaluating patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a semi-structured interview among participants who had experienced Katakori consistently during the past month to examine patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness; we particularly used the thinking-aloud method and cognitive debriefing to evaluate comprehensibility. [Results] We initially tested a provisional version of the Katakori Disability Index with 24 items using two 11-point numeric rating scales in a subset of 10 participants. Considering the issues identified concerning comprehensibility and comprehensiveness, we created a second draft of the Katakori Disability Index with two 6-point Likert scales, modified items, and four additional items. The second draft was tested in another subset of 10 participants. We eventually developed a 31-item Katakori Disability Index with modified instructions and items, two additional items, and a post-survey checklist; all these features addressed the concerns identified and suggestions obtained in the second round of interviews. [Conclusion] We developed a 31-item Katakori Disability Index with content validity.

Recency and intensification of positive symptoms enhance prediction of conversion to syndromal psychosis in clinical high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and intervention strategies in patients at clinical high-risk (CHR) for syndromal psychosis have the potential to contain the morbidity of schizophrenia and similar conditions. However, research criteria that have relied on severity and number of positive symptoms are limited in their specificity and risk high false-positive rates. Our objective was to examine the degree to which measures of recency of onset or intensification of positive symptoms [a.k.a., new or worsening (NOW) symptoms] contribute to predictive capacity. METHODS: We recruited 109 help-seeking individuals whose symptoms met criteria for the Progression Subtype of the Attenuated Positive Symptom Psychosis-Risk Syndrome defined by the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes and followed every three months for two years or onset of syndromal psychosis. RESULTS: Forty-one (40.6%) of 101 participants meeting CHR criteria developed a syndromal psychotic disorder [mostly (80.5%) schizophrenia] with half converting within 142 days (interquartile range: 69-410 days). Patients with more NOW symptoms were more likely to convert (converters: 3.63 ± 0.89; non-converters: 2.90 ± 1.27; p = 0.001). Patients with stable attenuated positive symptoms were less likely to convert than those with NOW symptoms. New, but not worsening, symptoms, in isolation, also predicted conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the severity and number of attenuated positive symptoms are less predictive of conversion to syndromal psychosis than the timing of their emergence and intensification. These findings also suggest that the earliest phase of psychotic illness involves a rapid, dynamic process, beginning before the syndromal first episode, with potentially substantial implications for CHR research and understanding the neurobiology of psychosis.

Malaria prevention and treatment in migrant agricultural workers in Dangur district, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia: social and behavioural aspects.

BACKGROUND: Sixty percent of the Ethiopia population is at risk of malaria, with the highest prevalence reported in Gambella (6%) and Benishangul-Gumuz (3%) regions. Within these regions are large agricultural developments with high numbers of seasonal migrant workers. The migrant workers are believed to be at increased risk for malaria infection due to their poor living conditions and outdoor activities, but there is little information on their specific behaviours and health risks. This study was conducted to address this gap. METHODS: Quantitative observations were conducted from September to December 2017 in the Benishangul-Gumuz Region. The nightly routines of mobile migrant workers were observed every month for 4 consecutive months. The study team collected quantitative data including nocturnal behavioural observations of worker living conditions, malaria prevention efforts, and work activities and surveys of worker representatives. Qualitative data was collected from migrant workers, farm managers and local health providers using focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Migrant workers arrived in the study area during the peak malaria transmission season and the workers in focus groups reported repeated cases of malaria during their stay on the farms. Overall, less than a quarter of the migrant workers were sleeping under a mosquito net by midnight in all 4 observation months. Some work activities also took place outdoors at night. The study additionally found a lack of access to malaria prevention and treatment at the farms and challenges in utilizing local public health facilities. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to better address malaria prevention and treatment needs among migrant workers in Ethiopia through outreach from existing healthcare infrastructure and within the farms themselves. This will help prevent malaria transmission both within this population and prevent transmission of malaria back to home communities in lower burden areas in Ethiopia.

Engaging with people living with HIV: challenges experienced by Malaysian counsellors.

People living with HIV (PLHIV) suffer from mental issues and need emotional support. Counselling is a part of HIV and AIDS care and management, and provides emotional support to PLHIV. Knowledge about HIV and AIDS care and management is not part of the counselling training curriculum in Malaysia. This study aims to explore the challenges experienced by registered counsellors who engage in counselling sessions with PLHIV. A total of five counsellors participated in this qualitative research. Data were gathered through a series of semi-structured interviews, and each of the interviews was conducted within one and half hours. Each of the participants was interviewed three times. The interviews were audio-recorded with the consent of the participants. The emergent themes were further explored in subsequent interviews until thematic saturation was reached, and data were analysed based on the grounded theory approach. The findings showed that lack of knowledge, limited training, and stigma among the registered counsellors contributed to resistance and poor trust among the PLHIV. Knowledge concerning the care and management of HIV and AIDS can be incorporated in a counselling training programme, and ongoing training related to HIV and AIDS are required.